Effects of acebutolol on paroxysmal atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in patients with manifest or concealed accessory pathways

Acebutolol: Ventricular Tachycardia

This Hospital Pharmacy feature is extracted from Off-Label Drug Facts, a quarterly publication available from Wolters Kluwer Health. Off-Label Drug Facts is a practitioner-oriented resource for information about specific drug uses that are unapproved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This new guide to the literature enables the health care professional or clinician to quickly identify published studies on off-label uses and determine if a specific use is rational in a patient care scenario. A summary of the most relevant data is provided, including background, study design, patient population, dosage information, therapy duration, results, safety, and therapeutic considerations. References direct the reader to the full literature for more comprehensive information before patient care decisions are made. Direct questions or comments regarding Off-Label Drug Uses to hospital pharmacy@drugfacts.com .

Use of intracardiac recordings to determine the site of drug action in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia most often results from atrioventricular (AV) reentry using an accessory AV pathway (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) or reentry within the region of the AV node. In AV reentry, using an accessory pathway, suppression of the tachycardia may be achieved by depressing either anterograde AV nodal conduction or retrograde accessory pathway conduction. Intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation have established that beta-adrenergic antagonists and calcium channel blockers principally affect AV nodal conduction (anterograde limb of the reentrant circuit), whereas class IA and IC agents principally affect the accessory AV pathway (retrograde limb). Pharmacologic therapy has been more effective when directed at the limb in which conduction is most marginal at the tachycardia rate (weak limb). In individual patients, intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation can be used to identify the weak limb, indicating the class of agents most likely to be effective. Specialized techniques allowing direct recording of accessory pathway activation suggest that limitations in accessory pathway conduction may be explained by anatomic impediments. Conduction is most limited at the atrial interface of the accessory pathway in some patients, whereas in others the ventricular interface may be the limiting factor. Class IA and IC agents appear to have the greatest effect at sites where conduction is most tenuous, i.e., at the anatomic impediments. Similar considerations apply to AV nodal reentry. Anterograde slow AV nodal pathway conduction is most often depressed by digitalis preparations, beta-adrenergic antagonists, and calcium channel blockers, whereas retrograde fast AV nodal pathway conduction is more often depressed by class IA and IC agents. Intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation can also be used in these patients to identify the weak limb and direct pharmacologic therapy. Direct catheter recordings of AV nodal conduction remain elusive, limiting knowledge of the different conduction properties of the anterograde and retrograde limbs and the site(s) of drug action. Studies in progress, comparing the retrograde AV nodal conduction time during tachycardia with that during ventricular pacing at the same rate, suggest that the His bundle may be incorporated in the reentrant circuit in some patients. It appears that verapamil more readily depresses retrograde fast pathway conduction in these patients than in those in whom the His bundle does not form part of the reentrant circuit, but the reasons for this are unknown.

Acebutolol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses, and adverse effects

Acebutolol is a new hydrophilic, cardioselective beta-adrenergic-blocking agent that possesses partial agonist and membrane-stabilizing activities. In the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension, once-daily acebutolol as monotherapy provides effective control in a large majority of patients and produces a further reduction in blood pressure when used concomitantly with diuretics. Acebutolol is as effective as other beta-blocking agents, and in a large, double-blind, parallel study against propranolol was found to cause less reduction in heart rate, and fewer neurologic side effects and patient withdrawals due to adverse effects. Oral acebutolol is also effective in suppressing premature ventricular contractions, and in small numbers of patients generally beneficial results were obtained in supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias with intravenous administration. These salutary effects are attributable to beta blockade. Controlled clinical trials documented the antianginal actions of oral acebutolol in chronic stable angina pectoris; its efficacy in this regard is comparable to that of other beta-blocking agents. The drug produces smaller decreases in heart rate and cardiac output and alterations in peripheral vascular hemodynamics than beta-blocking drugs without partial agonist activity, and because of its cardioselectivity, it may be used cautiously in patients with bronchospastic disease. Acebutolol has minimal metabolic effects and does not elevate levels of blood lipids during long-term therapy; high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol increased with acebutolol in a small number of patients.

Effect of intravenous and oral acebutolol in patients with bundle branch block

We studied the effect of intravenous (1 mg/kg) and oral (400 mg) acebutolol on atrioventricular conduction in 22 patients with idiopathic bundle branch block and 1 to 1 atrioventricular conduction. Seven patients had previously symptomatic complete heart block (Group 1) and 15 were asymptomatic with bundle branch block only (Group 2). Following intravenous acebutolol heart rate decreased 82 +/- 16 to 63 +/- 16/min (P less than 0.01), A-H interval lengthened 98 +/- 22 to 121 +/- 30 msec (P less than 0.005) and H-V time was prolonged 60 +/- 13 to 70 +/- 17 msec (P less than 0.02) in those with previous heart block. The corresponding changes in the patients with no previous block were 74 +/- 14 to 61 +/- 8/min (P less than 0.01), 90 +/- 17 to 109 +/- 22 msec (P less than 0.05) and 48 +/- 15 to 56 +/- 14 msec (P less than 0.01). There was no difference between the basal or induced changes between these two groups. After intravenous acebutolol infusion 2 of 6 patients with previous spontaneous heart block and none of those without previous heart block developed atrioventricular block distal to His. The induced block was temporary (less than 10 min) and corresponded to the time of peak plasma acebutolol levels. Temporary atrioventricular block followed oral acebutolol administration in 4/7 patients with previous spontaneous heart block and 0/14 in those without block. In patients with bundle branch block intravenous acebutolol prolonged H-V conduction times in 19/20 patients and intravenous and oral acebutolol induced A-V block in 4/7 patients with previous spontaneous block.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)