Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: El-Sanea AM, Abdoon ASS, Kandil OM, El-Toukhy NE, El-Maaty AMA, Ahmed HH. Effect of oxygen tension and antioxidants on the developmental competence of buffalo oocytes cultured in vitro. Vet World 2021;14:78-84. [PMID: 33642789 PMCID: PMC7896883 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.78-84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open

For:	El-Sanea AM, Abdoon ASS, Kandil OM, El-Toukhy NE, El-Maaty AMA, Ahmed HH. Effect of oxygen tension and antioxidants on the developmental competence of buffalo oocytes cultured in vitro. Vet World 2021;14:78-84. [PMID: 33642789 PMCID: PMC7896883 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.78-84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Cao J, Dong Y, Li Z, Wang S, Wu Z, Zheng E, Li Z. Treatment of Donor Cells with Oxidative Phosphorylation Inhibitor CPI Enhances Porcine Cloned Embryo Development. Animals (Basel) 2024;14:1362. [PMID: 38731366 PMCID: PMC11083069 DOI: 10.3390/ani14091362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open

Affiliation(s)

Jinping Cao National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; (J.C.); (Y.D.); (Z.L.); (S.W.); (Z.W.) State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Gene Bank of Guangdong Local Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Yazheng Dong National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; (J.C.); (Y.D.); (Z.L.); (S.W.); (Z.W.) State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Gene Bank of Guangdong Local Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Zheng Li National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; (J.C.); (Y.D.); (Z.L.); (S.W.); (Z.W.) State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Gene Bank of Guangdong Local Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Shunbo Wang National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; (J.C.); (Y.D.); (Z.L.); (S.W.); (Z.W.) State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Gene Bank of Guangdong Local Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Zhenfang Wu National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; (J.C.); (Y.D.); (Z.L.); (S.W.); (Z.W.) State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Gene Bank of Guangdong Local Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Enqin Zheng National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; (J.C.); (Y.D.); (Z.L.); (S.W.); (Z.W.) State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Gene Bank of Guangdong Local Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Zicong Li National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; (J.C.); (Y.D.); (Z.L.); (S.W.); (Z.W.) State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China Gene Bank of Guangdong Local Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Collapse

Boumerdassi Y, Labrosse J, Hammami F, Dahoun M, Bouyer J, O'Neill L, Sarandi S, Peigné M, Cedrin I, Grynberg M, Sifer C. Impact of oxygen tension during in vitro maturation: a sibling-oocyte prospective double-blinded study. Fertil Steril 2024;121:615-621. [PMID: 38103883 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether oxygen (O2) tension (20% vs. 5%) has an impact on oocyte maturation rates and morphology during in vitro maturation (IVM).

DESIGN

A prospective, observational, monocentric, sibling-oocyte study.

SETTING

University Hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 143 patients who underwent IVM for fertility preservation purposes from November 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed. Patients were included when ≥2 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were retrieved. The cohort of COCs obtained for each patient was randomly split into two groups: group 20% O2 and group 5% O2.

INTERVENTION

Cumulus-oocyte complexes were incubated for 48 hours either under 5% O2 or 20% O2. After 24 and 48 hours of culture, every oocyte was assessed for maturity and morphology, to estimate oocyte quality. Morphology was evaluated considering six parameters (shape, size, ooplasm, perivitelline space, zona pellucida, and polar body characteristics), giving a total oocyte score ranging from -6 to +6.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Maturation rates and total oocyte scores were compared using paired-sample analysis between group 20% O2 and group 5% O2.

RESULTS

Patient median age was 31.4 [28.1-35.2] years-old. The mean serum antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count were 3.2 ± 2.3 ng/mL and 27.2 ± 16.0 follicles, respectively. A mean of 10.7 COCs per cycle were retrieved, leading to 6.1 ± 2.4 metaphase II oocytes vitrified (total maturation rate = 57.3%; 991 metaphase II oocytes/1,728 COCs). A total of 864 COCs were included in each group. Oocyte maturation rates were not different between the two groups (group 20% O2: 56.82% vs. group 5% O2: 57.87%, respectively). Regarding oocyte morphology, the mean total oocyte score was significantly higher in group 5% O2 compared with group 20% O2 (3.44 ± 1.26 vs. 3.16 ± 1.32, P=.014).

CONCLUSION

As culture under low O2 tension (5% O2) improves oocyte morphology IVM, our results suggest that culture under hypoxia should be standardized. Additional studies are warranted to assess the impact of O2 tension on oocyte maturation and the benefit of IVM under low O2 tension for embryo culture after utilization of frozen material.

Collapse

Effects of EGF and melatonin on gene expression of cumulus cells and further in vitro embryo development in bovines. ZYGOTE 2022;30:600-610. [DOI: 10.1017/s0967199421000940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]