Why commutability matters

Assessment of accuracy of laboratory testing results, relative to peer group consensus values in external quality control, by bivariate z-score analysis: the example of D-Dimer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to develop a practical method for bivariate z-score analysis which can be applied to the survey of an external quality assessment programme.

METHODS

To develop the bivariate z-score analysis, the results of four surveys of the international D-Dimer external quality assessment programme of 2022 of the ECAT Foundation were used. The proposed methodology starts by identifying the bivariate outliers, using a Supervised Sequential Hotelling T2 control chart. The outlying data are removed, and all the remaining data are used to provide robust estimates of the parameters of the assumed underlying bivariate normal distribution. Based on these estimates two nested homocentric ellipses are drawn, corresponding to confidence levels of 95 and 99.7 %. The bivariate z-score plot described provides the laboratory with an indication of both systematic and random deviations from zero z-score values. The bivariate z-score analysis was examined within survey 2022-D4 across the three most frequently used methods.

RESULTS

The number of z-score pairs included varied between 830 and 857 and the number of bivariate outliers varied between 20 and 28. The correlation between the z-score pairs varied between 0.431 and 0.647. The correlation between the z-score pairs for the three most frequently used varied between 0.208 and 0.636.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the bivariate z-score analysis is of major importance when multiple samples are distributed around in the same survey and dependency of the results is likely. Important lessons can be drawn from the shape of the ellipse with respect to random and systematic deviations, while individual laboratories have been informed about their position in the state-of-the-art distribution and whether they have to deal with systematic and/or random deviations.

Evaluation of imprecision in the different detection methods of Zn based on 5 years of data from an external quality assessment program in China

BACKGROUND

This study examines the imprecision of zinc (Zn) measurements across various clinical detection methods by analyzing the external quality assessment (EQA) data from 2018 to 2022. The findings of this study aim to offer recommendations for enhancing Zn measurements.

METHODS

Participating laboratories were grouped into peer categories based on the detection methods. The robust mean and coefficient of variation (CV) of the samples were calculated following ISO 13528 guidelines. The evaluation criteria for optimal, desirable, and minimum allowable imprecision in Zn estimation are 2.50%, 5.05%, and 7.55%, respectively, based on biological variation. Furthermore, the study examined inter-lab CVs, inter-method bias, and the passing rate. The impact of sample concentration on CVs and the pass rate was also investigated.

RESULTS

Over the past five years, 4283 laboratories participated in the EQA program, showing a high pass rate that improved as sample concentration increased. Differential pulse polarography (DPP) demonstrated stable and low CVs (0.61-1.86%). Although differential pulse stripping (DPS) was less stable than DPP, it still exhibited a low CV (0.71-3.10%). Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) and flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) performed similarly and displayed stable CVs (2.39-4.42%) within the acceptable range of desirable imprecision (5.05%). However, the CVs for ICP-MS were unacceptable in three out of the five years (5.28-6.20%). In 2022, the number of participating laboratories for DDP, DPS, GFAAS, FAAS and ICP-MS is 131, 35, 35, 820 and 72, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study provides reliable insights into the imprecision of Zn measurements in clinical laboratories. The findings indicate that additional efforts are required to reduce the imprecision of ICP-MS in Zn measurements.

Report from the HarmoSter study: different LC-MS/MS androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone methods compare well; however, unifying calibration is a double-edged sword

OBJECTIVES

Current liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) applications for circulating androgen measurements are technically diverse. Previously, variable results have been reported for testosterone. Data are scarce for androstenedione and absent for dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). We assessed the agreement of androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone LC-MS/MS measurements among nine European centers and explored benefits of calibration system unification.

METHODS

Androgens were measured twice by laboratory-specific procedures in 78 patient samples and in EQA materials. Results were obtained by in-house and external calibration. Intra- and inter-laboratory performances were valued.

RESULTS

Intra-laboratory CVs ranged between 4.2-13.2 % for androstenedione, 1.6-10.8 % for DHEAS, and 4.3-8.7 % and 2.6-7.1 % for female and male testosterone, respectively. Bias and trueness in EQA materials were within ±20 %. Median inter-laboratory CV with in-house vs. external calibration were 12.0 vs. 9.6 % for androstenedione (p<0.001), 7.2 vs. 4.9 % for DHEAS (p<0.001), 6.4 vs. 7.6 % for female testosterone (p<0.001) and 6.8 and 7.4 % for male testosterone (p=0.111). Median bias vs. all laboratory median with in-house and external calibration were -13.3 to 20.5 % and -4.9 to 18.7 % for androstenedione, -10.9 to 4.8 % and -3.4 to 3.5 % for DHEAS, -2.7 to 6.5 % and -11.3 to 6.6 % for testosterone in females, and -7.0 to 8.5 % and -7.5 to 11.8 % for testosterone in males, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods showed high intra-laboratory precision but variable bias and trueness. Inter-laboratory agreement was remarkably good. Calibration system unification improved agreement in androstenedione and DHEAS, but not in testosterone measurements. Multiple components, such as commutability of calibrators and EQA materials and internal standard choices, likely contribute to inter-laboratory variability.

Quality assurance programs for vitamin A and E in serum: are we doing enough to assess laboratory performance?

OBJECTIVES

Monitoring serum vitamin A (retinol) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) concentrations is common practice for assessing nutritional status. Measurement of these vitamins can be challenging due to several factors. Whilst the RCPAQAP Vitamins: Serum Program assists participating laboratories in harmonisation, the materials provided do not contain the analogues of retinol and α-tocopherol that may be present in real patient samples. We aimed to assess participants' capacity to accurately report retinol and α-tocopherol in the presence of the vitamin E analogues tocopherol acetate and γ-tocopherol.

METHODS

A supplementary series of a control sample and three matched spiked samples were distributed to each laboratory participating in the Program. Retinol and α-tocopherol results for each spiked sample were compared to the results of the control sample submitted by each participant. Acceptability of retinol and α-tocopherol results was determined based on the RCPAQAP allowable performance specifications (APS).

RESULTS

Thirteen participants returned results for the supplementary sample series. Interference from α-tocopherol acetate was observed with results below the APS in 30 % (n=4) of laboratories for retinol quantification and in 23 % (n=3) for α-tocopherol quantification. One laboratory returned results above the APS for α-tocopherol when γ-tocopherol was present.

CONCLUSIONS

This supplementary sample series has shown that the presence of vitamin E analogues can lead to the over or under estimation of nutritional status by some participants. Affected laboratories are encouraged to review their analytical procedures. To further assess laboratory competence, EQA providers should consider using patient samples or spiked challenge samples.

Bias in Laboratory Medicine: The Dark Side of the Moon

Physicians increasingly use laboratory-produced information for disease diagnosis, patient monitoring, treatment planning, and evaluations of treatment effectiveness. Bias is the systematic deviation of laboratory test results from the actual value, which can cause misdiagnosis or misestimation of disease prognosis and increase healthcare costs. Properly estimating and treating bias can help to reduce laboratory errors, improve patient safety, and considerably reduce healthcare costs. A bias that is statistically and medically significant should be eliminated or corrected. In this review, the theoretical aspects of bias based on metrological, statistical, laboratory, and biological variation principles are discussed. These principles are then applied to laboratory and diagnostic medicine for practical use from clinical perspectives.

Imprecision remains to be improved in the measurement of serum cystatin C with heterogeneous systems

OBJECTIVES

Except for the large bias of some measurement systems for serum cystatin C (CysC) measurements, unacceptable imprecision has been observed for the heterogenous system. This study analyzed the external quality assessment (EQA) results in 2018-2021 to provide an insight into the imprecision of CysC assays.

METHODS

Five EQA samples were sent to participating laboratories every year. Participants were divided into reagent/calibrator-based peer groups, for which the robust mean of each sample and robust coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated by Algorithm A from ISO 13528. Peers with more than 12 participants per year were selected for further analysis. The limit of CV was determined to be 4.85% based on clinical application requirements. The concentration-related effect on CVs was investigated using logarithmic curve fitting; the difference in medians and robust CVs between instrument-based subgroups was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The total number of participating laboratories increased from 845 to 1,695 in four years and heterogeneous systems remained the mainstream (≥85%). Of 18 peers with ≥12 participants, those using homogeneous systems showed relatively steady and small CVs over four years, with the mean four-year CVs ranging from 3.21 to 3.68%. Some peers using heterogenous systems showed reduced CVs over four years, while 7/15 still had unacceptable CVs in 2021 (5.01-8.34%). Six peers showed larger CVs at the low or high concentrations, and some instrument-based subgroups presented greater imprecision than others.

CONCLUSIONS

More efforts should be made to improve the imprecision of heterogeneous systems for CysC measurement.

Development of a glucose reference material in human serum for clinical assay standardization

BACKGROUND

Blood glucose is an important monosaccharide functioning as the main source of energy for the human body. The accurate measurement of blood glucose is crucial for the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of diabetes and diabetes-associated diseases. To assure the reliability and traceability of blood glucose measurements, we developed a reference material (RM) for use in human serum at two different concentrations, which were certified by the National Institute of Metrology (NIM) as GBW(E)091040 and GBW(E)091043.

METHODS

Raw serum samples were collected from residual samples after clinical testing, filtered, and repackaged under mild stirring. The homogeneity and stability of the samples were examined according to ISO Guide 35: 2017. Commutability was evaluated in compliance with CLSI EP30-A. Value assignment was carried out in six certified reference laboratories using the JCTLM-listed reference method for serum glucose. Moreover, the RMs was further applied in a trueness verification program.

RESULTS

The developed RMs was homogeneous and commutable enough for clinical use. They were also stable for 24 h at 2-8 ℃ or 20-25 ℃ and for at least 4 years at - 70 ℃. The certified values were 5.20 ± 0.18 mmol/L and 8.18 ± 0.19 mmol/L (k = 2) for GBW(E)091040 and GBW(E)091043, respectively. The pass rates were evaluated by bias, coefficient of variation (CV), and total error (TE) for 66 clinical laboratories in the trueness verification program were 57.6%, 98.5%, and 89.4% of GBW(E)091040, and 51.5%, 98.5%, and 90.9% of GBW(E)091043, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The developed RM could be used for the standardization of reference and clinical systems with satisfactory performance and traceable values, providing strong support for the accurate measurement of blood glucose.

Overcoming challenges regarding reference materials and regulations that influence global standardization of medical laboratory testing results

BACKGROUND

Standardized results for laboratory tests are particularly important when their interpretation depends on fixed medical practice guidelines or common reference intervals. The medical laboratory community has developed a roadmap for an infrastructure to achieve standardized test results described in the International Organization for Standardization standard 17511:2020 In vitro diagnostic medical devices - Requirements for establishing metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators, trueness control materials and human samples. Among the challenges to implementing metrological traceability are the availability of fit-for-purpose matrix-based certified reference materials (CRMs) and requirements for regulatory review that differ among countries. A workshop in December 2021 focused on these two challenges and developed recommendations for improved practices.

DISCUSSION

The participants agreed that prioritization of measurands for standardization should be based on their impact on medical decisions in a clinical pathway. Ensuring that matrix-based CRMs are globally available for more measurands will enable fit-for-purpose calibration hierarchies for more laboratory tests. Regulation of laboratory tests is important to ensure safety and effectiveness for the populations served. Because regulations are country or region specific, manufacturers must submit recalibration changes intended to standardize results for regulatory review to all areas in which a measuring system is marketed.

RECOMMENDATIONS

A standardization initiative requires collaboration and planning among all interested stakeholders. Global collaboration should be further developed for prioritization of measurands for standardization, and for coordinating the production and supply of CRMs worldwide. More uniform regulatory submission requirements are desirable when recalibration is implemented to achieve internationally standardized results.

Commutability assessment of reference materials for homocysteine

OBJECTIVES

Commutability of reference materials is essential for ensuring the traceability of patient measurement results and the technical basis for the use of reference materials. Commutability is only relevant for matrixed reference material; it is a prerequisite for the accuracy and authenticity of calibration methods. In this study, we evaluated the commutability of reference materials for homocysteine.

METHODS

Five conventional measurement methods were applied to simultaneously measure 30 serum samples and seven homocysteine reference materials from the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Institute of Metrology. Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry was used as a reference method. Two methods were used to evaluate the commutability of the seven reference materials according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP30-A and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) commutability assessment document.

RESULTS

Among 35 combinations of the five conventional methods and seven reference materials, after evaluation in accordance with the EP30-A, the seven reference materials passed the commutability assessment, and 34 combinations were commutable. According to the IFCC, the commutability evaluation of 28 combinations was conclusive (commutable or non-commutable), while results for the remaining seven combinations could not be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

The homocysteine reference materials showed good commutability. The sensitivity of the measurement procedure, measurement deviation and uncertainty, and differences in the "measurand" selected by different methods may affect the evaluation results. Additionally, different judgment standards for different methods may explain the observed variations in evaluation results.

Menstrual Cycle Related Fluctuations in Circulating Markers of Bone Metabolism at Rest and in Response to Running in Eumenorrheic Females

This study examined potential fluctuations in bone metabolic markers across the menstrual cycle both at rest and after a 30-min bout of continuous running at 80% of V̇O_2max. Resting and post-exercise (0, 30, 90 min) sclerostin, parathyroid hormone (PTH), carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTXI), and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (PINP) were assessed in 10 eumenorrheic women (age: 21 ± 3 y, BMI: 23.2 ± 3.0 kg^.m²) during the mid- to late-follicular (FP: day 8.0 ± 1.4) and mid-luteal (LP: day 22.0 ± 2.5) phases of the menstrual cycle. Ovulation was determined using ovulation kits and daily measurement of oral body temperature upon awakening. Menstrual cycle phase was subsequently confirmed by measurement of plasma estradiol and progesterone. On average, resting estradiol concentrations increased from 46.3 ± 8.9 pg·mL^-1 in the FP to 67.3 ± 23.4 pg·mL^-1 in the LP (p = 0.015), and resting progesterone increased from 4.12 ± 2.36 ng·mL^-1 in the FP to 11.86 ± 4.49 ng·mL^-1 in the LP (p < 0.001). At rest, there were no differences between menstrual cycle phases in sclerostin (FP: 260.1 ± 135.0 pg·mL^-1; LP: 303.5 ± 99.9 pg·mL^-1; p = 0.765), PTH (FP: 0.96 ± 0.64 pmol·L^-1; LP: 0.79 ± 0.44 pmol·L^-1; p = 0.568), β-CTXI (FP: 243.1 ± 158.0 ng·L^-1; LP: 202.4 ± 92.3 ng·L^-1; p = 0.198), and PINP (FP: 53.6 ± 8.9 μg·L^-1; LP: 66.2 ± 20.2 μg·L^-1; p = 0.093). Main effects for time (p < 0.05) were shown in sclerostin, PTH, β-CTXI and PINP, without phase or interaction effects. Sclerostin increased from pre- to immediately post-exercise (45%; p = 0.007), and so did PTH (43%; p = 0.011), both returning to resting concentrations 30 min post-exercise. β-CTXI decreased from pre- to post-exercise (20%; p = 0.027) and was still below its pre-exercise concentrations at 90 min post-exercise (17%; p = 0.013). PINP increased immediately post-exercise (29%; p < 0.001), returning to resting concentrations at 30 min post-exercise. These results demonstrate no effect of menstrual cycle phase on resting bone marker concentrations or on the bone metabolic marker response to intense exercise.

Report from the HarmoSter study: impact of calibration on comparability of LC-MS/MS measurement of circulating cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone

OBJECTIVES

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is recommended for measuring circulating steroids. However, assays display technical heterogeneity. So far, reproducibility of corticosteroid LC-MS/MS measurements has received scant attention. The aim of the study was to compare LC-MS/MS measurements of cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone from nine European centers and assess performance according to external quality assessment (EQA) materials and calibration.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patient samples, EQA materials and two commercial calibration sets were measured twice by laboratory-specific procedures. Results were obtained by in-house (CAL1) and external calibrations (CAL2 and CAL3). We evaluated intra and inter-laboratory imprecision, correlation and agreement in patient samples, and trueness, bias and commutability in EQA materials.

RESULTS

Using CAL1, intra-laboratory CVs ranged between 2.8-7.4%, 4.4-18.0% and 5.2-22.2%, for cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone, respectively. Trueness and bias in EQA materials were mostly acceptable, however, inappropriate commutability and target value assignment were highlighted in some cases. CAL2 showed suboptimal accuracy. Median inter-laboratory CVs for cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone were 4.9, 11.8 and 13.8% with CAL1 and 3.6, 10.3 and 8.6% with CAL3 (all p<0.001), respectively. Using CAL1, median bias vs. all laboratory-medians ranged from -6.6 to 6.9%, -17.2 to 7.8% and -12.0 to 16.8% for cortisol, 17OH-progesterone and aldosterone, respectively. Regression lines significantly deviated from the best fit for most laboratories. Using CAL3 improved cortisol and 17OH-progesterone between-method bias and correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-laboratory imprecision and performance with EQA materials were variable. Inter-laboratory performance was mostly within specifications. Although residual variability persists, adopting common traceable calibrators and RMP-determined EQA materials is beneficial for standardization of LC-MS/MS steroid measurements.

Formation and Evaluation of Complete Blood Count Proficiency Testing Program

Introduction: The haematology external quality assessment (EQA) scheme is the most commonly used service of quality assurance. The provision of complete blood count (CBC) materials must meet the quality requirements at a reasonable cost. These requirements are the most significant challenges for EQA organisers in Vietnam. This study’s objective was to evaluate the homogeneity, long-term stability, and peer-group performance of 10-parameter stabilised CBC EQA samples. Methods: The CBC EQA material was prepared using the following steps, including (1) adjusting levels of stabilised erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet samples, (2) mixing those cells into batches at three levels, and (3) dispensing and storing them at 2–6 °C. A set of 10 and 30 specimens were randomly chosen from each batch to study the homogeneity and long-term stability following ISO 13528:2015. In total, 166 samples at two levels were randomly distributed to 40 participants, which reported 83 automatic cell counters among six automated analyser models in the CBC EQA program. Results: The 10-parameter stabilised CBC EQA materials at three levels became homogeneous and stable in 12 weeks when preserved at 2–6 °C. Meanwhile, for five parameters (RBC, Hb, MCH, MCV, and MPV), this process was prolonged for up to 16 weeks in stock condition. In terms of peer-group performance, the CV (%) values increased at the low concentration for almost all parameters, especially in platelet counts. Conclusions: The stabilised CBC EQA samples prepared using the partial fixation method with aldehyde and gutaraldehyde in this study meet the ISO 13528:2015 requirements of homogeneity and long-term stability for the CBC EQA scheme. Analytical performance evaluation should categorise participant methods into peer groups.

A national surveillance program for evaluating new reagent lots in medical laboratories

Objectives

Differences between laboratory results attributable to the use of different reagent lots can potentially affect the diagnosis and monitoring of patients. To minimize patient risks, all laboratories should verify that new reagent lots meet agreed analytical performance specifications (APS). We propose a simplified, pragmatic approach for laboratories that involves compilating results into a national surveillance program, and present the first results obtained when applying this approach to troponins, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and D-dimer.

Methods

In the surveillance program we have (i) determined APS for selected analytes, (ii) implemented a simplified procedure for lot evaluation with patient samples used in laboratories across Norway and (iii) performed central processing of the results from the participating laboratories.

Results

Over a one-year period, 27 Norwegian laboratories returned results from 28 lot changes for troponin I, 11 for troponin T, and 29 for HbA1c, PSA and D-dimer. The mean difference between two reagent lots was 4.5% for troponin I (for a concentration interval of 20–32 ng/L), 5.1% for troponin T (10.7–17.5 ng/L), 2.2% for HbA1c (40–50 mmol/mol), 3.7% for PSA (3–5 μg/L) and 5.5% for D-dimer (0.4–1.0 mg/L FEU).

Conclusions

A novel procedure for reagent lot evaluation is proposed in which information about multiple lot changes from different medical laboratories can be accumulated nationally. Sharing this information allows simplification of lot evaluations in individual laboratories and provides real-world data about lot-to-lot variations.

External quality assessment for one-stage and chromogenic factor IX assays in samples containing Alprolix (rFIXFc) or Idelvion (rIX-FP) and evidence that UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for blood coagulation samples are commutable with patient samples

INTRODUCTION

There may be clinically relevant differences between results of different FIX assays in samples containing extended half life FIX concentrates requiring regular surveillance of assay results through proficiency testing exercises. Control materials used in proficiency testing must be commutable, that is have the same inter-assay properties as those demonstrated by authentic clinical samples when measured by different analytical methods.

METHODS

We assessed relationships between results with different FIX assays and commutability of UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) materials containing rIX-FP (Idelvion) or rFIXFc (Alprolix) by comparing results obtained using widely used one-stage and chromogenic assays during a proficiency testing exercise with results obtained when analysing a series of individual patient samples using the same assay systems. NEQAS samples prepared by addition of either Idelvion or Alprolix to FIX deficient plasma were sent to 76 haemophilia centres in Europe. A total of 18 Idelvion and 22 Alprolix patient samples were assayed in a single centre. Two chromogenic and two one-stage assays were compared.

RESULTS

The pattern of results obtained for NEQAS samples and patient samples was similar. In all cases, the NEQAS sample data point was within the scatter of patient sample data in plots of patient sample results showing one-stage assay results using Synthasil or Actin FS plotted against chromogenic assay results with Biophen or Rox chromogenic FIX kits.

CONCLUSION

This indicates that the NEQAS samples containing Idelvion or Alprolix were commutable and therefore suitable for use in proficiency testing exercises.

IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Correction of Bias Caused by Noncommutability of a Certified Reference Material Used in the Calibration Hierarchy of an End-User Measurement Procedure

Establishing metrological traceability to an assigned value of a matrix-based certified reference material (CRM) that has been validated to be commutable among available end-user measurement procedures (MPs) is central to producing equivalent results for the measurand in clinical samples (CSs) irrespective of the clinical laboratory MPs used. When a CRM is not commutable with CSs, the bias due to noncommutability will be propagated to the CS results causing incorrect metrological traceability to the CRM and nonequivalent CS results among different MPs. In a commutability assessment, a conclusion that a CRM is commutable or noncommutable for use with a specific MP is made when the difference in bias between the CRM and CSs meets or does not meet a criterion for that specific MP when compared to other MPs. A conclusion regarding commutability or noncommutability requires that the magnitude of the difference in bias observed in the commutability assessment remains unchanged over time. This conclusion requires the CRM to be stable and no substantive changes in the MPs. These conditions should be periodically reverified. If an available CRM is determined to be noncommutable for a specific MP, that CRM can be used in the calibration hierarchy for that MP when an appropriately validated MP-specific correction for the noncommutability bias is included. We describe with examples how a MP-specific correction and its uncertainty can be developed and applied in a calibration hierarchy to achieve metrological traceability of results for CSs to the CRM's assigned value.

The evolving role of commutability in metrological traceability

Commutability is a property of a reference material (RM) which denotes that the analytical response in measurement procedures (MPs) observed for the measurand is the same for the RM as for clinical samples that contain the same amount of the measurand. Matrix-based secondary calibrators are required to be commutable with clinical samples to achieve metrological traceability of results from a clinical laboratory MP to higher order references. Results for clinical samples may not agree among different end-user MPs if a noncommutable RM is used in the calibration hierarchy for one or more of the MPs. Consequently, a useful RM is one that is commutable with clinical samples for all or most MPs in common use. If a matrix-based RM is noncommutable for one or a few MPs, a correction for the noncommutability bias may be added in the calibration hierarchy to enable the results for clinical samples to be metrologically traceable to the RM. Producing a large batch of matrix-based RM requires pooling single donations and making various modifications of the matrix such as spiking with exogenous substances, freezing or lyophilization. These modifications could potentially affect commutability of the RM and compromise its suitability. Documentation of commutability of matrix-based RMs used as calibrators is required by the International Organization for Standardization and the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine. We describe how commutability was recognized as a critical requirement for metrological traceability and we present recommendations from the IFCC Working Groups on Commutability and on Commutability in Metrological Traceability.

Evaluation of INSTAND e.V.'s external proficiency testing program for tetanus and diphtheria antitoxin detection: Lessons for assessing levels of immunoprotection

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the development and status quo of the quality of high throughput in vitro diagnostic testing for tetanus and diphtheria antitoxin antibody (ATX) concentrations based on external quality assessment (EQA) data.

METHODS

We analyzed manufacturer-specific data of 22 EQA surveys-each for the detection of tetanus and diphtheria ATX-to check the diagnostic strength of the corresponding in vitro diagnostic systems.

RESULTS

While the results were mostly well aligned, individual surveys showed widely dispersed ATX concentrations. The medians of manufacturer collectives deviated from the overall median by up to 8.9-fold in the case of diphtheria ATX and by up to 3.5-fold in the case of tetanus ATX. Such a distribution in the results is particularly critical in the cut-off range for immunity and may lead to an incorrect assessment of vaccination status.

CONCLUSION

These results were surprising as there are International Standards for both ATX; however, the results may be linked to the high ATX concentration of the reference material, which deviates considerably from clinically significant concentrations. To increase the accuracy and diagnostic strength of both assays, we recommend a recalibration of the test systems and verification of their traceability to the International Standards.

Development of a certified reference material for anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG - commutability studies

Objectives

In this paper, we describe the steps followed for the development of a certified reference material for immunoglobulin G antibodies against β2-glycoprotein I (also known as apolipoprotein H). These steps include processing of the material, commutability, the impact of dilution, the appropriate reconstitution conditions, homogeneity and stability during transport and storage.

Methods

We analysed 69 clinical samples from patients suffering from antiphospholipid syndrome with several commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) purchased from in vitro diagnostic manufacturers.

Results

Analysis of the results indicated that the candidate reference material can be safely freeze-dried, and that the user should carefully follow the reconstitution instructions as small changes in e.g. temperature may have unwanted effects. The statistical analysis of the commutability studies indicated that the analytical response of the reference material upon dilution is similar to that of clinical samples, and that correlation between results may differ from assay to assay. Finally yet importantly, the presented and developed candidate reference material is commutable for most assays tested, homogeneous and stable.

Conclusions

Immunoglobulin G antibodies against β2-glycoprotein I are associated with a higher risk of thrombosis and pregnancy complications. Their measurement is essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of antiphospholipid syndrome. These antibodies are detected by specific immunoassays, routinely used in clinical diagnostics, but various of these methods show enormous variability, in part due to the lack of a reference material.

Certified reference material against PR3 ANCA IgG autoantibodies. From development to certification

Background The importance of the standardisation of immunoassays for autoantibodies has been widely discussed. The appropriate use of certified reference materials (CRM) could contribute to a more accurate diagnosis and follow-up of a series of diseases such as small vessel-associated vasculitis. This is a systemic autoimmune disorder during which two autoantibodies can be present, MPO ANCA IgG and PR3 ANCA IgG. Results from different commercially available immunoassays used for PR3 ANCA IgG measurement can vary significantly. Therefore the potential for improvement using a suitable certified reference material was assessed and led to the development of a CRM. Methods Thirty clinical samples were evaluated using 10 immunoassays. The correlation between results from these assays was assessed in a pairwise manner. Feasibility studies were conducted in order to find a reference material format most suitable for the preparation of a CRM. Results The evaluation of two sets of 30 clinical samples with 10 assays showed that differences between assays can result in different interpretations for individual clinical samples. Most of the samples had the same result classification in all assays. However, six of the samples tested led to inconsistent results. Conclusions The correlation between results from clinical samples was systematically good for combinations of eight of those assays. Therefore, it should be possible to improve the comparability of results using a commutable CRM for calibration. Based on these studies, a final format for the CRM was selected and eventually produced and certified for its PR3 ANCA IgG content.

Commutability of proficiency testing material containing amitriptyline and nortriptyline: A study within the framework of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 project

BACKGROUND

External quality assessment schemes (EQAS) can provide important information regarding accuracy and comparability of different measurement methods if the sample matrices are composed of commutable material. The aim of this study was to assess the commutability of different matrices for the material used in an EQAS for amitriptyline and nortriptyline.

METHODS

Proficiency testing material (PTM) and patient samples containing amitriptyline and nortriptyline were prepared, collected, pooled, and distributed to participating laboratories for analysis. Low, medium and high concentrations of both drugs in liquid pooled human, lyophilized human and lyophilized bovine serum were tested in this study. The measurement deviation of the PTM results to the patient serum regression line were normalized by dividing trough the average within-laboratory SD (SD_wl) derived from the results reported in the official EQAS, resulting in a relative residual. The commutability decision limit was set at 3 SD_wl.

RESULTS

With 10 laboratories participating in this study, 45 laboratory couples were formed. All matrix types delivered several relative residuals outside the commutability decision limit. The number and the magnitude of relative residuals for both drugs were lower for liquid human sera as compared to lyophilized human and bovine sera.

CONCLUSIONS

The PTM used for amitriptyline and nortriptyline is preferably prepared with human serum, although not all relative residuals are within the commutability decision limit.

Commutability of external quality assessment materials for serum magnesium and calcium measurements

The commutability of pooled patient sera (PPS) and control materials (CM) should be evaluated to investigate their suitability for use in an external quality assessment (EQA) program. Individual human samples, PPS and CM were analyzed by four routine methods and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry reference methods for magnesium and calcium measurements. The commutability was analyzed according to EP14-A3 protocol and the difference in bias approach, respectively. For magnesium measurements, all PPS were commutable and 3/5 CM were commutable for all measurement systems according to the EP14-A3 protocol. For calcium measurements, most PPS were commutable for all measurement systems, but the CM were only commutable with the Cobas c702 system. The IFCC approach produced similar commutability profiles, except that a large number of inconclusive results appeared. The routine methods exhibited excellent linearity and precision. The majority of relative biases between the routine and reference methods were beyond the bias limits. The commutability of the CM and PPS vary depending on which evaluation approach and criterion is applied. Superiority in the commutability of PPS over CM was observed whichever evaluation approach is applied.

Commutability of control materials for external quality assessment of serum apolipoprotein A-I measurement

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the commutability of commercial control materials and human serum pools and to investigate the suitability of the materials for the external quality assessment (EQA) of serum apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I) measurement.

METHODS

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP14-A3 protocol was used for the commutability study. Apo A-I concentrations in two levels of commercial control materials used in EQA program, two fresh-frozen human serum pools (FSPs) and two frozen human serum pools prepared from residual clinical specimens (RSPs) were measured along with 50 individual samples using nine commercial assays. Measurement results of the 50 individual samples obtained with different assays were pairwise analyzed by Deming regression, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated. The commutability of the processed materials was evaluated by comparing the measurement results of the materials with the limits of the PIs.

RESULTS

The FSP-1 was commutable for all the 36 assay pairs, and FSP-2 was commutable for 30 pairs; RSP-1 and RSP-2 showed commutability for 27/36 and 22/36 assay pairs, respectively, whereas the two EQA materials were commutable only for 4/36 and 5/36 assay pairs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-commutability of the tested EQA materials has been observed among current apo A-I assays. EQA programs need either to take into account the commutability-related biases in the interpretation of the EQA results or to use more commutable materials. Frozen human serum pools were commutable for most of the assays.

Commutability of reference and control materials: an essential factor for assuring the quality of measurements in Laboratory Medicine

Traceability to a common reference ensures equivalence of results obtained by different assays. Traceability is achieved by an unbroken sequence of calibrations, using reference materials (RMs) that must be commutable. Using non-commutable RMs for calibration will introduce a bias in the calibrated method producing incorrect results for clinical samples (CS). Commutability was defined in 1973 as “the ability of an enzyme material to show inter-assay activity changes comparable to those of the same enzyme in human serum” and later extended as a characteristic of all RMs. However, the concept is still poorly understood and appreciated. Commutability assessment has been covered in CLSI guidelines and requires: (a) selection of 20 CS spanning the relevant concentration range; (b) analysis of both RM and CS with the pair of procedures; (c) data elaboration using regression analysis and calculation if RM fall within the 95% prediction interval defined by CS. This approach has been criticized and to improve it The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine established a working group that recently finalized recommendations. Commutability is also a requirement for the applicability of external quality assessment (EQA) results in the evaluation of the performance of participating laboratories in terms of standardization of their measurements. Unfortunately, EQA materials are usually not validated for commutability.

Standardization of Nucleic Acid Tests: the Approach of the World Health Organization

The first World Health Organization (WHO) international standards (ISs) for nucleic acid amplification techniques were established two decades ago, with the initial focus on blood screening for three major viral targets, i.e., hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, and human immunodeficiency virus 1. These reference materials have subsequently found utility in the diagnosis and monitoring of a wide range of infectious diseases in clinical microbiology laboratories worldwide. WHO collaborating centers develop ISs and coordinate international studies for their evaluation. The WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization is responsible for the endorsement of new standardization projects and the establishment of new and replacement ISs. Potencies of ISs are defined in international units (IU); the reporting in IU for assays calibrated with an IS (or secondary standards traceable to the IS) facilitates comparability of results for different assays and determination of assay parameters such as analytical sensitivities.

Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry?

The goal of harmonizing laboratory information is to contribute to quality in patient care, ultimately improving upon patient outcomes and safety. The main focus of harmonization and standardization initiatives has been on analytical processes within the laboratory walls, clinical chemistry tests in particular. However, two major evidences obtained in recent years show that harmonization should be promoted not only in the analytical phase but also in all steps of the testing process, encompassing the entire field of laboratory medicine, including innovative areas (e.g. “omics”) rather than just conventional clinical chemistry tests. A large body of evidence demonstrates the vulnerability of the extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle. Because only “good biological samples” can assure good analytical quality, a closer interconnection between the different phases of the cycle is needed. In order to provide reliable and accurate laboratory information, harmonization activities should cover all steps of the cycle from the “pre-pre-analytical” phase (right choice of test at right time for right patient) through the analytical steps (right results with right report) to the “post-post-analytical” steps (right and timely acknowledgment of laboratory information, right interpretation and utilization with any necessary advice as to what to do next with the information provided). In addition, modern clinical laboratories are performing a broad menu of hundreds of tests, covering both traditional and innovative subspecialties of the discipline. In addition, according to a centered viewpoint, harmonization initiatives should not be addressed exclusively to clinical chemistry tests but should also include all areas of laboratory medicine.

The importance of commutability in material used for quality control purposes

External Quality Assessment (EQA) is an important part of laboratory quality assurance. Spiking of normal plasma is sometimes employed to mimic clinical samples. It is important that spiked material gives similar results to clinical samples (ie, is commutable) to ensure appropriate conclusions can be drawn from EQA exercises. We describe here data from UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation (NEQAS BC) exercises where spiked samples were tested alongside samples from patients to explore commutability of artificial material. Normal plasma was spiked with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban. Factor VIII (FVIII) deficient plasma was spiked with FVIII concentrate. Spiked samples and ex vivo patient material were sent to laboratories for testing. For LMWH, good agreement was seen between results for samples from patient plasma and plasma spiked with heparin. For UFH, APTT ratios differed between spiked and patient samples for the same drug concentration, with no correlation in ranking of reagents. Precision for patient and spiked material for Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran assays was comparable. However, the pattern of results for some Dabigatran assay kits differed between spiked and patient samples. For FVIII assays, results obtained with spiked and postinfusion samples gave comparable results. Spiked material is suitable for EQA if commutability is demonstrated. Our data show commutability for plasma spiked with Rivaroxaban, LWMH and some FVIII concentrates. For some tests, notably APTT for UFH, marked differences between patient and spiked samples indicate not all tests can be evaluated using artificial samples.

Commutability of external quality assessment materials for serum sodium and potassium measurements

Background

The commutability of electrolyte trueness verification materials (ETVs) and commercial general chemistry materials (GCs) was evaluated to investigate their suitability for use in an external quality assessment (EQA) program for serum sodium and potassium measurements.

Methods

Eighty fresh individual human samples (40 for sodium measurements and 40 for potassium measurements), six ETVs and three GCs were analyzed by five routine methods (validated methods) and by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry reference methods (comparative methods) for the determination of sodium and potassium. The commutability was analyzed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP14-A3 protocol and difference in bias approach, respectively. The linearity, bias and imprecision of the routine methods were also assessed according to CLSI guidelines.

Results

According to EP14-A3 protocol, ETVs were commutable for all assays, and GCs were commutable for 3/5 assays for sodium. ETVs were commutable in most assays except Cobas C501, while GCs showed no commutability except in case of AU5821 for potassium. According to a difference in bias approach, the commutability of ETVs was inconclusive for most routine assays for both sodium and potassium, and GCs were inconclusive for sodium and non-commutable for potassium in most routine assays. The routine methods exhibited excellent linearities and precisions. The majority and minority of relative biases between the routine and reference methods were beyond the bias limits for sodium and potassium, respectively.

Conclusions

Superiority in the commutability of ETVs over GCs was observed among the sodium and potassium assays whichever evaluation approach was applied.

Lack of grading agreement among international hemostasis external quality assessment programs

: Laboratory quality programs rely on internal quality control and external quality assessment (EQA). EQA programs provide unknown specimens for the laboratory to test. The laboratory's result is compared with other (peer) laboratories performing the same test. EQA programs assign target values using a variety of methods statistical tools and performance assessment of 'pass' or 'fail' is made. EQA provider members of the international organization, external quality assurance in thrombosis and hemostasis, took part in a study to compare outcome of performance analysis using the same data set of laboratory results. Eleven EQA organizations using eight different analytical approaches participated. Data for a normal and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and a normal and reduced factor VIII (FVIII) from 218 laboratories were sent to the EQA providers who analyzed the data set using their method of evaluation for aPTT and FVIII, determining the performance for each laboratory record in the data set. Providers also summarized their statistical approach to assignment of target values and laboratory performance. Each laboratory record in the data set was graded pass/fail by all EQA providers for each of the four analytes. There was a lack of agreement of pass/fail grading among EQA programs. Discordance in the grading was 17.9 and 11% of normal and prolonged aPTT results, respectively, and 20.2 and 17.4% of normal and reduced FVIII results, respectively. All EQA programs in this study employed statistical methods compliant with the International Standardization Organization (ISO), ISO 13528, yet the evaluation of laboratory results for all four analytes showed remarkable grading discordance.

Feasibility study of a candidate reference material for ions in PM2.5: does commutability matter also for inorganic matrices?

The existing Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC establishes within the European Union (EU) member states limit values for fine air particulate matter (PM_2.5) including the possibility to discount natural sources of pollution when assessing compliance with the legislation. In proving this, EU member states shall determine, amongst others, the rural background concentration of some anions (Cl⁻, NO₃⁻ and SO₄²⁻) and cations (Na⁺, NH₄⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺). To deliver reliable data and to comply with the data quality objectives of the legislation, environmental control laboratories should use certified reference materials (CRMs) to validate or verify the performance of their analytical methods. Since no CRMs for anions and cations in PM_2.5 are presently available, we present the commutability issues encountered during the first attempt to develop such a material. We demonstrate that a dust, collected in a road tunnel and previously used for the production of two CRMs of a PM₁₀-like material, does not behave as an authentic fine particulate matter collected according to EN12341:2014 when measured by an established method proposed by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN/TR 16269:2011). The water-soluble fractions of SO₄²⁻, NH₄⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ in a PM_2.5-like candidate CRM produced from that road tunnel dust are only fully extracted after 3 h of sonication and not after 30 min, as stated in the method. Moreover, we found that the particle size of the test material influenced the extraction yield of K⁺, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺, suggesting that these ionic species were incorporated in the core of the particles and inaccessible to the extraction procedure. These particular features make the material unsuitable for the measurements of ions with the CEN method. The difference in the extraction time can be seen as a commutability issue and the candidate CRM should be considered as not commutable with routine samples. This demonstrates that commutability studies should not only be considered for clinical CRMs, but also for inorganic CRMs when they are intended to be used to quantify operationally defined analytes.

Commutability and traceability in EQA programs

OBJECTIVES

The concept of commutability of samples has focused laboratories on the importance of traceability. However, the critical role of External Quality Assurance (EQA) in achieving the primary role of traceability (i.e. facilitating comparable patient results in different laboratories) has largely been lost. The aim of this paper is to review the role of EQA in achieving traceable/commutable results.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The role of commutability and traceability in EQA and Internal Quality Control (IQC) are discussed. Examples of commutable EQA samples are given to highlight the problem of assuming EQA material does not behave like patient samples.

RESULTS

We provide the conventional traceability chain (top down) and the role of EQA in a "bottom up" model using conventional EQA samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The quest for commutable samples has compromised the value of EQA without an understanding that some EQA materials are commutable for some measurands. EQA plays a key role in performance improvement, but laboratories need to understand the importance of using a range of values appropriate to the assay to identify areas of quality need. Traceability and EQA using conventional samples are not mutually exclusive concepts.

Current state and recommendations for harmonization of serum/plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone mass spectrometry methods

Background:

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) methods show considerable variation in results in external quality assurance (EQA) programs. An understanding of the current status of MS-based serum/plasma 17OHP quantification is important to facilitate harmonization.

Methods:

A 50-item e-survey related to (1) laboratory characteristics, (2) pre-analytical considerations and (3) analysis of 17OHP was developed and circulated to clinical MS laboratories via professional associations in Asia Pacific, Europe and North America.

Results:

Forty-four laboratories from 17 countries completed the survey. Sample preparation varied between laboratories with protein precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction being the most common processes. Analyte separation was most commonly achieved by liquid chromatography (LC) using a C18 column and mobile phases of water, methanol and formic acid. The ions selected for quantification were 331>97 m/z or 331>109 m/z. Alternative transition ions were used as qualifiers. Twenty-seven of 44 respondents reported preparing their calibrators in-house and variations in material purity and matrix were evident. Nine of 44 laboratories did not participate in an EQA program, and half did not know if their method separated out isobars. The reference intervals, and also their partitioning, reported by the laboratories were highly discrepant, in some cases, by multiple folds.

Conclusions:

Although MS-based methods are similar in many facets, they are highly disparate. Five recommendations have been developed as an outcome of this survey to support the continued improvement of analysis of serum/plasma 17OHP by MS.

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; Laboratory Implementation and Current Global Status

In 2002, the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines for identifying and treating CKD recommended that clinical laboratories report estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with every creatinine result to assist clinical practitioners to identify people with early-stage CKD. At that time, the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation based on serum creatinine measurements was recommended for calculating eGFR. Because the MDRD Study equation was developed using a nonstandardized creatinine method, a Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education program was formed and implemented standardized calibration traceability for all creatinine methods from global manufacturers by approximately 2010. A modified MDRD Study equation for use with standardized creatinine was developed. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration developed a new equation in 2009 that was more accurate than the MDRD Study equation at values above 60 mL/min/1.73 m². As of 2017, reporting eGFR with creatinine is almost universal in many countries. A reference system for cystatin C became available in 2010, and manufacturers are in the process to standardize cystatin C assays. Equations for eGFR based on standardized cystatin C alone and with creatinine are now available from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and other groups.

Interpretation of EQA results and EQA-based trouble shooting

Important objectives of External Quality Assessment (EQA) is to detect analytical errors and make corrective actions. The aim of this paper is to describe knowledge required to interpret EQA results and present a structured approach on how to handle deviating EQA results. The value of EQA and how the EQA result should be interpreted depends on five key points: the control material, the target value, the number of replicates, the acceptance limits and between lot variations in reagents used in measurement procedures. This will also affect the process of finding the sources of errors when they appear. The ideal EQA sample has two important properties: it behaves as a native patient sample in all methods (is commutable) and has a target value established with a reference method. If either of these two criteria is not entirely fulfilled, results not related to the performance of the laboratory may arise. To help and guide the laboratories in handling a deviating EQA result, the Norwegian Clinical Chemistry EQA Program (NKK) has developed a flowchart with additional comments that could be used by the laboratories e.g. in their quality system, to document action against deviations in EQA. This EQA-based trouble-shooting tool has been developed further in cooperation with the External quality Control for Assays and Tests (ECAT) Foundation. This flowchart will become available in a public domain, i.e. the website of the European organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM).

Serum triglyceride measurements: the commutability of reference materials and the accuracy of results

Background We aimed to evaluate the commutability of external quality assessment (EQA) materials, aqueous solutions, and commercial reference materials (calibrators and controls), and the accuracy of routine systems for serum triglyceride measurements. Methods According to the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) EP14-A3 protocol, we analyzed 43 fresh patient specimens and 32 processed materials including lyophilized samples, human serum pools, liquid reagents, swine sera and aqueous solutions by 14 routine methods (evaluated methods) and an isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method (ID-LC/MS/MS) (comparative method). The accuracy of the routine method was evaluated by analyzing the absolute bias, relative bias, and the bias at three medical decision levels based on CLSI EP9-A3. Results Frozen serum samples and swine sera were commutable for all of the assays. The EQA/PT materials, commercial calibrators and control materials showed matrix effects differently on routine methods. The aqueous glycerol solutions were generally noncommutable for routine method. All except one routine analytical systems met the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommended analytical performance guideline analytical quality criteria for total error. Conclusions Matrix effects and calibration biases existed in measurements of serum triglyceride. Continued efforts are needed to improve the accuracy and comparability of routine measurements.

Traceability in laboratory medicine: a global driver for accurate results for patient care

Laboratory medicine results influence a high percentage of all clinical decisions. Globalization requires that laboratory medicine results should be transferable between methods in the interests of patient safety. International collaboration is necessary to deliver this requirement. That collaboration should be based on traceability in laboratory medicine and the adoption of higher order international commutable reference materials and measurement procedures. Application of the metrological traceability chain facilitates a universal approach. The measurement of serum cholesterol and blood HbA1cserve as examples of the process of method standardization where an impact on clinical outcomes is demonstrable. The measurement of plasma parathyroid hormone and blood HbA2 serve as examples where the current between-method variability is compromising patient management and method standardization and/or harmonization is required. Challenges to the widespread adoption of traceability in laboratory medicine include the availability of reference materials and methods, geographical differences, the use of variable units, complex analytes and limited global coordination. The global collaboration requires the involvement of several different stakeholder groups ranging from international experts to laboratory medicine specialists in routine clinical laboratories. A coordinated action plan is presented with actions attributable to each of these stakeholder groups.

Development of an Improved Standard Reference Material for Vitamin D Metabolites in Human Serum

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed Standard Reference Material (SRM) 972a Vitamin D Metabolites in Frozen Human Serum as a replacement for SRM 972, which is no longer available. SRM 972a was developed in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health's Office of Dietary Supplements. In contrast to the previous reference material, three of the four levels of SRM 972a are composed of unmodified human serum. This SRM has certified and reference values for the following 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] species: 25(OH)D2, 25(OH)D3, and 3-epi-25(OH)D3. The value assignment and certification process included three isotope-dilution mass spectrometry approaches, with measurements performed at NIST and at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The value assignment methods employed have been modified from those utilized for the previous SRM, and all three approaches now incorporate chromatographic resolution of the stereoisomers, 25(OH)D3 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3.

Harmonisation of serum dihydrotestosterone analysis: establishment of an external quality assurance program

BACKGROUND

Serum dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is an important analyte for the clinical assessment of disorders of sex development. It is also reportedly a difficult analyte to measure. Currently, there are significant gaps in the standardisation of this analyte, including no external quality assurance (EQA) program available worldwide to allow for peer review performance of DHT. We therefore proposed to establish a pilot EQA program for serum DHT.

METHODS

DHT was assessed in the 2015 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs' Endocrine program material. The material's target (i.e. "true") values were established using a measurement procedure based on isotope dilution gas chromatography (GC) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). DHT calibrator values were based on weighed values of pure DHT material (>97.5% purity) from Sigma. The allowable limits of performance (ALP) were established as ±0.1 up to 0.5 nmol/L and ±15% for targets >0.5 nmol/L.

RESULTS

Target values for the six levels of RCPAQAP material for DHT ranged from 0.02 to 0.43 nmol/L (0.01-0.12 ng/mL). The material demonstrated linearity across the six levels. There were seven participating laboratories for this pilot study. Results of the liquid chromatography (LC) MS/MS methods were within the ALP; whereas the results from the immunoassay methods were consistently higher than the target values and outside the ALP.

CONCLUSIONS

This report provides the first peer comparison of serum DHT measured by mass spectrometry (MS) and immunoassay laboratories. Establishment of this program provides one of the pillars to achieve method harmonisation. This supports accurate clinical decisions where DHT measurement is required.

The role of EQA in harmonization in laboratory medicine - a global effort

There are many activities currently being undertaken in the field of laboratory medicine under the broad heading of "harmonization". These include traceability of results to international reference standards, processes to align results from assays where traceability has not been achieved (analytical harmonization) and international or national clinical guidelines based on studies from many parts of the world. Many of these issues are global in nature, with clinical evidence derived from studies performed in all parts of the world and multinational diagnostic companies providing assays worldwide. As with all aspects of medicine, progress can only be assured where these is evidence of effectiveness of the activities. External Quality Assurance (EQA) programs are designed to meet this need. Currently EQA processes have significant limitations in meeting the global needs of the laboratory medicine community. This paper aims to identify the steps that can be taken to allow current and future EQA programs to provide information on global variation in results. It is only by being aware of result differences that steps can be taken to improve performance.

A mussel tissue certified reference material for multiple phycotoxins. Part 4: certification

A freeze-dried mussel tissue (Mytilus edulis) reference material (CRM-FDMT1) was produced containing multiple groups of shellfish toxins. Homogeneity and stability testing showed the material to be fit for purpose. The next phase of work was to assign certified values and uncertainties to 10 analytes from six different toxin groups. Efforts involved optimizing extraction procedures for the various toxin groups and performing measurements using liquid chromatography-based analytical methods. A key aspect of the work was compensating for matrix effects associated with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry through standard addition, dilution, or matrix-matched calibration. Certified mass fraction values are reported as mg/kg of CRM-FDMT1 powder as bottled for azaspiracid-1, -2, and -3 (4.10 ± 0.40; 1.13± 0.10; 0.96 ± 0.10, respectively), okadaic acid, dinophysistoxin-1 and -2 (1.59 ± 0.18; 0.68 ± 0.07; 3.57± 0.33, respectively), yessotoxin (2.49 ± 0.28), pectenotoxin-2 (0.66 ± 0.06), 13-desmethylspirolide-C (2.70 ± 0.26), and domoic acid (126 ± 10). Combined uncertainties for the certified values include contributions from homogeneity, stability, and characterization experiments. The commutability of CRM-FDMT1 was assessed by examining the extractability and matrix effects for the freeze-dried material in comparison with its equivalent wet tissue homogenate. CRM-FDMT1 is the first shellfish matrix CRM with certified values for yessotoxins, pectenotoxins or spirolides, and is the first CRM certified for multiple toxin groups. CRM-FDMT1 is a valuable tool for quality assurance of phycotoxin monitoring programs and for analytical method development and validation. Graphical Abstract CRM-FDMT1 is a multi-toxin mussel tissue certified reference material (CRM) to aid in development and validation of analytical methods for measuring the levels of algal toxins in seafood.

Assessment of enzyme measurement procedures in China through a trueness verification program

BACKGROUND

Since 2003, the National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) has organized a network of reference laboratories and several survey programs to improve standardization in China.

METHODS

We analyzed the 2015 trueness verification program to assess the status of enzyme measurement standardization. Commutable serum-based materials were prepared and sent to 10 reference laboratories to assign target values for 2 enzymes (alanine aminotransferase-pyridoxal phosphate [ALT-pp] and γ-glutamyltransferase [GGT]) using IFCC reference measurement procedures.

RESULTS

Analytical performance was assessed for compliance to 3 indexes: trueness (bias), imprecision (CV), and accuracy (total error). Of the 250 participating laboratories, about half (≥124) used heterogeneous systems. More laboratories met the tolerance limit of imprecision than of trueness or accuracy. Except at the lowest concentration, the CV pass rates were >90% for the 2 enzymes. The optimal performance criterion derived from biological variation yielded pass rates for total error (ALT 77%, GGT 80%) that were higher than for bias (ALT 63%, GGT 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

PT/EQA results for commutable samples can be used to assess trueness against reference measurement procedures. Despite global and national standardization programs, bias remains a critical limitation of current enzyme measurement procedures in China.

Commutability and interchangeability of commercial quality control materials with feline plasma for common biochemical analytes

BACKGROUND

Species-specific plasma or serum pools are considered the ideal standard material for quality control materials (QCM) instead of commercially available human QCM. However, using plasma or serum pools is limited by volume restrictions, degradation over time, and a narrow range of analyte concentrations. Concentrations of QCM analytes should be consistent or commutable with those from species-specific plasma/serum samples, and the precision from plasma pools should be comparable or interchangeable with commercial human QCM.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to determine the commutability and interchangeability of 2 levels of commercial QCM (MAS chemTRAK-H [CT]) with feline plasma pools (PP) from normal and renal disease cats measured using a commercial laboratory analyzer and a veterinary in-house analyzer.

METHODS

Agreement between the 2 analyzers was assessed for 16 analytes by correlation and Passing-Bablok regression analyses of feline plasma samples. The difference between each CT data point and the regression line (residuals) was determined and standardized, and CT were considered 'commutable' with PP if the standardized residual was within a range of -3 to 3. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for CT and PP for 16 analytes on 2 analyzers were compared by bootstrap analysis to determine interchangeability.

RESULTS

Most CT analytes were within the range of patient plasma sample analytes, thus commutable. Only 2 analytes had equivalent precision for both levels of CT and both levels of PP, and 5 additional analytes had similar precision for at least one level of CT compared to at least one level of PP.

CONCLUSIONS

The QCM assessed is commutable to feline PP within the tested ranges for 2 particular analyzers. Commutability does not grant interchangeability.