Risk Factors for Prophylaxis Failure in Patients Receiving Aerosol Pentamidine for Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia Prophylaxis

Clinical conditions associated with PCP in children

Pneumocystis jirovecii is a leading cause of opportunistic infections among the immune compromised. During the 1980s, attention focused on patients with HIV, however, with the advent of anti-retroviral therapy, we wished to revisit the question of underlying diseases associated with Pneumocystis pneumonia in children. We identified 80 cases from 1986 to 2006 and performed a retrospective chart review to identify clinical characteristics for each of the cases. HIV was the single most common associated underlying condition seen in this cohort, accounting for 39% of the cases overall, however, it was seen in just 15% of the cases since 1998. Transplant recipients and oncology patients together comprised another 39% of the cases, with 9% of cases attributed to primary immune deficiency and another 9% of cases associated with less well-recognized causes of susceptibility. This study documents the ongoing need for vigilance to diagnose Pneumocystis pneumonia in less well-recognized clinical scenarios.

Aerosolized pentamidine prophylaxis against AIDS-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and its short- and long-term effects on pulmonary function in the Japanese

We evaluated the incidence of prophylaxis failure with aerosolized pentamidine (AP) for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in Japanese patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and we examined the short- and long-term effects of AP on pulmonary function. The patients inhaled 300 mg of pentamidine by ultrasonic nebulizer, after the inhalation of procaterol (80 micrograms), every 4 weeks. PCP developed in 2 of 16 patients receiving primary prophylaxis with AP, and in 4 of 13 patients with secondary prophylaxis. The CD4(+) T-lymphocyte count was very low in the patients with prophylaxis failure. The chest radiographic presentations were atypical in 4 of the 6 patients with prophylaxis failure. There were no significant changes in the vital capacity (VC), VC/predictive VC (%VC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1.0)), FEV(1.0)/forced vital capacity (FEV(1.0)%), and maximum expiratory flow rate at 25% of vital capacity (MEF(25))/height comparing values before and after initial AP treatment. However, a reduction of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) of over 3% was noted in 4 patients during the initial AP administration. In 9 patients receiving AP prophylaxis for more than 36 months, we compared the pulmonary function parameters between the baseline and final observations (mean, 52.7 months). There were no changes in VC, %VC, FEV(1.0,) FEV(1.0)%, and SpO(2), but there was a statistically significant decline in MEF(25)/height after long-term AP treatment. We concluded that the incidence of prophylaxis failure with AP for PCP in Japanese patients was similar to that in Western patients, and that long-term AP treatment affected MEF(25)/height in spite of the safe pulmonary effects in short-term AP inhalation.