Lightning can strike twice: second primary lung cancers

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in establishing new clinical and therapeutic modalities in lung cancer. A short review

Lung cancer is a fairly common malignancy. An early diagnosis and a reliable staging and re-staging with the aim to detect both local and distant relapse are of utmost importance in planning the therapeutic management. The imaging diagnostic work-up of patients with lung cancer usually includes conventional imaging (chest X-ray, contrast-enhanced CT, bone scan) and more recently ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Great advances in the management of lung cancer are based on the information provided by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, as it supplies both metabolic and anatomic information (better localisation). There is vast evidence in the literature demonstrating its utility in (a) characterising benign versus malignant solitary nodules, (b) staging and re-staging lung cancer, (c) guiding the type of therapy, (d) monitoring treatment response and (e) predicting outcome. In particular, given its specificity in differentiating ¹⁸F-FDG-avid relapse from post-surgical changes or post-radiation fibrosis (which do not take up ¹⁸F-FDG), PET/CT can detect recurrent disease after initial treatment and (being a whole-body technique) has demonstrated high accuracy in the detection of distant metastases or secondary tumours. In conclusion, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be considered a highly accurate and reliable method for staging and re-staging lung cancer, and is highly effective in guiding personalised therapies.

Post-therapeutic positron emission tomography/computed tomography for early detection of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence

Patients after curative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a high risk of loco-regional and/or distant tumor recurrence, especially within the first two years. Timely and accurate detection of recurrence is crucial in order to start salvage or palliative therapies with the overall goal of increasing patients' survival and quality of life. However, with the emerging use of non-surgical curative-intended therapies, follow-up of patients becomes even more challenging, as local recurrence has to be distinguished from various post-therapeutic changes at the site of the primary cancer. Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), which is already an established imaging modality in the staging of NSCLC, is increasingly used in recurrence surveillance algorithms. By detailed morphological information being combined with additional information about the metabolic activity of suspicious sites, determination of suspicious lesions as benign or malignant can be improved. This article reviews the value of integrated PET/CT in assessing recurrence in NSCLC patients after potentially curative surgery and after curative-intended non-surgical therapies and raises as well the issue of cost-effectiveness of PET/CT for follow-up.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative intent therapy: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guideline (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

To develop an evidence-based approach to follow-up of patients after curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

METHODS

Guidelines on lung cancer diagnosis and management published between 2002 and December 2005 were identified by a systematic review of the literature, and supplemental material appropriate to this topic was obtained by literature search of a computerized database (Medline) and review of the reference lists of relevant articles.

RESULTS

Adequate follow-up by the specialist responsible for the curative intent therapy should be ensured to manage complications related to the curative intent therapy and should last at least 3 to 6 months. In addition, a surveillance program should be considered to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. A standard surveillance program for these patients, coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer, is recommended based on periodic visits with chest imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Smoking cessation and, if indicated, facilitation in participation in special programs is recommended for all patients following curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence favors follow-up of complications related to curative intent therapy, and a surveillance program at regular intervals with imaging and review of symptoms. Smoking cessation after curative intent therapy to prevent recurrence of lung cancer is strongly supported by the available evidence.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative-intent therapy

The following two distinctly different issues should be taken into account when planning patient care following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer: adequate follow-up to manage complications related to the curative-intent therapy; and surveillance to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. Follow-up for complications should be performed by the specialist responsible for the curative-intent therapy and should last 3 to 6 months. Recurrences of the original lung cancer will be more likely during the first 2 years after curative-intent therapy, but there will be an increased lifelong risk of approximately 1 to 2% per year of developing a metachronous, or new primary, lung cancer. A standard surveillance program for these patients is recommended based on periodic visits, with chest-imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Whether subgroups of patients with a higher risk of developing a metachronous lung cancer (eg, those patients whose primary lung cancer was radiographically occult or central and those patients surviving for > 2 years after treatment for small cell lung cancer) should have a more intensive surveillance program is presently unclear. The surveillance program should be coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer. Smoking cessation is recommended for all patients following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer.