Recurrent tachyarrhythmia associated with a bifocal demand pacemaker

Feasibility and safety of adenosine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 Tesla

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) with adenosine stress is a valuable diagnostic tool in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, despite the development of MR conditional pacemakers CMR is not yet established in clinical routine for pacemaker patients with known or suspected CAD. A possible reason is that adenosine stress perfusion for ischemia detection in CMR has not been studied in patients with cardiac conduction disease requiring pacemaker therapy. Other than under resting conditions it is unclear whether MR safe pacing modes (paused pacing or asynchronous mode) can be applied safely because the effect of adenosine on heart rate is not precisely known in this entity of patients. We investigate for the first time feasibility and safety of adenosine stress CMR in pacemaker patients in clinical routine and evaluate a pacing protocol that considers heart rate changes under adenosine.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed CMR scans of 24 consecutive patients with MR conditional pacemakers (mean age 72.1 ± 11.0 years) who underwent CMR in clinical routine for the evaluation of known or suspected CAD. MR protocol included cine imaging, adenosine stress perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement.

RESULTS

Pacemaker indications were sinus node dysfunction (n = 18) and second or third degree AV block (n = 6). Under a pacing protocol intended to avoid competitive pacing on the one hand and bradycardia due to AV block on the other no arrhythmia occurred. Pacemaker stimulation was paused to prevent competitive pacing in sinus node dysfunction with resting heart rate >45 bpm. Sympatho-excitatory effect of adenosine led to a significant acceleration of heart rate by 12.3 ± 8.3 bpm (p < 0.001), no bradycardia occurred. On the contrary in AV block heart rate remained constant; asynchronous pacing above resting heart rate did not interfere with intrinsic rhythm.

CONCLUSION

Adenosine stress CMR appears to be feasible and safe in patients with MR conditional pacemakers. Heart rate response to adenosine has to be considered for the choice of pacing modes during CMR.

Two mechanisms of arrhythmia induction by a DDD pacemaker: a case report

A 68-year-old man with sick sinus syndrome and a history of intermittent atrial fibrillation was treated by implantation of a DDD pacemaker. He subsequently developed recurrent episodes of shortness of breath and tachycardia. Investigation revealed two different arrhythmias, both induced by the pacemaker: (1) a tachycardia in which the dual-chamber pacemaker system provided the antegrade limb and the AV node provided the retrograde limb and (2) a triggered, ventricularly paced tachycardia caused by the pacemaker sensing atrial fibrillation waves. Both rhythms were abolished by reprogramming to the DVI mode.

Pacemaker related tachycardias

Three cases of pacemaker interactive tachycardia are presented. The first two are [artificial] circus movement tachycardias. In the first one the retrograde arm of the tachycardia circuit was provided by the A-V node and the antegrade arm by an atrial synchronous pulse generator. In the second case, the A-V node and, coincidentally, an A-V sequential pulse generator alternately provided the antegrade arm while the retrograde arm was by way of an accessory pathway. In the third case ventricular inhibition during A-V sequential pacing gave the paced atrial events the chance to be conducted to the ventricles with a long A-V interval. This resulted in a tachycardia with a rate of 150 bpm, instead of the programmed rate of 110 bpm.