Mitral valve prolapse. Cross sectional and provocative M-mode echocardiography

Comparison of auscultation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with suspected mitral valve prolapse

Auscultation was compared to two-dimensional echocardiography (2D echo) and Doppler ultrasonography in 140 consecutive patients referred for evaluation for suspected mitral valve prolapse (MVP) to asses the precision of the two diagnostic methods. Ninety patients (64%) had midsystolic clicks, of which 42 (47%) had MVP by echocardiography; 6 patients (4%) had MVP by 2D echo but no click on examination. In 15 (17%) of the 90 patients, a click was heard only in the standing or squatting positions and 2D echo did not detect prolapse in the supine position in 10 (67%) of the 15. With auscultation as the reference standard for MVP, 2D echo has a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 89%. Of the 140 patients, 51 (36%) had systolic murmurs; Doppler detected mitral and/or tricuspid regurgitation in 26 (50%). In 23 (16%) patients, there was Doppler evidence of mitral or tricuspid regurgitation even though systolic murmurs were not heard. Auscultation shows a 53% sensitivity and 73% specificity for systolic murmurs, using Doppler ultrasonography as the reference standard. Of 48 patients with MVP by 2D echo, 15 (13%) had associated mitral regurgitation by Doppler. The results indicate that 2D echo and Doppler ultrasonography should be interpreted in concert with auscultation for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse and for therapeutic decision making.

Observer variation in the echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse

To assess inter- and intraobserver variation in the echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse, three independent observers analyzed M-mode echocardiograms (n = 80) and two-dimensional echocardiograms (n = 65) of patients with a mobile midsystolic click with or without a late or holosystolic murmur. In addition, a control group of 100 normal echocardiograms were interspersed among the echocardiograms of patients with mitral valve prolapse and were then interpreted. Each of the three observers analyzed all M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiograms initially and then 2 weeks later for the presence or absence of mitral valve prolapse. M-mode echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse consisted of late systolic posterior motion (greater than or equal to 3 mm) of one or both mitral leaflets or holosystolic hammocking (greater than or equal to 3 mm) of one or both mitral leaflets. Two-dimensional echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse consisted of: posterior systolic arching of one or both mitral leaflets in the parasternal long-axis view, and/or posterior systolic bowing of one or both mitral leaflets in the apical four-chamber view posterior to the plane of the mitral anulus, and/or excessive posterior coaptation of the mitral leaflets in either view flush with or posterior to the plane of the mitral anulus. There was insignificant observer variation both in the M-mode and two-dimensional echo groups, as determined using Cochran's Q test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

M-mode echocardiography in supine and standing position in control subjects and patients with auscultatory evidence of mitral valve prolapse but negative supine echocardiography: does sensitivity improve?

Approximately 10-20% of patients with auscultatory evidence of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) have "false negative" echocardiograms. Pharmacological maneuvers do not significantly improve the sensitivity and may cause side effects. It is well known that auscultatory features of MVP change and not uncommonly can be heard only in the standing position. Therefore M-mode echo was performed in both supine and standing positions in 10 normal control subjects and 25 patients of comparable age and sex who had auscultatory evidence of MVP but negative echo in supine position. All 10 control subjects had normal echo in both supine and standing positions. No instance of false positive MVP was noted. Of the 25 patients with "false negative" supine echo, 5 showed evidence of MVP (3 pansystolic and 2 late systolic) in standing position. Based on these results the following conclusions were reached. In normal individuals the MVE remains uninfluenced by change in posture. There is modest (20%) improvement in sensitivity of detecting MVP when M-mode echo is performed in standing position in addition to supine position. Change in posture is preferable to the use of pharmacological maneuver to improve the sensitivity of detecting MVP because it is physiological, devoid of any cost, and does not produce side effects. M-mode echo in standing position or two-dimensional echo in supine position can be used to confirm the diagnosis of MVP in those patients who have "false negative" and/or nondiagnostic supine echo in the presence of auscultatory features of midsystolic click and mid- or late-systolic murmurs.

Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiographic signs of mitral valve prolapse

The sensitivity and specificity of previously described 2-dimensional echocardiographic signs of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) were assessed in 70 patients with MVP and in 100 normal control subjects. Specificity of individual signs was uniformly high, ranging from 88% for excessive motion of the posterior mitral ring to 100% for several signs including systolic arching in the parasternal long-axis view, excessive posterior coaptation and diastolic doming of the anterior mitral leaflet. Sensitivity of individual signs was low to moderate, ranging from 1% for whip-like motion of both mitral leaflets to 70% for excessive posterior coaptation of the mitral leaflets in the apical 4-chamber view. The highest sensitivity value (87%) was associated with the presence of systolic arching of 1 or both mitral leaflets in the parasternal long-axis view or systolic bowing of 1 or both mitral leaflets in the apical 4-chamber view or excessive posterior coaptation of the mitral leaflets or a combination. This increase in sensitivity was achieved without sacrificing specificity (97%). Thus, the individual 2-dimensional echocardiographic signs tested possess uniformly high specificity, but only low to moderate sensitivity; however, sensitivity can be markedly enhanced without sacrificing specificity by using selected combinations of echocardiographic signs.

Mitral valve prolapse: comparative value of m-mode, two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography

M-mode, two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography were used to assess the comparative value of each in the detection of clinically diagnosed mitral valve prolapse; 125 consecutive patients with a mid- to late systolic click, with or without a late systolic murmur, were included. There were 46 men and 79 women; their mean age was 42 years. M-mode echocardiography detected 62 of 125 cases (sensitivity 50%). Two-dimensional echocardiography was positive in 85 cases (sensitivity 68%) and 90 cases were detected with Doppler echocardiography (sensitivity 72%). When all three techniques were combined, 116 cases were correctly diagnosed (total echographic sensitivity 93%). The relative insensitivity of the M-mode technique and the additive value of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in the detection of auscultatory mitral prolapse are emphasized.