Accuracy of a Direct Progesterone Immunoassay

Simultaneous measurement of 17 endogenous steroid hormones in human serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry without derivatization

Mass spectrometric-based steroidomics is a valuable analytical approach that gives a comprehensive understanding of the interlinked steroid biosynthetic pathways. Here, we describe a rapid and versatile liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method designed to accurately quantify endogenous steroids in human serum. Sample preparation involved liquid-liquid extraction with methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) from 180 µL serum. The targeted steroids for quantification included androgens: dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), androstenedione (A4), testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 11-oxyandrogens: 11β-hydroxy-androstenedione (11OHA4), 11-keto-androstenedione (11KA4), 11β-hydroxy-testosterone (11OHT), 11-keto-testosterone (11KT), progestogens: 17α-hydroxy-progesterone (17OHP4), progesterone (P4), 11β-hydroxy-progesterone (11OHP4), 11-keto-progesterone (11KP4), mineralocorticoids: aldosterone, corticosterone, and glucocorticoids: 11-deoxycortisol, cortisol, and cortisone. The lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) were 0.05 ng/mL for A4, T, 11KA4, P4, and cortisone, 0.1 ng/mL for DHT, 11OHA4, 11OHT, 11KT, 17OHP4, 11OHP4, 11KP4, corticosterone, aldosterone, 11-deoxycortisol, and cortisol, and 0.5 ng/mL for DHEA. Accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and recovery fell within acceptable limits for bioanalytical method validation. Using serum samples from 29 premenopausal women in different menstrual phases, we demonstrated the clinical utility of our method, which showed sufficient sensitivity to reliably quantify all targeted steroids at levels typically found in circulation, except for 11OHP4 and 11KP4.

Spironolactone metabolite causes falsely increased progesterone in the Abbott Architect immunoassay

BACKGROUND

Immunoassays are important for routine clinical testing and medical diagnosis. However, they are limited by cross-reactivity especially at low analyte concentrations. There is a critical need to investigate compounds that can interfere with immunoassays. Herein, we describe the identification of canrenone, a spironolactone metabolite that falsely increases progesterone concentrations on the Abbott Architect i2000 Immunoassay.

METHODS

Serum samples and assay diluents were spiked with spironolactone or canrenone and progesterone concentrations were measured on the Architect i2000 and Immulite XPi immunoassay platforms. Blood samples from patients taking spironolactone were analyzed with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to evaluate the intrinsic response of progesterone concentrations to the presence of canrenone.

RESULTS

We measured approximately 10-fold higher progesterone concentrations on the Abbott Architect i2000 compared to reference immunoassay analyzers (Siemens Immulite XPi and Roche Cobas e601/602), suggesting an analytical error which is unique to the Architect i2000 antibody and/or assay conditions. By measuring serum progesterone after addition of spironolactone or canrenone to serum samples, we found that canrenone falsely increased progesterone on the Architect i2000 immunoassay. However, this interference was more pronounced at low serum progesterone concentrations. Moreover, a strong positive correlation was seen between canrenone and measured serum progesterone concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our investigations are important for individuals who require progesterone measurements using the Architect i2000 immunoassay, especially because it is unlikely for clinicians to order canrenone measurements alongside progesterone measurements for individuals taking spironolactone. Further research is needed to determine whether canrenone can influence progesterone measurements on other immunoassay systems.

Longitudinal analysis of external quality assessment of immunoassay-based steroid hormone measurement indicates potential for improvement in standardization

As hormonal disorders are linked to several diseases, the accurate quantitation of steroid hormone levels in serum is crucial in order to provide patients with a reliable diagnosis. Mass spectrometry-based methods are regarded as having the highest level of specificity and sensitivity. However, immunoassays are more commonly used in routine diagnostics to measure steroid levels as they are more cost effective and straightforward to conduct. This study analyzes the external quality assessment results for the measurement of testosterone, progesterone and 17β-estradiol in serum using immunoassays between early 2020 and May 2022. As reference measurement procedures are available for the three steroid hormones, the manufacturer-specific biases were normalized to the reference measurement values. The manufacturer-specific coefficients of variation were predominantly inconspicuous, below 20% for the three hormones when outliers are disregarded, however there were large differences between the various manufacturer collectives. For some collectives, the median bias to the respective reference measurement value was repeatedly greater than ±35%, which is the acceptance limit defined by the German Medical Association. In the case of testosterone and progesterone determination, some collectives tended to consistently over- or underestimate analyte concentrations compared to the reference measurement value, however, for 17β-estradiol determination, both positive and negative biases were observed. This insufficient level of accuracy suggests that cross-reactivity continues to be a fundamental challenge when antibody detection is used to quantify steroids with a high structural similarity. Distinct improvements in standardization are required to provide accurate analysis and thus, reliable clinical interpretations. The increased accuracy of the AX immunoassay for testosterone measurement, as observed in the INSTAND EQAs between 2020 and 2022, could be the result of a recalibration of the assay and raises hope for further improvement of standardization of immunoassay-based steroid hormone analyses in the coming years.

Evaluation of testosterone, estradiol and progesterone immunoassay calibrators by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

OBJECTIVES

In clinical practice, steroid measurements are performed mainly by direct, non-extraction immunoassays adapted to high throughput, automated immunoassay platforms and employing secondary calibrators. The accuracy of such steroid immunoassays is limited by cross-reactivity with structurally related steroids and nonspecific matrix interference as well as the metrological traceability of manufacturer supplied calibrators. The accuracy of steroid immunoassay calibrators has been little investigated by independent chemical methods.

METHODS

Steroid concentrations of 41 calibrators (4-6 replicates per calibrator) supplied by four manufacturers for use in testosterone (T), estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P4) commercial immunoassays were measured by ultra-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS).

RESULTS

Among 14 non-zero T calibrators, six (43 %) deviated significantly from the label concentration with 29 % outside 20 % of it. Among 14 E2 calibrators, eight (57 %) deviated significantly, whereas seven (50 %) were outside 20 % of the label concentration. Among 11 P4 calibrators, eight (73 %) deviated significantly whereas four (36 %) were outside within 20 % of the label concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that inaccurate calibration of manufacturer's supplied standards may contribute to inaccuracy of commercial direct steroid immunoassays.

Effects of elevated serum estrogen on dry eye in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation

PURPOSE

Sex hormones impact inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases. During IVF (in vitro fertilisation) treatment, circulating estrogen levels increase dramatically (10-50x) alongside changes in other hormones. This study examined changes in dry eye with IVF and its relationship with sex hormones.

METHODS

A two visit study was conducted on first day of menstruation when estrogen levels are lowest (baseline visit), and on day 9-11 (peak estrogen visit (PO)) of IVF. Symptoms of dry eye and ocular pain and signs of dry eye were examined. Serum hormone levels were assessed using mass spectrometry and immunoassay. Changes in signs and symptoms and associations were explored. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis assessed factors contributing to signs and symptoms.

RESULTS

40 women (36.2 ± 4.0 years) completed the study. Baseline and PO oestradiol (E2) levels were 28.9 pg/ml (20) (median (IQR)); 1360 pg/ml (1276) respectively. Ocular pain and dry eye symptoms worsened (p = 0.02 and p < 0.01) and tear break up and tear secretion values decreased (p = 0.005 and 0.01) at PO. Higher E2 and lower luteinizing hormone (LH) were associated with worsening of dry eye symptoms (ρ = 0.34 p = 0.03, ρ = -0.49 p = 0.001). Reduction in LH and increase in progesterone (P4) were associated with increased ocular pain (ρ = 0.45, p = 0.004 and ρ = 0.39, p = 0.01). Dry eye symptoms were predicted by LH and tear break up (p = 0.02; R2 = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

IVF treatment resulted in significantly increased ocular symptoms and tear film alterations although these changes were not clinically significant. Dry eye signs and symptoms were poorly predicted by hormone levels.

Altered visual cortex excitability in premenstrual dysphoric disorder: Evidence from magnetoencephalographic gamma oscillations and perceptual suppression

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by extreme mood shifts during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (MC) due to abnormal sensitivity to neurosteroids and unbalanced neural excitation/inhibition (E/I) ratio. We hypothesized that in women with PMDD in the luteal phase, these factors would alter the frequency of magnetoencephalographic visual gamma oscillations, affect modulation of their power by excitatory drive, and decrease perceptual spatial suppression. Women with PMDD and control women were examined twice-during the follicular and luteal phases of their MC. We recorded visual gamma response (GR) while modulating the excitatory drive by increasing the drift rate of the high-contrast grating (static, 'slow', 'medium', and 'fast'). Contrary to our expectations, GR frequency was not affected in women with PMDD in either phase of the MC. GR power suppression, which is normally associated with a switch from the 'optimal' for GR slow drift rate to the medium drift rate, was reduced in women with PMDD and was the only GR parameter that distinguished them from control participants specifically in the luteal phase and predicted severity of their premenstrual symptoms. Over and above the atypical luteal GR suppression, in both phases of the MC women with PMDD had abnormally strong GR facilitation caused by a switch from the 'suboptimal' static to the 'optimal' slow drift rate. Perceptual spatial suppression did not differ between the groups but decreased from the follicular to the luteal phase only in PMDD women. The atypical modulation of GR power suggests that neuronal excitability in the visual cortex is constitutively elevated in PMDD and that this E/I imbalance is further exacerbated during the luteal phase. However, the unaltered GR frequency does not support the hypothesis of inhibitory neuron dysfunction in PMDD.

Lack of analytical interference of dydrogesterone in progesterone immunoassays

OBJECTIVES

Progesterone, a sex steroid, is measured in serum by immunoassay in a variety of clinical contexts. One potential limitation of steroid hormone immunoassays is interference caused by compounds with structural similarity to the target steroid of the assay. Dydrogesterone (DYD), an orally active stereoisomer of progesterone, is used for various indications in women's health. Herein, we report a systematic in vitro investigation of potential interference of DYD and its active metabolite 20α-dihydrodydrogesterone (DHD) in seven widely used, commercially available progesterone assays.

METHODS

Routine human plasma samples were anonymized and pooled to create three graded concentration levels of progesterone (P4 high, P4 medium, P4 low). Each pooled P4 plasma sample (6-7 mL) was spiked at high, medium, and "none" concentration with DYD/DHD and was divided into 0.5 mL aliquots. The blinded aliquots were analyzed by seven different laboratories with their routine progesterone assay (six different immunoassays and one liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay, respectively) within the Dutch working group on endocrine laboratory diagnostics of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessments in Medical Laboratories.

RESULTS

The sample recovery rate (P4 result obtained for sample spiked with DYD/DHD, divided by the result obtained for the corresponding sample with no DYD/DHD × 100) was within a ±10% window for the medium and high P4 concentrations, but more variable for the low P4 samples. The latter is, however, attributable to high inter- and intra-method variability at low P4 concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not indicate any relevant interference of DYD/DHD within routinely used progesterone assays.

Reproducibility of saliva progesterone measured by immunoassay compared to liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

Immunoassay overestimates progesterone in blood, but no studies have tested whether this occurs in saliva. We measured progesterone in saliva using immunoassay and mass spectrometry. We tested the immunoassay for cross reactivity with dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17α-OHP). Progesterone was significantly higher in immunoassay compared to mass spectrometry. Immunoassay progesterone levels increased in when incremental levels of 17α-OHP standard was added. This effect was not observed with the addition of DHEA-S. Research using salivary progesterone immunoassay techniques should be wary, particularly with individuals taking steroid supplementation or with high levels of progesterone metabolites.

Pubertal development of estradiol-induced hypothalamic progesterone synthesis

In females, a hallmark of puberty is the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge that triggers ovulation. Puberty initiates estrogen positive feedback onto hypothalamic circuits, which underlie the stimulation of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons. In reproductively mature female rodents, both estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) signaling are necessary to stimulate the surge release of GnRH and LH. Estradiol membrane-initiated signaling facilitates progesterone (neuroP) synthesis in hypothalamic astrocytes, which act on E2-induced progesterone receptors (PGR) to stimulate kisspeptin release, thereby activating GnRH release. How the brain changes during puberty to allow estrogen positive feedback remains unknown. In the current study, we hypothesized that a critical step in estrogen positive feedback was the ability for estradiol-induced neuroP synthesis. To test this idea, hypothalamic neuroP levels were measured in groups of prepubertal, pubertal and young adult female Long Evans rats. Steroids were measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Hypothalamic neuroP increases from pre-puberty to young adulthood in both gonad-intact females and ovariectomized rats treated with E2. The pubertal development of hypothalamic E2-facilitated progesterone synthesis appears to be one of the neural switches facilitating reproductive maturation.

Simultaneous measurement of 18 steroids in human and mouse serum by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry without derivatization to profile the classical and alternate pathways of androgen synthesis and metabolism

BACKGROUND

The recently identified alternate, or backdoor, pathway of DHT synthesis provides important novel information on androgen biosynthesis beyond the classical pathway. We report a rapid and versatile liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to simultaneously and accurately quantify key steroids in human or mouse serum involved in either the classical or backdoor androgen synthesis pathways.

METHODS

Serum (200 µL) fortified with isotopically labelled internal standards underwent liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with MTBE and extracts were analysed on a LC-MS/MS. The targeted steroids for quantification were testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol (3α diol), 5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol (3β diol), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), androstenedione (A4), androsterone (AD), estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), progesterone (P4), pregnenolone (P5), androstenediol (Adiol), 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP4) and 17-hydroxypregnenolone (17-OHP5), corticosterone (B), cortisol (F), allopregnanolone (Allo-P5) and dihydroprogesterone (DHP).

RESULTS

The limits of quantification (LOQ) were 5 pg/mL for E2 and E1, 25 pg/mL for T, 50 pg/mL for A4 and 0.10 ng/mL for DHT, 17OHP5, P4, P5, AD, Adiol, DHEA, AlloP5 and 0.20 ng/mL for 17OHP4, 3α diol, 3β diol, DHP, 0.25 ng/mL for B and 1 ng/mL for F. Accuracy, precision, reproducibility and recovery were within acceptable limits for bioanalytical method validation. The method is illustrated in human and mouse, male and female serum.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented method is sufficiently sensitive, specific and reproducible to meet the quality criteria for routine laboratory application for accurate quantitation of 18 steroid concentrations in male and female serum from humans or mice for the purpose of profiling androgen synthesis and metabolism pathways.

Endocrine mechanisms and assay issues in premature progesterone elevation in assisted reproductive technology

Progesterone elevation occurring in the late phases of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has been reported for over 25 years. Yet doubts remain regarding the mechanisms at play in this phenomenon and its net consequences on assisted reproductive technology outcome, which is known to occur in poor and good assisted reproductive technology responders. The pathophysiology of end-COS progesterone elevation encountered in gonadotropin-suppressed cycles is different from that prevailing at the time of, and just after, ovulation. The different divergence in practical consequences of end-COS progesterone elevation led to review the progesterone assays developed for measuring progesterone in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, but commonly used for measuring all forms of progesterone elevation.