Simultaneous Detection of Gene Fusions and Base Mutations in Cancer Tissue Biopsies by Sequencing Dual Nucleic Acid Templates in Unified Reaction

Simultaneous identification of DNA and RNA pathogens using metagenomic sequencing in cases of severe acute respiratory infection

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a valuable technique for identifying pathogens. However, conventional mNGS requires the separate processing of DNA and RNA genomes, which can be resource- and time-intensive. To mitigate these impediments, we propose a novel method called DNA/RNA cosequencing that aims to enhance the efficiency of pathogen detection. DNA/RNA cosequencing uses reverse transcription of total nucleic acids extracted from samples by using random primers, without removing DNA, and then employs mNGS. We applied this method to 85 cases of severe acute respiratory infections (SARI). Influenza virus was identified in 13 cases (H1N1: seven cases, H3N2: three cases, unclassified influenza type: three cases) and was not detected in the remaining 72 samples. Bacteria were present in all samples. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii were detected in four influenza-positive samples, suggesting coinfections. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting influenza A virus were 73.33% and 95.92%, respectively. A κ value of 0.726 indicated a high level of concordance between the results of DNA/RNA cosequencing and SARI influenza virus monitoring. DNA/RNA cosequencing enhanced the efficiency of pathogen detection, providing a novel capability to strengthen surveillance and thereby prevent and control infectious disease outbreaks.

MET alterations detection platforms and clinical implications in solid tumors: a comprehensive review of literature

MET alterations, including MET exon 14 skipping variants, MET amplification, MET overexpression, and MET fusion, play pivotal roles in primary tumorigenesis and acquired resistance to targeted therapies, especially EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. They represent important diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in many solid tumor types. However, the detection of MET alterations is challenging due to the complexity of MET alterations and the diversity of platform technologies. Therefore, techniques with high sensitivity, specificity, and reliable molecular detection accuracy are needed to overcome such hindrances and aid in biomarker-guided therapies. The current review emphasizes the role of MET alterations as oncogenic drivers in a variety of cancers and their involvement in the development of resistance to targeted therapies. Moreover, our review provides an overview of and recommendations on the selection of various cross-platform technologies for the detection of MET exon 14 skipping variants, MET amplification, MET overexpression, and MET fusion. Furthermore, challenges and hurdles underlying these common detection platforms are discussed.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of RET gene fusion non-small cell lung cancer in China

The rearranged during transfection (RET) gene is one of the receptor tyrosine kinases and cell-surface molecules responsible for transmitting signals that regulate cell growth and differentiation. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion is a rare driver gene alteration associated with a poor prognosis. Fortunately, two selective RET inhibitors (sRETi), namely pralsetinib and selpercatinib, have been approved for treating RET fusion NSCLC due to their remarkable efficacy and safety profiles. These inhibitors have shown the ability to overcome resistance to multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are investigating several second-generation sRETis that are specifically designed to target solvent front mutations, which pose a challenge for first-generation sRETis. The effective screening of patients is the first crucial step in the clinical application of RET-targeted therapy. Currently, four methods are widely used for detecting gene rearrangements: next-generation sequencing (NGS), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Each of these methods has its advantages and limitations. To streamline the clinical workflow and improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for RET fusion NSCLC, our expert group has reached a consensus. Our objective is to maximize the clinical benefit for patients and promote standardized approaches to RET fusion screening and therapy.

Molecular characterization of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer via integrated genomic transcriptomic analysis

Introduction

Colorectal adenoma can develop into colorectal cancer. Determining the risk of tumorigenesis in colorectal adenoma would be critical for avoiding the development of colorectal cancer; however, genomic features that could help predict the risk of tumorigenesis remain uncertain.

Methods

In this work, DNA and RNA parallel capture sequencing data covering 519 genes from colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer samples were collected. The somatic mutation profiles were obtained from DNA sequencing data, and the expression profiles were obtained from RNA sequencing data.

Results

Despite some similarities between the adenoma samples and the cancer samples, different mutation frequencies, co-occurrences, and mutually exclusive patterns were detected in the mutation profiles of patients with colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer. Differentially expressed genes were also detected between the two patient groups using RNA sequencing. Finally, two random forest classification models were built, one based on mutation profiles and one based on expression profiles. The models distinguished adenoma and cancer samples with accuracy levels of 81.48% and 100.00%, respectively, showing the potential of the 519-gene panel for monitoring adenoma patients in clinical practice.

Conclusion

This study revealed molecular characteristics and correlations between colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer, and it demonstrated that the 519-gene panel may be used for early monitoring of the progression of colorectal adenoma to cancer.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of NTRK gene fusion solid tumors in China

Gene fusions can drive tumor development for multiple types of cancer. Currently, many drugs targeting gene fusions are being approved for clinical application. At present, tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors targeting neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are among the first "tumor agnostic" drugs approved for pan-cancer use. Representative TRK inhibitors, including larotrectinib and entrectinib, have shown high efficacy for many types of cancer. At the same time, several second-generation drugs designed to overcome first-generation drug resistance are undergoing clinical development. Due to the rarity of NTRK gene fusions in common cancer types and technical issues regarding the complexity of fusion patterns, effectively screening patients for TRK inhibitor treatment in routine clinical practice is challenging. Different detection methods including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and (DNA and/or RNA-based) next-generation sequencing have pros and cons. As such, recommending suitable tests for individual patients and ensuring the quality of tests is essential. Moreover, at present, there is a lack of systematic review for the clinical efficacy and development status of first- and second-generation TRK inhibitors. To resolve the above issues, our expert group has reached a consensus regarding the diagnosis and treatment of NTRK gene fusion solid tumors, aiming to standardize clinical practice with the goal of benefiting patients with NTRK gene fusions treated with TRK inhibitors.

Case Report: Patient With Lung Adenocarcinoma With ALK-HLA-DRB1 Rearrangement Shows Impressive Progression-Free Survival After Sequential Crizotinib and Ceritinib Treatment

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement is a driving mutation that underlies about 5-6% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Lung cancers that are ALK gene rearrangement-positive can be effectively treated with ALK inhibitors. However, the response of patients with rarer ALK gene rearrangements to ALK inhibitors remains unknown. Herein, we described a case of lung adenocarcinoma carrying ALK-HLA-DRB1 fusion in a 48-year-old nonsmoking woman. A similar case of ALK-HLA-DRB1 rearrangement in NSCLC has not been described previously neither in NSCLC nor in other disease. The patient achieved a progression-free survival of 18 months after sequential therapy consisting of crizotinib and then ceritinib during the follow-up. These findings provide basis for the application of ALK inhibitors in patients carrying the rare ALK-HLA-DRB1 fusion.

Deep RNA Sequencing Revealed Fusion Junctional Heterogeneity May Predict Crizotinib Treatment Efficacy in ALK-Rearranged NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Gene fusion variants in ALK-rearranged NSCLC may predict patient outcomes, but previous results have been inconclusive. Fusion isoforms coexisting in the same tumor may affect the efficacy of targeted therapy, but they have not been investigated.

METHODS

Patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who received crizotinib treatments were recruited. Precrizotinib tumor tissues were analyzed by the anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction for targeted RNA sequencing. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to compare overall and progression-free survivals.

RESULTS

Of the 51 studied subjects, EML4-ALK variant types v1, v2, v3, and others were detected in 23 (45.1%), five (9.8%), 19 (37.3%), and four patients (7.8%), respectively. Multiple EML4-ALK RNA isoforms were detected in 24 tumors (47.1%), and single isoform in 27 (52.9%). Most of the v3 tumors (16 of 19) harbored both v3a and v3b RNA isoforms. Multiple isoforms were also detected in eight non-v3 tumors (33.3% of all 24 multiple isoforms; five v1, two v5', and one v2). Compared with patients with single isoform, those with multiple isoforms had worse progression-free (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 2.45 [1.06-5.69]) and overall (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.74 [1.26-11.13]) survivals after adjusting for potential confounders including variant type. Using the patient-derived H2228 cells known to express v3a and v3b, our single-cell polymerase chain reaction detected either v3a or v3b in most single cells. Treatment of H2228 cells by three ALK inhibitors revealed increased ratios of v3a-to-v3b expression over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral EML4-ALK isoforms may predict the efficacy of targeted therapy in ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Temporal changes of intratumoral fusion isoforms may result from differential selection pressures that a drug might have on one isoform over another. Larger studies on fusion heterogeneity using RNA sequencing are warranted.

Molecular Mechanism of EGFR-TKI Resistance in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Application to Biological Diagnostic and Monitoring

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world. Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are a positive predictive factor for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). For common EGFR mutations (Del19, L858R), the standard first-line treatment is actually third-generation TKI, osimertinib. In the case of first-line treatment by first (erlotinib, gefitinib)- or second-generation (afatinib) TKIs, osimertinib is approved in second-line treatment for patients with T790M EGFR mutation. Despite the excellent disease control results with EGFR TKIs, acquired resistance inevitably occurs and remains a biological challenge. This leads to the discovery of novel biomarkers and possible drug targets, which vary among the generation/line of EGFR TKIs. Besides EGFR second/third mutations, alternative mechanisms could be involved, such as gene amplification or gene fusion, which could be detected by different molecular techniques on different types of biological samples. Histological transformation is another mechanism of resistance with some biological predictive factors that needs tumor biopsy. The place of liquid biopsy also depends on the generation/line of EGFR TKIs and should be a good candidate for molecular monitoring. This article is based on the literature and proposes actual and future directions in clinical and translational research.

YAP1-MAML2 Fusion as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Metaplastic Thymoma

BACKGROUND

Metaplastic thymoma is a very rare tumor with only a few case reports documented in literature. Hence, its molecular features have not been well explored.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventeen specimens of metaplastic thymoma were sequenced and retrospectively analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry in the study. In addition, seven cases of micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma and nine cases of type A thymoma were also investigated.

RESULTS

Among these metaplastic thymomas, fifteen cases showed classical histological features, and two cases displayed characteristic micronodular-like growth patterns. DNA and RNA based next-generation sequencing identified and confirmed highly recurrent Yes Associated Protein 1 (YAP1) - Mastermind Like Transcriptional Coactivator 2 (MAML2) translocation (13/17, 76.5%) in metaplastic thymoma but not in micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma (0/7, 0%) and type A thymoma (0/9, 0%). In addition, six nonsense mutations were also detected in the metaplastic thymoma. FISH in microdissection specimens indicated that both epithelioid and spindle cell components harbored YAP1-MAML2 gene rearrangements.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study explored the genetic alterations in epithelioid and spindle cell components in metaplastic thymoma. Furthermore, YAP1-MAML2 gene rearrangements emerged as a potential diagnostic biomarker helpful for distinguishing metaplastic thymoma from type A and micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma.

Identification of NTRK gene fusions in lung adenocarcinomas in the Chinese population

The molecular profile of neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTRK) gene fusions in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is not fully understood. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and pan-tyrosine kinase receptor (TRK) immunohistochemistry (IHC) are powerful tools for NTRK fusion detection. In this study, a total of 4,619 LUAD formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were collected from patients who underwent biopsy or resection at the Shanghai Chest Hospital during 2017-2019. All specimens were screened for NTRK1 rearrangements using DNA-based NGS. Thereafter, the cases with NTRK1 rearrangements and cases negative for common driver mutations were analyzed for NTRK1/2/3 fusions using total nucleic acid (TNA)-based NGS and pan-TRK IHC. Overall, four NTRK1/2 fusion events were identified, representing 0.087% of the original sample set. At the DNA level, seven NTRK1 rearrangements were identified, while only two TPM3-NTRK1 fusions were confirmed on TNA-based NGS as functional. In addition, two NTRK2 fusions (SQSTM1-NTRK2 and KIF5B-NTRK2) were identified by TNA-based NGS in 350 'pan-negative' cases. Two patients harboring NTRK1/2 fusions were diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma, while the other two were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. All four samples with NTRK fusions were positive for the expression of pan-TRK. The two samples with NTRK2 fusions showed cytoplasmic staining alone, while the other two samples with NTRK1 fusions exhibited both cytoplasmic and membranous staining. In summary, functional NTRK fusions are found in early-stage LUAD; however, they are extremely rare. According to this study's results, they are independent oncogenic drivers, mutually exclusive with other driver mutations. We demonstrated that NTRK rearrangement analysis using a DNA-based approach should be verified with an RNA-based assay.

Development and Analytical Validation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel to Detect Actionable Mutations for Targeted Therapy

Background

The ability to rapidly, inexpensively, and accurately identify cancer patients based on actionable genomic mutations in tumour specimens is becoming critically important in routine clinical diagnostics. Targeted panel sequencing is becoming popular because it enables comprehensive and cost-effective diagnosis. However, the implementation of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay in clinical settings requires careful analytical validation to demonstrate its ability to detect multiple genomic variants.

Materials and Methods

Here, we developed a custom-targeted NGS panel to identify actionable variants, including single nucleotide variants, insertions, and deletions; copy number variants; and gene fusions, across 73 genes for targeted cancer therapy. We implemented a practical validation strategy with diluted samples and reference standard samples that modelled key determinants of accuracy, including mutant allele frequency, insertion/deletion length, amplitude of copy number, and hotspot gene fusions.

Results

The analytical validation results demonstrated that our panel can identify different types of genomic alterations in these test samples with high levels of accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility.

Conclusion

Our panel could be deployed as a routine clinical test to comprehensively detect actionable variants in cancer patients to guide targeted therapy decisions.

Emerging oncogenic fusions other than ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK in NSCLC and the role of fusions as resistance mechanisms to targeted therapy

Recent evidence has shown that gene fusions caused by chromosomal rearrangements are frequent events in the initiation and during progression of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Since the discoveries of ALK and ROS1 fusions in 2007 and the subsequent successes of pharmacological targeting for these fusions, numerous efforts have identified additional oncogenic driver fusions in NSCLCs, especially in lung adenocarcinomas. In this review, we will summarize recent advances in this field focusing on novel oncogenic fusions other than ALK, ROS1, NTRK, and RET fusions, which are summarized in other articles in this thematic issue. These novel gene fusions include neuregulin-1 (NRG1) fusions, MET fusions, fusion genes involving fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family members, EGFR fusions, and other rare fusions. In addition, evidence has suggested that acquisition of gene fusions by cancer cells can be a molecular mechanism of acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Most of the current data are from analyses of resistance mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancers with oncogenic EGFR mutations. However, a few recent studies suggest that gene fusions can also be a resistance mechanism to ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancers with oncogenic ALK fusions. Detection, validation, and pharmacological inhibition of these fusion genes are becoming more important in the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Potential Unreliability of Uncommon ALK, ROS1, and RET Genomic Breakpoints in Predicting the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Variable genomic breakpoints have been identified through the application of target-capture DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) for ALK, ROS1, and RET fusion detection in NSCLC. We investigated whether ALK, ROS1, and RET genomic breakpoint location can predict matched targeted therapy efficacy.

METHODS

NSCLCs were analyzed by DNA NGS, target-specific RNA NGS, whole-transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In total, 3787 NSCLC samples were analyzed. DNA NGS detected ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions in 241, 59, and 76 cases, respectively. These fusions were divided into canonical (single EML4-ALK, CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1, and KIF5B/CCDC6-RET fusions), noncanonical (single non-EML4-ALK, non-CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1, and non-KIF5B/CCDC6-RET fusions), and primary/reciprocal (both primary and reciprocal rearrangements were detected) subtypes on the basis of genomic breakpoint position, and noncanonical and primary/reciprocal subtypes were defined as uncommon fusions. Further RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry revealed that six of 47 (12.8%) uncommon fusions were actually nonproductive rearrangements that generated no aberrant transcripts or proteins. Moreover, genomic breakpoints of canonical ALK and RET, but not ROS1, fusions always predicted breakpoints at the transcript level, whereas 85.4% (35 of 41) of uncommon fusions actually produced canonical fusion transcripts. Patients with uncommon ALK fusion (n = 31) who received first-line crizotinib exhibited shorter median progression-free survival than those with canonical ALK fusion (n = 53, 8.4 mo versus 12.0 mo, p = 0.004). However, no difference in progression-free survival was observed when only ALK RNA or protein-positive cases were analyzed (p = 0.185).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncommon ALK, ROS1, and RET genomic breakpoint is an unreliable predictor of matched targeted therapy efficacy. Functional validation by RNA or protein assay may add value for the accurate detection and interpretation of rare fusions.

Next Generation Sequencing for Gene Fusion Analysis in Lung Cancer: A Literature Review

Gene fusions have a pivotal role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) precision medicine. Several techniques can be used, from fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to next generation sequencing (NGS). Although several NGS panels are available, gene fusion testing presents more technical challenges than other variants. This is a PubMed-based narrative review aiming to summarize NGS approaches for gene fusion analysis and their performance on NSCLC clinical samples. The analysis can be performed at DNA or RNA levels, using different target enrichment (hybrid-capture or amplicon-based) and sequencing chemistries, with both custom and commercially available panels. DNA sequencing evaluates different alteration types simultaneously, but large introns and repetitive sequences can impact on the performance and it does not discriminate between expressed and unexpressed gene fusions. RNA-based targeted approach analyses and quantifies directly fusion transcripts and is more accurate than DNA panels on tumor tissue, but it can be limited by RNA quality and quantity. On liquid biopsy, satisfying data have been published on circulating tumor DNA hybrid-capture panels. There is not a perfect method for gene fusion analysis, but NGS approaches, though still needing a complete standardization and optimization, present several advantages for the clinical practice.

A novel SOS1-ALK fusion variant in a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and a remarkable response to crizotinib

OBJECTIVES

Transforming anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements are well known as a unique subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations other than EGFR. Currently, crizotinib is the standard first-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With advances in detection methods, more and more uncommon ALK fusion partners have been identified. Herein we present a novel SOS1-ALK fusion and the efficacy of crizotinib in an advanced NSCLC patient harboring this type of fusion.

RESULTS

A 52-year-old Chinese man had left upper lobe primary NSCLC and synchronous multiple lung metastases (cT2N3M1, stage IV). The ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of palpable left supraclavicular lymph nodes and the results of immunohistochemistry staining supported the diagnosis of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Using a next-generation sequencing assay (NGS), we showed that the tumor had a SOS1-ALK fusion which the breakpoints was (S2, A20) rather than other actionable mutations. Therefore, the patient received first-line crizotinib and experienced a remarkable tumor response and has tolerated crizotinib well until this writing.

CONCLUSION

Considering this rare SOS1-ALK fusion and remarkable response to an ALK-inhibitor, it is important to be aware of the presence of SOS1-ALK fusions in patients with advanced NSCLC to better guide targeted therapy. Precision methods, such as NGS for oncogenic alteration detection, should also be encouraged in clinical practice.