Chronic disorders of consciousness following coma: Part one: medical issues

The visual stimulation in disorders of consciousness

Severe brain damage usually leads to disorders of consciousness (DOC), which include coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and a minimally conscious state (MCS). Visual stimulation is widely used, especially in the diagnosis and treatment and treatment of DOC. Researchers have indicated that tests based on visual stimulation including visual pursuit, when used in conjunction with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, are able to differentiate between UWS from an MCS. Recently, targeting patients' circadian rhythms has been proposed to be a possible treatment target for DOC. Indeed, light therapy has been applied in some other fields, including treating seasonal affective disorder, sleep problems, and Parkinson's disease. However, at present, although visual stimulation and light therapy are frequently used in DOC, there is still no international unified standard. Therefore, we recommend the development of an international consensus in regard to the definitions, operational criteria and assessment procedures of visual stimulation and light therapy. This review combines visual stimulation, circadian rhythm recovery, and light therapy in DOC patients and presents the mechanisms and current advances in applications related to light therapy and visual stimulation in an attempt to provide additional ideas for future research and treatment of DOC.

Comorbidities: a key issue in patients with disorders of consciousness

The aim of this study was to identify the impact of comorbidities on outcomes of patients with vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS). All patients in VS or MCS consecutively admitted to two postacute care units within a 1-year period were evaluated at baseline and at 6 months through the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Version and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Comorbidities were also recorded for each patient along the same period. Six-month outcomes included death, full recovery of consciousness, and functional improvement. One hundred and thirty-nine patients (88 male and 51 female; median age, 59 years) were included. Ninety-seven patients were in VS (70%) and 42 in MCS (30%). At 6 months, 33 patients were dead (24%), 39 had a full recovery of consciousness (28%), and 67 remained in VS or MCS (48%). According to DRS scores, 40% of patients (n=55) showed a functional improvement in the level of disability. One hundred and thirty patients (94%) showed at least one comorbidity. Severity of comorbidities (hazard ratio [HR]=2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-4.68; p<0.001) and the presence of ischemic or organic heart diseases (HR=2.6; 95% CI, 1.21-5.43; p=0.014) were the strongest predictors of death, together with increasing age (HR=1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.06; p=0.033). Respiratory diseases and arrhythmias without organic heart diseases were negative predictors of full recovery of consciousness (odds ratio [OR]=0.3; 95% CI, 0.12-0.7; p=0.006; OR=0.2; 95% CI, 0.07-0.43; p<0.001) and functional improvement (OR=0.4; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85, p=0.020; OR=0.2; 95% CI, 0.08-0.45; p<0.001). Our data show that comorbidities are common in these patients and some of them influence recovery of consciousness and outcomes.

Outcomes after delirium in a Japanese intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) is recognized as a major public health problem. Few Japanese outcome studies have been reported. The purpose of the study was to investigate the hospital outcomes of ICU delirium in a Japanese general hospital.

METHODS

Patients were drawn from consecutive admissions to an ICU at a tertiary care university hospital. Delirium assessments were conducted using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC). The following information was recorded: age, sex, the reason for ICU admission, the ICDSC scores, the COmplexity PRediction Instrument (COMPRI) scores, the length of stay (LOS) in the ICU, the total hospital LOS, hospital outcomes and social worker's consultation.

RESULTS

Of the 126 patients who were evaluated, 35 (27.8%) developed delirium during the ICU stay. Older age and biopsychosocial vulnerability assessed by the COMPRI were risk factors of ICU delirium. ICU delirium was a predictor of increased mortality and associated with prolonged ICU and hospital LOS. ICU delirium was an independent risk factor for having social worker's consultation after ICU discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU delirium is associated with worse outcomes including mortality and LOS in Japan. ICU delirium is independently associated with further social worker's consultations, suggesting that early proactive social worker's intervention may be beneficial for the patients with ICU delirium.

Chronic disorders of consciousness following coma: Part two: ethical, legal, and social issues

Increasing numbers of patients survive traumatic brain injury and cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation and are admitted to the ICU while in coma. Some of these patients become brain dead; others regain consciousness. Still others become vegetative or minimally conscious, conditions called chronic disorders of consciousness and ultimately can be cared for outside the ICU. Whether these patients would want life-sustaining therapy is difficult to determine because most have not articulated their wishes before becoming comatose. Ethics and law recognize that patients with decision-making capacity have a right to refuse such therapy and that surrogates can exercise this right for them through the principle of substituted judgment as was established by the Supreme Court of New Jersey in the case of Karen Ann Quinlan. In its decision regarding Nancy Cruzan, the US Supreme Court determined that states may require clear and convincing evidence of a vegetative patient's prior wishes before life-sustaining therapy may be withdrawn; this standard has been applied to minimally conscious patients by state supreme courts in some cases. Nevertheless, cases such as these only come to the legal system because end-of-life decisions are contested, which is unusual, and most end-of-life decisions for specific patients with chronic disorders of consciousness are made by surrogates with recommendations from physicians without court involvement. Recent advances in neuroimaging may influence both end-of-life decision-making and legal deliberations. Targeting vegetative and minimally conscious patients in medical resource allocation remains ethically unacceptable and untested in the law.