WR-2721 reduces intestinal toxicity from concurrent gemcitabine and radiation treatment

Enteral Activation of WR-2721 Mediates Radioprotection and Improved Survival from Lethal Fractionated Radiation

Unresectable pancreatic cancer is almost universally lethal because chemotherapy and radiation cannot completely stop the growth of the cancer. The major problem with using radiation to approximate surgery in unresectable disease is that the radiation dose required to ablate pancreatic cancer exceeds the tolerance of the nearby duodenum. WR-2721, also known as amifostine, is a well-known radioprotector, but has significant clinical toxicities when given systemically. WR-2721 is a prodrug and is converted to its active metabolite, WR-1065, by alkaline phosphatases in normal tissues. The small intestine is highly enriched in these activating enzymes, and thus we reasoned that oral administration of WR-2721 just before radiation would result in localized production of the radioprotective WR-1065 in the small intestine, providing protective benefits without the significant systemic side effects. Here, we show that oral WR-2721 is as effective as intraperitoneal WR-2721 in promoting survival of intestinal crypt clonogens after morbid irradiation. Furthermore, oral WR-2721 confers full radioprotection and survival after lethal upper abdominal irradiation of 12.5 Gy × 5 fractions (total of 62.5 Gy, EQD2 = 140.6 Gy). This radioprotection enables ablative radiation therapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer and nearly triples the median survival compared to controls. We find that the efficacy of oral WR-2721 stems from its selective accumulation in the intestine, but not in tumors or other normal tissues, as determined by in vivo mass spectrometry analysis. Thus, we demonstrate that oral WR-2721 is a well-tolerated, and quantitatively selective, radioprotector of the intestinal tract that is capable of enabling clinically relevant ablative doses of radiation to the upper abdomen without unacceptable gastrointestinal toxicity.

Stem cell enriched-epithelial spheroid cultures for rapidly assaying small intestinal radioprotectors and radiosensitizers in vitro

Radiation therapy is one of the main treatment options for many cancer patients. Although high doses of radiation may maximize tumor cell killing, dose escalation is limited by toxicity to neighboring normal tissues. This limitation applies particularly to the small intestine, the second most radiosensitive organ in the body. Identifying small intestinal (SI) radioprotectors could enable dose escalation in the treatment of abdominopelvic malignancies. However, the only assay currently available to identify effects of radiomodulating drugs on the regenerating capacity of SI stem cells is the Withers-Elkind microcolony assay, which requires large numbers of mice, making it a costly and low throughput method. Here, we describe a novel spheroid formation assay (SFA) that utilizes SI stem cell-enriched three-dimensional epithelial spheroid cultures to identify gastrointestinal radiomodulators ex vivo. The SFA is scalable for high throughput screening and can be used to identify both radioprotectors and radiosensitizers.

Phase I trial of radiotherapy concurrent with twice-weekly gemcitabine for head and neck cancer: translation from preclinical investigations aiming to improve the therapeutic ratio

BACKGROUND

Once-weekly gemcitabine concurrent with radiotherapy was highly effective in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) but limited by high mucosal toxicity. Pre-clinical investigations suggested that delivering gemcitabine at substantially lower doses twice weekly during radiotherapy improved the therapeutic ratio. We sought to translated these preclinical findings to a phase I trial.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with non-resectable HNC were scheduled to receive gemcitabine twice weekly during the last 2 weeks (total 5 infusions) of hyperfractionated radiotherapy delivering 1.2 Gy twice daily to total 76.8 Gy. Tumor biopsies to measure active intracellular (phosphorylated) gemcitabine were planned after the first drug delivery. Patients were assigned to escalating dose cohorts using the Continuous Reassessment Method.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients evaluable for toxicity were divided into cohorts receiving twice weekly treatment with 10, 20, 33, or 50 mg/m(2) gemcitabine. Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3-4 confluent mucositis/pharyngitis, and the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) was 20 mg/m(2). Median survival was 20 months, with no difference between cohorts receiving lower (10, 20 mg/m(2)) or higher (33, 50 mg/m(2)) gemcitabine doses. Tumor biopsies after the first drug delivery showed only a minority of tumor cells in the specimens.

CONCLUSION

These findings validate preclinical models that show that gemcitabine is radiation sensitizer at doses far below those used for systemic chemotherapy. However, the improvement in the therapeutic ratio predicted from the preclinical study did not translate into a substantial relative increase in the MTD of the drug in the clinical phase I trial.

Randomized phase II exploratory study of prophylactic amifostine in cancer patients who receive radical radiotherapy to the pelvis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic amifostine in reducing the risk of severe radiation colitis in cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the pelvis.

METHODS

Patients with pelvic tumours referred for radical radiotherapy who consented participation in this trial, were randomly assigned to receive daily amifostine (A) (subcutaneously, 500 mg flat dose) before radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone (R). Sigmoidoscopy and blinded biopsies were scheduled to conduct prior to initiation and following completion of radiotherapy and again 6 to 9 months later. Radiation colitis was assessed by clinical, endoscopic and histolopathological criteria.

RESULTS

A total 44 patients were enrolled in this trial, the majority with rectal (20 patients) and cervical cancer (12 patients) and were assigned 23 in R arm and 21 in the A arm. In total 119 sigmoidoscopies were performed and 18 patients (18/44, 40.9%) were diagnosed with radiation colitis (15 grade 1 and 2, and 3 grade 3 and 4). Of them, 6 patients belonged to the A group (6/21, 28.6%) and 12 to the R group (12/23, 52.2%). Acute and grade IV radiation colitis was only developed in four patients (17.4%) in the R group. Amifostine side effects were mild. Amifostine treated patients were less likely to develop histologically detectable mucosal lesions, which indicate protection from acute mucosal injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Amifostine given subcutaneously can lower the risk of acute severe radiation colitis in patients who receive radical radiotherapy to pelvic tumors.

The role of amifostine on late normal tissue damage induced by pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant gemcitabine: an in vivo study

In this in vivo study, we aimed to assess the radioprotective effect of amifostine on late normal tissue damage induced by gemcitabine concomitant with pelvic radiotherapy by histopathological and quantitative methods. Fifty-six male Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into seven experimental groups as follows: (I) gemcitabine, (II) radiation + gemcitabine, (III) radiation + gemcitabine + amifostine, (IV) radiation + amifostine, (V) sham radiation, (VI) amifostine, (VII) radiation. Irradiation was given to pelvic region with a dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions. Amifostine was given for 30 min; gemcitabine was administered 24 h before the first fraction of radiotherapy. All animals were killed at the end of 4th month. Pathological examination was performed and the tissue collagen content was measured in bladder and rectal tissues. Fifty-one animals that were alive at the end of the follow-up period were analyzed. Thirty-five animals (68.6%) revealed grades I-III late effect in histopathological examination. We observed grade III colitis in 1 animal (radiation + gemcitabine) and bladder fibrosis in 4 animals (radiation and radiation + gemcitabine groups). There was no significant difference between any groups for bladder cystitis and fibrosis by Kruskal-Wallis method. Colitis was seen significantly lower in the radiation + gemcitabine + amifostine group (P = 0.0005). The collagen contents in the bladder and rectum of radiation and radiation + gemcitabine groups were markedly increased as compared to the sham group. This effect was reversed in the groups which received amifostine in addition to radiation and radiation + gemcitabine groups, but this difference was not significant. This study demonstrated that amifostine may have a beneficial effect in limiting rectal colitis from the radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine.

Tyrphostins reduce chemotherapy-induced intestinal injury in mice: assessment by a biochemical assay

Intestinal injury that results from chemotherapy belongs to the major factors of dose-limitation in tumour therapy. The tyrphostins AG1714 and AG1801 reduce cisplatin and 5-FU-induced small intestinal mucosal damage, using a quantitative biochemical assay. The assay is based on the determination of the enzymatic activity of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, a marker of the brush border epithelium of the small intestine.

Effects of dose and schedule on the efficacy of Ethyol: preclinical studies1 1The authors are employees and shareholders of MedImmune Inc

The chemo- and radioprotectant drug amifostine (Ethyol; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) is approved for intravenous (IV) administration; however, the subcutaneous (SC) route is being explored as a practical alternative. We have previously reported equivalence between IV and SC administration using a rat model of radioprotection and active metabolite (WR-1065) tissue pharmacokinetics. To examine the more clinically relevant fractionated and hyperfractionated radiation schedules and the effects of variations in the time of amifostine administration, we expanded these studies to include radioprotection and pharmacokinetic studies of WR-1065 using multiple dosing. To measure radioprotection using a fractionated radioprotection model, rats were given amifostine over a 1-week period at various doses (25 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg; or 162.5 mg/m(2), 325 mg/m(2), 650 mg/m(2), respectively) IV or SC daily 30 minutes before exposure to 7.5 Gy/dose. Rats were fully protected from mucositis at the highest amifostine dose, with protection diminishing as the amifostine was decreased. Equivalent protection was observed whether the drug was given IV or SC. When the number of days of amifostine administration was reduced, protection was diminished. Amifostine also protected against radiation delivered using a 1-week hyperfractionated schedule (4.5 Gy/exposure twice daily), with optimal protection occurring when the drug was administered bid 30 minutes before each exposure (50 mg/kg) or every day before the morning exposure (100 mg/kg). The need for daily dosing to achieve optimal radioprotection was consistent with the tissue pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite. We found that WR-1065 did not accumulate in tissues or in SC-implanted tumors when amifostine was administered daily for 3 weeks. In addition, tissue and tumor levels of WR-1065 declined to baseline 24 hours after each amifostine dose. In a monkey pharmacokinetic model, plasma levels of WR-1065 (characterized by a pronounced spike of WR-1065 immediately after IV administration that was absent when the drug was given SC) were similar to those of humans; however, levels of WR-1065 in the tissues were higher 30 minutes following SC administration and were equivalent 60 minutes following IV or SC administration. These results suggest that maximum tissue levels and protection occur when amifostine is given 30 to 60 minutes before radiation exposure, that treatment breaks reduce the radioprotection by amifostine, and that protection from hyperfractionated radiation is dependent on amifostine dose and schedule.

The radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine and the influence of the rescue agent amifostine in vitro

In this study, the radiosensitising effect of different concentrations of gemcitabine and the combination of gemcitabine/radiotherapy with the rescue agent amifostine was investigated in different human tumour cell lines. The cells were treated with gemcitabine (0-8 nM) for 24 h prior to radiation (0-8 Gy). Amifostine (ami) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) were added 30 min before radiation. Cell survival was determined 7 or 8 days after radiation treatment by the sulforhodamine B (SRB) test. For ECV304 cells, the dose enhancement factor (DEF) varied from 1.39 to 2.98 after treatment with 1-6 nM gemcitabine. FaDu, H292, A549 and CAL-27 seemed to be less sensitive, with DEFs ranging from 1.02 to 2.67. These cells were also less sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of single-agent gemcitabine. Amifostine with AP clearly showed a protective effect in combination with gemcitabine/radiotherapy. In H292 cells, the protection factor (PF) of amifostine after treatment with gemcitabine and radiotherapy varied from 1.64 to 1.86. In ECV304 cells, the PF varied from 2.20 to 2.29. In conclusion, a clear concentration- and cell line-dependent radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine was observed in all cell lines. Amifostine with AP showed protection against the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine. If the protection in vivo indeed occurs selectively in normal tissues, then amifostine could prevent or strongly minimise the increased toxicity resulting from the radiosensitising effect of the combination of gemcitabine and radiotherapy, without influencing the antitumour effect.

Double-walled microspheres for the sustained release of a highly water soluble drug: characterization and irradiation studies

Composite double-walled microspheres with biodegradable poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) shells and poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) cores were fabricated with highly water-soluble etanidazole entrapped within the core as solid crystals. This paper discusses the characterization, in vitro release and the effects of irradiation on this class of microsphere. Through the variation of polymer mass ratios, predictable shell and core dimensions could be fabricated and used to regulate the release rates. A direct and simple method was devised to determine the composition of the shell and core polymer based on the different solubilities of the polymer pair in ethyl acetate. A distribution theory based on solubility parameter explains why highly hydrophilic etanidazole has the tendency to be distributed consistently to the more hydrophilic polymer. Release profiles for normal double-walled samples have about 80% of drug released over 10 days after the initial time lag, while for irradiated double-walled samples, the sustained release lasted for more than 3 weeks. Although sustained release was short of the desired 6-8 weeks required for therapy, a low initial burst of less than 5% and time lags that can be manipulated, allows for administration of these microspheres together with traditional ones to generate pulsatile or new type of releases. The effects of irradiation were also investigated to determine the suitability of these double-walled microspheres as delivery devices to be used in conjunction with radiotherapy. Typical therapeutic dosage of 50 Gy was found to be too mild to have noticeable effects on the polymer and its release profiles, while, sterilization dosages of 25 kGy, lowered the glass transition temperatures and crystalline melting point, indirectly indicating a decrease in molecular weight. This accelerated degradation of the polymer, hence releasing the drug.