1
|
Nwandison M, Daly‐Jones E, Drought A, Story L, De‐Rosnay P, Sebire N, Nyberg D, Oyelese Y. Incorporation of vasa previa screening into a routine anomaly scan: A single center cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:1466-1473. [PMID: 38594913 PMCID: PMC11168266 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vasa previa (VP), defined as unprotected fetal vessels traversing the membranes over the cervix, is associated with a high perinatal mortality when undiagnosed prenatally. Conversely, prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound and cesarean delivery before the membranes rupture is associated with excellent outcomes. However, controversy exists regarding screening for VP. In the UK, routine screening for VP is not recommended. The objective of this study was to report the incidence of VP and our experience in the detection of VP with a universal screening protocol at the time of the second-trimester fetal anomaly scan with third-trimester confirmation in an unselected population of pregnancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a single-center historical cohort study of all pregnant women who underwent routine second-trimester anomaly screening scans at West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK, between 2012 and 2016. Over 5 years, every patient undergoing routine anomaly screening was evaluated for VP using a systematic protocol during their 20-week anomaly scan. Suspected cases of VP were rescanned in the third trimester by specialist sonographers with an interest in VP. The primary outcomes were the incidence and detection of VP. RESULTS During the study period, 24 690 anatomy scans were performed. A total of 64 patients were identified as having potential VP at the second-trimester anomaly screening scan, of which 19 were confirmed by the specialist sonographer in the third trimester and at delivery. The screen positive rate was 0.26% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20%-0.32%). VP at birth was found in 19/24690 births (1:1299 [95% CI: 1:832-1:2030] births). Universal screening for VP using our protocol had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.78% (95% CI: 99.72%-99.84%). The false-positive rate of the second-trimester screen was 0.18% (95% CI: 0.13-0.24). There were no false positives or false negatives at delivery. Of the 19 patients with confirmed VP, 17 had scheduled cesarean deliveries, and two required emergency deliveries due to antepartum hemorrhage. One baby died, giving a perinatal mortality of 5%. CONCLUSIONS VP complicates approximately 1:1300 pregnancies. Routine screening for VP yielded a 100% detection rate. We suggest the inclusion of structured VP assessment in standard fetal anomaly screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Millicent Nwandison
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust HospitalWest Middlesex University HospitalLondonUK
| | - Elizabeth Daly‐Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust HospitalWest Middlesex University HospitalLondonUK
- Imperial NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Alexandra Drought
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust HospitalWest Middlesex University HospitalLondonUK
| | - Lisa Story
- Department of Women and Children's HealthKing's CollegeLondonUK
| | - Philippe De‐Rosnay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust HospitalWest Middlesex University HospitalLondonUK
| | - Neil Sebire
- NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research CenterGreat Ormond Street HospitalLondonUK
| | | | - Yinka Oyelese
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oyelese Y, Javinani A, Gudanowski B, Krispin E, Rebarber A, Akolekar R, Catanzarite V, D'Souza R, Bronsteen R, Odibo A, Scheier MA, Hasegawa J, Jauniaux E, Lees C, Srinivasan D, Daly-Jones E, Duncombe G, Melcer Y, Maymon R, Silver R, Prefumo F, Tachibana D, Henrich W, Cincotta R, Shainker SA, Ranzini AC, Roman AS, Chmait R, Hernandez-Andrade EA, Rolnik DL, Sepulveda W, Shamshirsaz AA. Vasa previa in singleton pregnancies: diagnosis and clinical management based on an international expert consensus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)00442-3. [PMID: 38494071 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data to guide the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Currently, what is known is largely based on case reports or series and cohort studies. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to systematically collect and classify expert opinions and achieve consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of vasa previa using focus group discussions and a Delphi technique. STUDY DESIGN A 4-round focus group discussion and a 3-round Delphi survey of an international panel of experts on vasa previa were conducted. Experts were selected on the basis of their publication record on vasa previa. First, we convened a focus group discussion panel of 20 experts and agreed on which issues were unresolved in the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. A 3-round anonymous electronic survey was then sent to the full expert panel. Survey questions were presented on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa, which the experts were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale (from "strongly disagree"=1 to "strongly agree"=5). Consensus was defined as a median score of 5. Following responses to each round, any statements that had median scores of ≤3 were deemed to have had no consensus and were excluded. Statements with a median score of 4 were revised and re-presented to the experts in the next round. Consensus and nonconsensus statements were then aggregated. RESULTS A total of 68 international experts were invited to participate in the study, of which 57 participated. Experts were from 13 countries on 5 continents and have contributed to >80% of published cohort studies on vasa previa, as well as national and international society guidelines. Completion rates were 84%, 93%, and 91% for the first, second, and third rounds, respectively, and 71% completed all 3 rounds. The panel reached a consensus on 26 statements regarding the diagnosis and key points of management of vasa previa, including the following: (1) although there is no agreement on the distance between the fetal vessels and the cervical internal os to define vasa previa, the definition should not be limited to a 2-cm distance; (2) all pregnancies should be screened for vasa previa with routine examination for placental cord insertion and a color Doppler sweep of the region over the cervix at the second-trimester anatomy scan; (3) when a low-lying placenta or placenta previa is found in the second trimester, a transvaginal ultrasound with Doppler should be performed at approximately 32 weeks to rule out vasa previa; (4) outpatient management of asymptomatic patients without risk factors for preterm birth is reasonable; (5) asymptomatic patients with vasa previa should be delivered by scheduled cesarean delivery between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation; and (6) there was no agreement on routine hospitalization, avoidance of intercourse, or use of 3-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of vasa previa. CONCLUSION Through focus group discussion and a Delphi process, an international expert panel reached consensus on the definition, screening, clinical management, and timing of delivery in vasa previa, which could inform the development of new clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinka Oyelese
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Ali Javinani
- Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Brittany Gudanowski
- Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Eyal Krispin
- Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrei Rebarber
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Mount Sinai West, New York, NY; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Carnegie Imaging for Women, PLLC, New York, NY
| | - Ranjit Akolekar
- Medway Fetal and Maternal Medicine Centre, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Medical Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Chatham, United Kingdom
| | - Val Catanzarite
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Rady Children's Specialists of San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Rohan D'Souza
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Richard Bronsteen
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI
| | - Anthony Odibo
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Junichi Hasegawa
- Department of Perinatal Development Pathophysiology, St. Marianna University Graduate School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Eric Jauniaux
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christoph Lees
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Deepa Srinivasan
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Daly-Jones
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory Duncombe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Logan Hospital, Metro South Health, Meadowbrook, Australia
| | - Yaakov Melcer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shamir Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ron Maymon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shamir Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Robert Silver
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Federico Prefumo
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daisuke Tachibana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Wolfgang Henrich
- Department of Obstetrics, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Campus Charité Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Obstetrics, Charité - University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Cincotta
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Mater Mothers' Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
| | - Scott A Shainker
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Angela C Ranzini
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ashley S Roman
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Ramen Chmait
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Edgar A Hernandez-Andrade
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel L Rolnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Waldo Sepulveda
- Fetal Imaging Unit, FETALMED Maternal-Fetal Diagnostic Center, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alireza A Shamshirsaz
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bihun R, Trinidad MC, Packard AT. Impact of Universal Vasa Previa Screening With Color Doppler During the OB Ultrasound Anatomy Scan. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2024; 43:479-487. [PMID: 38009660 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our institution introduced universal vasa previa (VP) screening utilizing transabdominal ultrasound with color Doppler for all pregnancies at the second trimester anatomy scan. Our study sought to describe the clinical impact of this intervention. METHODS Radiology records from the 12 months pre- and post-intervention were queried for "vasa previa." Records included for analysis were those with a first-time diagnosis or discussion of VP at the anatomy scan. Cases were categorized by outcome: (Group 1) True VP, with subgroups A, unresolved by time of delivery and B, resolved by delivery; (Group 2) False positives; (Group 3) Possible VP without definitive diagnosis; and (Group 4) VP ruled out, for example, "no features of VP." Group size was expressed as a percentage of total anatomy scans during pre- or post-intervention periods respectively. Absolute and relative percent change were calculated for each group. RESULTS In the pre-intervention period, 1 case (0.36% of total scans) was categorized in Group 1A, 1 case (0.36%) in Group 3, and 7 cases (2.53%) in Group 4. In the post-intervention period, 2 cases (0.30%) were in Group 1A, 4 cases (0.61%) in Group 1B, 2 cases (0.30%) in Group 2, 1 case (0.15%) in Group 3, and 7 cases (1.06%) in Group 4. There was a +153% relative change in true positives, from 0.36 to 0.91%. CONCLUSIONS Universal color Doppler screening may have increased detection (sensitivity) while simultaneously increasing false positives (decreased specificity). While decreasing sensitivity is not ideal, this is acceptable given the potential catastrophic outcome of a missed VP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Bihun
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Ann T Packard
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, D'Antonio F, Da Silva Costa F, Odibo A, Prefumo F, Papageorghiou AT, Salomon LJ. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of third-trimester obstetric ultrasound scan. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2024; 63:131-147. [PMID: 38166001 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- A Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Hospital, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - A Sotiriadis
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - F D'Antonio
- Centre for Fetal Care and High-Risk Pregnancy, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - F Da Silva Costa
- Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, and School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - A Odibo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - F Prefumo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - A T Papageorghiou
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Hospital, St George's University of London, London, UK; Nuffield Department for Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - L J Salomon
- URP FETUS 7328 and LUMIERE platform, Maternité, Obstétrique, Médecine, Chirurgie et Imagerie Foetales, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chmait RH, Monson MA, Chon AH, Masri J, Korst LM, Incerpi MH. Third-trimester fetoscopic ablation therapy for types II and III vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:87.e1-87.e9. [PMID: 37741533 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vasa previa is an obstetrical condition in which fetal vessels located near the cervix traverse the fetal membranes unprotected by underlying placenta. Type I vasa previa arises directly from a velamentous cord root, whereas types II and III arise from an accessory lobe or a distal lobe of the same placenta, respectively. Fetoscopic laser ablation for types II and III vasa previa is a novel therapeutic option with benefits that include surgical resolution of the vasa previa, avoidance of prolonged hospitalization, and opportunity for a term vaginal delivery. The potential risks of fetoscopy can be mitigated by delaying laser surgery until a gestational age of 31 to 33 weeks, immediately before anticipated hospitalized surveillance. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess feasibility and outcomes of types II and III vasa previa patients treated via fetoscopic laser ablation in the third trimester. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective study of singleton pregnancies with types II and III vasa previa treated with fetoscopic laser ablation at a gestational age ≥31 weeks at a single center between 2006 and 2022. Pregnancy and newborn outcomes were assessed. Continuous variables are expressed as mean±standard deviation. RESULTS Of 84 patients referred for vasa previa, 57 did not undergo laser ablation: 19 either had no or resolved vasa previa, 25 had type I vasa previa (laser-contraindicated), and 13 had type II or III vasa previa but declined laser treatment. Of the remaining 27 patients who underwent laser ablation, 7 were excluded (laser performed at <31 weeks and/or twins), leaving 20 study patients. The mean gestational age at fetoscopic laser ablation was 32.0±0.6 weeks, and total operative time was 62.1±19.6 minutes. There were no perioperative complications. All patients had successful occlusion of the vasa previa vessels (1 required a second procedure). All patients were subsequently managed as outpatients. The mean gestational age at delivery was 37.2±1.8 weeks, the mean birthweight was 2795±465 g, and 70% delivered vaginally. Neonatal intensive care unit admission occurred in 3 cases: 1 for respiratory distress syndrome and 2 for hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy. There were no cases of neonatal transfusion, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus, or death. CONCLUSION Laser ablation for types II and III vasa previa at 31 to 33 gestational weeks was technically achievable and resulted in favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramen H Chmait
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Martha A Monson
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Andrew H Chon
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Jinnen Masri
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Marc H Incerpi
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|