HetIG-PreDiG: A Heterogeneous Integrated Graph Model for Predicting Human Disease Genes based on gene expression

Tissue specific tumor-gene link prediction through sampling based GNN using a heterogeneous network

A tissue sample is a valuable resource for understanding a patient's symptoms and health status in relation to tumor growth. Recent research seeks to establish a connection between tissue-specific tumor samples and genetic markers (genes). This breakthrough has paved the way for personalized cancer therapies. With this motivation, the proposed model constructs a heterogeneous network based on tumor sample-gene relation data and gene-gene interaction data. This network also incorporates tissue-specific gene expression and primary site-based gene counts as features, enabling tissue-specific predictions. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have proven effective in modeling complex interactions and predicting links within this network. The proposed model has successfully predicted tumor-gene associations by leveraging sampling-based GNNs and link layer embedding. The model's performance metrics, such as AUC-ROC scores, reached approximately 94%, demonstrating the potential of this heterogeneous network in predicting tissue-specific tumor sample-gene links. This paper's findings highlight the importance of tissue-specific associations in cancer research.

Advances in computational methods for identifying cancer driver genes

Cancer driver genes (CDGs) are crucial in cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment. This study employed computational methods for identifying CDGs, categorizing them into four groups. The major frameworks for each of these four categories were summarized. Additionally, we systematically gathered data from public databases and biological networks, and we elaborated on computational methods for identifying CDGs using the aforementioned databases. Further, we summarized the algorithms, mainly involving statistics and machine learning, used for identifying CDGs. Notably, the performances of nine typical identification methods for eight types of cancer were compared to analyze the applicability areas of these methods. Finally, we discussed the challenges and prospects associated with methods for identifying CDGs. The present study revealed that the network-based algorithms and machine learning-based methods demonstrated superior performance.