Symptomatic unilateral cannon "a" waves in a patient with a ventricular pacemaker

Hemodynamic findings during sinus rhythm, atrial and AV sequential pacing compared to ventricular pacing in a dog model

The hemodynamic responses of atrial (AP), atrioventricular sequential (AVP) and ventricular pacing (VP) were compared to sinus rhythm (SR) in seventeen anesthetized dogs with intact AV conduction. The atrium and/or ventricle were paced at fixed rates above the control sinus rate. An AV interval shorter than normal conduction was selected to capture the ventricle. The changes of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP, mmHg), mean aortic pressure (MAP, mmHg), cardiac output (CO, L/min), systemic vascular resistance (SVR, dynes/s/cm-5), left ventricular stroke work index (SWI) and mean systolic ejection rate (MSER, ml/s) during sinus rhythm, atrial pacing and atrioventricular sequential pacing (expressed in percentages of the individual values during ventricular pacing) were: (Chart: See text) The importance of atrial systole for cardiac performance was clearly demonstrated in dogs with normally compliant hearts. In both atrial and atrioventricular sequential pacing compared to ventricular pacing there was a reduction of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (p less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (p less than 0.01) despite an increase in cardiac output (CO). The lesser mean systolic ejection rate (MSER) found during atrioventricular sequential pacing compared to sinus rhythm and atrial pacing may be explained by the abnormal ventricular depolarization in this pacing mode; nevertheless, the mean systolic ejection rate was still greater than that found during ventricular pacing (p less than 0.05).

Pacemaker-induced pseudotricuspid regurgitation

A patient with aortic stenosis and ventricular pacemaker had clinical findings suggesting tricuspid regurgitation. Her presentation was actually caused by regular and constant cannon waves resulting from ventriculoatrial conduction of paced beats. The correct diagnosis was confirmed by abolition of hepatic pulsations during atrial pacing at the time of cardiac catheterization. Therapy consisted of restoring antegrade atrioventricular conduction.

Hemodynamic and symptomatic consequences of ventricular pacing

After implantation of a ventricular demand pacemaker (VVI), occasional patients continue to have dizziness, syncope, or near syncope ("pacemaker syndrome"). To identify patients in whom VVI pacing may have deleterious effects, we compared cuff blood pressure responses to VVI pacing with blood pressure responses to atrioventricular sequential pacing (DVI) or sinus rhythm in 50 consecutive patients. Patients with intact ventriculoatrial conduction had a much greater decrease in systolic blood pressure with VVI pacing (24 +/- 11 mm Hg) than those with ventriculoatrial dissociation (-4 +/- 15 mm Hg) (P less than 0.005). Patients who were in heart failure had a lesser decrease in blood pressure with VVI pacing than did those without failure (P less than 0.05); 13 of the 14 heart failure patients lacked ventriculoatrial conduction. Ten patients had symptomatic dizziness after VVI pacing; the incidence of symptoms was higher in patients with ventriculoatrial conduction (9 of 23) than in those without ventriculoatrial conduction (1 of 27) (P less than 0.003). We conclude that the presence of intact ventriculoatrial conduction appears to be a crucial determinant of the hemodynamic response to VVI pacing, and its presence may identify patients who are at risk for "pacemaker syndrome."

Pacemakers, cardiac mapping and EEG in the community hospital: a concise review of background and basic technical considerations

The heart is a pump. The objective of cardiac pacing is to improve the cardiac output. The most popular method of cardiac pacing (RV) is not physiologic and results in reduced stroke output when compared to that of normal sinus or atrial paced rhythm. Recognition of pacemaker induced low output states and pacemaker aggravated neurological symptoms has quickened interest in physiologic atrial pacing. The increased complexity of atrial pacing has been discouraging in the past, but technical advances in electrode and pacemaker design are promising. Selection of the optimal pacing site appears critical and requires the determination of the focal electrical potential and stimulating threshold before electrodes are positioned. With minimal expense, the EEG can be adapted for this type of cardiac mapping in the community hospital.