Bleb geometry and morphology after Preserflo Microshunt surgery: Risk factors for surgical failure

Comparison of Bleb Morphology following PRESERFLO® MicroShunt and Trabeculectomy Using Anterior Segment OCT

Trabeculectomy has traditionally been upheld as the gold standard in glaucoma surgery, but recent advancements, including the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt, have introduced less invasive techniques to mitigate complications and reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). The examination of bleb morphology post-filtering surgery is critical for modulating wound healing and ensuring long-term success. While previous evaluations of PRESERFLO-generated blebs have relied on data from trabeculectomy blebs, the differing surgical techniques used in PRESERFLO and trabeculectomy surgeries suggest potential variations in bleb morphologies. This study conducted a comparative analysis of blebs resulting from PRESERFLO and trabeculectomy procedures. Retrospective descriptive assessments using the Jenaer Bleb Grading System were performed, along with quantitative evaluation using eight-dimensional parameters utilizing anterior segment OCT. We included 93 eyes (57 following PRESERFLO, 36 following trabeculectomy). In the descriptive assessment, PRESERFLO-generated blebs exhibited fewer conjunctival cysts (3.5% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.007) and cavernous changes (10.5% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.021) compared to trabeculectomy. Quantitatively, overall bleb dimensions were comparable (maximal bleb height, width, and length, p > 0.05 for all). However, PRESERFLO blebs displayed a shallower (0.52 ± 0.24 vs. 0.67 ± 0.3 mm, p = 0.017) yet longer (4.12 ± 1.54 vs. 3.23 ± 1.64 mm, p = 0.024) episcleral lake. A thicker bleb wall (1.52 ± 0.46 vs. 1.10 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.001) along with more posteriorly positioned blebs (distance to limbus = 6.16 ± 1.36 vs. 4.87 ± 1.34 mm, p < 0.001) were observed following PRESERFLO. This study illuminates the nuanced morphological differences between PRESERFLO and trabeculectomy blebs. Understanding these distinctions is vital, empowering clinicians to make informed postoperative decisions and avoid misinterpretation of bleb morphology.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges

The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.