Validation of a CYP2D6 Genotyping Panel on the NanoChip Molecular Biology Workstation

Practical interpretation of CYP2D6 haplotypes: Comparison and integration of automated and expert calling

We describe a population genetic approach to compare samples interpreted with expert calling (EC) versus automated calling (AC) for CYP2D6 haplotyping. The analysis represents 4812 haplotype calls based on signal data generated by the Luminex xMap analyzers from 2406 patients referred to a high-complexity molecular diagnostics laboratory for CYP450 testing. DNA was extracted from buccal swabs. We compared the results of expert calls (EC) and automated calls (AC) with regard to haplotype number and frequency. The ratio of EC to AC was 1:3. Haplotype frequencies from EC and AC samples were convergent across haplotypes, and their distribution was not statistically different between the groups. Most duplications required EC, as only expansions with homozygous or hemizygous haplotypes could be automatedly called. High-complexity laboratories can offer equivalent interpretation to automated calling for non-expanded CYP2D6 loci, and superior interpretation for duplications. We have validated scientific expert calling specified by scoring rules as standard operating procedure integrated with an automated calling algorithm. The integration of EC with AC is a practical strategy for CYP2D6 clinical haplotyping.

Cytochrome P450 testing for prescribing antipsychotics in adults with schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analyses

There is wide variability in the response of individuals to standard doses of antipsychotic drugs. It has been suggested that this may be partly explained by differences in the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme system responsible for metabolizing the drugs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to consider whether testing for CYP450 single nucleotide polymorphisms in adults starting antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia predicts and leads to improvements in clinical outcomes. High analytic validity in terms of sensitivity and specificity was seen in studies reporting P450 testing. However, there was limited evidence of the role of CYP2D6 polymorphisms in antipsychotic efficacy, although there was an association between CYP2D6 genotype and extrapyramidal adverse effects. No studies reported on the prospective use of CYP2D6 genotyping tests in clinical practice. In conclusion, evidence of clinical validity and utility of CYP2D6 testing in patients being prescribed antipsychotics is lacking, and thus, routine pharmacogenetic testing prior to antipsychotic prescription cannot be supported at present. Further research is required to improve the evidence base and to generate data on clinical validity and clinical utility.

Pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry: a review of features and clinical realities

This article focuses on the first generation of pharmacogenetic tests that are potentially useful in psychiatry. All pharmacogenetic tests currently on the market, or soon to be marketed in psychiatry, for which some information has been published in peer-reviewed journal articles (or abstracts), were selected. Five pharmacogenetic tests are reviewed in detail: the Roche AmpliChip CYP450 Test, the Luminex Tag-It Mutation Detection Kit, the LGC clozapine response test, the PGxPredict: Clozapine test, and the Genomas PhyzioType system. After reviewing these tests, three practical aspects of implementing pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatric clinical practice are briefly reviewed: (1) the evaluation of these tests in clinical practice, (2) cost-effectiveness, and (3) regulatory oversight. Finally, the future of these and other pharmacogenetic tests in psychiatry is discussed.

Pharmacogenetics: where are we with respect to personalized medicine?

The application of genetic testing to predict how well or how poorly an individual will respond to a therapeutic drug is beginning to make its way into the clinical laboratory. As this testing begins to unfold in the clinical setting, there is a necessary paradigm change that must occur for the laboratory and for the healthcare provider in order for this to be successful. New molecular-based technologies are commercially available to perform this testing on a routine basis and several established examples of pharmacogenetic tests are currently being performed. Several national organizations are now working on practice guidelines for the incorporation of this testing into a clinical setting. This manuscript provides an overview of where we are with respect to pharmacogenetic testing.