Pulmonary infiltrates with eosinophilia due to naproxen

Repurposing naproxen as a potential nucleocapsid antagonist of beta-coronaviruses: targeting a conserved protein in the search for a broad-spectrum treatment option

Ongoing mutations in the coronavirus family, especially beta-coronaviruses, raise new concerns about the possibility of new unexpected outbreaks. Therefore, it is crucial to explore new alternative treatments to reduce the impact of potential future strains until new vaccines can be developed. A promising approach to combat the virus is to target its conserved parts such as the nucleocapsid, especially via repurposing of existing drugs. The possibility of this approach is explored here to find a potential anti-nucleocapsid compound to target these viruses. 3D models of the N- and C-terminal domains (CTDs) of the nucleocapsid consensus sequence were constructed. Each domain was then screened against an FDA-approved drug database, and the most promising candidate was selected for further analysis. A 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was conducted to analyze the final candidate in more detail. Naproxen was selected and found to interact with the N-terminal domain via conserved salt bridges and hydrogen bonds which are completely conserved among all Coronaviridae members. MD analysis also revealed that all relevant coordinates of naproxen with N terminal domain were kept during 100 ns of simulation time. This study also provides insights into the specific interaction of naproxen with conserved RNA binding pocket of the nucleocapsid that could interfere with the packaging of the viral genome into capsid and virus assembly. Additionally, the in-vitro binding assay demonstrated direct interaction between naproxen and recombinant nucleocapsid protein, further supporting the computational predictions.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

An 84-Year-Old Physician With Progressive Dyspnea and Bilateral Upper Lobe Opacities

CASE PRESENTATION

An 84-year-old physician was seen in the pulmonary clinic with 10 days of progressive exertional dyspnea, night sweats, and dry cough. For the past 5 months, he had been taking ibuprofen for lumbar radiculopathy from spinal stenosis. Ten days earlier, ibuprofen was switched to naproxen 250 mg twice daily because of its longer half-life. He denied fever, weight loss, rash, dysphagia, proximal muscle weakness, wheeze, sinus congestion, and peripheral numbness/tingling. Medical history included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and OSA. Long-term medications included aspirin, flecainide, atorvastatin, amlodipine, levothyroxine, and candesartan. He was a lifelong nonsmoker. There was no history of recent travel.

Eosinophilic pneumonia induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: An underestimated risk

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare but serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

We describe the second published case of EP induced by oral diclofenac. We also reviewed the literature as well as French pharmacovigilance database. Case presentation A 63 year-old woman with polyarthralgia had taken diclofenac for three days for analgesic purposes. Progressively, the patient presented weakness, dyspnea and fever. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed bilateral interstitial infiltration. Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) showed an elevated level of eosinophils. After ruling out all other possible etiologies, drug-induced EP was diagnosed and treatment by corticosteroid was initiated. The patient recovered in three months.

RESULTS

In the French pharmacovigilance database, six cases of EP were recorded (3 with naproxen, 2 with ibuprofen, 1 with piroxicam). In the literature, twenty-six cases of EP with NSAIDs were published. The most commonly involved drug was naproxen (n=8), followed by fenbufen (n=4), ibuprofen (n=3) and diclofenac (n=2). A high level of eosinophils was systematically observed in the blood cell count or BAL. Corticosteroid therapy was started in eleven cases. All patients recovered.

CONCLUSION

Complete history taking and examination should be done to rule out other etiological diagnoses. BAL is sufficient to diagnose EP. Corticosteroid therapy should be indicated for more severe or refractory cases. This adverse drug reaction is underestimated, healthcare professionals should be informed.

Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) sensitivities encompass a diverse group of both pharmacological and hypersensitivity reactions. Conventionally, hypersensitivities include aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), ASA-induced urticaria, and anaphylaxis. With an increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease in an aging population, aspirin continues to play a significant role in cardiac prophylaxis in a large patient population. Invariably, the clinician will encounter patients with clear indications for aspirin therapy but a history of aspirin sensitivity. Although protocols have been established for aspirin challenge and desensitization, it is not always an efficacious or safe procedure. This article reviews the different classifications of ASA/NSAIDs hypersensitivities to better guide the clinician in dealing with this patient population. History of crossrelativities between multiple NSAIDs implies a non-IgE-mediated process. Similarly, a history of monosensitivity to one NSAID implies an IgE-mediated process, although specific antibodies are often elusive. Despite the name, AERD can potentially be exacerbated by all cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors based on dose-dependent inhibition of COX-1. Aspirin desensitization can be achieved to improve both upper and lower respiratory symptoms for most patient with AERD. Aspirin desensitization can usually be achieved for those in need of the antiplatelet effects of aspirin, with the exception of those with aspirin-induced urticaria and baseline chronic urticaria. However, desensitization should only be attempted in those with stable coronary artery disease because the process of desensitization carries the inherent risk of anaphylaxis/anaphylactoid reaction, which may further increase cardiac demand and bring about ischemic injury. Therefore, desensitization is reserved until coronary artery disease is stabilized.

Adverse respiratory reactions to aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is an adult-onset condition that manifests as asthma, rhinosinusitis/nasal polyps, and sensitivity to aspirin and other cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1)-inhibitor nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). There is no cross-sensitivity to highly selective COX-2 inhibitors. AERD is chronic and does not improve with avoidance of COX-1 inhibitors. The diagnosis of AERD is made through provocative challenge testing. Following a positive aspirin challenge, patients can be desensitized to aspirin and NSAIDs. The desensitized state can be maintained indefinitely with continued daily administration. After desensitization, there is an approximately 48-hour refractory period to adverse effects from aspirin. The pathogenesis of AERD remains unknown, but these patients have been shown to have multiple abnormalities in arachidonic acid metabolism and in cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptors. AERD patients can take up to 650 mg of acetaminophen for analgesic or antipyretic relief. Patients can also use weak COX-1 inhibitors, such as sodium salicylate or choline magnesium trisalicylate. Treatment of AERD patients with antileukotriene medications has been helpful but not preferential when compared with non-AERD patients. An alternative treatment for many AERD patients is aspirin desensitization. This is particularly effective in reducing upper-airway mucosal congestion, nasal polyp formation, and systemic steroids.

[Pulmonary infiltrates with blood eosinophilia in a 62-year-old patient]

A 62-year-old woman was admitted because of chronic cough and bilateral infiltrates on chest roentgenogram. Additional history revealed that the patient had been taken diclofenac emulgel during the previous 10 years for arthrosis. Diagnostic bronchoscopy showed eosinophilic alveolitis. After ruling out infectious, parasitic or systemic diseases drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia was diagnosed due to topical diclofenac therapy and subsequent percutaneous drug absorption. No previous case of eosinophilic pneumonia to topical diclofenac was discovered in our review of the literature. The diclofenac therapy was discontinued. Oral corticosteroid therapy cleared bilateral infiltrates on CT scan within seven days. Drug reactions are the most common cause of pulmonary infiltrates with blood eosinophilia and/or eosinophilic alveolitis and should be considered as a differential diagnosis.

Adverse reactions to aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

BACKGROUND

Aspirin can provoke reactions ranging from respiratory to cutaneous in those susceptible individuals. There has been particular attention looking at the role of cyclooxygenase enzymes and 2 and their role in aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease.

OBJECTIVE

Patients who present with a spectrum of allergic and pseudoallergic reactions to aspirin pose a special challenge for the physician. This article discusses proposed classification system, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis of disease, and current treatment options of aspirin related disease.

METHODS

Relevant articles in the medical literature were. derived from searching the MEDLINE database. Sources also include review articles, randomized control trials, and standard textbooks of allergy and immunology.

RESULTS

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease remains a complex, heterogeneous disease with manvaried clinical presentations. There have been many advances in trying to elucidate the pathogenesis of this disease. The classification system presented will provide greater ease when reading the literature and communicating with one another. Oral aspirin challenge remains the diagnostic test of choice for both respiratory and cutaneous reactions. Aspirin desensitization is an option for those with refractory respiratory disease or who require aspirin for other medical conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This review discusses the challenges in classification, diagnosis and treatment of those patients with a sensitivity to aspirin. Special attention is made to the possible mechanisms mediating disease progression and how specific. Therapies, such as the leukotriene modifiers may be helpful.

Sensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

Aspirin can provoke reactions ranging from respiratory to cutaneous in susceptible individuals. There has been particular attention looking at the role of cyclo-oxygenase enzymes 1 and 2 and their role in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.

OBJECTIVE

Patients who present with a spectrum of allergic and pseudoallergic reactions to aspirin pose a special challenge for the physician. This article discusses proposed classification system, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis of disease, and current treatment options of aspirin-related disease.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant articles in the medical literature were derived from searching the MEDLINE database with key terms aspirin-sensitive asthma, cyclo-oxygenase enzymes 1 and 2. Sources also include review articles, randomized control trials, and standard textbooks of allergy and immunology.

RESULTS

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease remains a complex, heterogenous disease with varied clinical presentations. There have been many advances in trying to elucidate the pathogenesis of this disease. The classification system presented will provide greater ease when reading the literature and communicating with one another. Oral aspirin challenge remains the diagnostic test of choice for both respiratory and cutaneous reactions. Aspirin desensitization is an option for those with refractory respiratory disease or who require aspirin for other medical conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This review discusses the challenges in classification, diagnosis, and treatment of those patients with a sensitivity to aspirin. Special attention is made to the possible mechanisms mediating disease progression and how specific therapies, such as leukotriene modifiers, may be helpful.

Antirheumatic drug reactions in the lung

Drug-induced lung disease during treatment with antirheumatic drugs should be considered in all patients receiving these agents who develop new pulmonary symptoms. When a potential drug-related reaction is identified, the possible offending agents should be discontinued, appropriate respiratory support initiated, and a thorough investigation for other causes of respiratory disease launched to exclude infection or other pulmonary processes. Lung biopsy may be needed to define the disorder completely. In patients with acute pneumonitis, the use of corticosteroids should be considered. Although significant morbidity and even mortality may occur with drug-induced pulmonary events, proper and prompt evaluation and treatment of these disorders can often result in complete resolution of the pulmonary disease.

Naproxen. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states

Naproxen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) advocated for use in painful and inflammatory rheumatic and certain nonrheumatic conditions. It may be administered orally or rectally using a convenient once or twice daily regimen. Dosage adjustments are not usually required in the elderly or those with mild renal or hepatic impairment although it is probably prudent to start treatment at a low dosage and titrate upwards in such groups of patients. Numerous clinical trials have confirmed that the analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy of naproxen is equivalent to that of the many newer and established NSAIDs with which it has been compared. The drug is effective in many rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and nonarticular rheumatism, in acute traumatic injury, and in the treatment of and prophylaxis against acute pain such as migraine, tension headache, postoperative pain, postpartum pain and pain associated with a variety of gynaecological procedures. Naproxen is also effective in treating the pain and associated symptoms of primary or secondary dysmenorrhoea, and decreases excessive blood loss in patients with menorrhagia. The adverse effect profile of naproxen is well established, particularly compared with that of many newer NSAIDs, and the drug is well tolerated. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of naproxen have been clearly established over many years of clinical use, and it can therefore be considered as a first-line treatment for rheumatic diseases and various pain states.

Pulmonary complications of antirheumatic drug therapy

Drug-induced pulmonary disease should be considered in all patients receiving these antirheumatic agents who develop new pulmonary symptoms. When a drug reaction is suspected, the possible offending agents should be discontinued, required respiratory support instituted, and infection or other pulmonary processes excluded. Pathological evaluation by lung biopsy may be needed to define the disorder and rule out infection. Treatment with corticosteroids should be considered in patients with acute pneumonitis. While significant morbidity and even death may occur with drug-induced pulmonary disease, prompt evaluation and treatment of these disorders often results in complete resolution of the process.

Pulmonary infiltrates associated with sulindac therapy

Pulmonary infiltrates, cough, dyspnea, and fever developed in a 62-year-old woman with chronic degenerative arthritis who had been receiving sulindac therapy for six months. Her pulmonary signs and symptoms resolved upon withholding the drug. Inadvertent rechallenge resulted in rapid recurrence of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates. This constellation of clinical findings provides strong evidence of isolated pulmonary reactions as a complication of sulindac therapy.

Severe metabolic acidosis after acute naproxen sodium ingestion

Naproxen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is a propionic acid derivative that possesses analgesic and antipyretic properties through inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. The propionic acids have been considered the least toxic of the NSAIDs, and one, ibuprofen, is currently available as an over-the-counter medication. Though acidosis has been reported with ibuprofen, no such occurrence has been reported for naproxen sodium. We report the case of a 15-year-old girl who presented with severe metabolic acidosis and seizures that rapidly followed naproxen sodium ingestion. Serum bicarbonate levels returned to normal 12 hours after admission and correlated with the known pharmacokinetics of naproxen. The pharmacokinetics of naproxen and treatment of its overdose, and possible mechanisms of metabolic acidosis are reviewed.

Gold-naproxen pneumonitis. A toxic drug interaction?

A patient with rheumatoid arthritis developed restrictive lung disease and blood eosinophilia. Gold pneumonitis was suspected but the patient did not improve until naproxen was discontinued as well. Lymphocyte transformation studies suggested hypersensitivity to gold. We hypothesize that naproxen unmasked and perpetuated the manifestations of gold hypersensitivity in our patient.

Adverse reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Diclofenac compared with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The most common adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are gastritis, peptic ulceration, and depression of renal function, all of which result primarily from prostaglandin inhibition. The types of side effects observed with diclofenac are similar to those of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and are unavoidable given that the drugs are prostaglandin inhibitors. However, the incidences of such side effects may be lower with diclofenac than with some of the other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Worldwide experience with diclofenac exceeds 7.6 million patient-years, which should provide estimates of the frequency of very rare adverse reactions. The latter include blood dyscrasias, erythema multiforme, hepatitis, and others, such as aseptic meningitis, anaphylaxis, and urticaria. Moreover, some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs appear to have unique side-effect profiles. Examples include a higher incidence of ulceration and erythema multiforme with piroxicam, and acute pancreatitis, in rare instances, with sulindac. From a careful survey of the world's accumulated literature and reports to CIBA-GEIGY, diclofenac does not appear to have any unusual adverse reactions.