Optimal interpretation of the supine exercise electrocardiogram in patients with right bundle branch block

Diagnostic value of exercise electrocardiography and dipyridamole stress echocardiography in hypertensive and normotensive chest pain patients with right bundle branch block

OBJECTIVES

Studies on the diagnostic value of exercise electrocardiography in right bundle branch block produced controversial results, and data on the accuracy of stress echo are still lacking. The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of exercise electrocardiography and dipyridamole stress echo in chest pain patients with right bundle branch block, and to verify whether stress testing accuracy is affected by history of hypertension.

METHODS

The study group was made up of 71 patients (56 men, aged 63 +/- 8 years) with chest pain of unknown origin and complete right bundle branch block. Of them, 35 were hypertensives and 36 normotensives. Patients performed, on different days and in random order, exercise electrocardiography and dipyridamole stress echo and underwent coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Significant (> or = 70% diameter stenosis) coronary artery disease was found in 34 patients (17 hypertensives and 17 normotensives). Positive exercise electrocardiography (ST-segment shift > 1 mm at 80 ms after the J point in leads V5 and V6 or leads II and Vf) and dipyridamole stress echo (new wall motion abnormalities) were observed in 38 and 30 patients, respectively. The result of tests was concordant in 69% of hypertensives and 92% of normotensives. The two tests shared the same sensitivity in hypertensives (82%) and normotensives (71%). Of 37 patients without coronary artery disease, 12 had a false-positive result during exercise electrocardiography and four during stress echo. The specificity was lower for exercise electrocardiography than for stress echo in hypertensives (50 versus 89%, P = 0.0006), while no difference was evidenced in normotensives (84 versus 89%, P = 0.4). In hypertensives, the accuracy, positive, and negative predictive values were 66, 61, and 75% for exercise electrocardiography, and 86, 87, and 84% for stress echo. Corresponding figures in normotensives were 78, 80, and 76% for exercise electrocardiography, and 81, 86, and 77% for stress echo.

CONCLUSIONS

In chest-pain patients with right bundle branch block, dipyridamole stress echo was effective to diagnose coronary artery disease in both normotensives and hypertensives. Moreover, it exhibited superior diagnostic information than exercise electrocardiography in hypertensives, due to significantly higher specificity. However, the two tests had similar diagnostic value in normotensives.

Relation between exercise-induced myocardial ischemia as assessed by nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography and QT interval behavior in patients with right bundle branch block

Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia is difficult to detect with ST-T changes in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB). We sought to predict exercise-induced myocardial ischemia with QT interval behavior during exercise in patients with RBBB. Twenty-two patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and RBBB and 9 healthy volunteers underwent nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography with bicycle ergometer exercise at a fixed workload of 25 W. Regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF) and electrocardiographic changes were measured both at rest and after 5 minutes of exercise. The QT interval was measured from the onset of the QRS complex to the offset of the T wave in lead V5. The deltaQT and deltaRMBF, which indicated values after 5 minutes of exercise minus values at rest, were negatively correlated (r = -0.74, p <0.001). Exercise-induced shortening of the QT interval (422 +/- 27 to 381 +/- 38 ms, p = 0.0020) was observed in 15 patients (group 1) and no change or prolongation (411 +/- 45 to 420 +/- 37 ms, p = NS) was observed in 7 patients (group 2). Multivessel disease was significantly more frequent but collateral circulation was significantly less in group 2 than in group 1 (p <0.01, p <0.05, respectively). Cardiac output at rest was significantly lower in groups 1 and 2 than in healthy volunteers (4.52 +/- 0.83 and 4.51 +/- 0.84 vs 6.20 +/- 0.83 L/min; p = 0.0014, p = 0.0003). Although RMBF at rest did not differ significantly among groups 1 and 2 and healthy volunteers (0.63 +/- 0.20 vs 0.69 +/- 0.13 and vs 0.77 +/- 0.14 ml/min/g), RMBF after 5 minutes of exercise was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 and healthy volunteers (0.78 +/- 0.11 vs 0.96 +/- 0.20 and vs 1.20 +/- 0.18 ml/min/g; p = 0.0289, p <0.0001). The number of regions of critical coronary artery disease was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 (4.0 +/- 1.2 vs 2.1 +/- 1.3, p = 0.0039). Our results suggest that the absence of QT interval shortening during exercise may indicate severe myocardial ischemia induced by exercise in patients with RBBB and coronary artery disease.