Standardization of Assays for Human Chorionic Gonadotropin

Development of radioimmunoassay system for determination of human chorionic gonadotropin in human sera

The main objective of this study was the preparation and evaluation of the primary reagents for the liquid phase human chorionic gonadotropin-radioimmunoassay (HCG-RIA) kit. Polyclonal antibody is specific and valid; monoclonal antibodies are more specific. In HCG-RIA technique, polyclonal antibodies for βHCG subunits with high binding and displacement % were used. 125I-HCG radioactive tracer was prepared with high yield 71.58 ± 0.92%, purity 99.2 ± 0.05%, and specific activity 170.42 ± 1.65 µCi/µg using chloramine T method, βHCG polyclonal antisera and HCG standards in assay buffer matrix were locally prepared. In-house HCG-RIA was developed with high sensitivity 0.5 mIU/ml, specificity (99%), precision (CV% < 6.4 and < 8.3 for intra-and inter-assay, respectively), and accuracy (recovery range 96.4–104.3%) could be used for quantitative estimation of HCG in human sera for monitoring pregnancy and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic diseases.

Effective purification of human chorionic gonadotropin and production of highly specific polyclonal anti-βHCG as a component of radioimmunoassay kit

This study aimed to purify human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) from the urine of pregnant women with high biological activity (10811 IU/mg) and purity (98.2%), by simple capturing of HCG using DEAE Sepharose FF and polishing using Sephacryl S200 HR. The HCG obtained was characterized by SDS-PAGE and dissociated into alpha and beta subunits using the urea treatment method. The βHCG subunits were injected into rabbits for the production of highly specific polyclonal anti-βHCG antisera. The polyclonal anti-βHCG was locally produced in rabbits and assessed for binding titer (1/10000), displacement (84.8%), and specificity (98.8%). Purified HCG along with locally prepared polyclonal anti-βHCG antisera were used as basic components of the in-house Radioimmunoassay system for quantitative estimation of HCG in human serum.

Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Assays for Testicular Tumors: Closing the Gap between Clinical and Laboratory Practice

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend the measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and/or hCGβ in serum for management of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs). These guidelines, however, disregard relevant biochemical information on hCG variants to be detected for oncological application. We set out to provide a critical review of the clinical evidence together with a characterization of the selectivity of currently marketed hCG immunoassays, identifying assays suitable for management of GCTs.

CONTENT

Evidence sources in the available literature were critically appraised. Most instances of misdiagnosis and mismanagement of testicular GCTs have been associated with hCG results. According to the clinical evidence, 36% of patients with seminoma show an exclusive hCGβ increase, and 71% of patients with nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs) show an increase of intact hCG and/or hCG + hCGβ, whereas the hCGβ increase in NSGCTs is variable according to the tumor stage and histology.

SUMMARY

hCG + hCGβ assays that display an equimolar recognition of hCG and hCGβ, or at least do not overtly underestimate hCGβ, may be employed for management of testicular GCTs. Assays that underestimate hCGβ are not recommended for oncological application. In addition to the hCG + hCGβ assay in service, an additional assay with broader selectivity for other hCG variants should be considered when false-negative or false-positive results are suspected on the basis of clinical data.

Evidence of biochemical hyperandrogenism in women: the limitations of serum testosterone quantitation

Hyperandrogenism in women is a common clinical scenario and is characterised by menstrual disturbance, hirsutism and infertility. Accurate measurement of serum testosterone is often used in these patients to diagnose polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to prompt further investigation in patients with suspected androgen-secreting tumours. Immunoassay methods are commonly used for serum testosterone quantitation, although the 'gold standard' reference method is mass spectrometry (MS), which is only available at certain tertiary centres. In this retrospective observational study, 57 female patients were investigated for possible hyperandrogenism. Biochemical testing for testosterone using an immunoassay was compared to an MS method. Correlation between the immunoassay and MS method was worse at lower testosterone concentrations, however overall, gave a reasonably strong correlation coefficient of 0.73. This study highlights the ongoing controversy over the most reliable test for hyperandrogenism in clinical practice. It is vital that clinicians are aware of the limitations of these methods and the clinical repercussions.

Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards

The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) recommend that a marker of bone formation (serum procollagen type I N propeptide, s-PINP) and a marker of bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, s-CTX) are used as reference analytes for bone turnover markers in clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION

Bone turnover markers (BTM) predict fracture risk, and treatment-induced changes in specific markers account for a substantial proportion of fracture risk reduction. The aims of this report were to determine their clinical potential in the prediction of fracture risk and for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis and to set an appropriate research agenda.

METHODS

Evidence from prospective studies was gathered through literature review of the PUBMED database between the years 2000 and 2010 and the systematic review of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality up to 2001.

RESULTS

High levels of BTMs may predict fracture risk independently from bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. They have been used for this purpose in clinical practice for many years, but there is still a need for stronger evidence on which to base practice. BTMs provide pharmacodynamic information on the response to osteoporosis treatment, and as a result, they are widely used for monitoring treatment in the individual. However, their clinical value for monitoring is limited by inadequate appreciation of the sources of variability, by limited data for comparison of treatments using the same BTM and by inadequate quality control. IOF/IFCC recommend one bone formation marker (s-PINP) and one bone resorption marker (s-CTX) to be used as reference markers and measured by standardised assays in observational and intervention studies in order to compare the performance of alternatives and to enlarge the international experience of the application of markers to clinical medicine.

CONCLUSION

BTM hold promise in fracture risk prediction and for monitoring treatment. Uncertainties over their clinical use can be in part resolved by adopting international reference standards.

Can glycans unveil the origin of glycoprotein hormones? - human chorionic gonadotrophin as an example -

Doping with (glyco)protein hormones represent an extremely challenging, analytical problem as nearly all are constitutively present at low concentrations that fluctuate according to circadian or alternative periodical, or external stimuli. Thus the mere concentration in a biological sample is only resolutive when this surpasses extreme values. As the vast majority of these molecules are produced by recombinant DNA technology it is believed that the exogenous molecules could bear the signature of the host cell. In particular, these could comprise structural differences originated from co or post-translational differences. In this study we have employed both proteomics and glycomics strategies to compare recombinant and urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin in order to evaluate this hypothesis. As anticipated the recombinant hormone could be shown to contain N-glycolyl neuraminic acid, a sialic acid that cannot be produced by humans. Furthermore, differences were observed in the overall glycosylation, in particular the presence of abundant hybrid-type glycans that were much less pronounced in the recombinant species. These differences were determined to occur predominantly in the alpha-subunit for which antidoping strategies focussed on these elements could be used for both chorionic gonadotrophin and lutrophin as they share the same alpha-subunit.

Gonadotropins in doping: pharmacological basis and detection of illicit use

Parenteral administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulates the production of testosterone in males and these gonadotropins can therefore be used by athletes to enhance muscle strength. However, they are more expensive and less efficient than testosterone and anabolic steroids. Therefore their main use is probably to stimulate gonadal testosterone production during and after self-administration of testosterone or anabolic steroids. A positive effect of hCG on muscle strength has not been demonstrated in women and elevated concentrations of hCG in females are often caused by pregnancy. The use of gonadotropins is therefore prohibited only in males but not in females. HCG occurs at low but measurable concentrations in plasma and urine of healthy males and can be measured by sensitive methods. However, the characteristics of the method to be used for doping control have not been defined. Virtually all commercially available hCG assays have been designed for determination of hCG in serum rather than urine, which is used for doping control. Methods based on mass spectrometric detection of fragments derived from hCG extracted from urine by immunoadsorption have been developed but their suitability for doping control remains to be determined. The concentrations of LH in serum and urine are variable and more then 10-fold higher than those hCG. It is therefore difficult to detect illicit use of LH. The characteristics and reference values for hCG and LH assays used in doping control and the cutoff values need to be defined.

Standardization of FSH, LH and hCG--current position and future prospects

Gonadotropin measurements contribute significantly to patient management in both endocrinology and oncology. Differences in calibration, antibody specificities and assay design mean that gonadotropin results obtained in different methods are still not comparable. Comparing patient results obtained in different methods therefore remains problematic, whether for individual patient care, when assessing the results of multicentre clinical trials, or when formulating national and international guidelines and recommendations. Achieving improved comparability of results for these important analytes will require clear descriptive nomenclature, accurate calibration with highly purified standards, careful characterization of what gonadotropin isoforms methods are measuring, broad recommendations about the most clinically appropriate antibody combinations, and increased awareness of clinically relevant interferences and the action required to minimise their effect. Encouraging manufacturers to standardize and carefully describe the evaluation methods they use, such that data from different manufacturers can readily be compared, is also a pre-requisite for future progress.

Importance of the detection method for intact dimeric human chorionic gonadotropin without interference with the free human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit for pregnancy exclusion before liver transplantation in a woman with cholangiocarcinoma

Assay of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is mainly used for the detection and monitoring of pregnancy, and for the follow-up of trophoblastic tumors. The serum free beta-hCG subunit (hCGbeta) is also a tumor marker in many non-trophoblastic tumors, including gastrointestinal cancers. In this work, we compared the performance of several immunoassays for pregnancy exclusion before liver transplantation and in the follow-up of a woman with cholangiocarcinoma. Serum hCG was detected with the Abbott Testpack plus hCG-Combo and measured with four automated sandwich immunoassays: ADVIA-Centaur, ACS:180, AxSYM and Dimension. hCGbeta was determined by an automated fluorescence sandwich immunoassay (Kryptor-Free beta hCG) and with a specific immunoradiometric assay (ELSA-F beta hCG, Schering). The expression of hCG was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry on sections of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells and on peritoneal metastases. Before transplantation, discordant results were observed for pregnancy exclusion. Qualitative Testpack and Dimension tests detected no hCG-like immunoreactivity, whereas the ADVIA-Centaur, ACS:180 and AxSYM tests revealed positive levels. The same discrepancy was obtained in follow-up of the patient after liver transplantation. hCGbeta assay and immunohistochemical staining revealed tumor cell secretion of hCGbeta. In conclusion, a specific serum immunoassay for intact dimeric hCG without cross-reaction with hCGbeta should be adopted as routine policy for pregnancy exclusion before liver transplantation.