1
|
Hensel B, Henneberg S, Kleve-Feld M, Jung M, Schulze M. Selection and direct biomarkers of reproductive capacity of breeding boars. Anim Reprod Sci 2024; 269:107490. [PMID: 38735766 DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Efficient management of pig reproduction is paramount for the sustainability and productivity of the global pork industry. Modern artificial insemination (AI) breeding programs have greatly benefited from the integration of advanced selection methods and biomarkers to enhance the reproductive performance of boars. While traditional selection methods have relied soley on boar phenotype, such as growth rate and conformation, modern pig breeding has shifted more and more toward molecular and genetic tools, which are still complemented by phenotypic traits. These methods encompass genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics. Biomarkers serve as critical indicators of boar reproductive capacity. They can help to identify individuals with superior fertility and aid in the early identification of potential fertility issues, allowing for proactive management strategies. This review summarizes current knowledge of various biomarkers associated with semen quality, sperm function, and overall reproductive fitness in boars. Furthermore, we explore advanced technologies and their potential applications in uncovering novel selection methods and biomarkers for predicting boar fertility. A comprehensive understanding of selection criteria and biomarkers governing boar reproductive capacity is essential for developing effective breeding programs to enhance swine reproductive performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britta Hensel
- Institute for Reproduction of Farm Animals Schönow, Bernauer Allee 10, Bernau D-16321, Germany
| | - Sophie Henneberg
- Institute for Reproduction of Farm Animals Schönow, Bernauer Allee 10, Bernau D-16321, Germany
| | - Michael Kleve-Feld
- Pig Improvement Company, 100 Bluegrass Commons Blvd. Ste 2200, Hendersonville, TN 37075, United States
| | - Markus Jung
- Institute for Reproduction of Farm Animals Schönow, Bernauer Allee 10, Bernau D-16321, Germany
| | - Martin Schulze
- Institute for Reproduction of Farm Animals Schönow, Bernauer Allee 10, Bernau D-16321, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamada H, Kato N, Ichikawa M, Mannen K, Kiba T, Osakabe Y, Sakakibara H, Matsui M, Okamoto T. DNA- and Selectable-Marker-Free Genome-Editing System Using Zygotes from Recalcitrant Maize Inbred B73. PLANT & CELL PHYSIOLOGY 2024; 65:729-736. [PMID: 38288629 DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcae010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Genome-editing tools such as the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system have become essential tools for increasing the efficiency and accuracy of plant breeding. Using such genome-editing tools on maize, one of the most important cereal crops of the world, will greatly benefit the agriculture and the mankind. Conventional genome-editing methods typically used for maize involve insertion of a Cas9-guide RNA expression cassette and a selectable marker in the genome DNA; however, using such methods, it is essential to eliminate the inserted DNA cassettes to avoid legislative concerns on gene-modified organisms. Another major hurdle for establishing an efficient and broadly applicable DNA-free genome-editing system for maize is presented by recalcitrant genotypes/cultivars, since cell/tissue culture and its subsequent regeneration into plantlets are crucial for producing transgenic and/or genome-edited maize. In this study, to establish a DNA-free genome-editing system for recalcitrant maize genotypes/cultivars, Cas9-gRNA ribonucleoproteins were directly delivered into zygotes isolated from the pollinated flowers of the maize-B73 cultivar. The zygotes successfully developed and were regenerated into genome-edited plantlets by co-culture with phytosulfokine, a peptide phytohormone. The method developed herein made it possible to obtain DNA- and selectable-marker-free genome-edited recalcitrant maize genotypes/cultivars with high efficiency. This method can advance the molecular breeding of maize and other important cereals, regardless of their recalcitrant characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajime Yamada
- Agri-Bio Research Center, KANEKA CORPORATION, Higashibara 700, Iwata, Shizuoka, 438-0802 Japan
- Plant Innovation Center, Japan Tobacco, Inc., Higashibara 700, Iwata, Shizuoka, 438-0802 Japan
| | - Norio Kato
- Plant Innovation Center, Japan Tobacco, Inc., Higashibara 700, Iwata, Shizuoka, 438-0802 Japan
- Plant Breeding Innovation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Tsurumi, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minami-osawa 1-1, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392 Japan
| | - Masako Ichikawa
- Agri-Bio Research Center, KANEKA CORPORATION, Higashibara 700, Iwata, Shizuoka, 438-0802 Japan
- Plant Innovation Center, Japan Tobacco, Inc., Higashibara 700, Iwata, Shizuoka, 438-0802 Japan
| | - Keiko Mannen
- Plant Breeding Innovation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Tsurumi, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan
| | - Takatoshi Kiba
- Plant Breeding Innovation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Tsurumi, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan
- Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601 Japan
| | - Yuriko Osakabe
- Plant Breeding Innovation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Tsurumi, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan
- Department of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, 226-8501 Japan
| | - Hitoshi Sakakibara
- Plant Breeding Innovation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Tsurumi, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan
- Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601 Japan
| | - Minami Matsui
- Plant Breeding Innovation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Tsurumi, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan
- RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045 Japan
| | - Takashi Okamoto
- Plant Breeding Innovation Laboratory, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Tsurumi, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan
- Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minami-osawa 1-1, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wani AK, Akhtar N, Singh R, Prakash A, Raza SHA, Cavalu S, Chopra C, Madkour M, Elolimy A, Hashem NM. Genome centric engineering using ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 systems for trait improvement and disease control in Animals. Vet Res Commun 2023; 47:1-16. [PMID: 35781172 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-022-09967-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Livestock is an essential life commodity in modern agriculture involving breeding and maintenance. The farming practices have evolved mainly over the last century for commercial outputs, animal welfare, environment friendliness, and public health. Modifying genetic makeup of livestock has been proposed as an effective tool to create farmed animals with characteristics meeting modern farming system goals. The first technique used to produce transgenic farmed animals resulted in random transgene insertion and a low gene transfection rate. Therefore, genome manipulation technologies have been developed to enable efficient gene targeting with a higher accuracy and gene stability. Genome editing (GE) with engineered nucleases-Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) regulates the targeted genetic alterations to facilitate multiple genomic modifications through protein-DNA binding. The application of genome editors indicates usefulness in reproduction, animal models, transgenic animals, and cell lines. Recently, CRISPR/Cas system, an RNA-dependent genome editing tool (GET), is considered one of the most advanced and precise GE techniques for on-target modifications in the mammalian genome by mediating knock-in (KI) and knock-out (KO) of several genes. Lately, CRISPR/Cas9 tool has become the method of choice for genome alterations in livestock species due to its efficiency and specificity. The aim of this review is to discuss the evolution of engineered nucleases and GETs as a powerful tool for genome manipulation with special emphasis on its applications in improving economic traits and conferring resistance to infectious diseases of animals used for food production, by highlighting the recent trends for maintaining sustainable livestock production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atif Khurshid Wani
- School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, 144411, India
| | - Nahid Akhtar
- School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, 144411, India
| | - Reena Singh
- School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, 144411, India
| | - Ajit Prakash
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, 120 Mason Farm Road, CB# 7260, 3093 Genetic Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-2760, USA
| | - Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China
| | - Simona Cavalu
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, P -ta 1Decembrie 10, 410073, Oradea, Romania
| | - Chirag Chopra
- School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, 144411, India
| | - Mahmoud Madkour
- Animal Production Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, 12622, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Elolimy
- Animal Production Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, 12622, Egypt
| | - Nesrein M Hashem
- Department of Animal and Fish Production, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21545, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu H, Zhou W, Liu H, Cui X, Ma W, Wu H, Li G, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhang X, Ji P, Lian Z, Liu G. Whole-genome methylation analysis reveals epigenetic variation between wild-type and nontransgenic cloned, ASMT transgenic cloned dairy goats generated by the somatic cell nuclear transfer. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2022; 13:145. [PMID: 36434676 PMCID: PMC9701027 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-022-00764-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND SCNT (somatic cell nuclear transfer) is of great significance to biological research and also to the livestock breeding. However, the survival rate of the SCNT cloned animals is relatively low compared to other transgenic methods. This indicates the potential epigenetic variations between them. DNA methylation is a key marker of mammalian epigenetics and its alterations will lead to phenotypic differences. In this study, ASMT (acetylserotonin-O-methyltransferase) ovarian overexpression transgenic goat was produced by using SCNT. To investigate whether there are epigenetic differences between cloned and WT (wild type) goats, WGBS (whole-genome bisulfite sequencing) was used to measure the whole-genome methylation of these animals. RESULTS It is observed that the different mCpG sites are mainly present in the intergenic and intronic regions between cloned and WT animals, and their CG-type methylation sites are strongly correlated. DMR (differentially methylated region) lengths are located around 1000 bp, mainly distributed in the exonic, intergenic and intronic functional domains. A total of 56 and 36 DMGs (differentially methylated genes) were identified by GO and KEGG databases, respectively. Functional annotation showed that DMGs were enriched in biological-process, cellular-component, molecular-function and other signaling pathways. A total of 10 identical genes related to growth and development were identified in GO and KEGG databases. CONCLUSION The differences in methylation genes among the tested animals have been identified. A total of 10 DMGs associated with growth and development were identified between cloned and WT animals. The results indicate that the differential patterns of DNA methylation between the cloned and WT goats are probably caused by the SCNT. These novel observations will help us to further identify the unveiled mechanisms of somatic cell cloning technology, particularly in goats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wu
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China ,Sany Institute of China Agricultural University, Sanya, 572025 China
| | - Wendi Zhou
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Haijun Liu
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Tianjin, Tianjin, 300192 China
| | - Xudai Cui
- Qingdao Senmiao Industrial Co., Ltd., Qingdao, 266101 China
| | - Wenkui Ma
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Haixin Wu
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Guangdong Li
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Likai Wang
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Jinlong Zhang
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Tianjin, Tianjin, 300192 China
| | - Xiaosheng Zhang
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Tianjin, Tianjin, 300192 China
| | - Pengyun Ji
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Zhengxing Lian
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China
| | - Guoshi Liu
- grid.22935.3f0000 0004 0530 8290National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agricultural, Beijing Key Laboratory for Animal Genetic Improvement, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China ,Sany Institute of China Agricultural University, Sanya, 572025 China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ladowski JM, Houp J, Hauptfeld-Dolejsek V, Javed M, Hara H, Cooper DKC. Aspects of histocompatibility testing in xenotransplantation. Transpl Immunol 2021; 67:101409. [PMID: 34015463 PMCID: PMC8197754 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Xenotransplantation, using genetically-modified pigs for clinical organ transplantation, is a solution to the organ shortage. The biggest barrier to clinical implementation is the antigenicity of pig cells. Humans possess preformed antibody to pig cells that initiate antibody-mediated rejection of pig organs in primates. Advances in genetic engineering have led to the development of a pig lacking the three known glycan xenoantigens (triple-knockout [TKO] pigs). A significant number of human sera demonstrate no antibody binding to TKO pig cells. As a result of the TKO pig's low antigen expression, survival of life-supporting pig organs in immunosuppressed nonhuman primates has significantly increased, and hope has been renewed for clinical trials of xenotransplantation. It is important to understand the context in which xenotransplantation's predecessor, allotransplantation, has been successful, and the steps needed for the success of xenotransplantation. Successful allotransplantation has been based on two main immunological approaches - (i) adequate immunosuppressive therapy, and (ii) careful histocompatibility matching. In vivo studies suggest that the available immunosuppressive regimens are adequate to suppress the human anti-pig cellular response. Methods to evaluate and screen patients for the first clinical xenotransplantation trial are the next challenge. The goal of this review is to summarize the history of histocompatibility testing, and the available tools that can be utilized to determine xenograft histocompatibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Ladowski
- Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Julie Houp
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Mariyam Javed
- Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Hidetaka Hara
- Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - David K C Cooper
- Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mançanares ACF, Cabezas J, Manríquez J, de Oliveira VC, Wong Alvaro YS, Rojas D, Navarrete Aguirre F, Rodriguez-Alvarez L, Castro FO. Edition of Prostaglandin E2 Receptors EP2 and EP4 by CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Equine Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10:E1078. [PMID: 32585798 PMCID: PMC7341266 DOI: 10.3390/ani10061078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), it has been reported that prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) stimulation of EP2 and EP4 receptors triggers processes such as migration, self-renewal, survival, and proliferation, and their activation is involved in homing. The aim of this work was to establish a genetically modified adipose (aMSC) model in which receptor genes EP2 and EP4 were edited separately using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. After edition, the genes were evaluated as to if the expression of MSC surface markers was affected, as well as the migration capacity in vitro of the generated cells. Adipose MSCs were obtained from Chilean breed horses and cultured in DMEM High Glucose with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). sgRNA were cloned into a linearized LentiCRISPRv2GFP vector and transfected into HEK293FT cells for producing viral particles that were used to transduce aMSCs. GFP-expressing cells were separated by sorting to obtain individual clones. Genomic DNA was amplified, and the site-directed mutation frequency was assessed by T7E1, followed by Sanger sequencing. We selected 11 clones of EP2 and 10 clones of EP4, and by Sanger sequencing we confirmed 1 clone knock-out to aMSC/EP2 and one heterozygous mutant clone of aMSC/EP4. Both edited cells had decreased expression of EP2 and EP4 receptors when compared to the wild type, and the edition of EP2 and EP4 did not affect the expression of MSC surface markers, showing the same pattern in filling the scratch. We can conclude that the edition of these receptors in aMSCs does not affect their surface marker phenotype and migration ability when compared to wild-type cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Carolina Furlanetto Mançanares
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile; (J.C.); (J.M.); (Y.S.W.A.); (F.N.A.); (L.R.-A.)
| | - Joel Cabezas
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile; (J.C.); (J.M.); (Y.S.W.A.); (F.N.A.); (L.R.-A.)
| | - José Manríquez
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile; (J.C.); (J.M.); (Y.S.W.A.); (F.N.A.); (L.R.-A.)
| | - Vanessa Cristina de Oliveira
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo 13630-000, Brazil;
| | - Yat Sen Wong Alvaro
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile; (J.C.); (J.M.); (Y.S.W.A.); (F.N.A.); (L.R.-A.)
| | - Daniela Rojas
- Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile;
| | - Felipe Navarrete Aguirre
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile; (J.C.); (J.M.); (Y.S.W.A.); (F.N.A.); (L.R.-A.)
| | - Lleretny Rodriguez-Alvarez
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile; (J.C.); (J.M.); (Y.S.W.A.); (F.N.A.); (L.R.-A.)
| | - Fidel Ovidio Castro
- Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Concepción, Campus Chillan, Chillán 3780000, Chile; (J.C.); (J.M.); (Y.S.W.A.); (F.N.A.); (L.R.-A.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Synthetic biology applied in the agrifood sector: Public perceptions, attitudes and implications for future studies. Trends Food Sci Technol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
8
|
|
9
|
de Graeff N, Jongsma KR, Johnston J, Hartley S, Bredenoord AL. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2019; 374:20180106. [PMID: 30905297 PMCID: PMC6452271 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, new genome editing technologies have emerged that can edit the genome of non-human animals with progressively increasing efficiency. Despite ongoing academic debate about the ethical implications of these technologies, no comprehensive overview of this debate exists. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted a systematic review of the reasons reported in the academic literature for and against the development and use of genome editing technologies in animals. Most included articles were written by academics from the biomedical or animal sciences. The reported reasons related to seven themes: human health, efficiency, risks and uncertainty, animal welfare, animal dignity, environmental considerations and public acceptability. Our findings illuminate several key considerations about the academic debate, including a low disciplinary diversity in the contributing academics, a scarcity of systematic comparisons of potential consequences of using these technologies, an underrepresentation of animal interests, and a disjunction between the public and academic debate on this topic. As such, this article can be considered a call for a broad range of academics to get increasingly involved in the discussion about genome editing, to incorporate animal interests and systematic comparisons, and to further discuss the aims and methods of public involvement. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The ecology and evolution of prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke de Graeff
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht/Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, GA 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Karin R. Jongsma
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht/Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, GA 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Josephine Johnston
- Research Department, The Hastings Center, 21 Malcolm Gordon Road, Garrison, NY 10524, USA
| | - Sarah Hartley
- The University of Exeter Business School, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4PU, UK
| | - Annelien L. Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht/Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, GA 3508, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Peters SO, Bemji MN, Adeleke MA, Do DN. Leveraging Available Resources and Stakeholder Involvement for Improved Productivity of African Livestock in the Era of Genomic Breeding. Front Genet 2019; 10:357. [PMID: 31105739 PMCID: PMC6499167 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The African continent is home to diverse populations of livestock breeds adapted to harsh environmental conditions with more than 70% under traditional systems of management. Animal productivity is less than optimal in most cases and is faced with numerous challenges including limited access to adequate nutrition and disease management, poor institutional capacities and lack of adequate government policies and funding to develop the livestock sector. Africa is home to about 1.3 billion people and with increasing demand for animal proteins by an ever growing human population, the current state of livestock productivity creates a significant yield gap for animal products. Although a greater section of the population, especially those living in rural areas depend largely on livestock for their livelihoods; the potential of the sector remains underutilized and therefore unable to contribute significantly to economic development and social wellbeing of the people. With current advances in livestock management practices, breeding technologies and health management, and with inclusion of all stakeholders, African livestock populations can be sustainably developed to close the animal protein gap that exists in the continent. In particular, advances in gene technologies, and application of genomic breeding in many Western countries has resulted in tremendous gains in traits like milk production with the potential that, implementation of genomic selection and other improved practices (nutrition, healthcare, etc.) can lead to rapid improvement in traits of economic importance in African livestock populations. The African livestock populations in the context of this review are limited to cattle, goat, pig, poultry, and sheep, which are mainly exploited for meat, milk, and eggs. This review examines the current state of livestock productivity in Africa, the main challenges faced by the sector, the role of various stakeholders and discusses in-depth strategies that can enable the application of genomic technologies for rapid improvement of livestock traits of economic importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline M. Ibeagha-Awemu
- Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Sunday O. Peters
- Department of Animal Science, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA, United States
| | - Martha N. Bemji
- Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Abeokuta, Nigeria
| | - Matthew A. Adeleke
- School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Duy N. Do
- Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Medvedieva MO, Blume YB. Legal Regulation of Plant Genome Editing with the CRISPR/Cas9 Technology as an Example. CYTOL GENET+ 2018. [DOI: 10.3103/s0095452718030106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|