Predictive power of individual genetic and environmental factor scores

Heritability estimates of muscle strength-related phenotypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to clarify the heritability estimates of human muscle strength-related phenotypes (H² -msp). A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (through August 22, 2016). Studies reporting the H² -msp for healthy subjects in a sedentary state were included. Random-effects models were used to calculate the weighted mean heritability estimates. Moreover, subgroup analyses were performed based on phenotypic categories (eg, grip strength, isotonic strength, jumping ability). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity of H² -msp, which included age and sex. Twenty-four articles including 58 measurements were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted mean H² -msp for all 58 measurements was 0.52 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.48-0.56), with high heterogeneity (I² =91.0%, P<.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the heritability of isometric grip strength, other isometric strength, isotonic strength, isokinetic strength, jumping ability, and other power measurements was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46-0.67), 0.49 (0.47-0.52), 0.49 (0.32-0.67), 0.49 (0.37-0.61), 0.55 (0.45-0.65), and 0.51 (0.31-0.70), respectively. The H² -msp decreased with age (P<.05). In conclusion, our results indicate that the influence of genetic and environmental factors on muscle strength-related phenotypes is comparable. Moreover, the role of environmental factors increased with age. These findings may contribute toward an understanding of muscle strength-related phenotypes.

Covariance of Isometric and Dynamic Arm Contractions: Multivariate Genetic Analysis

The purpose of the present study was to examine genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences in maximal isometric, concentric and eccentric muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) of the elbow flexors. A generality versus specificity hypothesis was explored to test whether the 4 strength variables share a genetic component or common factors in the environment or whether the genetic/environmental factors are specific for each strength variable. The 4 variables under study were measured in 25 monozygotic and 16 dizygotic male Caucasian twin pairs (22.4 ± 3.7 years). The multivariate genetic analyses showed that all 4 variables shared a genetic and environmental component, which accounted for 43% and 6% in MCSA (h2= 81%), 47% and 20% in eccentric (h2= 65%), 58% and 4% in isometric (h2= 70%) and 32% and 1% in concentric strength (h2= 32%) respectively. The remaining variation was accounted for by contraction type specific and muscle cross-sectional area specific genetic and environmental effects, which accounted for 38% and 14% in MCSA, 18% and 15% in eccentric, 12% and 26% in isometric and 0% and 67% in concentric strength respectively. This exploratory multivariate study suggests shared pleiotropic gene action for MCSA, eccentric, isometric and concentric strength, with a moderate to high genetic contribution to the variability of these characteristics.

Behavioural-genetic perspectives on personality function

In the wake of the recent announcements that the human genome has been mapped, efforts to identify the genetic loci underlying personality function will grow and intensify. Much research has already been done in this area, but it has for the most part been limited to classical biometrical approaches designed to determine if personality has a heritable basis. These so-called "heritability" studies estimate how much of the individual differences in personality are attributable to genetic differences among people. Molecular-genetic approaches, on the other hand, are designed to identify specific putative loci, but have yielded mixed results. The inconsistency in research findings can be attributed in part to the lack of sufficient numbers of genetic markers in the chromosomal regions of interest--a problem that the creation of a map of the human genome will help to rectify. This map and its inevitable refinements, however, can only advance the search for the genes for personality to a limited degree. Serious unresolved problems in the conceptualization and definition of personality and its dysfunction remain, which will hamper the search for personality genes.