Combined effects of a nasal dilator and nasal prongs on nasal airflow resistance

Computational analysis of nasal airflow and its alteration by a nasal dilator

Nasal airflow obstruction correlates with several ailments, such as higher patency, increased friction at the mucosal wall or the so-called Little's area, improper air conditioning, and snoring. Nasal dilators are frequently employed, mainly due to their ease of access and use, combined with their non-permanent and non-surgical nature. Their overall efficacy, however, has not been clearly demonstrated so far, with some studies reporting conflicting outcomes, mainly because being based on subjective evaluations. This study employs Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations to analyze the flow inside a real nose, performs an objective assessment of a nasal dilator's effect in terms of airflow and air conditioning, reporting flow paths, friction levels, heat and water fluxes and detailed temperature and humidity distributions. Coincidentally, the studied nose presents a septal deviation, with one nostril being wider than the other. The tubes of the dilator used in both nostrils are identical, as with any standard commercial dilator. Consequently, the dilator widens one nostril, as intended, but results in an obstruction in the other. This allows simultaneously addressing two situations, the nominal function of the dilator, as well as an off-design case. Results indicate a 24 % increase in nasal patency in the design situation. The effect, however, is limited, as quantified by appropriate measures, such as the flow-generated friction at the nose surfaces and the temperature fluxes. Hence, the effect of such a dilator in nominal conditions is perhaps not as large as might be hoped. In the off-design situation, nasal resistance increases by 62 %, an undesirable effect, illustrating the consequences of using an inappropriate dilator.

Sleep, breathing and the nose

During sleep there is a discrete fall in minute ventilation and an associated increase in upper airway resistance. In normal subjects, the nasal part of the upper airway contributes only little to the elevation of the total resistance, which is mainly the consequence of pharyngeal narrowing. Yet, swelling of the nasal mucosa due to congestion of the submucosal capacitance vessels may significantly affect nasal airflow. In many healthy subjects an alternating pattern of congestion and decongestion of the nasal passages is observed. Some individuals demonstrate congestion of the ipsilateral half of the nasal cavity when lying down on the side. Nasal diseases, including structural anomalies and various forms of rhinitis, tend to increase nasal resistance, which typically impairs breathing via the nasal route in recumbency and during sleep. A role of nasal obstruction in the pathogenesis of sleep-disordered breathing has been implicated by many authors. While it proves difficult to show a relationship between the degree of nasal obstruction and the number of disturbed breathing events, the presence of nasal obstruction will most likely have an impact on the severity of sleep-disordered breathing. Identification of nasal obstruction is important in the diagnostic work-up of patients suffering from snoring and sleep apnea.

Treatment of nasal valve collapse with transcutaneous and intranasal electric stimulation

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study of patients presenting with symptoms of obstructed nasal breathing to determine whether electrotherapy could provide nonsurgical symptom relief. Forty patients were divided into an electrotherapy group (n = 20) and a placebo group (n = 20). All selected patients demonstrated nasal valve stenosis with a positive Cottle maneuver and clinically evident nasal valve collapse. Treatment consisted of high-frequency transcutaneous and intranasal electric stimulation of nasal muscles for 15 minutes, 3 times a week for 10 weeks. Treated patients were followed for 10 to 12 months. Twelve patients in the electrotherapy group (60%) exhibited subjective improvement; in 8 cases (40%), the improvement was proved objectively. In the placebo group, 7 patients (35%) indicated subjective improvement; and in one case (5%), the improvement was proved objectively. Follow-up visits showed a rapid decline of positive results when treatment was discontinued. Therefore, we concluded that sure relief of nasal valve stenosis and collapse cannot be achieved with treatment by electric stimulation alone, and this method appears to have limited application. However, further studies are needed to determine whether electrotherapy used in combination with other treatments (e.g., biofeedback training or nasal springs) may provide more lasting relief for patients who want to avoid endonasal surgical intervention.

Comparison of Nasal Prong Pressure and Thermistor Measurements for Detecting Respiratory Events during Sleep

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Thermistor (TH) measurements have been traditionally used to determine airflow during polysomnographic studies (PSG). However, low accuracy in detecting hypopneas is a major drawback. Nasal prong pressure (NPP) measurements are becoming increasingly popular for quantifying respiratory events during sleep. We prospectively compared NPP and TH measurements with respect to their ability to detect respiratory events during routine PSG.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients (26 male, 14 female) with clinically suspected sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) underwent routine diagnostic PSG. Airflow was measured using NPP and TH devices simultaneously. PSG was scored manually according to R and K criteria. Respiratory events were scored in two passes. During the first pass, the TH signal was disabled and the NPP signal was scored. During the second pass, the NPP signal was disabled and the TH signal was scored. Scorers for one method were blinded from the results of the other method. To assess respiratory events, we used the respiratory arousal index (RAI), which was defined as the number of apneas and/or hypopneas followed by an arousal per hour of sleep, as detected by TH (RAI-TH) or NPP (RAI- NPP). Agreement analysis of the results obtained using the two different techniques was performed using the methodology of Bland-Altman.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients had obstructive sleep apnea, 10 had respiratory effort-related arousals and 4 had habitual snoring. The failure time of the flow signal on the raw data was not different between the two methods (NPP: 6 +/- 13 min, TH: 4 +/- 7 min). The Bland-Altman analysis of RAIs demonstrated that more events were nearly always detected using NPP compared to TH devices (44.4 +/- 37 vs. 35.4 +/- 31, p < 0.001). No difference in the index of central apneas between the two methods could be detected. Sleep position had no effect on either measurement method.

CONCLUSIONS

NPP measurements are superior to TH measurements for detecting obstructive respiratory events during sleep. Measurement of NPP is a simple, practical, sensitive and reliable method for detecting the whole spectrum of SDB. We recommend incorporating nasal prongs in routine polysomnographic monitoring.

Comparison between anatomy and resistance of upper airway in normal subjects, snorers and OSAS patients

Upper airway (UA) anatomical abnormalities are frequently observed in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). The correspondence between UA anatomical modifications and UA resistance (UAR) had not been studied. We aimed to determine if cephalometric characteristics could be related to segmental UAR. In twenty-five patients (21 males) (15 OSAS patients, 10 snorers) and 10 control subjects (8 males), segmental UAR were measured in supine position and cephalometry was performed. Inspiratory and expiratory UAR were calculated at peak flow. Length of the soft palate (LP), posterior airway space (PAS), distance from hyoid bone to mandibular plane and to posterior pharyngeal wall were different between the groups (P<0.01). Inspiratory and expiratory, total and segmental, UAR were higher in OSAS (P<0.001). Segmental UAR were correlated with PAS and distance from hyoid bone to mandibular plane and to pharyngeal posterior wall (P<0.05). In conclusion, OSAS patients had higher UAR depending on anatomical variables, especially the place of the hyoid bone.