Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Assays for Measuring Serum Infliximab and Antibodies to Infliximab

Evaluating the Performance of Two Automated Anti-drug Antibodies Assays for Infliximab and Adalimumab Without Acid Dissociation

Monitoring anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to infliximab and adalimumab is critical to treatment management in various autoimmune disorders. The growing need for proactive therapeutic monitoring further requires the detection of ADAs in the presence of measurable concentrations of infliximab or adalimumab. To provide robust analytical assays for clinical application, we evaluated two automated immunoassays developed using ImmunoCAP™ technology and based on the bridging format to measure serum ADAs to infliximab and adalimumab respectively. Without an acid-dissociation step, these research prototype assays can detect a positive control monoclonal ADA towards infliximab and adalimumab, ranging from < 25 ng/ml to 10,000 ng/mL. Both assays exhibit imprecision less than 20% at different ADA titer levels and can distinguish ADAs towards different drug targets. In method comparison using authentic patient samples, the quantitative results of the ADA assays are not directly comparable to two existing clinical immunoassays for ADAs (correlation coefficient rs = 0.673 for infliximab ADAs; rs = 0.510 for adalimumab ADAs), presumably due to the lack of commutable ADA standards and the polyclonal nature of ADAs. Nevertheless, there is qualitative agreement between the methods when evaluating putative positive and negative patient samples (overall agreement 0.83 for infliximab ADAs; 0.76 for adalimumab ADAs). Biotin and high levels of rheumatoid factors may interfere with the performance of the automated assays due to competitive binding with the biotinylated drug and non-specific formation of bridging complexes. The two ImmunoCAP assays can provide new analytical methods for proactive therapeutic monitoring of adalimumab and infliximab.

Comparison of Two Clinical Laboratory Assays for Measuring Serum Adalimumab and Antibodies to Adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody developed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), used for the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Immunogenicity to this drug may lead to therapeutic failure. Various laboratory assays are used for measuring serum adalimumab and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to adalimumab, for therapeutic monitoring and evaluation of clinical non-responsiveness. This study compared the performance of 2 clinical assays used by different reference laboratories.

METHODS

In total, 120 residual clinical samples were tested at both laboratories. A sandwich ELISA for adalimumab detecting free drug and a bridging ELISA capable of detecting both free and bound ADA were performed at the Mayo Clinic. A functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA) was used at ARUP Laboratories for measuring bioactive serum drug concentrations, and neutralizing ADA.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight samples had measurable concentrations of adalimumab by both methods and yielded a correlation coefficient r = 0.93, slope = 0.886, and intercept = 0.950. Overall agreement of 92.5% was observed between the assays, with most discrepant drug results being attributed to a higher positivity rate with ELISA (8/9). One outlier positive with RGA and negative with ELISA was confirmed by LC-MS/MS to be attributed to infliximab. Overall agreement of 79.2% was observed between the ADA assays. Differences in ADA results may be due to the bridging ELISA detecting total ADA (free, drug-bound, neutralizing, and non-neutralizing), while RGA detects free, neutralizing ADA only.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the assays are fundamentally different, the results show significant concordance between the clinically validated tests performed in different laboratories.

Outcomes of Infliximab-Treated inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring with two different assays

OBJECTIVES

There are multiple assays for infliximab (IFX) drug level (IFX-DL) and antibody to infliximab (ATI) measurement. The aims of this study are to examine the correlation and outcomes of IFX-DL and ATI in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, simultaneously measured with different methods in different institutions.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Residual samples of IFX-treated IBD patients undergoing drug monitoring for IFX-DL and ATI, both measured by ECLIA (Esoterix Laboratories) were used to simultaneously quantify IFX-DL via LC-MS/MS and ATI via an in-house ECLIA (ih-ECLIA) (Mayo Clinic Laboratories). Comparisons of IFX-DL and ATI detection between the assays from different institutions were performed, along with a comparison between the assays by association of IFX-DL and ATI obtained by each method with clinical remission, endoscopic healing (EH) and normal serum C-reactive protein (CRP ≤ 8 mg/L).

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were included (median age, 32 years (range, 12-84); 45.7% female). The median IFX-DL was 7 mcg/mL (IQR: 1.3, 19.4) and 6 mcg/mL (IQR: 0.9, 20) via LC-MS/MS and ECLIA, respectively (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.97). ATI was detected in 13/142 (9.2%) via ih-ECLIA of whom 100% had IFX-DL < 5 mcg/mL by LC-MS/MS. ATI was positive in 39/151 (25.8%) via ECLIA, and 84.6% of positives had IFX-DL < 5 mcg/mL by ECLIA. Compared to ECLIA, the frequency of ATI detection via ih-ECLIA was lower in patients in clinical remission (7.3% vs 36.6%; p = 0.0005), those with normal CRP (5.9% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.0005), and in patients with EH (5.3% vs 18.4%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

IFX-DL was comparable between LC-MS/MS and ECLIA assays. Rate of ATI detection via ih-ECLIA was lower than ECLIA, which was more aligned with favorable clinical outcomes.

Homogeneous Immunoassay Using a Tri-Part Split-Luciferase for Rapid Quantification of Anti-TNF Therapeutic Antibodies

Anti-TNF therapeutics bind and sequester tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to prevent downstream signaling and are clinically important in the treatment of several autoimmune diseases. Effective treatment with these drugs requires frequent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Current analytical methods, including reporter gene assay (RGA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and mobility shift assay (MSA), can be technically rigorous, slow, and expensive. These qualities prevent the implementation of point-of-care testing and ultimately limit the frequency and utility of monitoring. An assay simple enough to be performed in the clinic would enable increased TDM frequency, more accurate dosing, and improved patient outcomes. Toward this end, we developed a homogeneous immunoassay based on a tri-part split-luciferase system for "add-and-read" detection of anti-TNF therapeutics. In our platform, two small fragments of the split-luciferase, called β9 and β10, are each fused to a different interacting protein. The binding of each of these proteins to anti-TNF antibodies forces the split-luciferase components into proximity where they reform the active luciferase. We identified the fusion proteins, β9-protein A (β9-A) and β10-TNF, as promising binding pairs. We systematically adjusted assay conditions to optimize the signal/background (S/B) ratio, limit of detection (LOD), and percent recovery. The assay has a large dynamic range (0.5-32 μg/mL) and is sensitive enough to monitor both subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic serum concentrations of anti-TNF antibodies, as demonstrated in clinical samples.

Development of Label-Free Immunoassays as Novel Solutions for the Measurement of Monoclonal Antibody Drugs and Antidrug Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Immunoassays based on label-free technologies (label-free immunoassay [LFIA]) offer an innovative approach to clinical diagnostics and demonstrate great promise for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs. An LFIA measures immunocomplex formation in real time and allows for quantification on initial binding rate, which facilitates fast measurement within a few minutes.

METHODS

Based on thin-film interferometry (TFI) technology, open-access LFIAs were developed for the quantification of the mAb drugs adalimumab (ADL) and infliximab (IFX) and for the detection of the antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to the mAb drugs (ADL-ADAs and IFX-ADAs).

RESULTS

The LFIAs for active mAb drugs (ADL and IFX) and for ADAs (ADL-ADAs and IFX-ADAs) were validated. The analytical measurement range (AMR) for both ADL and IFX was from 2 to 100 μg/mL. The AMR for ADL-ADAs was from 5 to 100 μg/mL and for IFX-ADAs was 10 to 100 μg/mL. In the comparison of LFIAs and reporter gene assays, the correlation coefficient was 0.972 for the quantification of ADL and 0.940 for the quantification of IFX. The concordance rate was 90% for the detection of ADL-ADAs and 76% for the detection of IFX-ADAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The LFIAs for active mAb drugs and ADAs were appropriate for the TDM of ADL and IFX. The TFI technology has unique advantages compared with other technologies used for the measurement of mAb drugs. Label-free technologies, especially those allowing for open-access LFIAs, have great potential for clinical diagnostics.