Systemic antibiotics fail to clear multidrug-resistant Klebsiella from a pediatric ICU

Microcin MccI47 selectively inhibits enteric bacteria and reduces carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization in vivo when administered via an engineered live biotherapeutic

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the reservoir for multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens, specifically carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae, which often lead to the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes, severe extraintestinal infections, and lethal outcomes. Selective GI decolonization has been proposed as a new strategy for preventing transmission to other body sites and minimizing spreading to susceptible individuals. Here, we purify the to-date uncharacterized class IIb microcin I47 (MccI47) and demonstrate potent inhibition of numerous Enterobacteriaceae, including multidrug-resistant clinical isolates, in vitro at concentrations resembling those of commonly prescribed antibiotics. We then genetically modify the probiotic bacterium Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) to produce MccI47 from a stable multicopy plasmid by using MccI47 toxin production in a counterselection mechanism to engineer one of the native EcN plasmids, which renders provisions for inducible expression and plasmid selection unnecessary. We then test the clinical relevance of the MccI47-producing engineered EcN in a murine CR K. pneumoniae colonization model and demonstrate significant MccI47-dependent reduction of CR K. pneumoniae abundance after seven days of daily oral live biotherapeutic administration without disruption of the resident microbiota. This study provides the first demonstration of MccI47 as a potent antimicrobial against certain Enterobacteriaceae, and its ability to significantly reduce the abundance of CR K. pneumoniae in a preclinical animal model, when delivered from an engineered live biotherapeutic product. This study serves as the foundational step toward the use of engineered live biotherapeutic products aimed at the selective removal of MDR pathogens from the GI tract.

Clinical Relevance and Antimicrobial Profiling of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on Routine Antibiotics and Ethanol Extract of Mango Kernel (Mangifera indica L.)

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is known for serious health problems. Testing new inexpensive natural products such as mango kernel (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae) may provide alternative and economically viable anti-MRSA drugs. In the current study, we screened clinical isolates from Aseer Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia, during 2012–2017 for MRSA and tested an ethanolic extract of mango kernel for anti-MRSA activity. Brief confirmation of MRSA was performed by the Vitek 2 system, while antibiotic sensitivity of strains was tested for their clinical relevance. The In vitro disc diffusion method was used to test the anti-MRSA activity of the ethanolic mango kernel extract. The antimicrobial activity of mango kernel was compared to that of standard drugs (oxacillin and vancomycin). Of the identified 132 S. aureus strains, 42 (31.8%) were found to be MRSA and their prevalence showed a clear increase during the last two years (2016-2017; p < 0.001). MRSA strains showed 100% sensitivity to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, tetracycline, daptomycin, tigecycline, and tobramycin and 100% resistance to ampicillin and 98% to penicillin. The ethanolic extracts of mango kernel were found active against both S. aureus and the MRSA strains. Inhibitory activities (mean ± SE) were achieved at concentrations of 50 mg/mL (20.77 ± 0.61), 5 mg/mL (16.18 ± 0.34), and 0.5 mg/mL (8.39 ± 0.33) exceeding that of vancomycin (p=0.0162). MRSA strains were sensitive to mango kernel extracts when compared to vancomycin. Therefore, ethanolic extracts of mango kernel can be escalated to animal model studies as a promising leading anti-MRSA drug candidate and can be an economic alternative to high-priced synthetic antibiotics.

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality in critically ill patients. Systematic review of randomized, controlled trials

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) was undertaken to evaluate the impact of this procedure on bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality. Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, previous meta-analyses, and conference proceedings, without restriction of language or publication status. RCTs were retrieved that compared oropharyngeal and/or intestinal administration of antibiotics as part of the SDD protocol, with or without a parenteral component, with no treatment or placebo in the controls. The three outcome measures were patients with bloodstream infection, causative micro-organisms, and total mortality. Fifty-one RCTs conducted between 1987 and 2005, comprising 8065 critically ill patients were included in the review; 4079 patients received SDD and 3986 were controls. SDD significantly reduced overall bloodstream infections [odds ratio (OR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.90; P=0.0036], gram-negative bloodstream infections (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.63; P<0.001) and overall mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94; P=0.0064), without affecting gram-positive bloodstream infections (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.47). The subgroup analysis showed an even larger impact of SDD using parenteral and enteral antimicrobials on overall bloodstream infections, bloodstream infections due to gram-negative bacteria and overall mortality with ORs of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P=0.005), 0.30 (95% CI, 0.16-0.56; P<0.001), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61-0.91; P=0.0034), respectively. Twenty patients need to be treated with SDD to prevent one gram-negative bloodstream infection and 22 patients to prevent one death.

High mortality of invasive pneumococcal disease compared with meningococcal disease in critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain outcome, patterns of disease, incidence of concurrent infection, superinfection and penicillin resistance in children requiring intensive care for Streptococcus pneumoniae infection and compare it to a similar disease pattern, namely Neisseria meningitidis b infection.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective cohort study in a regional paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Children with invasive pneumococcal and meningococcal disease requiring intensive care.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The study included 22 children with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), median age 14 months (interquartile range 3-52), median Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) 0.051 (0.028-0.066), median length of PICU stay 8.5 days (4-13). Four patients died, three (13.5%) attributable to IPD. Incidence of concurrent infection 27%. There were no superinfections. All S. pneumoniae were sensitive to cefotaxime; one isolate (3.7%) was resistant to penicillin. There were 186 children with meningococcal disease (MD), with a higher PIM (median 0.068, 0.033-0.108), older age (29 months, 10.7-77.9) and shorter length of PICU stay (median 3 days, 2-6). Eight (4.3%) children died from MD. Incidence of concurrent and superinfection was 18% and 6%, respectively in children with MD. All N. meningitidis cases were sensitive to cefotaxime and penicillin. The standardized mortality ratio was considerably higher with IPD (2.0) than with MD (0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

In invasive pneumococcal disease preventative measures including early recognition, immediate antibiotic therapy and vaccination need to be taken in the community, similar to the control of meningococcal disease. Invasive pneumococcal disease should command the same respect as meningococcal disease.

Handwashing in the intensive care unit: a big measure with modest effects

Handwashing is widely accepted as the cornerstone of infection control in the intensive care unit. Nosocomial infections are frequently viewed as an indicator of poor compliance of handwashing. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of handwashing on infection rates in the intensive care unit, and to analyse the failure of handwashing. A literature search identified nine studies that evaluated the impact of handwashing or hand hygiene on infection rates, and demonstrated a low level of evidence for the efforts to control infection with handwashing. Poor compliance cannot be blamed as the only reason for the failure of handwashing to control infection. Handwashing on its own does not abolish, but only reduces transmission, as it is dependent on the bacterial load on the hand of healthcare workers. Finally, recent studies, using surveillance cultures of throat and rectum, have shown that, under ideal circumstances, handwashing can only influence 40% of all intensive care unit infections. A randomised clinical trial with the intensive care as randomisation unit is required to support handwashing as the cornerstone of infection control.

Prior antimicrobial therapy in the hospital and other predisposing factors influencing the usage of antibiotics in a pediatric critical care unit

Background

The aim of this study was to determine whether prior antimicrobial therapy is an important risk factor for extended antimicrobial therapy among critically ill children. To evaluate other predisposing factors influencing the usage of antibiotics in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting. To examine the relationship between the extent of antimicrobial treatment and the incidence of nosocomial infections and outcome.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated teaching hospital (760 beds) in Athens. Clinical data were collected upon admission and on each consecutive PICU day. The primary reason for PICU admission was recorded using a modified classification for mutually exclusive disease categories. All administered antibiotics to the PICU patients were recorded during a six-month period. Microbiological and pharmacological data were also collected over this period. The cumulative per patient and the maximum per day numbers of administered antibiotics, as well as the duration of administration were related to the following factors: Number of antibiotics which the patients were already receiving the day before admission, age groups, place of origin, the severity of illness, the primary disease and its complications during the course of hospitalization, the development of nosocomial infections with positive cultures, the presence of chronic disease or immunodeficiency, various interventional techniques (mechanical ventilation, central catheters), and PICU outcome.

Results

During a six-month period 174 patients were admitted to the PICU and received antibiotics for a total of 950 days (62.3% of the length of stay days). While in PICU, 34 patients did not receive antimicrobial treatment (19.5%), 69 received one antibiotic (39.7%), 42 two (24.1%), 17 three (9.8%), and 12 more than three (6.9%). The number of antibiotics prescribed in PICU or at discharge did not differ from that at admission. Indications for receiving antibiotics the day before admission and throughout during hospitalization into PICU were significantly correlated. Although the cumulative number of administered antibiotics did not correlate with mortality (9.8%), it was significantly related to the severity scoring systems PRISM (p < .001), TISS (p < .002) and was significantly related to the number of isolated microorganisms (p < .0001). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that independent determinants of the cumulative number of antibiotics were: prior administration of antibiotics, presence of a bloodstream infection, positive bronchial cultures, immunodeficiency, and severity of illness.

Conclusion

Prior antimicrobial therapy should be recognized as an important risk factor for extended antimicrobial therapy among critically ill children. Severity of illness, immunodeficiency, and prolonged length of stay are additional risk factors.

Infection in prolonged pediatric critical illness: A prospective four-year study based on knowledge of the carrier state

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to determine the rate, timing, and incidence density of infections occurring in a subgroup of patients requiring a prolonged stay in a regional pediatric intensive care unit.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational cohort study over 4 yrs.

SETTING

This epidemiologic descriptive study was performed in a university hospital 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Critically ill children requiring > or = 4 days of intensive care.

INTERVENTIONS

The microbial carrier state of the children was monitored by surveillance cultures of throat and rectum, obtained on admission and twice weekly afterward.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data are presented on a total of 1,241 children, accounting for 1,443 admissions to the unit, corresponding to 18,203 patient days. The median pediatric index of mortality was 0.063 (interquartile range, 0.025-0.131), and the mortality rate in this subset of children was 9.6%. Five hundred twenty children had infections, an overall infection rate of 41.9% (520 of 1,241); 14.5% (180 of 1,241) of the children developed viral and 33.0% (410 of 1,241) developed bacterial/yeast infections. The incidence of bloodstream infection was 20.1 and lower airway infection 9.1 episodes per 1,000 patient days. We found that 13.3% of the children were infected with a bacterial/yeast microorganism acquired on the pediatric intensive care unit; 4.0% (50 of 1,241) of children developed infections due to resistant microorganisms. There were a total of 803 bacterial/yeast infectious episodes, of which 59.8% (480) were due to microorganisms imported in the patients' admission flora. These primary endogenous infections predominantly occurred within the first week of pediatric intensive care unit stay. The other 38.9% (312) were caused by microorganisms acquired on the pediatric intensive care unit. A total of 38 viral infections (24.5%) were acquired during pediatric intensive care unit stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Two thirds of all infections diagnosed in children with prolonged illness on pediatric intensive care unit were due to microorganisms present in the patients' admission flora.

Analysis of three outbreaks due to Klebsiella species in a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical, microbiological, and epidemiologic features of three outbreaks caused by Klesiella during 3 years.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty affected neonates.

METHODS

Data were collected through chart reviews and conversations with physicians. Screening samples were obtained from the staff, the neonates, and the environment. Antibiogram typing and arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction-based fingerprinting were used to type the strains.

RESULTS

The first outbreak had 13 K. pneumoniae strains isolated. The second outbreak had 10 K. oxytoca strains isolated. The third outbreak had 20 K. pneumoniae strains isolated. More than half of the patients had low birth weights, were premature, and underwent mechanical ventilation and intravenous catheterization. Approximately three-fourths of the patients died. The isolates tested were completely susceptible to meropenem, cefoxitin, and ciprofloxacin and were resistant to cephalothin. More than half of these strains were resistant to many beta-lactam antibiotics, amikacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Typing procedures yielded 3 antibiotypes and 3 genotypes among the isolates of the first outbreak, 3 antibiotypes with 1 subtype and 2 genotypes with 1 subtype in the second outbreak, and 2 antibiotypes and 2 genotypes in the third outbreak.

CONCLUSIONS

Klebsiella outbreaks mainly affected premature neonates with intravenous catheters, mechanical ventilation, or both. The high mortality rate (76.7%) was notable. Resistance to multiple antibiotics, but mainly to broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics, was observed, particularly in K. pneumoniae isolates. Molecular typing indicated that the three outbreaks were not related to one other.

All great truths are iconoclastic: selective decontamination of the digestive tract moves from heresy to level 1 truth

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare evidence of the effectiveness, costs and safety of the traditional parenteral antibiotic-only approach against that gathered from 53 randomised trials involving more than 8,500 patients and six meta-analyses on selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) to control infection on the intensive care unit (ICU). PHILOSOPHY: Traditionalists believe that all infections are due to breaches of hygiene except those established in the first 2 days, and that all micro-organisms can cause death. In contrast, newer insights show that transmission via the hands of carers are responsible only for infections occurring after one week, and that only a limited range of 15 potential pathogens contribute to mortality. INTERVENTIONS TO PREVENT ICU INFECTION: The traditional approach is based on hand disinfection aiming at the prevention of transmission of all micro-organisms, to control all infections that occur after 2 days on the ICU. The second feature is the restrictive use of systemic antibiotics, only in cases of microbiologically proven infection. In contrast, SDD aims to control the three types of infection: primary, secondary endogenous and exogenous due to 15 potential pathogens. The classical SDD tetralogy comprises four components: (i) a parenteral antibiotic, cefotaxime, administered for three days to prevent primary endogenous infections typically occurring "early"; (ii) the oropharyngeal and enteral antimicrobials, polymyxin E, tobramycin and amphotericin B administered in throat and gut throughout the treatment on the ICU to prevent secondary endogenous infections tending to develop "late"; (iii) a high standard of hygiene to control transmission of potential pathogens; and (iv) surveillance samples of throat and rectum to monitor the efficacy of the treatment.

ENDPOINTS

(i) Infectious morbidity; (ii) mortality; (iii) antimicrobial resistance; and (iv) costs.

RESULTS

Properly designed trials on hand disinfection have never demonstrated a reduction in either pneumonia and septicaemia, or mortality. Two randomised trials using restrictive antibiotic policies failed to show a survival benefit at 28 days. In both trials the proportion of resistant isolates obtained from the lower ways was >60% despite significantly less use of antibiotics in the test group. A formal cost effectiveness analysis of the traditional antibiotic policies has not been performed. On the other hand, two meta-analyses have shown that SDD reduces the odds ratio for lower airway infections to 0.35 (0.29-0.41) and mortality to 0.80 (0.69-0.93), with a 6% overall mortality reduction from 30% to 24%. No increase in the rate of super infections due to resistant bacteria could be demonstrated over a period of 20 years of clinical research. Four randomised trials found the cost per survivor to be substantially lower in patients receiving SDD than for those traditionally managed.

CONCLUSIONS

The traditionalists still rely on level 5 evidence, i.e. expert opinion, with a grade E recommendation, whilst the proponents of SDD are able to cite level 1 evidence allowing a grade A recommendation in their attempts to control infection on the ICU. The main reason for SDD not being widely used is the primacy of opinion over evidence.

Oropharyngeal carriage and lower airway colonisation/infection in 45 tracheotomised children

BACKGROUND

A study was undertaken to determine the oropharyngeal carrier state of potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPM) and the magnitude of colonisation and infection rates of the lower airways with these PPM in children requiring long term ventilation first transtracheally and afterwards via a tracheotomy.

METHODS

A 5 year, prospective, observational cohort study was undertaken in 45 children (33 boys) of median age 6.4 months (range 0-180) over a 5 year period at the Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust of Alder Hey, a university affiliated tertiary referral centre. The children were first admitted to the 20-bed paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and, following placement of a tracheotomy, they were transferred to a four bedded respiratory ward. The two main indications were neurological disorders and airway obstruction. All children were ventilated transtracheally for a median period of 12 days (range 0-103) and, after placement of the tracheotomy, for a similar period of 12 days (range 1-281). Surveillance cultures of the oropharynx were taken on admission to the PICU and on the day of placement of the tracheotomy. Throat swabs were taken twice weekly during ventilation, both transtracheal and via the tracheotomy. Tracheal aspirates were taken once weekly and when clinically indicated (in cases where the lower airway secretions were turbid).

RESULTS

Twenty five patients (55%) had abnormal flora, mainly aerobic Gram negative bacilli (AGNB), particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while the community PPM Staphylococcus aureus was present in the oropharynx of 37% (17/45) of the study population. The lower airways were sterile in six children; the other 39 patients (87%) had a total of 82 episodes of colonisation. "Community" PPM significantly increased once the patients received a tracheotomy, independent of the number of patients enrolled, episodes of colonisation/infection, and the number of colonised/infected patients. "Hospital" PPM significantly decreased after tracheotomy only when episodes were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

While P aeruginosa present in the admission flora caused primary endogenous colonisation/infection during mechanical ventilation on the PICU, S aureus not carried in the throat was responsible for the exogenous colonisation/infection once the patients had a tracheotomy. This is in sharp contrast to adult studies where exogenous infections are invariably caused by AGNB. This discrepancy may be explained by chronic underlying conditions such as diabetes, alcoholism, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which promote AGNB, whereas the children were recovering following tracheotomy.

Antibiotic resistance in the intensive care unit

The increase in antibiotic resistance over the past 10 years can be traced to several factors. This includes exogenous transmission of bacteria, usually by hospital personnel. The use of potent antibiotics also can select for resistant bacteria initially present in low quantities. Strategies to reduce antibiotic resistance can be tailored to specific outbreaks in a given ICU. General strategies for reducing antibiotic resistance, on the other hand, include varying the agents used in the ICU over time. Reduction of the duration of therapy may prove to be another method of reducing antibiotic resistance.