Variations in DNR rates. The onus is on physicians

[The suitability of therapeutic effort: An end-of-life strategy]

End-of-life treatment and attention to the needs of relatives are not adequate for several reasons: Society denies or hides the death; it is very difficult to predict it accurately; treatment is frequently fragmented between different specialists, and there is insufficient palliative medicine training, including communication skills. There are frequent conflicts with decisions made at the end of life, particularly the suitability of therapeutic effort. The attitude of professionals on the adequacy of therapeutic effort is not homogenous, and varies depending on the specialty, experience, and beliefs. Many doctors are still afraid of inconveniencing patients. Primary care is in a privileged position to approach the life and values of our patients and their families, and not just the disease, which makes it the right place to guide and advise the patient on the preparation and registration of living wills.

Long-term admission to the intensive care unit: a cost-benefit analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes in long-term ICU patients, with follow-ups carried out at one year post discharge, in order to calculate the costs incurred by the hospital in relation to the benefits gained.

MATERIAL

Of 3639 patients consecutively admitted over the course of three years to ICU, 235 (6.5%) were assessed for the purposes of the study, having spent a period exceeding 20 days in intensive care.

METHOD

The survey tool used was the Spanish Minimum Data Set (MDS). The length of ICU stay and hospital stay following discharge from ICU were calculated, and one year post discharge the patient/next of kin was contacted in order to carry out a follow-up survey on survival and functional status (according to GOS-E scale).

RESULTS

The 235 study patients had a mean stay of 37 days, occupied 34% of ICU beds available and consumed 29% of the ICU's economic resources ($14,400,175). Their stay on hospital wards was (mean) 33 days. Mortality in ICU and on hospital wards was 40% higher amongst older patients, and those with a higher APACHE II and Charlson index score. Mortality rates were three times higher among neurosurgical patients: mortality at follow-up was 25%, and only 21% recovered an acceptable functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality rates in long-term ICU patients are high, both during their hospital stay and in the first year post discharge. Surviving patients do not exhibit a good level of recovery, and consume a large proportion of economic resources.

Do-not-resuscitate order after 25 years

BACKGROUND

In 1976, the first hospital policies on orders not to resuscitate were published in the medical literature. Since that time, the concept has continued to evolve and evoke much debate. Indeed, few initials in medicine today evoke as much symbolism or controversy as the Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order.

OBJECTIVE

To review the development, implementation, and present standing of the DNR order.

DESIGN

Review article.

MAIN RESULTS

The DNR order concept brought an open decision-making framework to the resuscitation decision and did much to put appropriate restraint on the universal application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for the dying patient. Yet, even today, many of the early concerns remain.

CONCLUSIONS

After 25 yrs of DNR orders, it remains reasonable to presume consent and attempt resuscitation for people who suffer an unexpected cardiopulmonary arrest or for whom resuscitation may have physiologic effect and for whom no information is available at the time as to their wishes (or those of their surrogate). However, it is not reasonable to continue to rely on such a presumption without promptly and actively seeking to clarify the patient's (or surrogate's) wishes. The DNR order, then, remains an inducement to seek the informed patient's directive.