What is 'minimally invasive' coronary bypass surgery? Experience with a variety of surgical revascularization procedures for single-vessel disease

The clinical outcome and quality of life following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) through a limited anterior small thoracotomy has been shown to be a promising technique of surgical treatment for single or double vessel disease. Little is known about the Health-Related Quality Of Life (HRQOL) in this group of patients.

METHODS

The records of 75 consecutive patients who underwent MIDCAB procedure at Harefield Hospital between April 2000 and January 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. HRQOL assessment was planned in a cross-sectional design. Patients were contacted by telephone to conduct a semi-structured interview and were sent two questionnaires: the Short Form health survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

RESULTS

There was no in-hospital death. Patients stayed in the Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) for 11.56 +/- 4.55 hours and stayed in hospital for 3 +/- 2.34 days. None of the study patients had perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) or neurological complications including permanent and transient strokes. We were able to contact all the 75 patients by telephone and they also completed the SF-36 and HADS. The SF-36 scores were compared to an age-matched group of normal British people. The MIDCAB group had an excellent general health perception compared to the normal group (p < 0.001), but similar scores otherwise. The HADS scores showed that only 1 patient (1.3%) had mild depression, 5 patients (6.7%) had mild anxiety, and 2 patients (2.6%) had moderate anxiety.

CONCLUSION

MIDCAB is a safe surgical treatment and provides excellent clinical and HRQOL outcomes.

Sleep during hospitalization and recovery after cardiac surgery

Sleep disturbance is common in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and has been recognized for more than 30 years. Research findings suggest that sleep disturbance is a multifactorial process that has many correlates in these patients and persists from the presurgical period throughout recovery. A growing body of literature suggests the importance of sleep for function and well-being of these patients. The research literature is synthesized and implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Atrial fibrillation: prevalence after minimally invasive direct and standard coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND

This study identified and compared the prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AFIB) following standard coronary artery bypass grafting (SCABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and minimally invasive direct vision coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) without CPB. A further comparison was made between AFIB prevalence in SCABG and MIDCAB subjects with two or fewer bypasses.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, comparative survey. Patients with new-onset AFIB who underwent SCABG or MIDCAB alone were identified electronically using a triangulated method (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9 CM] code; clinical database word search; and pharmacy database drug search).

RESULTS

The total sample (n = 814; 94 MIDCAB, 720 SCABG) exhibited a trend toward lower AFIB prevalence in MIDCAB (23.4%) versus SCABG (33.1%) subjects (p = 0.059). AFIB prevalence in the SCABG subset with two or less vessel bypasses (n = 98; n = 18 single vessel, n = 80 double vessels) and MIDCAB subjects (n = 94; n = 90 single vessels, n = 4 double vessels) was almost identical (SCABG subset 24.5% versus MIDCAB 23.4%, p = 0.860). Slightly more than half (56.9%) of new-onset AFIB subjects were identified by ICD-9 CM codes, with the remainder by word search (37.7%) or procainamide query (5.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample, the number of vessels bypassed seemed to have a greater influence on AFIB prevalence than the application of CPB or the surgical approach. Retrospective identification of AFIB cases by ICD-9 CM code grossly underestimated AFIB prevalence.

[Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: surgical techniques and anesthetic problems]

OBJECTIVE

To review current data on minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

DATA SOURCES

Search through the Medline data base of French or English articles.

DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were analysed to make a synthesis of the various techniques with their main indications and contra-indications.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery includes various surgical procedures. The usual techniques are described, their major benefits and drawbacks are discussed. The main goals of anaesthetic management are preservation of ventricular function and systemic perfusion, detection and treatment of myocardial ischaemia, prevention of hypothermia in case of coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart via sternotomy, intermittent selective ventilation of the collapsed lung using CPAP in case of limited thoracotomy. Expertise in transoesophageal echocardiography is essential for insertion and checking the accurate positioning of the various catheters of the endovascular CPB Heartport system (pulmonary vent, endosinus catheter, venous cannula, endoaortic clamp) allowing coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve surgery through limited thoracotomy and finally, detection of retained intracardiac air and assessment of complete clearing of cardiac cavities after mitral valve surgery through limited thoracotomy and aortic valve surgery via ministernotomy. Short-acting anaesthetic agents allow rapid recovery from anaesthesia, early extubation and discharge to the surgical ward within 24 h, whereas overall time spent in the operating room is often longer than with conventional cardiac surgery.

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Impact on Resource Usage, Costs, Length of Stay, and Return to Function

"Minimally invasive" approaches to coronary artery surgery include a number of procedures, most of which avoid the use of extracorporeal circulation. Economic considerations have contributed to the rising interest in these techniques. This article reviews current literature and potential ways in which these procedures may reduce overall costs. Several studies have reported decreased mean length of stay and overall hospital costs in patients undergoing off-bypass or "beating heart" procedures. Most of these studies have included small numbers of patients and have lacked long-term follow-up data. Prospective randomized trials are needed to conclusively establish these early findings. Copyright© 1999 by W. B. Saunders Company.