Bronchial responsiveness to ultrasonic fog in occupational asthma due to toluene diisocyanate

Evaluation of a 4-steps-1-day whole body challenge protocol for the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to diisocyanates

Inhalative challenges are important in the diagnosis of occupational asthma due to diisocyanates. As existing protocols are time-consuming and costly, it was the aim of this study to develop a short duration whole body exposure protocol. Ninety three subjects with suspected occupational diisocyanate-induced asthma and verified current or previous occupational exposure to diisocyanates and ten control subjects without diisocyanate exposure but with bronchial hyperresponsiveness were investigated. After baseline examination on the first day, subjects underwent a standardized whole body multiple-steps-1-day challenge with exposures of up to four times 30 min to concentrations of 5, 10, 20, and 30 ppb of the dominant diisocyanate used at work on the second day. Common spirometric and body plethysmographic parameters were used as positivity criteria. Overall, 14 subjects demonstrated a positive diisocyanate challenge, 19 were considered doubtful, and 60 were negative. All controls had negative challenges. Positive reactions occurred during the challenge (n = 10) or during follow-up (n = 4). Eight subjects showed >40 % fall of FEV1. These severe reactions occurred after 5 ppb (n = 2) or 10 ppb (n = 3), while isolated late reactions after 2 h of follow-up were not observed. Multivariate analysis showed an association between a positive challenge and both the degree of previous occupational exposure and the presence of baseline bronchial hyperresponsiveness. In summary, the proposed 4-steps-1-day diisocyanate challenge protocol induced pronounced bronchial reactions in a small number of subjects. As these reactions were more likely to occur after low concentrations, it is recommended to shift the initial concentration/dose step to lower exposures.

Occupational exposure to toluene diisocyanate and neutrophilic bronchitis without asthma

CONTEXT

Isocyanates represent a leading cause of occupational asthma, and sputum neutrophilia or eosinophilia has been described in subjects with isocyanate-induced occupational asthma after exposure to these chemicals. One case of non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis due to methylene diphenil isocyanates has been reported, but a similar condition in the instance of neutrophilic bronchial inflammation has never been described.

CASE DETAILS

We report a 34-year-old woman, who, 18 months after beginning work in a plastic industry, reported the onset of dry cough at work. Spirometry was normal, reversibility and methacholine challenge tests were negative. A specific inhalation challenge with toluene diisocyanate elicited dry cough without significant changes in respiratory function. Sputum induction showed a post-challenge neutrophil increase.

DISCUSSION

The results of our case suggest that the occurrence of a neutrophilic bronchial inflammation without the functional characteristics of occupational asthma as a consequence of exposure to toluene diisocyanate may also be considered, suggesting a diagnosis of occupational non-asthmatic neutrophilic bronchitis.

Use of aerosols for bronchial provocation testing in the laboratory: where we have been and where we are going

Bronchial provocation testing with pharmacological agents that act directly on airway smooth muscle has important limitations. These include the inability to identify exercise-induced asthma (EIA), to differentiate the airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) of airway remodelling from the AHR of active inflammation and to differentiate between doses of steroids. Recent studies show that tests that act indirectly to narrow airways are more sensitive than pharmacological agents for identifying airway inflammation and response to treatment. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is an indirect challenge that acts on mast cells to cause release of mediators. Hypertonic saline is another and, since its development in the 1980s, has become widely used in Australia. Hypertonic (4.5%) saline is used to identify those with active asthma, those with EIA and those who wish to enter certain occupations or sports (e.g., diving). The recent development, again in Australia, of a test that uses dry powder mannitol has promise for use in the laboratory, the office, or for testing in the field. AHR to mannitol identifies people with EIA and is an estimate of its severity. The mannitol response is modified by drugs used to prevent EIA, implying that similar mediators are involved. A mannitol test can be used to monitor response to steroids and is more sensitive than histamine for identifying persistent airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatics well controlled on steroids. These findings suggest that indirect challenges give more useful clinical information about currently active asthma and the response to treatment than direct challenge and they will become more widely used.

Increase in airway hyperresponsiveness among workers exposed to methylene diphenyldiisocyanate compared to workers exposed to toluene diisocyanate at a petrochemical plant in Korea

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness induced by methylene diphenyldiisocyanate (MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at a petrochemical industry complex in Korea.

METHODS

Questionnaires, allergic skin test, and nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) were studied in 64 exposed workers and 27 control subjects. Questionnaires included questions about symptoms of cough, wheezing, chest tightness, dyspnea, rhinorrhea, sneezing, itching, stuffiness, tearing, urticaria, sore throat, and exacerbating time. Methacholine challenge tests were done. Bronchial responsiveness (BRindex) defined as log (% fall in FEV(1))/log (last concentration of methacholine +10).

RESULTS

Prevalence of AHR (PC20 FEV(1) < 16.0 mg/mL of methacholine) was higher in MDI-exposed workers than in TDI-exposed workers [4/20 (20%) vs. 2/42 (4.7%), P<0.05]. Twenty-three workers (36%) of all subjects had respiratory symptoms. MDI-exposed workers, in comparison with control subjects, had higher BRindex (0.73+/-0.04 vs. 0.62+/-0.02, P<0.05). Workers exposed to TDI or MDI who had respiratory symptoms (n = 23), in comparison to workers exposed to TDI or MDI without respiratory symptoms (n = 41), had significantly higher BRindex (0.82+/-0.06 vs. 0.60+/-0.02, P<0.05). FEV(1) was significantly negatively correlated with BRindex (r = -0.253, P<0.05). BRindex was not correlated with atopy, smoking status, and exposure duration.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that workers exposed to MDI are at a higher risk of asthma in comparison with TDI-exposed workers and control subjects at a petrochemical plant in Korea.

Serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) in subjects with a history of asthma symptoms with or without rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) has been proposed as a marker of disease activity in bronchial asthma. The study aimed to evaluate the role of sECP in screening asthmatics in a group of subjects with asthma and rhinitis symptoms, and the relationship between sECP and clinical and functional parameters of asthma.

METHODS

A total of 185 subjects with asthma symptoms, 149 of them with rhinitis as well, underwent skin tests, spirometry, methacholine (MCH) test, blood sampling for eosinophil percentage (bEOS%) and sECP determination, and nasal secretions smear for eosinophil percentage (nEOS%) determination; PEF values, symptoms, and medication over a period of 4 weeks after sampling for sECP quantitation were recorded on a diary.

RESULTS

A total of 99 (53%) subjects received a diagnosis of asthma (asthmatics), and 86 did not (nonasthmatics). In asthmatics, neither sECP nor bEOS% was significantly different from nonasthmatics. In asthmatics, sECP was higher in subjects with increased than in those with normal daily PEF variability (16.4, 6.8-24.4 vs 5.3, 3.9-8.4 microg/l; P<0.001). sECP was higher in moderate persistent asthma than in intermittent asthma (24.8, 10.6-53 vs 8.4, 5.6-14.1; P<0.05). In nonasthmatics (73 with a history of rhinitis), both sECP and bEOS% correlated with nEOS% (rho=0.35; P<0.01 and rho=0.53; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with asthma symptoms with or without rhinitis, sECP did not distinguish asthmatics from nonasthmatics. In asthmatics, sECP was associated with PEF variability and symptom severity. In subjects with asthma and rhinitis, as well as in subjects with only rhinitis, sECP levels are possibly influenced by nasal inflammation.

Testing airway responsiveness using inhaled methacholine or histamine

Airway responsiveness assessed using histamine and methacholine is safe, reproducible and relatively easily undertaken in adults and children. Results are similar for methacholine and histamine although methacholine is better tolerated. Responsiveness is increased in children and the elderly, and in women compared to men, possibly due to body size effects. Baseline lung function confounds the interpretation of airway responsiveness and may explain the effect of smoking in most studies. Results are most usefully expressed as the provocative dose producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) or the dose-response slope (DRS). When technical factors are controlled the reproducibility of the test is from one to two doubling doses. Measurements of airway responsiveness have been widely used in clinical and research practice. However, assessing their value in diagnosing asthma is limited by the lack of a gold standard for the definition of asthma. Using a cut-off value of 8 mg/mL or 8 mumol for PD20, the tests will discriminate asthmatic from non-asthmatic subjects (based on questionnaire definitions of asthma) with a sensitivity of around 60% and a specificity of around 90%. These properties of the test result in positive and negative predictive values of 86% and 69% when the prevalence of asthma is high (50%-as in the clinical setting) and 40% and 95% when the prevalence of asthma is low (10%, as in general population studies). In the usual clinical setting, assessing the significance of atypical or non-specific symptoms, the tests are of intermediate value in predicting the presence of asthma and less useful in excluding asthma. The additional benefit of testing airway responsiveness to measuring peak flows or to a trial of therapy has yet to be fully assessed. Testing of airway responsiveness may be of value in assessing occupational asthma, asthma severity and the effects of potential sensitizers or treatments. In research, tests of airway responsiveness are more useful for excluding cases of asthma. In population studies, they serve as an objective marker of abnormal airway function which may be genetically determined and, like allergy, are strongly associated with asthma. The predictive value of airway hyperresponsiveness for the development of airway disease is yet to be clearly established. In epidemiology the benefits of measuring airway responses must be weighed against the added inconvenience and cost that is incurred.

Bronchial responsiveness to ultrasonic "fog" in occupational asthma due to low molecular weight chemicals

BACKGROUND

In a previous work we have demonstrated that the use of an indirect stimulus such as ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW, "fog") challenge, in addition to methacholine, in the assessment of occupational asthma due to TDI improves our ability in detecting sensitized subjects.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study we aimed to determine the validity of "fog" in the assessment of occupational asthma induced by various low molecular weight substances.

METHODS

Fourty subjects exposed to low molecular weight substances with work-related respiratory symptoms underwent methacholine, UNDW and specific bronchial challenge tests. Diagnosis of occupational asthma was made in 20 of 40 patients who developed bronchoconstrictive responses to the specific challenges (reactors). Sensitivity and specificity of UNDW alone, of methacholine alone, and of the combination of the two tests were determined at two different cutpoints of PD20FEV1 of methacholine, with the results of the specific challenge as the "gold standard".

RESULTS

Frequency and severity of bronchial hyperresponsiveness both to UNDW and to methacholine were significantly higher in reactors than in nonreactors. Ultrasonically nebulized distilled water had higher specificity (80% versus 60%) but lower sensitivity (65% versus 75% to 90%) than methacholine. As compared with methacholine alone, the combination in series of the two challenges (both challenges positive) substantially improved specificity (85% versus 60%).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in the assessment of low molecular weight chemical-induced asthma diagnosed with the specific challenge as the "gold standard," UNDW challenge proves more specific than methacholine for occupational asthma, but it is considerably less sensitive. The combination of the two challenges results in very high sensitivity and high specificity for occupational asthma, therefore, although further investigations are required for the definitive diagnosis, it should be regarded as a useful means to confirm objectively a suggestive history.

Respiratory and other hazards of isocyanates

Isocyanates are increasingly being used for manufacturing polyurethane foam, elastomers, adhesives, paints, coatings, insecticides, and many other products. At present, they are regarded as one of the main causes of occupational asthma. The large number of workers who are exposed to these chemicals have a concentration-dependent risk of developing chronic airway disorders, especially bronchial asthma. Different pathophysiologic mechanisms are involved. Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated sensitization and irritative effects have been clearly demonstrated in both exposed subjects and animals. Presumably, neural inflammation due to neuropeptide release of capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves is crucial. We collected data on 1780 isocyanate workers who had been examined by our groups. Of them 1095 (including subjects from outpatient departments) had work-related symptoms, predominantly of the respiratory tract. Specific IgE antibodies were found in 14% of the 1095 subjects. The methacholine challenge test was shown to be an inadequate predictor of the results of inhalative isocyanate provocation tests in workers and in asthmatic controls. Isocyanate (toluene diisocyanate TDI) air concentrations of 10 ppb (0.07 mg/m3) and 20 ppb (0.14 mg/m3), respectively, did not cause significant bronchial obstruction in the majority of previously unexposed asthmatics with bronchial hyperreactivity. IgG-mediated allergic alveolitis, a rare disease among isocyanate workers, was found in approximately 1% of the symptomatic subjects. Experimental studies exhibit dose-dependent toxic effects and give evidence for tachykinin-mediated bronchial hyperreactivity after exposure to isocyanates. The clinical role of genotoxic effects of isocyanates and their by-products demonstrated here in vitro and in vivo has yet to be clarified.