1
|
Suçeken FY, Özlü DN, Arslan A, Örnek ÖF, Durmaz AS, Beyatlı M, Küçük EV. Growth kinetics and predictive factors in renal angiomyolipomas. Int Urol Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s11255-024-04168-5. [PMID: 39060723 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04168-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are benign lesions, they can grow and cause serious complications. In this study, we aimed to determine the factors affecting the growth of renal AMLs. METHOD Patients followed up for AMLs between January 2014 and January 2024 were screened. By accepting 2.5 mm/year as the limit for a significant growth rate, the patients were divided into two groups: those with and without significant growth. Demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, and laboratory parameters, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase (De Ritis) ratio, were compared between the groups. RESULTS The study included a total of 98 patients. Of the entire cohort, 78.6% were women. Significant growth was detected in nine (9.2%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the baseline scan tumor size, PLR, and De Ritis ratio were significant independent predictors of significant AML growth (p = 0.011, p = 0.017, and p = 0.030, respectively). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value of PLR in predicting significant growth was 131.85 (sensitivity: 77.8%, specificity: 73%, area under the curve [AUC] 0754), while the cut-off value of the De Ritis ratio was 1.33 (sensitivity: 66.7%, specificity: 95.8%, AUC 0.721). CONCLUSION Tumor size at the time of initial diagnosis, as well as PLR and De Ritis ratio, were found to be independent predictors of AML growth rate. The use of these factors in patient follow-up has the potential to assist clinicians in predicting tumor growth and related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferhat Yakup Suçeken
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Aydan Arslan
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ömer Faruk Örnek
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Selim Durmaz
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Beyatlı
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Eyüp Veli Küçük
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng J, Liu W, Chen J, Sun Y, Chen C, Li J, Yi C, Zeng G, Chen Y, Song W. Differential diagnostic value of radiomics models in benign versus malignant vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2024; 178:111621. [PMID: 39018646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by analyzing imaging data is crucial to guide treatment and assess prognosis, and the development of radiomics made it an alternative option to biopsy examination. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the purpose of quantifying the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. METHODS Searching on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify eligible studies published before September 23, 2023. After evaluating for methodological quality and risk of bias using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), we selected studies providing confusion matrix results to be included in random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of sixteen articles, involving 1,519 vertebrae with pathological-diagnosed tumor infiltration, were included in our meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity and specificity of the top-performing models were 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.87-0.96) and 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.88-0.96), respectively. Their AUC was 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.96-0.99). By contrast, radiologists' combined sensitivity was 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.75-0.97) and specificity was 0.92 (95 %CI: 0.67-0.98). The AUC was 0.96 (95 %CI: 0.94-0.97). Subsequent subgroup analysis and sensitivity test suggested that part of the heterogeneity might be explained by differences in imaging modality, segmentation, deep learning and cross-validation. CONCLUSION We found remarkable diagnosis potential in correctly distinguishing vertebral compression fractures in complex clinical contexts. However, the published radiomics models still have a great heterogeneity, and more large-scale clinical trials are essential to validate their generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayuan Zheng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Wenzhou Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Jianan Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Yujun Sun
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Chen Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Jiajie Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Chunyan Yi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Gang Zeng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Yanbo Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| | - Weidong Song
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zechuan L, Tianshi L, Tiantian L, Shoujin C, Hang Y, Ziping Y, Haitao G, Zeyang F, Yinghua Z, Jian W. The radiomics-clinical nomogram for predicting the response to initial superselective arterial embolization in renal angiomyolipoma, a preliminary study. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1334706. [PMID: 38505597 PMCID: PMC10949893 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1334706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to explore a radiomics-clinical model for predicting the response to initial superselective arterial embolization (SAE) in renal angiomyolipoma (RAML). Materials and methods A total of 78 patients with RAML were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical data were recorded and evaluated. Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and intra- and inter-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used in feature selection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to develop the radiomics, clinical, and combined models where the fivefold cross-validation method was used. The predictive performance and calibration were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to measure clinical usefulness. Results The tumor shrinkage rate was 29.7% in total, and both fat and angiomyogenic components were significantly reduced. In the radiomics model, 12 significant features were selected. In the clinical model, maximum diameter (p = 0.001), angiomyogenic tissue ratio (p = 0.032), aneurysms (p = 0.048), and post-SAE time (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with greater volume reduction after SAE. Because of the severe linear dependence between radiomics signature and some clinical parameters, the combined model eventually included Rad-score, aneurysm, and post-SAE time. The radiomics-clinical model showed better discrimination (mean AUC = 0.83) than the radiomics model (mean AUC = 0.60) and the clinical model (mean AUC = 0.82). Calibration curve and DCA showed the goodness of fit and clinical usefulness of the radiomics-clinical model. Conclusions The radiomics-clinical model incorporating radiomics features and clinical parameters can potentially predict the positive response to initial SAE in RAML and provide support for clinical treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zou Yinghua
- Department of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wang Jian
- Department of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trovato P, Simonetti I, Morrone A, Fusco R, Setola SV, Giacobbe G, Brunese MC, Pecchi A, Triggiani S, Pellegrino G, Petralia G, Sica G, Petrillo A, Granata V. Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics. J Clin Med 2024; 13:547. [PMID: 38256682 PMCID: PMC10816509 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Trovato
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Alessio Morrone
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Giuliana Giacobbe
- General and Emergency Radiology Department, “Antonio Cardarelli” Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Annarita Pecchi
- Department of Radiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Sonia Triggiani
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (S.T.); (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Pellegrino
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (S.T.); (G.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giacomo Sica
- Radiology Unit, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (P.T.); (I.S.); (S.V.S.); (A.P.); (V.G.)
| |
Collapse
|