Survival in severe left ventricular failure treated with the new nonglycosidic, nonsympathomimetic oral inotropic agents

Thrombocytopenia in Critical Care Patients

Thrombocytopenia is a common laboratory finding in the intensive care unit (ICU) patient. Because the causes can range from laboratory artifact to life-threatening processes such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), identifying the cause of thrombocytopenia is important. In the evaluation of the thrombocytopenia patient, one should incorporate all clinical clues such as why the patient is in the hospital, medications the patient is on, and other abnormal laboratory findings. One should ensure that the patient does not suffer from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or one of the thrombotic microangiopathies (TMs). HIT can present in any patient on heparin and requires specific testing and antithrombotic therapy. TMs cover a spectrum of disease ranging from TTP to pregnancy complications and can have a variety of presentations. Management of disseminated intravascular coagulation depends on the patient’s condition and complication. Other causes of ICU thrombocytopenia include sepsis, medication side effects, post-transfusion purpura, catastrophic anti phospholipid antibody disease, and immune thrombocytopenia.

The effects of an angiotensin-converting inhibitor (enalapril) on patients with mild cardiac failure--evaluating cardiac function based on the relationship between daily walking pace and heart rate

BACKGROUND

Heart failure has been evaluated by several methods, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of heart failure based on symptoms being used most frequently. However, the degree of heart failure assessed by these criteria does not always correlate with cardiac function in daily life.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of the study was to evaluate cardiac function based on the walking pace/heart rate (HR) relationship to assess the effects of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with mild to moderate cardiac function.

METHODS

To evaluate cardiac function objectively, we developed a method using a pedometer to count the steps walked while simultaneously recording HR using a Holter electrocardiograph (ECG). Step-count walk rate (WR) was recorded on the magnetic tape of the Holter apparatus, and both HR and walking pace were calculated automatically by the Holter ECG analysis system. Data were determined every hour, and mean pace and HR were plotted along the x and y axes, respectively. The slope of HR x WR was calculated using the least squares method. The slope and the total number of steps were regarded as indicators of cardiac function and quality of life, respectively. We analyzed 36 subjects, consisting of 8 normal volunteers, 8 patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I. 11 in class II, and 9 in class III chronic mild heart failure, during maximal exercise work load by bicycle ergometer; furthermore, fractional shortening of the left ventricle on echocardiogram was determined in 14 patients with chronic mild heart failure and was compared with the slope of HR x WR. Enalapril was administered at a daily dose of 2.5-10 mg for 1-24 months (mean 6 months) in 60 patients to evaluate the effects of this drug on these parameters.

RESULTS

There was a significant inverse relationship between maximal work load and the HR x WR slope, and also between the fractional shortening and the slope, suggesting that the slope may reflect the severity of cardiac dysfunction. Furthermore, the slope decreased significantly from 1.8 +/- 1.26 before enalapril to 1.0 +/- 0.94 (mean +/- standard deviation) after drug administration, while the total number of steps increased significantly from 4842 +/- 3581 to 7804 +/- 4793.

CONCLUSION

The slope of the graph relating step count and HR proved to be a good, objective indicator of cardiac function, and enalapril therapy improved this parameter.

Mechanisms and management of ventricular dysrhythmias in heart failure

Despite recent pharmacologic and surgical advances in the management of heart failure, the morbidity and mortality rates of this chronic illness remain high. Ventricular dysrhythmias are common in heart failure and may be independently associated with increased mortality rates. Although the risks of sudden cardiac death leading to the patient's death are increased by the presence of complex ventricular dysrhythmias, the management of dysrhythmias is subject to controversy. The purpose of this article is to review the normal electrophysiologic properties of the heart and to examine the likely mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and proposed treatments for ventricular dysrhythmias in heart failure.

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: identification and management of high-risk patients

NSVT is common in normal persons and in patients with a variety of heart diseases. When present in patients with coronary artery disease, particularly after a recent myocardial infarction, it is associated with an increased risk of sudden and nonsudden cardiac death. However, its prognostic significance in patients with nonischemic heart disease, with the possible exception of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, remains controversial. In patients with coronary artery disease, certain diagnostic tools (e.g., determination of left ventricular function. PVS) help to identify low- and high-risk patients who may or may not benefit from antiarrhythmic treatment. There is no consensus at this point as to the best approach for identifying and treating high-risk patients. Ongoing clinical trials should provide important information on the roles of signal-averaged ECGs and PVS in the management of patients with NSVT and coronary artery disease. In the meantime, treatment should be individualized for each patient. beta-Blockers should probably be the first line of therapy to control symptoms. Asymptomatic potentially high-risk patients (i.e., those with LVEF < 40%) should be referred for enrollment in randomized controlled studies.

Oral treatment with enoximone in patients referred for cardiac transplantation

A prospective, uncontrolled, open ended study was performed to assess the effect of treatment with oral enoximone therapy in patients with end stage cardiac failure unresponsive to conventional treatment. The primary objective of treatment, hospital discharge, was achieved in 27 of 35 patients studied. Baseline haemodynamics were obtained in 21 patients. The mean cardiac index of patients who improved by one or more grades (New York Heart Association) was 2.1 litres/min while, in those who had less improvement, the mean cardiac index was 1.5 l/min (P less than 0.01). The average duration of treatment was 13 weeks, treatment being discontinued in 25 patients within twelve weeks. The main reasons for discontinuation were side effects (n = 11), and progressive cardiac failure (n = 7). The prognosis of patients in whom therapy was discontinued was very poor, only 5 of 28 being discharged from hospital without cardiac transplantation. Sudden death was uncommon (1/13), and Holter monitoring in 17 showed no aggravation of ventricular arrhythmias. Oral treatment with enoximone is a useful adjunct in the treatment of end stage cardiac failure.

Arrhythmias and their treatment in patients with heart failure

Heart failure is almost without exception associated with arrhythmias, which may be either supraventricular or ventricular. Supraventricular arrhythmias include frequent supraventricular extrasystoles, and episodic or chronic atrial fibrillation. The absence of atrial contraction may further reduce cardiac output, as may impaired control of QRS frequency. Therefore, supraventricular arrhythmias may be markers of the degree of heart failure and these arrhythmias will respond to heart failure therapy including diuretics, nitrates and, possibly, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Ventricular rate will be controlled by cardiac glycosides and further rate reduction obtained by verapamil or diltiazem. The rationale for this therapy is to optimize heart rate without compromising contractility. Severe heart failure is generally accompanied by severe ventricular arrhythmias including repetitive forms. Improving left ventricular function by ACE inhibition is accompanied by a reduction in the number of ventricular premature complexes and also a reduction in the rate of ventricular tachycardia. ACE inhibition reduces mortality but does not seem to influence sudden death rate, and sudden death patients may have different neurohormonal responses compared with patients destined to die of progressive heart failure. Uncontrolled trials with class IA or class III antiarrhythmic drugs have suggested that prognosis may be improved, but other studies have pointed out the increased risk of proarrhythmic responses in patients with low ejection fraction.

Pathophysiology and current therapy of congestive heart failure

Congestive heart failure is a common clinical syndrome, with a relatively poor prognosis in its advanced stages. During the development of heart failure, there is a decline in myocardial contractility and activation of neurohormonal systems. An overshoot of some of these compensatory mechanisms sets the stage for therapeutic interventions. Any of the three therapeutic classes of drugs (inotropic drugs, diuretics or vasodilators) can be used as first-line therapy. Other classes can be added to produce additive effects on ventricular function. Because vasodilators have been shown to prolong life, they should be used routinely in patients with heart failure. Arrhythmias and sudden death are relatively common in heart failure, although the value of antiarrhythmic therapy is less certain. Although current therapy is very helpful in patients with heart failure, it is clear that preventive approaches will be more effective in decreasing morbidity and mortality.

Congestive heart failure

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is not a single entity but a symptom complex that may represent the consequence of mechanical abnormalities, myocardial abnormalities, and/or disturbances of cardiac rhythm. In turn, it affects virtually every organ system in the body. This review focuses on CHF due to systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle, which comprises the majority of cases of this condition. Recent data suggest that CHF may be the most frequent primary diagnosis in patients on medical services in nonmilitary hospitals in this country: it affects approximately 2% of the United States population, or some 4 million people. The mortality rate for CHF is also worse than for many forms of cancer; thus, new therapeutic alternatives are imperative. In order to devise new therapeutic strategies, a detailed understanding of the pathophysiology of this condition is required. The relative advantages and disadvantages of various pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches are considered in detail. Certain medications, such as the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, have been shown to improve survival, and heart transplantation is clearly life-saving for those who are eligible for this therapy. However, the real challenge is to devise strategies to prevent the occurrence of heart failure, or interrupt its progress at a very early stage.

Factors causing arrhythmias in chronic congestive heart failure

Severe congestive heart failure (CHF) is a common syndrome with a high mortality rate (about 50% in 1 year among patients with symptoms at rest). Severity of left ventricular dysfunction is the most important adverse prognostic factor. Serious arrhythmias are common in CHF and also increase the mortality rate. Sudden death is the mode of death in about 40% of patients with severe heart failure. Multiple factors contribute to arrhythmias in CHF, including left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial ischemia, catecholamines, electrolyte disturbances, and drugs used to treat the heart failure. Minimizing or correcting these influences may be important in reducing serious arrhythmias. Antiarrhythmic drugs may be important in reducing the incidence of sudden death among patients with severe heart failure, although this has not yet been proved.