Thalidomide for chronic sarcoidosis

[Therapeutic Pathways in Sarcoidosis. A Position Paper of the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP)]

The present recommendations on the therapy of sarcoidosis of the German Respiratory Society (DGP) was written in 2023 as a German-language supplement and update of the international guidelines of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) from 2021. It contains 5 PICO questions (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) agreed in the consensus process, which are explained in the background text of the four articles: Confirmation of diagnosis and monitoring of the disease under therapy, general therapy recommendations, therapy of cutaneous sarcoidosis, therapy of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Cutaneous Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease that most commonly affects the lungs, lymphatic system, eyes, and skin but any organ may be involved. Cutaneous sarcoidosis most commonly presents as pink-red to red-brown papules and plaques that commonly affect the head and neck. With the skin being readily accessible for evaluation and biopsy, when sarcoidosis is suspected, dermatologic evaluation may be helpful for establishing a definitive diagnosis. Treatment strategy depends on the severity and distribution of skin lesions and should incorporate patient preference and treatment considerations for other organs that may be involved.

Efficacy and safety of mTOR inhibition in cutaneous sarcoidosis: a single-centre trial

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory condition that can affect various organs and tissues, causing the formation of granulomas and subsequent functional impairment. The origin of sarcoidosis remains unknown and there are few treatment options. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation is commonly seen in granulomas of patients across different tissues and has been shown to induce sarcoidosis-like granulomas in a mouse model. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus as a treatment for cutaneous sarcoidosis.

METHODS

We did a single-centre, randomised study treating patients with persistent and glucocorticoid-refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis with sirolimus at the Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna (Vienna, Austria). We recruited participants who had persistent, active, and histologically proven cutaneous sarcoidosis. We used an n-of-1 crossover design in a placebo-controlled, double-blind topical treatment period and a subsequent single-arm systemic treatment phase for 4 months in the same participants. Participants initially received either 0·1% topical sirolimus in Vaseline or placebo (Vaseline alone), twice daily. After a washout period, all participants were subsequently administered a 6 mg loading dose followed by 2 mg sirolimus solution orally once daily, aiming to achieve serum concentrations of 6 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was change in the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Index (CSAMI) after topical or systemic treatment. All participants were included in the safety analyses, and patients having completed the respective treatment period (topical treatment or systemic treatment) were included in the primary analyses. Adverse events were assessed at each study visit by clinicians and were categorised according to their correlation with the study drug, severity, seriousness, and expectedness. This study is registered with EudraCT (2017-004930-27) and is now closed.

FINDINGS

16 participants with persistent cutaneous sarcoidosis were enrolled in the study between Sept 3, 2019, and June 15, 2021. Six (37%) of 16 participants were men, ten (63%) were women, and 15 (94%) were White. The median age of participants was 54 years (IQR 48-58). 14 participants were randomly assigned in the topical phase and 2 entered the systemic treatment phase directly. Daily topical treatment did not improve cutaneous lesions (effect estimate -1·213 [95% CI -2·505 to 0·079], p=0·066). Systemic treatment targeting trough serum concentrations of 6 ng/mL resulted in clinical and histological improvement of skin lesions in seven (70%) of ten participants (median -7·0 [95% CI -16·5 to -3·0], p=0·018). Various morphologies of cutaneous sarcoidosis, including papular, nodular, plaque, scar, and tattoo-associated sarcoidosis, responded to systemic sirolimus therapy with a long-lasting effect for more than 1 year after treatment had been stopped. There were no serious adverse events and no deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Short-term treatment with systemic sirolimus might be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with persistent glucocorticoid-refractory sarcoidosis with a long-lasting disease-modulating effect. The effect of sirolimus in granulomatous inflammation should be investigated further in large, multi-centre, randomised clinical trials.

FUNDING

Vienna Science and Technology Fund, Austrian Science Fund.

The role of thalidomide in dermatology

Thalidomide is a medication that has been in existence for over half a century, and has proven to be useful and effective in severe dermatological conditions. For dermatologists, the ability of thalidomide to reduce the levels of the cytokine tumour necrosis factor-α, along with its immunomodulatory and anti-angiogenic properties, is of great significance, with the added advantage of being an oral medication. Its use is of course strictly monitored, owing to its potential adverse effects (AEs), particularly teratogenicity, with precautions taken to ensure its safe and correct use by both prescriber and patient. In this review, we look at the background and mechanism of action of thalidomide, provide an overview of conditions it can be used for with case examples, explain the potential AEs and monitoring requirements, and discuss future developments.

A Comprehensive Review of Sarcoidosis Treatment for Pulmonologists

Due to frequent lung involvement, the pulmonologist is often the reference physician for management of sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disease with a heterogeneous course. Treatment of sarcoidosis raises some issues. The first challenge is to select patients who are likely to benefit from treatment, as sarcoidosis may be self-limiting and remit spontaneously, in which case treatment can be postponed and possibly avoided without any significant impact on quality of life, organ damage or prognosis. Systemic glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are the drug of first choice for sarcoidosis. When GCs are started, there is a > 50% chance of long-term treatment. Prolonged use of prednisone at > 10 mg/day or equivalent is often associated with severe side effects. In these and refractory cases, steroid-sparing options are advised. Antimetabolites, such as methotrexate, are the second-choice therapy. Biologics, such as anti-TNF and especially infliximab, are third-choice drugs. The three treatments can be used concomitantly. Regardless of whether treatment is started, the clinician needs to organize regular follow-up to monitor remissions, flares, progression, complications, toxicity and relapses in order to promptly adjust the drugs used.

ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations.

RESULTS

The TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment.

MESSAGE

An evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.

Biologic and advanced immunomodulating therapeutic options for sarcoidosis: a clinical update

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations and outcomes. A quarter of sarcoidosis patients require long-term treatment for chronic disease. In this group, corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents be insufficient to control diseaseAreas covered: Several biologic agents have been studied for treatment of chronic pulmonary and extra-pulmonary disease. A review of the available literature was performed searching PubMed and an expert opinion regarding specific therapy was developed.Expert opinion: These agents have the potential of treating patients who have progressive disease. Many of these agents have different mechanisms of action, response rates, and toxicity profiles.

Indications for treatment of sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the current knowledge on indications for sarcoidosis treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the lack of evidence-based recommendations, the sarcoidosis community has adopted the concept of starting systemic anti-inflammatory treatment because of potential danger (risk of severe dysfunction on major organs or death) or unacceptable impaired quality of life (QoL). On the contrary, while QoL and functionality are patients' priorities, few studies have evaluated treatment effect on patient-reported outcomes. The awareness of long-term corticosteroids toxicities and consequences on QoL and the emergence of novel drugs have changed therapeutic management. Second-line therapy, mainly methotrexate and azathioprine, are indicated for corticosteroids sparing or corticosteroids-resistant sarcoidosis. TNF-α inhibitors are a useful third-line therapy in chronic refractory disease. In addition to organ-targeted treatment, efforts should also be taken for treating nonorgan-specific symptoms, such as physical training for fatigue, and various disease complications.

SUMMARY

Clinicians should offer a tailored treatment for each patient and ensure a holistic multidisciplinary approach, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Patient-centered communication is critical to drive shared decisions, in particular for the tricky situation of isolated impaired QoL as the unique therapeutic indication. Once treatment is decided, clinicians should define a clear therapeutic plan, including goals and instruments to assess response.

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disorder of unknown cause that is characterized by granuloma formation in affected organs, most often in the lungs. Patients frequently suffer from cough, shortness of breath, chest pain and pronounced fatigue and are at risk of developing lung fibrosis or irreversible damage to other organs. The disease develops in genetically predisposed individuals with exposure to an as-yet unknown antigen. Genetic factors affect not only the risk of developing sarcoidosis but also the disease course, which is highly variable and difficult to predict. The typical T cell accumulation, local T cell immune response and granuloma formation in the lungs indicate that the inflammatory response in sarcoidosis is induced by specific antigens, possibly including self-antigens, which is consistent with an autoimmune involvement. Diagnosis can be challenging for clinicians because of the potential for almost any organ to be affected. As the aetiology of sarcoidosis is unknown, no specific treatment and no pathognomic markers exist. Thus, improved biomarkers to determine disease activity and to identify patients at risk of developing fibrosis are needed. Corticosteroids still constitute the first-line treatment, but new treatment strategies, including those targeting quality-of-life issues, are being evaluated and should yield appropriate, personalized and more effective treatments.

Sinonasal and Laryngeal Sarcoidosis-An Uncommon Presentation and Management Challenge

Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of uncertain etiology characterized by the formation of noncaseating granulomas. The thorax is involved in 95% of cases, but any organ can be involved. Sinonasal or laryngeal involvement is uncommon and can be difficult to diagnose. The reported incidence of sarcoidosis in the upper airway clearly depends on study characteristics, and this creates uncertainty about the actual incidence. In a large prospective study in the United States, upper respiratory tract involvement occurred in 3% of the patients. Some patients have upper airway involvement without thoracic disease, and this presentation may cause delays in diagnosis. These patients have nonspecific symptoms which range from minimal nasal stuffiness to life-threatening upper airway obstruction. Currently, there is no established standard therapy for the management of upper airway sarcoidosis. These patients often respond poorly to nasal and/or inhaled corticosteroids and require long courses of oral corticosteroids. Patients with poor responses to oral corticosteroids or severe side effects may respond to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors. In this review, we will discuss the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnostic tests, drug treatment, surgical management options and the challenges clinicians have managing these patients.

Thalidomide for steroid-dependent chronic disseminated candidiasis after stem cell transplantation: A case report

Chronic disseminated candidiasis (CDC) is a rare and difficult-to-treat invasive fungal disease occurring mainly after prolonged and profound neutropenia. We describe the case of a 59-year-old man successfully treated with thalidomide for CDC recurrences after an autologous transplantation. We add evidence of the effectiveness of immunomodulatory drugs to manage inflammatory reconstitution immune syndrome-related refractory CDC.

Treatment of Sarcoidosis

Treatment of sarcoidosis is not required in all patients with the diagnosis. The decision to treat and the strategy for how to treat usually require input and shared decision making by the patient. Some common consequences of sarcoidosis are not caused by granulomatous inflammation, but may be the dominant disease manifestation and should be actively considered when formulating a treatment plan. The medication regimen should be tailored to each patient. Steroid-sparing medications should be prescribed early as part of a long-term strategy.

Cytotoxic agents in sarcoidosis: which one should we choose?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease which affects multiple organs. Its therapeutic management is very challenging due to the heterogeneity in disease manifestation and clinical course, as well as the potential side effects of the immunosuppressive therapy. An overview of presently available second-line and third-line systemic agents is provided.

RECENT FINDINGS

Because curative treatment is currently not available for sarcoidosis, nonspecific immunosuppression with prednisone remains the first-choice therapy. However, as chronic use of corticosteroids is accompanied with severe adverse events, timely implementation of appropriate steroid-sparing cytotoxic agents is important. Commonly prescribed second-line agents in sarcoidosis are methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide and hydroxychloroquine. Nevertheless, the evidence supporting their use is limited. Third-line treatment options, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab and the experimental therapeutic rituximab, are currently reserved for patients refractory to standard therapy.

SUMMARY

A better insight into the advantages and disadvantages of second-line and third-line treatment is important. The long-term effects of immunosuppressive agents, the optimal starting and maintenance dosages, and the best interval and discontinuation regimens should be elucidated. Identified associations of polymorphisms with treatment response suggest a step towards personalized medicine. Future research should focus on the role for pharmacogenetic and phenotypic predictors of treatment response and toxicity.

TNF-α: a treatment target or cause of sarcoidosis?

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease that affects numerous organs, commonly manifesting at the lungs and skin. While corticosteroids remain the first line of treatment, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors have been investigated as one potential steroid sparing treatment for sarcoidosis. TNF-α is one of many components involved in the formation of granulomas in sarcoidosis. While there have been larger scale studies of biologic TNF-α inhibition in systemic sarcoidosis, studies in cutaneous disease are limited. Paradoxically, in some patients treated with biologic TNF-α inhibitors for other diseases, treatment can induce the development of sarcoidosis. In the light of this complexity, we discuss the role of TNF-α in granuloma formation, the therapeutic role of TNF-α inhibition and immunologic abnormalities following treatment with these TNF-α inhibitors including drug-specific alterations involving interferon-γ, lymphotoxin-α, TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) and T-regulatory cells.

Anti-TNF therapeutics for the treatment of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease with an incidence of 1 to 40 per 100 000 persons per year. It predominantly affects people in the age of 20 to 40 years old. Disease course varies from mild self-limiting to chronic debilitating and life-threatening disease. Since the cause of sarcoidosis is unknown, curative therapy is not available. Immunosuppressive drugs may, however, control the symptoms of the disease. The hallmark of sarcoidosis is the formation of granulomas that are most commonly found in lungs and lymph nodes. As TNF plays an important role in both formation and maintenance of these granulomas, as well as in the immune response, anti-TNF biologicals such as infliximab and adalimumab are considered a last resort therapeutic option. Clinical effectiveness, however, varies considerably and data showing which patients would benefit most from this expensive therapy are scarce. This review summarizes current knowledge on anti-TNF therapeutics in sarcoidosis, and describes insights on prediction of response, outcome measures and antibody development.

Thalidomide in dermatology: revisited

The use of thalidomide in relation to dermatology is well- known and enough data is available in the literature about various aspects of thalidomide. Despite being an interesting and useful drug for many dermatoses, it is associated with many health hazards including the birth defects, phocomelia. We hereby present a comprehensive review about thalidomide and its application in dermatology.

A randomized, investigator-masked, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on thalidomide in severe cutaneous sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Thalidomide use in cutaneous sarcoidosis is based on data from small case series or case reports. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thalidomide in severe cutaneous sarcoidosis.

METHODS

This study consisted of a randomized, double-bind, parallel, placebo-controlled, investigator-masked, multicenter trial lasting 3 months and an open-label study from month 3 to month 6. Adults with a clinical and histologic diagnosis of cutaneous sarcoidosis were included in nine hospital centers in France. Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral thalidomide (100 mg once daily) or to a matching oral placebo for 3 months. In the course of an open-label follow-up from month 3 to month 6, all patients received thalidomide, 100 mg to 200 mg daily. The proportions of patients with a partial or complete cutaneous response at month 3, based on at least a 50% improvement in three target lesions scored for area and infiltration, were compared across randomization groups.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population included 39 patients. None of them had a complete cutaneous response. Four out of 20 patients in the thalidomide group (20%) vs four out of 19 patients in the placebo group (21%) had a partial cutaneous response at month 3 (difference in proportion of -1% [95% CI, -26% to +24%] for thalidomide vs placebo, P = 1.0). Eight patients with side effects were recorded in the thalidomide group vs three in the placebo group. We observed a large number of adverse event-related discontinuations in patients taking thalidomide in the first 3 months (four patients with thalidomide, zero with placebo) and in the 3 following months (five patients).

CONCLUSIONS

At a dose of 100 mg daily for 3 months, our results do not encourage thalidomide use in cutaneous sarcoidosis.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT0030552; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Current best practice in the management of pulmonary and systemic sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that is characterized by the presence of granulomatous inflammation in affected tissues. It can affect essentially any organ system but shows a predilection for the lungs, eyes, and skin. Accurate epidemiological data are not available in the USA, but sarcoidosis is considered a 'rare disease' (prevalence less than 200,000). However, recent epidemiologic studies indicate that regional prevalence is much higher than previously estimated, especially among African American women. Additionally, mortality rates of patients with sarcoidosis are increasing by 3% per year over the past two decades. The most common causes of death are attributed to progressive lung disease and cardiac sarcoidosis, and the health of the patients is further compromised by other systemic manifestations. As such, the management of sarcoidosis requires a collaborative multidisciplinary approach. We aim to discuss the principles of managing sarcoidosis, including standards of care relating to pulmonary disease as well as recent advances relating to the detection and treatment of extrapulmonary manifestations.

Approaches to the treatment of some of the troublesome manifestations of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis can be a major therapeutic challenge given its multiplicity of clinical presentations, variable combination of organ involvement and severity, and unpredictable longitudinal behaviour. Six manifestations of sarcoidosis are especially difficult to manage because of (i) an incomplete knowledge of causation - fatigue and small fibre neuropathy, (ii) the rare occurrence in sarcoidosis - intra-abdominal complications or (iii) the potentially life-threatening consequences in some patients - neurological disease, pulmonary hypertension and hypercalcaemia. In none of these situations have a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of any therapy been conducted. Despite this absence of any firm evidence base to support therapeutic recommendations, these six entities can be extremely problematic for the practising clinician. It is for this reason that we have focused in this review on these six disease manifestations and provided a synopsis of each problem together with suggested treatment approaches, based on an analysis of the current literature.

An update on granulomatous diseases of the oral tissues

With new insights into the pathogenesis of specific granulomatous diseases, and with the advent of high-throughput genetic screening and availability of next-generation biological therapies, clinicians have several options at their disposal to help ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. This article highlights some of the current knowledge about the more common granulomatous systemic diseases that may be encountered in clinical practice.

Reliability and convergent validity of the cutaneous sarcoidosis activity and morphology instrument for assessing cutaneous sarcoidosis

IMPORTANCE

A validated scoring system is essential to assess the effect of therapeutic interventions on a disease. The instrument introduced here captures sarcoidosis disease activity in a reliable, reproducible manner, which will help standardize clinical trial outcomes and allow comparative efficacy studies in the future and may help lead to more robust data regarding the effect of different treatments on cutaneous sarcoidosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability and convergent validity of the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Instrument (CSAMI) and Sarcoidosis Activity and Severity Index (SASI) for evaluating cutaneous sarcoidosis outcomes.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional study evaluating cutaneous sarcoidosis disease severity using CSAMI, SASI, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) as reference in the dedicated cutaneous sarcoidosis clinic of a teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight dermatologists evaluating cutaneous sarcoidosis in 11 patients.

INTERVENTION

Evaluation using the study instruments.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes included interrater and intrarater reliability and convergent validity; secondary outcomes, correlation with quality-of-life measures and time required for completion.

RESULTS

All instruments demonstrated good to excellent intrarater reliability. Interrater reliability was excellent for CSAMI Activity scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.66-0.94]) and fair to poor for CSAMI Damage scores (0.42 [0.21-0.72]), modified Facial SASI (0.40 [0.17-0.72]), and PGA scores (0.40 [0.18-0.70]). CSAMI Activity and Damage scores and modified Facial SASI all demonstrated convergent validity with statistically significant correlations with PGA scores. Trends for correlations were seen between CSAMI scores and specific Skindex-29 quality-of-life domains. Although CSAMI required longer time to complete than SASI, both were scored within adequate time for use in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

CSAMI appears to be a reliable and valid outcome instrument to measure cutaneous sarcoidosis and may capture a wide range of body surface and cutaneous morphologic types. This instrument can be adopted into clinical practice and clinical trials to allow physicians to assess the intensity of their patients' cutaneous sarcoidosis disease activity. Widespread use of one metric for disease severity assessment can help standardize the evaluation of the effect of various treatments on the disease. Future research is necessary to demonstrate its sensitivity to change and to confirm its correlation with quality-of-life measures.

Cryptococcosis in sarcoidosis: cryptOsarc, a comparative study of 18 cases

AIM

To describe the main characteristics and the treatment of cryptococcosis in patients with sarcoidosis.

DESIGN

Multicenter study including all patients notified at the French National Reference Center for Invasive Mycoses and Antifungals.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review. Each case was compared with two controls without opportunistic infections.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases of cryptococcosis complicating sarcoidosis were analyzed (13 men and 5 women). With 2749 cases of cryptococcosis registered in France during the inclusion period of this study, sarcoidosis accounted for 0.6% of all the cryptococcosis patients and for 2.9% of the cryptococcosis HIV-seronegative patients. Cryptococcosis and sarcoidosis were diagnosed concomitantly in four cases; while sarcoidosis was previously known in 14/18 patients, including 12 patients (67%) treated with steroids. The median rate of CD4 T cells was 145 per mm(3) (range: 55-1300) and not related to steroid treatment. Thirteen patients had cryptococcal meningitis (72%), three osteoarticular (17%) and four disseminated infections (22%). Sixteen patients (89%) presented a complete response to antifungal therapy. After a mean follow-up of 6 years, no death was attributable to cryptococcosis. Extra-thoracic sarcoidosis and steroids were independent risk factors of cryptococcosis in a logistic regression model adjusted with the sex of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryptococcosis is a significant opportunistic infection during extra-thoracic sarcoidosis, which occurs in one-third of the cases in patients without any treatment; it is not associated to severe CD4 lymphocytopenia and has a good prognosis.

Current and emerging pharmacological treatments for sarcoidosis: a review

The treatment of sarcoidosis is not standardized. Because sarcoidosis may never cause significant symptoms or organ dysfunction, treatment is not mandatory. When treatment is indicated, oral corticosteroids are usually recommended because they are highly likely to be effective in a relative short period of time. However, because sarcoidosis is often a chronic condition, long-term treatment with corticosteroids may cause significant toxicity. Therefore, corticosteroid sparing agents are often indicated in patients requiring chronic therapy. This review outlines the indications for treatment, corticosteroid treatment, and corticosteroid sparing treatments for sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis: a comprehensive review and update for the dermatologist: part I. Cutaneous disease

Sarcoidosis is a common systemic, noncaseating granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. The development of sarcoidosis has been associated with a number of environmental factors and genes. Cutaneous sarcoidosis, the "great imitator," can baffle clinicians because of its diverse manifestations and its ability to resemble both common and rare cutaneous diseases. Depending on the type, location, and distribution of the lesions, treatment can prevent functional impairment, symptomatic distress, scarring, and disfigurement. Numerous therapeutic options are available for the treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis, but there are few well designed trials to guide practitioners on evidence-based, best practice management. In part I, we review the current knowledge and advances in the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, and genetics of sarcoidosis, discuss the heterogeneous manifestations of cutaneous sarcoidosis, and provide a guide for treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis.

Therapy for sarcoidosis: evidence-based recommendations

The options for treatment of sarcoidosis have expanded. In this article, we outline a stepwise approach to treatment. Recommendations for treatment are based on available evidence. While corticosteroids remain the treatment of choice for initial systemic therapy, other agents have been shown to be steroid sparing, and therefore useful for long-term management. In addition, new agents have proved to be useful for patients with refractory disease.

Neuro-ophthalmologic Manifestations of Sarcoidosis

The first-line treatment for the neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of sarcoidosis is corticosteroid therapy. Prednisone, 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day, is initially prescribed for 2 to 4 weeks, before a slow taper is begun as the patient's symptoms and examination are monitored. Patients frequently require adjunct therapy, which can be in the form of immunomodulatory drugs such as pentoxyfillin, hydroxychloroquine, or thalidomide, or immunosuppressive drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide. Individuals with profound visual compromise or progressive disease may benefit from high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone or tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists such as infliximab. Attention to the overall medical status of the patient is essential to ensure that an optimal clinical status is achieved.

Sarcoidosis--scientific progress and clinical challenges

Sarcoidosis is an uncommon systemic inflammatory disorder characterized by noncaseating granulomatous inflammation that most commonly affects the lungs, intrathoracic lymph nodes, eyes and skin. One-third or more of patients with sarcoidosis have chronic, unremitting inflammation with progressive organ impairment. Findings of family and genetic studies indicate a genetic susceptibility to sarcoidosis, with genes in the MHC region having a dominant role. Immunologic hallmarks of the disease include highly polarized expression of cytokines produced by type 1 T helper cells and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) at sites of inflammation. Increasing evidence obtained within the past decade suggests the etiology of sarcoidosis predominantly involves microbial triggers, with the most convincing data implicating mycobacterial or propionibacterial organisms. Innate immune mechanisms, possibly involving misfolding and aggregation of serum amyloid A, might have a critical role in the pathobiology of sarcoidosis. Despite these advances, there are no clinically useful biomarkers that can assist the clinician in diagnosis, prognosis or assessment of treatment effects. Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy when organ function is threatened or progressively impaired. The role of immunosuppressive drugs and anti-TNF agents in the treatment of sarcoidosis remains uncertain, and there are no FDA-approved therapies. Meaningful progress in developing clinically useful tools and new therapies will depend on further advances in understanding the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and its disease-specific pathways.

Cytokine modulators in the treatment of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous lung disease in which several cytokines play a pivotal pathogenetic role. Steroid-resistant disease can be treated with immunosuppressive drugs, antimalarial therapies and recently with anti-TNFα agents. The use of biological agents for the treatment of sarcoidosis springs from research into the pathogenesis of the disease and also from the experience of rheumatologists with other chronic inflammatory diseases. Rituximab, golimumab and ustekinumab are cytokine modulators, useful in the treatment of immunoinflammatory disorders, for which randomized trials to evaluate safety and efficacy in sarcoidosis are not yet available. Novel anticytokine drugs administered alone or in association may offer a new approach to treatment of the disease. This review focuses on recent advances in anti-TNFα agents and cytokine modulators for the treatment of sarcoidosis and their therapeutic prospects.

Innovative uses of thalidomide

Thalidomide is approved for treating erythema nodosum leprosum and multiple myeloma, but it has also emerged as a useful treatment option for many refractory dermatologic disorders. Some of the innovative but off-label uses of thalidomide include aphthous stomatitis, Behçet's disease, lupus erythematosus, prurigo nodularis, sarcoidosis, actinic prurigo, graft-versus-host disease, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, erythema multiforme, lichen planus, Kaposi sarcoma, Jessner lymphocytic infiltrate, uremic pruritus, pyoderma gangrenosum, scleroderma, scleromyxedema, and necrobiosis lipoidica. This article reviews the background, pharmacology, and innovative uses of thalidomide in dermatology.

Headache attributed to non-vascular intracranial disorder

This chapter deals with non-vascular intracranial disorders resulting in headache. Headache attributed to high or low cerebrospinal fluid pressure is separated into headache attributed to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), headache attributed to intracranial hypertension secondary to metabolic, toxic, or hormonal causes, headache attributed to intracranial hypertension secondary to hydrocephalus, post-dural puncture headache, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula headache, headache attributed to spontaneous (or idiopathic) low CSF pressure. Headache attributed to non-infectious inflammatory disease can be caused by neurosarcoidosis, aseptic (non-infectious) meningitis or lymphocytic hypophysitis. Headache attributed to intracranial neoplasm can be caused by increased intracranial pressure or hydrocephalus caused by neoplasm or attributed directly to neoplasm or carcinomatous meningitis. Other causes of headache include hypothalamic or pituitary hyper- or hyposecretion and intrathecal injection. Headache attributed to epileptic seizure is separated into hemicrania epileptica and post-seizure headache. Finally headache attributed to Chiari malformation type I (CM1) and the syndrome of transient headache and neurological deficits with cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis (HaNDL) are described.

Thalidomide prevents formation of multinucleated giant cells (Langhans-type cells) from cultured monocytes: possible pharmaceutical applications for granulomatous disorders

Thalidomide is an effective drug for chronic inflammatory diseases, but the mechanism underlying its immunomodulatory action remains uncertain. Thalidomide has been reported to clinically improve chronic inflammatory granulomatous disorders. In such disorders, the granulomas consist of epithelioid cells, scattered lymphocytes and multinucleated giant cells (MNGC; Langhans-type cells). The present experimental approach permitted the reproduction of MNGC formation from peripheral blood monocytes and examination of thalidomides effect on it. MNGC can be effectively generated from monocytes cultured in the presence of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor(M-CSF) for 14 days. Thalidomide can inhibit the formation of MNGC in a dose-dependent manner. MNGC formation was partly inhibited by the presence of neutralizing TNF-alpha antibody in the responses induced by IL-4 and M-CSF. Autocrinal TNF-alpha production and modulation of cadhelin expression to regulate cell adhesion might be involved in this inhibitory action of thalidomide. Our results support thalidomides clinical efficacy in the treatment of chronic granulomatous disorders (granulomatosis).

Recalcitrant cutaneous sarcoidosis: an evidence-based sequential approach

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous sarcoidosis in black-skinned people is more severe and, in a subset, recalcitrant to therapy. Management of these patients is a challenge.

AIM

To document the clinical features of recalcitrant cutaneous sarcoidosis (RCS) and its response to sequential therapy. A treatment algorithm is suggested.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was made of patients with RCS. Demographic data, clinical features, histology, blood parameters, radiology and management and response to therapy were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with cutaneous sarcoidosis were seen, of which six had recalcitrant lesions. All had black skin, with a male to female ratio of 1:5. The average age was 48.5 years (41-67) and the average duration of lesions was 11.3 years (2-29). Skin lesions were papules (three), plaques (four), annular (three), nodules (four), ulcers (one), alopecia (one) and lupus pernio (one). Extracutaneous involvement was noted in four of six patients as follows: pulmonary (three of six), dactylitis (two of six) and hepatosplenomegaly (one of six). Histopathology was undertaken in all confirmed non-caseating granulomas. None of the cases responded to systemic prednisone alone. Alternative therapies were: chloroquine (six of six), methotrexate (four of six), doxycycline (two of six), allopurinol (two of six) and isotretinoin (one of six), and azathioprine (one of six). All patients responded well to a stepwise approach to therapy using second-line agents with no relapses during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Sequential therapy avoids the side effects of toxic drugs whilst controlling aggressive cutaneous lesions.

Cardiac sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a rare but potentially fatal condition that may present with a wide range of clinical manifestations including congestive heart failure, conduction abnormalities, and most notably, sudden death. Recent advances in imaging technology allow easier detection of CS, but the diagnostic guidelines with inclusion of these techniques have yet to be written. It has become clear that minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic cardiac involvement is far more prevalent than previously thought. Because of the potential life-threatening complications and potential benefit of treatment, all patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis should be screened for cardiac involvement. Patients with CS and symptoms such as syncope need an aggressive workup for a potentially life-threatening etiology, and often require implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. CS patients without arrhythmic symptoms are still at risk for sudden death and may warrant an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention reasons. Although corticosteroids are regarded as the first-line drug of choice, therapy for CS is not yet standardized, and it is unclear at this point whether asymptomatic patients require therapy. Randomized clinical trials are clearly warranted to answer these very important patient care questions, and are endorsed fully by the authors.

Neurosarcoidosis

Although neurosarcoidosis seems to occur in only 5% to 10% of patients who have sarcoidosis, it may lead to significant complications. The diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis usually relies on indirect information from imaging and spinal fluid examination. Although MR imaging remains the most sensitive technique for detecting neurologic disease, other tests, including positron emission tomography scanning and cerebral spinal fluid examination, can provide important information. The role of immunosuppressive agents such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine has been expanded, and these agents should be considered for the treatment of some manifestations of neurosarcoidosis. Reports of the antitumor necrosis factor agent infliximab suggest that this drug can be helpful for patients who have neurosarcoidosis.