Pretreatment staging evaluation in small cell lung carcinoma. A new approach to medical decision making

Small cell lung cancer survival: 3 years as a minimum for predicting a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVES

To define the minimum survival time indicating a significantly reduced risk of recurrence of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) basing on the evaluation of survival of patients (pts) with SCLC who underwent anatomic staging and were exposed to combination chemotherapy (CT) (including combined modality treatment).

METHODS

Eight pts being our 'historic' group submitted to the NCI Registry for Long Term Survivors with SCLC (est. 1977) and a following 657 unselected pts diagnosed, staged, treated and undergoing life-long follow-up at a single institution between the years 1981 and 1996. For those among our pts who had no evidence of metastatic disease, but had not undergone thorough staging, we have arbitrarily created an intermediate group referred to as 'XD'.

RESULTS

Of the 657 pts 111 survived 2 years or more. Among these 111 there were 88 pts with LD at presentation, 11 with 'XD' and 12 with ED. Of the 111 pts surviving 2 years 51 (51/111) were re-treated for relapse before 24 months. From this group of 111 2 year-or-more survivors 45 (41%) died between 2 and 3 years. From year 3 onwards mortality decreased substantially-eight pts died in the 3-4 year interval and eight in the 4-5 interval-accounting for 14% of all the 2 year survivors. We did not observe any failure of the primary tumor beyond a period of 5 years-both in our 'historic' and the analyzed group. After 5 years development of a second primary tumor, mainly lung cancer, is one of the major causes of death in pts 'cured' of their primary tumor.

CONCLUSION

The shortest survival-time which allows predicting a significantly reduced risk of recurrence of SCLC is 3 years. The same landmark was achieved with the estimation of hazard function and allowed to find a remarkably decreased risk of death at the point of 3 years.

Carboplatin-etoposide combination in small cell lung cancer patients older than 70 years: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

No standard treatment is defined for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Carboplatin and etoposide are highly active agents against SCLC. In this study, we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination of these two agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four untreated patients with limited or extensive SCLC and median age of 73.9 years entered the study. Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin i.v. on day 1 (AUC 5 using Calvert's formula) and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) given orally on days 1-5, every 4 weeks, and thoracic irradiation was given to limited disease patients after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall response rates was 59% (95% CI: 43-76). The median survival for all patients was 37 weeks (range 3-76 weeks). The toxicity was mainly haematological with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 59% of courses, febrile neutropenia in 15% of courses, and toxic death in 9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this regimen are disappointing with worse response and survival, and more haematological toxicity than expected and previously reported, despite the use of Calvert's formula. Possible explanations are the use of etoposide per os rather than i.v., the frequent comorbidities of older patients and the inclusion of patients with poor prognosis factors.

Small-cell lung cancer: patients included in clinical trials are not representative of the patient population as a whole

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical characteristics of the subpopulation of patients not included in clinical trials, their outcome, and the reasons for their ineligibility and non-participation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 57 patients (out of 178 consecutive patients with SCLC), who were not included in any of the three successive clinical trials completed at our center during the study period. We also compared 37 patients excluded from the largest clinical trial to their 73 included counterparts.

RESULTS

Reasons for ineligibility (n = 53) included low Karnofsky index (n = 17), advanced age (n = 12), non-feasible long-term follow-up (n = 12), previous history of cancer (n = 8), contraindication for anthracyclines (n = 5), and other medical reasons (n = 11). Only four eligible patients were not included in the trials. As compared to patients included in the studies, non-included patients had a significantly lower Karnofsky index, were older, presented more frequently with metastatic disease, and had a lower response rate to treatment and a shorter survival. However, exclusion from the trial was not an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection biases were unlikely in the three trials, based on the high ratio of included/eligible patients. However, the subgroup of patients included in the trials was not representative of the patient population as a whole because of restrictive eligibility criteria. Results from published clinical trials to the overall population should be extrapolated only with caution. We suggest that the proportion and major characteristics of ineligible and non-participating patients be mentioned in any publication of a clinical trial.

Diagnostic bone scanning in oncology

Over the last several decades bone scanning has been used extensively in the evaluation of oncology patients to detect bone involvement. It can provide information about disease location, prognosis, and the effect of therapy. Bone scanning offers the advantages of whole body evaluation and the detection of lesions earlier than other techniques. However, as newer diagnostic tools become available, indications for bone scanning must be revised and the results combined with these other tests in order to provide optimum patient care. Advances in instrumentation and the subsequent improvement in image quality have allowed nuclear medicine physicians to provide more accurate bone scan interpretations. By optimizing image acquisition, it is often possible to determine lesion characteristics, which are more likely to represent malignancy. Knowledge of disease pathophysiology and other specific properties of the patient's primary tumor, along with subsequent correlation of scan abnormalities to patient history, physical examination, previous studies, and other radiological examinations, is essential for determining lesion significance. The differential diagnosis of a scan abnormality should also include consideration of both false normal and abnormal causes. The final interpretation should be clearly communicated to the clinician with appropriate recommendations for further evaluation. Only through careful attention to the patient, the clinician, and appropriate study acquisition parameters will bone scanning maintain its place in the evaluation of oncology patients.

Transcutaneous abdominal ultrasonography in the staging of lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There is limited information available regarding the relationship between clinical indicators of widespread disease in patients with lung cancer and the findings of transcutaneous ultrasonography.

METHODS

A retrospective survey was made of 279 consecutive patients with lung cancer. By reviewing the patients' records the clinical findings were divided into symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests indicative of metastatic disease. All patients had been examined by abdominal ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The patients included 19% with small cell carcinoma. The frequency of abdominal metastases by ultrasonography in those with small cell carcinoma was 40%, in the other patients it was 8%. Regardless of histological group, all the 40 patients with abdominal metastases by ultrasonography had at least one clinical category indicative of widespread disease and 38 (95%) had two or all three clinical categories positive. Fifty nine patients had no clinical indicators of metastases and none of these had abdominal metastases by ultrasonography.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that abdominal metastases are found in lung cancer patients with clinical findings indicative of widespread disease. No abdominal metastases were found in patients with a negative clinical evaluation. The results indicate that transcutaneous ultrasonography of the abdomen is not necessary in the initial staging if the clinical evaluation is unremarkable.

Small cell lung cancer: etiology, biology, clinical features, staging, and treatment

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20% to 25% of all bronchogenic carcinoma and is associated with the poorest 5-year survival of all histologic types. SCLC differs in its etiologic, pathologic, biologic, and clinical features from non-SCLC, and these differences have translated to distinct approaches to its prevention and treatment. Compared with other histologic types of lung cancer, exposures to tobacco smoke, ionizing radiation, and chloromethyl ethers pose a substantially greater risk for development of SCLC. The histologic classification of SCLC has been revised to include three categories: (1) small cell carcinoma, (2) mixed small cell/large cell, and (3) combined small cell carcinoma. Ultrastructurally, SCLC displays a number of neuroendocrine features in common with pulmonary neuroendocrine cells, including dense core vesicles or neurosecretory granules. These dense core vesicles are associated with a variety of secretory products, cell surface antigens, and enzymes. The biology of SCLC is complex. The activation of a number of dominant proto-oncogenes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in SCLC have been described. Dominant proto-oncogenes that have been found to be amplified or overexpressed in SCLC include the myc family, c-myb, c-kit, c-jun, and c-src. Altered expression of two tumor suppressor genes in SCLC, p53 and the retinoblastoma gene product, has been demonstrated. Cytogenetic and molecular evidence for chromosomal loss of 3p, 5q, 9p, 11p, 13q, and 17p in SCLC has intensified the search for other tumor suppressor genes with potential import in this malignancy. Bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide, insulin-like growth factor I, and transferrin have been identified as autocrine growth factors in SCLC, with a number of other peptides under active investigation. Several mechanisms of drug resistance in SCLC have been described, including gene amplification, the recently described overexpression of multi-drug resistance-related protein (MRP), and the expression of P-glycoprotein. The classic SCLC staging system has been supplanted by a revised TNM staging system where limited disease and extensive disease are equivalent to the TNM stages I through III and stage IV, respectively. Therapeutically, recent strategies have attained small improvements in survival but significant reductions in the toxicities of chemotherapeutic regimens. Presently, the overall 5-year survival for SCLC is 5% to 10%, with limited disease associated with a significantly higher survival rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)