A prospective comparison of IMV and T-piece weaning from mechanical ventilation

Mechanical ventilation in dogs and cats with tick paralysis

Respiratory failure from tick paralysis (TP) is an important cause of mortality in cats and dogs in Australia, occurring from a combination of respiratory muscle paralysis, upper respiratory tract obstruction and pulmonary disease. Patients may require positive-pressure ventilation in management of any combination of hypoxemia, hypoventilation or respiratory fatigue, but may also require airway management due to laryngeal paralysis. No single ventilation strategy is recommended due to the heterogenous disease presentations. Lung protective ventilation should be used in patients with pulmonary disease. Due to local and systemic effects of TP, patients are at higher risk of complications such as aspiration pneumonia and corneal ulceration and may have additional intravenous fluid and nutritional considerations. Treatment with hyperimmune serum is associated with improved outcomes. Prognosis is considered good with documented survival to discharge (STD) of 52.6-77% for animals with TP ventilated with lung disease and 90.5% for animals without lung disease. Median reported duration of ventilation for TP ranges from 23 to 48 h (range 3 h-10 days). The severity of individual neuromuscular signs and the presence of associated conditions such as aspiration pneumonia and laryngeal paralysis may necessitate longer periods of mechanical ventilation. This review aims to summarize the current recommendations regarding indications, management and prognosis of cats and dogs undergoing MV for TP and to identify areas for future research.

Automated weaning and SBT systems versus non-automated weaning strategies for weaning time in invasively ventilated critically ill adults

BACKGROUND

Automated systems use closed-loop control to enable ventilators to perform basic and advanced functions while supporting respiration. SmartCare™ is a unique automated weaning system that measures selected respiratory variables, adapts ventilator output to individual patient needs by operationalizing predetermined algorithms and automatically conducts spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) when predetermined thresholds are met.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to compare weaning time (time from randomization to extubation as defined by study authors) between invasively ventilated critically ill adults weaned by automated weaning and SBT systems versus non-automated weaning strategies.As secondary objectives, we ascertained differences between effects of alternative weaning strategies on clinical outcomes (time to successful extubation, time to first SBT and first successful SBT, mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia, total duration of ventilation, lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), adverse events and clinician acceptance).The third objective of our review was to use subgroup analyses to explore variations in weaning time, length of ICU stay, mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia, use of NIV and reintubation according to (1) the type of clinician primarily involved in implementing the automated weaning and SBT strategy, (2) the ICU (as a reflection of the population involved) and (3) the non-automated (control) weaning strategy utilized.We conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate variations in weaning time based on (4) the methodological quality (low or unclear versus high risk of bias) of the included studies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2013, Issue 5; MEDLINE (1966 to 31 May 2013); EMBASE (1988 to 31 May 2013); the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to 31 May 2013), Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews and Ovid HealthSTAR (1999 to 31 May 2013), as well as conference proceedings and trial registration websites; we also contacted study authors and content experts to identify potentially eligible trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing automated weaning and SBT systems versus non-automated weaning strategies in intubated adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and abstracted data according to prespecified criteria. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were planned to assess the impact on selected outcomes of the following: (1) the type of clinician primarily involved in implementing automated weaning and SBT systems, (2) the ICU (as a reflection of the population involved) and (3) the non-automated (control) weaning strategy utilized.

MAIN RESULTS

We pooled summary estimates from 10 trials evaluating SmartCare™ involving 654 participants. Overall, eight trials were judged to be at low or unclear risk of bias, and two trials were judged to be at high risk of bias. Compared with non-automated strategies, SmartCare™ decreased weaning time (mean difference (MD) -2.68 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.99 to -1.37; P value < 0.0001, seven trials, 495 participants, moderate-quality evidence), time to successful extubation (MD -0.99 days, 95% CI -1.89 to -0.09; P value 0.03, seven trials, 516 participants, low-quality evidence), length of ICU stay (MD -5.70 days, 95% CI -10.54 to -0.85; P value 0.02, six trials, 499 participants, moderate-quality evidence) and proportions of participants receiving ventilation for longer than seven and 21 days (risk ratio (RR) 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85; P value 0.01 and RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86; P value 0.02). SmartCare™ reduced the total duration of ventilation (MD -1.68 days, 95% CI -3.33 to -0.03; P value 0.05, seven trials, 521 participants, low-quality evidence) and the number of participants receiving ventilation for longer than 14 days (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.00; P value 0.05); however the estimated effects were imprecise. SmartCare™ had no effect on time to first successful SBT, mortality or adverse events, specifically reintubation. Subgroup analysis suggested that trials with protocolized (versus non-protocolized) control weaning strategies reported significantly shorter ICU stays. Sensitivity analysis excluded two trials with high risk of bias and supported a trend toward significant reductions in weaning time favouring SmartCare™.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-automated weaning strategies, weaning with SmartCare™ significantly decreased weaning time, time to successful extubation, ICU stay and proportions of patients receiving ventilation for longer than seven days and 21 days. It also showed a favourable trend toward fewer patients receiving ventilation for longer than 14 days; however the estimated effect was imprecise. Summary estimates from our review suggest that these benefits may be achieved without increasing the risk of adverse events, especially reintubation; however, the quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate, and evidence was derived from 10 small randomized controlled trials.

Our paper 20 years later: how has withdrawal from mechanical ventilation changed?

Withdrawal from mechanical ventilation (or weaning) is one of the most common procedures in intensive care units. Almost 20 years ago, we published one of the seminal papers on weaning in which we showed that the best method for withdrawal from mechanical ventilation in difficult-to-wean patients was a once-daily spontaneous breathing trial with a T-piece. Progress has not stood still, and in the intervening years up to the present several other studies, by our group and others, have shaped weaning into an evidence-based technique. The results of these studies have been applied progressively to routine clinical practice. Currently, withdrawal from mechanical ventilation can be summarized as the evaluation of extubation readiness based on the patient's performance during a spontaneous breathing trial. This trial can be performed with a T-piece, which is the most common approach, or with continuous positive airway pressure or low levels of pressure support. Most patients can be disconnected after passing the first spontaneous breathing trial. In patients who fail the first attempt at withdrawal, the use of a once-daily spontaneous breathing trial or a gradual reduction in pressure support are the preferred weaning methods. However, new applications of standard techniques, such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, or new methods of mechanical ventilation, such as automatic tube compensation, automated closed-loop systems, and automated knowledge-based weaning systems, can play a role in the management of the patients with difficult or prolonged weaning.

Clinical verification of a clinical decision support system for ventilator weaning

Background

Weaning is typically regarded as a process of discontinuing mechanical ventilation in the daily practice of an intensive care unit (ICU). Among the ICU patients, 39%-40% need mechanical ventilator for sustaining their lives. The predictive rate of successful weaning achieved only 35-60% for decisions made by physicians. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are promising in enhancing diagnostic performance and improve healthcare quality in clinical setting. To our knowledge, a prospective study has never been conducted to verify the effectiveness of the CDSS in ventilator weaning before. In this study, the CDSS capable of predicting weaning outcome and reducing duration of ventilator support for patients has been verified.

Methods

A total of 380 patients admitted to the respiratory care center of the hospital were randomly assigned to either control or study group. In the control group, patients were weaned with traditional weaning method, while in the study group, patients were weaned with CDSS monitored by physicians. After excluding the patients who transferred to other hospitals, refused further treatments, or expired the admission period, data of 168 and 144 patients in the study and control groups, respectively, were used for analysis.

Results

The results show that a sensitivity of 87.7% has been achieved, which is significantly higher (p<0.01) than the weaning determined by physicians (sensitivity: 61.4%). Furthermore, the days using mechanical ventilator for the study group (38.41 ± 3.35) is significantly (p<0.001) shorter than the control group (43.69 ± 14.89), with a decrease of 5.2 days in average, resulting in a saving of healthcare cost of NT$45,000 (US$1,500) per patient in the current Taiwanese National Health Insurance setting.

Conclusions

The CDSS is demonstrated to be effective in identifying the earliest time of ventilator weaning for patients to resume and sustain spontaneous breathing, thereby avoiding unnecessary prolonged ventilator use and decreasing healthcare cost.

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) provides ventilatory support without the need for an invasive airway. Interest has emerged in using NPPV to facilitate earlier removal of an endotracheal tube and to decrease complications associated with prolonged intubation.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated studies in which invasively ventilated adults with respiratory failure of any cause (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), non-COPD, postoperative, nonoperative) were weaned by means of early extubation followed by immediate application of NPPV or continued IPPV weaning. The primary objective was to determine whether the noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) strategy reduced all-cause mortality compared with invasive positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) weaning. Secondary objectives were to ascertain differences between strategies in proportions of weaning failure and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), total duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical support related to weaning, duration of endotracheal mechanical ventilation (ETMV), frequency of adverse events (related to weaning) and overall quality of life. We planned sensitivity and subgroup analyses to assess (1) the influence on mortality and VAP of excluding quasi-randomized trials, and (2) effects on mortality and weaning failure associated with different causes of respiratory failure (COPD vs. mixed populations).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2013), MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2013), proceedings from four conferences, trial registration websites and personal files; we contacted authors to identify trials comparing NPPV versus conventional IPPV weaning.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing early extubation with immediate application of NPPV versus IPPV weaning in intubated adults with respiratory failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and abstracted data according to prespecified criteria. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses assessed (1) the impact of excluding quasi-randomized trials, and (2) the effects on selected outcomes noted with different causes of respiratory failure.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 16 trials, predominantly of moderate to good quality, involving 994 participants, most with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Compared with IPPV weaning, NPPV weaning significantly decreased mortality. The benefits for mortality were significantly greater in trials enrolling exclusively participants with COPD (risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.56) versus mixed populations (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.40). NPPV significantly reduced weaning failure (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.43); shortened length of stay in an intensive care unit (mean difference (MD) -5.59 days, 95% CI -7.90 to -3.28) and in hospital (MD -6.04 days, 95% CI -9.22 to -2.87); and decreased the total duration of ventilation (MD -5.64 days, 95% CI -9.50 to -1.77) and the duration of endotracheal mechanical ventilation (MD - 7.44 days, 95% CI -10.34 to -4.55) amidst significant heterogeneity. Noninvasive weaning also significantly reduced tracheostomy (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.47) and reintubation (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.97) rates. Noninvasive weaning had no effect on the duration of ventilation related to weaning. Exclusion of a single quasi-randomized trial did not alter these results. Subgroup analyses suggest that the benefits for mortality were significantly greater in trials enrolling exclusively participants with COPD versus mixed populations.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Summary estimates from 16 trials of moderate to good quality that included predominantly participants with COPD suggest that a weaning strategy that includes NPPV may reduce rates of mortality and ventilator-associated pneumonia without increasing the risk of weaning failure or reintubation.

Weaning from mechanical ventilation: why are we still looking for alternative methods?

Most patients who require mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 hours, and who improve the condition leading to the indication of ventilatory support, can be weaned after passing a first spontaneous breathing test. The challenge is to improve the weaning of patients who fail that first test. We have methods that can be referred to as traditional, such as the T-tube, pressure support or synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV). In recent years, however, new applications of usual techniques as noninvasive ventilation, new ventilation methods such as automatic tube compensation (ATC), mandatory minute ventilation (MMV), adaptive support ventilation or automatic weaning systems based on pressure support have been described. Their possible role in weaning from mechanical ventilation among patients with difficult or prolonged weaning remains to be established.

The importance of knowing the patient in weaning from mechanical ventilation

AIM

The aim of the research was to understand how nurses used technology to wean patients from mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND

The literature concerned with the development of critical care centres on the role of technology with little emphasis on the nursing contribution.

DESIGN

An ethnographic approach was used to understand how nurses used technology to wean patients from mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Data were gathered by participant observation and interviewing over a 6-month period. In total, 250 h of field notes were recorded.

RESULTS

Data were analysed by the content analysis method. Knowing the patient was a central theme identified. Three sub-themes were identified: ways of knowing, continuity of care and the role of the patient in the weaning trajectory.

CONCLUSION

'Knowing the patient' was implied during the interviews as essential to the delivery of patient-centred care. There were two main factors that needed to be present in order for nurses to know their patients: continuity of care and expertise. 'Ways of knowing' was reliant on gaining information about the patient. The role of the patient was a passive recipient of treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Knowing the patient has been defined as a characteristic of expert nursing. To be truly patient-centred nursing needs to address the barriers that prevent nurses from getting to 'know' their patients.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) provides ventilatory support without the need for an invasive airway approach. Interest has emerged in using NPPV to facilitate earlier removal of an endotracheal tube and decrease complications associated with prolonged intubation.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the evidence comparing NPPV and invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) weaning on clinical outcomes in intubated adults with respiratory failure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2008), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2008), proceedings from four conferences, and personal files; and contacted authors to identify randomized controlled trials comparing NPPV and IPPV weaning.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized studies comparing early extubation with immediate application of NPPV to IPPV weaning in intubated adults with respiratory failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and abstracted data according to prespecified criteria. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were planned to assess the impact of (i) excluding quasi-randomized trials, and (ii) the etiology of respiratory failure on selected outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 12 trials of moderate to good quality that involved 530 participants with predominantly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Compared to the IPPV strategy, NPPV significantly decreased mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.55, 95% confidence Interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.79), ventilator associated pneumonia (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45), length of stay in an intensive care unit (weighted mean difference (WMD) -6.27 days, 95% CI -8.77 to -3.78) and hospital (WMD -7.19 days, 95% CI -10.80 to -3.58), total duration of ventilation (WVD) -5.64 days (95% CI -9.50 to -1.77) and duration of endotracheal mechanical ventilation (WMD - 7.81 days, 95% CI -11.31 to -4.31). Noninvasive weaning had no effect on weaning failures or the duration of ventilation related to weaning. Excluding a single quasi-randomized trial maintained the significant reduction in mortality and ventilator associated pneumonia. Subgroup analyses suggested that the benefits on mortality and weaning failures were nonsignificantly greater in trials enrolling exclusively COPD patients versus mixed populations.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Summary estimates from 12 small studies of moderate to good quality that included predominantly COPD patients demonstrated a consistent, positive effect on mortality and ventilator associated pneumonia. The net clinical benefits associated with noninvasive weaning remain to be fully elucidated.

Outcomes of patients ventilated with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support: a comparative propensity score study

BACKGROUND

Few data are available regarding the benefits of one mode over another for ventilatory support. We set out to compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support (SIMV-PS) compared with assist-control (A/C) ventilation as their primary mode of ventilatory support.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of an observational study conducted in 349 ICUs from 23 countries. A propensity score stratified analysis was used to compare 350 patients ventilated with SIMV-PS with 1,228 patients ventilated with A/C ventilation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

In a logistic regression model, patients were more likely to receive SIMV-PS if they were from North America, had lower severity of illness, or were ventilated postoperatively or for trauma. SIMV-PS was less likely to be selected if patients were ventilated because of asthma or coma, or if they developed complications such as sepsis or cardiovascular failure during mechanical ventilation. In the stratified analysis according to propensity score, we did not find significant differences in the in-hospital mortality. After adjustment for propensity score, overall effect of SIMV-PS on in-hospital mortality was not significant (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.77-1.42; P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of ventilated patients, ventilation with SIMV-PS compared with A/C did not offer any advantage in terms of clinical outcomes, despite treatment-allocation bias that would have favored SIMV-PS.

Weaning from ventilation--current state of the science and art

Weaning from mechanical ventilation has attracted a growing interest recently in the medical and nursing press. Attempts have been made to determine a patient's readiness to wean, define criteria for successful weaning and enhance the weaning process through the developments of protocols. Key to this work is the role of the critical care nurse. Transferring the role and the responsibility of weaning from the traditional perspective of the intensivist to the nurse is not without challenges. Inherent is the need for skill and expertise and the willingness to accept this level of responsibility, not questioned in the medical role, but worthy of consideration when transferred to nurses. Key to successful weaning and weaning is redefined for the purposes of this paper, is continuity of care, knowing the patient and the development of patient-centred, individualized weaning plans. Critical care nurses have an important role to play. This is particularly so when the patient experience is to be understood. There is relatively little research conducted in this area, yet this is an important consideration if we are to fully understand and embrace the role of patients in their weaning. Weaning in the context of critical care can be challenging. To wean the difficult-to-wean or the long-term-weaning patient requires great skill and expertise. Expertise in this context has not been fully explored, yet research suggests that these patients are not allocated expert nurses to care for them because they are not seen as critically ill. It may be that this group of patients would benefit from a transfer to a weaning centre as suggested by the Modernisation Agency in 2002. This would greatly challenge the way we, as critical care nurses, perceive weaning in critical care.

Issues in weaning from mechanical ventilation: literature review

AIM

The aim of this paper is to raise questions on the effect of skill mix and organizational structure on weaning from mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation is an essential life-saving technology. There are, however, numerous associated complications that influence the morbidity and mortality of patients receiving intensive care. Therefore, it was essential to use the safest and most effective form of ventilation for the shortest possible duration. Because of the potential complications and costs of mechanical ventilation, research to date have focused on accurate weaning readiness assessment, methods and organizational aspects that influence the weaning process.

METHOD

In early 2005, the literature was reviewed from 1986 to 2004 by accessing the following databases: Medline, Proquest, Science Direct, CINAHL, and Blackwell Science. The keywords mechanical ventilation, weaning, protocols, critical care, nursing role, decision-making and weaning readiness were used separately and combinations.

DISCUSSION

Controversy exists in weaning practices about appropriate and efficacious weaning readiness assessment indicators, the best method of weaning and the use of weaning protocols. Arguably, the implementation of weaning protocols may have little effect in an environment that favours collaboration between nursing and medical staff, autonomous nursing decision-making in relation to weaning practices, and high numbers of nurses qualified at postgraduate level.

CONCLUSION

Further research is required that better quantifies critical care nurses' role in weaning practices and the contextual issues that influence both the nursing role and the process of weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) provides ventilatory support without the need for an invasive airway. Interest has emerged in using NPPV to facilitate earlier removal of the endotracheal tube and decrease complications associated with prolonged intubation.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the evidence comparing NPPV and invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) weaning on clinical outcomes in intubated adults with respiratory failure.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2003) and EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2003) for randomized controlled trials comparing NPPV and IPPV weaning. Additional data sources included personal files, conference proceedings and author contact.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized studies comparing early extubation with immediate application of NPPV to IPPV weaning in intubated adults with respiratory failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and abstracted data according to prespecified criteria. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were planned to assess the impact of (i) excluding quasi-randomized trials and (ii) the etiology of respiratory failure on outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eleven trials, of which five were included, involving 171 participants with predominantly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Overall, the included studies were of moderate to good quality. Compared to the IPPV strategy, the NPPV strategy decreased mortality (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.76), the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.85), intensive care unit length of stay (WMD -6.88 days, 95% CI -12.60 to -1.15), hospital length of stay (WMD -7.33 days, 95%CI -14.05 to -0.61), total duration of mechanical support (WMD -7.33 days, 95% CI -11.45 to -3.22) and the duration of endotracheal mechanical ventilation (WMD -6.79 days, 95% CI -11.70 to -1.87). There was no effect of NPPV on weaning failures or the duration of mechanical support related to weaning and insufficient data to pool adverse events or quality of life. Excluding a single quasi-randomized trial maintained the significant reduction in mortality and ventilator associated pneumonia. Subgroup analyses suggested that the mortality benefit of the NPPV approach is greater in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Summary estimates from five studies of moderate to good quality demonstrated a consistent positive effect on overall mortality. At present, use of NPPV to facilitate weaning in mechanically ventilated patients, with predominantly chronic obstructive lung disease, is associated with promising, although insufficient, evidence of net clinical benefit.

Trials comparing alternative weaning modes and discontinuation assessments

We identified 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of methods for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation, 8 of which were trials of discontinuation assessment strategies, 5 of which were trials of stepwise reduction in mechanical ventilatory support, and 3 of which were trials comparing alternative ventilation modes for weaning periods lasting < 48 h. We found that different thresholds for deciding when a patient is ready for a trial of spontaneous breathing, different criteria for a successful trial, and different thresholds for extubation may overwhelm the impact of alternative ventilation strategies. Nevertheless, the results of these studies suggest the possibility that multiple daily T-piece weaning or pressure support may be superior to synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Other RCTs suggest that early extubation with the back-up institution of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as needed may be a useful strategy in selected patients.

Gastric intramucosal pH and intraluminal PCO2 during weaning from mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVE

To study the value of gastric intramucosal pH and gastric intraluminal PCO2 measurements to predict weaning outcome from mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

Intensive care medicine department of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Nineteen adult critically ill patients who were mechanically ventilated because of acute respiratory failure and were considered ready to be weaned.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were weaned with: synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus positive end-expiratory pressure (SIMV+PEEP) or continuous positive airway pressure with pressure support ventilation (CPAP+PSV). A gastric tonometer was placed in all the patients. Tonometric, respiratory, and hemodynamic variables were measured during the weaning process.

MEASUREMENTS

Hemodynamic variables, respiratory mechanics, pulmonary gas exchange, respiratory muscle force, spontaneous pattern of breathing, and the central control of breathing were recorded. Simultaneously, the intramucosal pH and gastric intraluminal PCO2 were measured.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven patients were successfully extubated and eight failed. The patients who failed showed higher values of mouth occlusion pressure, respiratory rate, and effective inspiratory impedance (mouth occlusion pressure/mean inspiratory flow). The intramucosal pH was initially 7.19 +/- 0.22 and decreased to 7.10 +/- 0.16 during the weaning process in patients who failed (p < .05). At the same time, the intramucosal pH showed a nonsignificant change from 7.36 +/- 0.07 to 7.32 +/- 0.07 in the patients who were successfully extubated. The intramucosal pH was statistically different when both groups were compared during the initial and the final evaluations (p < .05). For the initial evaluation, the sensitivity and specificity to predict weaning failure when the intramucosal pH was < or =7.30 were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.59-1), respectively. The gastric intraluminal PCO2 was higher in patients who failed (p < .05). When gastric intraluminal PCO2 was . or =40 torr during the initial evaluation, weaning failure occurred with a sensitivity of 1 (95% CI, 0.31-1) and a specificity of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.26-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Weaning failure was associated with gastric intramucosal acidosis. The intramucosal pH and gastric intraluminal PCO2 may be helpful to predict weaning outcome. Further controlled clinical trials in a larger group of patients are needed.

Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive lung disease

Exacerbations of COPD are a leading indication for MV in the intensive care unit. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of AVF in COPD is critical for physicians caring for these patients. In particular, physicians should understand DHI and use the ventilator and ancillary techniques to minimize its impact. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation should be considered strongly in relatively stable patients with an adequate mental status and manageable secretions. Once AVF resolves, patients should be removed from the ventilator as soon as is safe to do so to minimize the adverse effects of prolonged MV. An organized approach to weaning and identifying patients capable of independent breathing is crucial. Most patients with COPD and AVF benefit from MV and generally return to or approach their premorbid functional status. A significant subset, however, will not benefit from, or choose not to undergo, MV. Deciding upon appropriate therapeutic options for these patients relies heavily on effective communication between physician and patient. Comprehensive discussions before the development of AVF can assist decision-making after respiratory failure develops.

Weaning from mechanical ventilation

Patients that require positive pressure ventilation to maintain sufficient alveolar ventilation or pulmonary gas exchange may eventually reach a point in the course of their care wherein mechanical ventilation is no longer necessary. This process of transferring the work of breathing from the ventilator back to the patient is referred to as ventilator weaning. The term "ventilator weaning" may be used to refer to all methods by which this transfer of workload may be accomplished. In many patients, particularly those with short-lasting or readily correctable causes of respiratory insufficiency (e.g., general anesthesia), the discontinuation of positive pressure ventilation may be easily achieved. Indeed, in patients awakening from general anesthesia, the axiom "awake enough to blink, awake enough to breath" may prove to be a sufficient guideline. However, in those patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilatory support, the process can prove to be both frustrating and exceptionally challenging. It is of crucial importance to identify those patients that may be successfully weaned because of both the financial impact of prolonged intensive care unit hospitalization and the risks imposed on the patient by the process of positive pressure ventilation. To be able to predict which patients may be ready to be weaned from the ventilator requires an understanding of the balance between the work of breathing (ventilatory load) and the ability of the patient's respiratory pump to meet those needs (ventilatory capacity). The management of patients experiencing difficulty during the weaning process requires that the clinician recognize imbalances between ventilatory load and capacity and to correct these imbalances once identified.

Is there a preferred technique for weaning the difficult-to-wean patient? A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To answer the following question: In difficult-to-wean patients, which of the three commonly used techniques of weaning (T-piece, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, or pressure support ventilation) leads to the highest proportion of successfully weaned patients and the shortest weaning time?

DATA SOURCES

Computerized literature searches in MEDLINE (1975-1996), Cinahl (1982-1996), and Healthplan (1985-1996), exploding all Mesh headings pertaining to Mechanical Ventilation and Weaning. Searches were restricted to the English language, adults, and humans. Personal files were hand searched, and references of selected articles were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

a)

POPULATION

Patients requiring a gradual weaning process from the ventilator (either requiring prolonged initial ventilation of >72 hrs or a failed trial of spontaneous breathing after >24 hrs of ventilation); b)

INTERVENTIONS

At least two of the following three modes of weaning from mechanical ventilation must have been compared: T-piece, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, or pressure support ventilation; c)

OUTCOMES

At least one of the following: weaning time (time from initiation of weaning to extubation) or successful weaning rate (successfully off the ventilator for >48 hrs); and d)

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled trial.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently reviewed the articles and graded them according to their methodologic rigor. Data on the success of weaning and the time to wean were summarized for each study.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The search strategy identified 667 potentially relevant studies; of these, 228 had weaning as their primary focus, and of these, 48 addressed modes of ventilation during weaning. Only 16 of these 48 studies had one of the specified outcomes, and only ten of these were controlled trials. Of the ten trials, only four fulfilled all our selection criteria. The results of the trials were conflicting, and there was heterogeneity among studies that precluded meaningful pooling of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few trials designed to determine the most effective mode of ventilation for weaning, and more work is required in this area. From the trials reviewed, we could not identify a superior weaning technique among the three most popular modes, T-piece, pressure support ventilation, or synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. However, it appears that synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation may lead to a longer duration of the weaning process than either T-piece or pressure support ventilation. Finally, the manner in which the mode of weaning is applied may have a greater effect on the likelihood of weaning than the mode itself.

Clinical characteristics, respiratory functional parameters, and outcome of a two-hour T-piece trial in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation

The discrepancy in results from different studies regarding outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation may be due to several factors such as the differences in patient populations and weaning indexes used. In order to analyze the clinical characteristics and weaning indexes in patients undergoing a 2-h T-piece weaning trial and the relationship between the etiology of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and the outcome of this weaning trial, we prospectively studied 217 patients receiving mechanical ventilation who met standard weaning criteria. Successful weaning occurred in 57.6% (125 of 217) of patients: 13 of 33 (39.4%) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 27 of 46 (58.7%) neurologic patients, and 85 of 138 (61.6%) patients with ARF. Ventilatory support was reinstituted in 31.8% (69 of 217) patients: 20 of 33 (60.6%) of patients with COPD, four of 46 (8.7%) neurologic patients, and 45 of 138 (32.6%) patients with ARF (p < 0.001). Reintubation was required in 23 of 148 (15.5%) patients: 15 of 42 (35.7%) neurologic patients, and eight of 93 (8.6%) patients with ARF, whereas no patient with COPD was reintubated (p < 0.001). Using a discriminant analysis, the following variables were selected as the best predictors of outcome: (1) in the whole population, days of mechanical ventilation before weaning trial (DMV), frequency-to-tidal volume ratio (f/VT), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and vital capacity (VC); (2) in patients with ARF, DMV, P0.1/MIP, MIP, f/VT, and age; (3) in patients with COPD, f/VT, P0.1, P0.1/MIP, MIP, age, and DMV; (4) in neurologic patients, MIP, MEP, and f/VT.P0.1. Using these predictors, 74.6% of the whole population, 76.1% of patients with ARF, 93.9% of patients with COPD, and 73.9% of neurologic patients were accurately classified as weaning successes or failures. The highest rate of reintubation occurred in neurologic patients. In this group, the ability to cough and clear respiratory secretions, objectively reflected by MEP, may help in clinical decision-making.

Weaning from mechanical ventilation

Use of mechanical ventilation is associated with several major complications despite its lifesaving potential. Timely discontinuation of mechanical ventilation is critical to control of duration of intensive care unit stay and reduction of complications associated with mechanical ventilation. Difficulty in discontinuation (or weaning) of patients from mechanical ventilatory support is in part attributable to inadequate understanding of the mechanisms responsible for unsuccessful outcome and a lack of guidelines regarding the optimal approach to the process of discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. For the first time, results from prospective, randomized, multicenter trials are available comparing common means of discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. In addition, the physiologic basis for a weaning strategy in mechanical ventilation is also coming into better focus. Two recent trials of weaning suggest different optimal modes, one favoring T-piece trials and the other supporting the use of pressure support ventilation. In either case, the above weaning techniques appear to be superior to intermittent mandatory ventilation in separating patients from mechanical ventilatory support. Based on available clinical trials, pressure support ventilation or T-piece trials appear to be the preferred methods for discontinuation of mechanical ventilatory support. A method using a simple T-piece trial technique is described.

Ventilator weaning protocols and techniques: getting the job done

Various protocols and techniques used to facilitate the weaning process are herein summarized. The protocols were derived from the literature, a survey of critical care nurses, and personal communications with individuals who use innovative methods to expedite the weaning process and reduce costs. The protocols provide a guideline for standardizing the weaning process, but they do not negate the importance of having skilled clinicians who provide continuity in implementing the protocols. The nursing profession has the opportunity to provide leadership in reducing health care costs through implementation of standardized approaches to weaning patients from mechanical ventilatory support.

Weaning from ventilatory support

Resumption of spontaneous unassisted breathing after an episode of acute respiratory failure often is achieved without major difficulty. In a significant number of patients however, weaning from mechanical ventilation is a long and difficult process that markedly increases the duration of mechanical ventilation and consumes a significant fraction of critical care resources. Some criteria have been suggested to predict early and more accurately the moment the patient is ready to be separated from the ventilator. At the present time, the f/VT ratio (rapid shallow breathing index) appears to yield the best predictive power. None of these indices, however, is powerful enough to be relied on solely, and their use should be limited to that of aids to the critical care physician. The inability to sustain spontaneous ventilation usually is the consequence of an imbalance between respiratory demand and respiratory muscle capacity. Increased elastic workload, increased resistive workload, and increased VE are the main causes of excessive demand imposed on the respiratory system. Respiratory muscle pump failure usually relates to peripheral nerve dysfunction or muscular dysfunction. Left ventricular dysfunction also is an important cause of weaning failure. The usual methods of weaning from mechanical ventilation are T-piece trials with abrupt definitive discontinuation of mechanical ventilation if tolerated or with progressive intermittent trials, IMV, and PSV. All have their advantages and disadvantages, and the method of weaning per sé is not the only critical factor. Although their conclusions were different regarding the best method of weaning, however, two recent clinical trials suggest that ventilatory management has a major influence on the outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation in difficult-to-wean patients. The global management of such patients requires a systematic approach with consideration of all factors involved in the process of separation from the ventilator. New computer-assisted systems already are tested and, in the future, may provide a significant advantage in the management of weaning from mechanical ventilation.

A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

Weaning patients from mechanical ventilation is an important problem in intensive care units. Weaning is usually conducted in an empirical manner, and a standardized approach has not been developed.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective, randomized, multicenter study involving 546 patients who had received mechanical ventilation for a mean (+/- SD) of 7.5 +/- 6.1 days and who were considered by their physicians to be ready for weaning. One hundred thirty patients had respiratory distress during a two-hour trial of spontaneous breathing. These patients were randomly assigned to undergo one of four weaning techniques: intermittent mandatory ventilation, in which the ventilator rate was initially set at a mean (+/- SD) of 10.0 +/- 2.2 breaths per minute and then decreased, if possible, at least twice a day, usually by 2 to 4 breaths per minute (29 patients); pressure-support ventilation, in which pressure support was initially set at 18.0 +/- 6.1 cm of water and then reduced, if possible, by 2 to 4 cm of water at least twice a day (37 patients); intermittent trials of spontaneous breathing, conducted two or more times a day if possible (33 patients); or a once-daily trail of spontaneous breathing (31 patients). Standardized protocols were followed for each technique.

RESULTS

The median duration of weaning was 5 days for intermittent mandatory ventilation (first quartile, 3 days; third quartile, 11 days), 4 days for pressure-support ventilation (2 and 12 days, respectively), 3 days for intermittent (multiple) trials of spontaneous breathing (2 and 6 days, respectively), and 3 days for a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing (1 and 6 days, respectively). After adjustment for other covariates, the rate of successful weaning was higher with a once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing than with intermittent mandatory ventilation (rate ratio, 2.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.36 to 5.89; P < 0.006) or pressure-support ventilation (rate ratio, 2.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 4.04; P < 0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of success between once-daily trials and multiple trials of spontaneous breathing.

CONCLUSIONS

A once-daily trial of spontaneous breathing led to extubation about three times more quickly than intermittent mandatory ventilation and about twice as quickly as pressure-support ventilation. Multiple daily trials of spontaneous breathing were equally successful.

Predictors of weaning after 6 weeks of mechanical ventilation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify variables associated with weaning outcome in long-term ventilator-dependent patients. Using those variables, to construct models to predict weaning success and to test the accuracy of those models.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review.

SETTING

Regional weaning center (RWC).

PATIENTS

An initial group of 421 and a subsequent group of 170 consecutive patients referred for attempted weaning after 6 weeks of mechanical ventilation.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Data obtained on admission to our facility were analyzed for correlation with weaning outcome. In the initial patient group, selected variables which correlated with weaning success were alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference (P[A-a]O2), BUN, BUN/creatinine ratio (each with p < or = 0.001), and female gender (p = 0.04). We used these variables in logistic regression models to predict weaning success in this population. We then tested the models in the 170-patient validation group using both standard and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The ROC analysis indicated 59% accuracy using P(A-a)O2 alone and 68% accuracy using all previously mentioned variables. We used data from all 565 patients with known outcome and omitted BUN/creatinine ratio to fashion a simple scoring system to predict weaning success with 70% accuracy using P(A-a)O2, BUN, and Gender--the A+B+G score.

CONCLUSION

In patients suffering prolonged mechanical ventilation, models incorporating simple measurements allowed construction of a score to predict weaning success at our RWC.

Automatic weaning from mechanical ventilation using an adaptive lung ventilation controller

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new method of closed-loop mechanical ventilation using an adaptive lung ventilation (ALV) controller in patients with different pathologic causes of respiratory failure at a time when they first met standard weaning criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, open, selected case study.

SETTING

The 10-bed, multidisciplinary respiratory intensive care unit at Groote Schuur hospital, which is a teaching unit of the University of Cape Town.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven patients (9 patients in each of 3 groups: normal lungs, parenchymal lung disease, and COPD) who required prolonged mechanical ventilation and who met standard weaning criteria were included. Our institutional committee for ethical research approved the study and informed consent was obtained.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were mechanically ventilated and had daily measurements of vital capacity, respiratory rate, and arterial blood gas analysis until they met standard weaning criteria. On the day that each patient met the weaning criteria, a closed loop control algorithm providing ALV was implemented on a modified ventilator (Hamilton AMADEUS) with a PC-based lung function analyzer. After measuring gross alveolar ventilation, patients were placed in ALV and ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters were measured at baseline, 5 min, 30 min, and 2 h. Pertinent parameters measured included airway pressures, pressure support levels, respiratory rates, rapid shallow breathing indices, airway resistance indices, and patient respiratory drive and work indices.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

In 22 patients, ALV reduced pressure support to 5 cm H2O and an intermittent mandatory ventilation rate of 4 breaths/min within 30 min, and all but 1 of these patients were successfully extubated within 24 h. In four patients, pressure support was maintained by ALV at a mean level of 14.6 cm H2O +/- for 2 h and these patients were recorded as having failed to wean. There was a measurable difference in an index of airway resistance relative to muscular activity between the successfully weaned and failed wean patients with COPD during the attempted wean by the ALV controller.

CONCLUSIONS

ALV will provide a safe, efficient wean and will respond immediately to inadequate ventilation in patients when standard weaning criteria are met.

Weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. The experience at a regional weaning center

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the facility, patient population, outcome of treatment, and survival of patients transferred to a regional weaning center (RWC) after prolonged mechanical ventilation in the ICU setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective record review.

SETTING

Regional weaning center.

PATIENTS

Four hundred twenty-one consecutive ventilator dependent patients were transferred from ICU care for attempted weaning over a 36-month period.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Acute catastrophic surgical, traumatic, or septic illness resulted in ventilator dependency with much greater frequency than decompensated COPD. Of the 421 patients, 116 died and 287 survived with outcome known at discharge. Of the 287 who survived, 212 were freed from ventilator support. Patients who weaned were ventilator-dependent for 46.9 +/- 2.9 days before transfer to the RWC. Almost half of those weaned were discharged to their homes. Survival at 6 months and 1 year after discharge was 44 percent and 28 percent respectively, and it was greater for those at home than for those discharged to an extended care facility (ECF). The RWC care was approximately $1,500 per patient day less costly than ICU care, and $208 per patient day less costly than noninvasive respiratory care unit care.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected patients who become ventilator dependent for prolonged periods in the ICU may be transferred to an RWC with the expectation of successful weaning in a majority of cases.

A computer-controlled ventilator weaning system

Weaning of patients from mechanical ventilation is a time-consuming, labor-intensive process. Because most weaning decisions are based on objective data, we tested a computer-directed weaning system on postoperative patients. We developed an automatic, computer-controlled ventilator weaning system which interfaces a laptop computer to a ventilator and a pulse oximeter. The laptop computer program accesses patient data through the ventilator and pulse oximeter to make weaning decisions. The computer directly controls the ventilator through an interface developed for this system. We tested the system in nine postoperative patients who met the following criteria: negative inspiratory force less than or equal to -20 cm H2O, vital capacity greater than 10 ml/kg, inspired oxygen concentration less than or equal to 40 percent, and satisfactory arterial blood gas parameters (pH between 7.32 and 7.48, PCO2 between 32 and 48, and oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 90 percent). The computer decreased the SIMV rate by 2 breaths/min every 5 min until a rate of 2 breaths/min was reached, then decreased pressure support by 4 cm H2O every 5 min as long as the patient met the following criteria: respiratory rate between 8 and 25 breaths/min, minute ventilation between 6 and 14 L, and pulse oximeter oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 90 percent. If unsatisfactory weaning criteria were noted, the system automatically returned the patient to the previous weaning level. We successfully weaned nine patients using the system. Additional studies are underway to determine if this system can be used in medical patients. We believe this computer-controlled ventilator weaning system can be used successfully in patients requiring mechanical ventilation and may decrease the time and cost associated with the care of these patients.

Weaning from mechanical ventilation

An understanding of respiratory physiology is helpful when weaning a patient from mechanical ventilation. Various criteria are available that assess pulmonary function and the patient's ability to breathe spontaneously. The majority of patients are weaned without difficulty, but a small percentage will require careful evaluation. A complete assessment of the patient is essential during the weaning trial. The mode of ventilation during weaning is less important than careful observation during the trial. Simple vital signs and physical findings remain some of the best indicators of success or failure.

Difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation

Difficult weaning is fortunately a rare occurrence in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU. When faced with this problem, a vast number of factors must be carefully considered simultaneously: physiological adjustment, technical problems (tubing, circuit resistances, . . .) [13]. The most promising approach to difficult weaning to date centers on the respiratory muscle function which represents the most common factor allowing weaning success or failure.

Mechanical ventilation

Among the many advances made in intensive care therapeutics in recent years, few have rivaled the impact of mechanical ventilators. Their expanded use affects all who practice in the critical care setting. This article reviews the physiologic basis for mechanical ventilation, how ventilators are classified, the various modes, and specific indications. A basic introduction is made into ventilator set up, weaning techniques, adjunctive drug therapy, and complications. The pharmacotherapy specialist who understands interactions between patients and ventilators, and the effects of mechanical ventilation on cardiopulmonary function will be best equipped to individualize drug therapy.