Oncolytic strategy using new bifunctional HDACs/BRD4 inhibitors against virus-associated lymphomas

LKB1 suppresses KSHV reactivation and promotes primary effusion lymphoma progression

Viruses normally reprogram the host cell metabolic pathways as well as metabolic sensors to facilitate their persistence. The serine-threonine liver kinase B1 (LKB1) is a master upstream kinase of 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) that senses the energy status and therefore regulates the intracellular metabolic homeostasis. Previous studies showed that AMPK restricts Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) lytic replication in endothelial cells during primary infection and promotes primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) cell survival. However, the role of LKB1 in KSHV lytic reactivation and KSHV-associated malignancies is unclear. In this study, we found that LKB1 is phosphorylated or activated in KSHV-positive PEL cells. Mechanistically, KSHV-encoded vCyclin mediated LKB1 activation in PEL cells, as vCyclin knockout ablated, while vCyclin overexpression enhanced LKB1 activation. Furthermore, knockdown of LKB1 inactivated AMPK and induced KSHV reactivation, as indicated by the increased expression of viral lytic genes and the increased virions in supernatants. Accordingly, AMPK inhibition by functional knockdown or a pharmacologic inhibitor, Compound C, promoted KSHV reactivation in PEL cells. Furthermore, inhibition of either LKB1 or AMPKα1 efficiently induced cell death by apoptosis of PEL cells both in vitro and in vivo. Together, these results identify LKB1 as a vulnerable target for PEL, which could be potentially exploited for treating other virus-associated diseases.IMPORTANCEKaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is an oncogenic virus associated with several human cancers, such as primary effusion lymphoma (PEL). Here, we showed that serine-threonine liver kinase B1 (LKB1), upstream of 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), is activated by KSHV-encoded vCyclin and maintains KSHV latency in PEL cells. Inhibition of either LKB1 or AMPK enhances KSHV lytic replication from latency, which at least partially accounts for PEL cell death by apoptosis. Compound C, a potent AMPK inhibitor, induced KSHV reactivation and efficiently inhibited PEL progression in vivo. Thus, our work revealed that LKB1 is a potential therapeutic target for KSHV-associated cancers.

An atlas of chromatin landscape in KSHV-infected cells during de novo infection and reactivation

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is an oncogenic γ-herpesvirus with a double-stranded DNA capable of establishing latent infection in the host cell. During latency, only a limited number of viral genes are expressed in infected host cells, and that helps the virus to evade host immune cell response. During primary infection, the KSHV genome is chromatinized and maintained as an episome, which is tethered to the host chromosome via Latency Associated Nuclear Antigen (LANA). The KSHV episome undergoes the same chromatin modification with the host cell chromosome and, therefore, is regulated by various epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, histone methylation, and histone acetylation. The KSHV genome is also organized in a spatiotemporal manner by forming genomic loops, which enable simultaneous and coordinated control of dynamic gene transcription, particularly during the lytic replication phase. The genome-wide approaches and advancing bioinformatic tools have increased the resolution of studies on the dynamic transcriptional control and our understanding of KSHV latency-lytic switch regulation. We will summarize our current understanding of the epigenetic gene regulation on the KSHV chromatin.

Targeting BRD4: Potential therapeutic strategy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Review)

As a member of BET (bromodomain and extra-terminal) protein family, BRD4 (bromodomain‑containing protein 4) is a chromatin‑associated protein that interacts with acetylated histones and actively recruits regulatory proteins, leading to the modulation of gene expression and chromatin remodeling. The cellular and epigenetic functions of BRD4 implicate normal development, fibrosis and inflammation. BRD4 has been suggested as a potential therapeutic target as it is often overexpressed and plays a critical role in regulating gene expression programs that drive tumor cell proliferation, survival, migration and drug resistance. To address the roles of BRD4 in cancer, several drugs that specifically target BRD4 have been developed. Inhibition of BRD4 has shown promising results in preclinical models, with several BRD4 inhibitors undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of various cancers. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a heterogeneous group of cancers, remains a health challenge with a high incidence rate and poor prognosis. Conventional therapies for HNSCC often cause adverse effects to the patients. Targeting BRD4, therefore, represents a promising strategy to sensitize HNSCC to chemo‑ and radiotherapy allowing de‑intensification of the current therapeutic regime and subsequent reduced side effects. However, further studies are required to fully understand the underlying mechanisms of action of BRD4 in HNSCC in order to determine the optimal dosing and administration of BRD4‑targeted drugs for the treatment of patients with HNSCC.

Epigenetic Restriction Factors (eRFs) in Virus Infection

The ongoing arms race between viruses and their hosts is constantly evolving. One of the ways in which cells defend themselves against invading viruses is by using restriction factors (RFs), which are cell-intrinsic antiviral mechanisms that block viral replication and transcription. Recent research has identified a specific group of RFs that belong to the cellular epigenetic machinery and are able to restrict the gene expression of certain viruses. These RFs can be referred to as epigenetic restriction factors or eRFs. In this review, eRFs have been classified into two categories. The first category includes eRFs that target viral chromatin. So far, the identified eRFs in this category include the PML-NBs, the KRAB/KAP1 complex, IFI16, and the HUSH complex. The second category includes eRFs that target viral RNA or, more specifically, the viral epitranscriptome. These epitranscriptomic eRFs have been further classified into two types: those that edit RNA bases-adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) and pseudouridine synthases (PUS), and those that covalently modify viral RNA-the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) writers, readers, and erasers. We delve into the molecular machinery of eRFs, their role in limiting various viruses, and the mechanisms by which viruses have evolved to counteract them. We also examine the crosstalk between different eRFs, including the common effectors that connect them. Finally, we explore the potential for new discoveries in the realm of epigenetic networks that restrict viral gene expression, as well as the future research directions in this area.