Sustained Responses in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Drug-resistance after Peg-interferon Alfa-2a Add-on Treatment: A Long-term Cohort Study

Impact of baseline body mass index on the long-term prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most prevalent form. Despite the current availability of multiple immune or immune combination treatment options, the prognosis is still poor, so how to identify a more suitable population is extremely important.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of combining lenvatinib with camrelizumab for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages B/C, considering various body mass index (BMI) in different categories.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 126 HCC patients treated with lenvatinib plus camrelizumab. Patients were divided into two groups based on BMI: The non-overweight group (BMI < 25 kg/m², n = 51) and the overweight/obese group (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², n = 75). Short-term prognosis was evaluated using mRECIST criteria, with subgroup analyses for non-overweight (BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (BMI: 25-30 kg/m²), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) patients. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), leading to the development of a column-line graph model.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the obese/overweight group compared to the non-overweight group. Similarly, the median OS was significantly prolonged in the obese/overweight group than in the non-overweight group. The objective remission rate and disease control rate for the two groups of patients were, respectively, objective remission rate (5.88% vs 28.00%) and disease control rate (39.22% vs 62.67%). Fatigue was more prevalent in the obese/overweight group, while other adverse effects showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis based on BMI showed that obese and overweight patients had better progression-free survival and OS than non-overweight patients, with obese patients showing the best outcomes. Multifactorial regression analysis identified BCLC grade, alpha-fetoprotein level, portal vein tumor thrombosis, and BMI as independent prognostic factors for OS. The column-line graph model highlighted the importance of BMI as a major predictor of patient prognosis, followed by alpha-fetoprotein level, BCLC classification, and portal vein tumor thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

BMI is a long-term predictor of the efficacy of lenvatinib plus camrelizumab, and obese/overweight patients have a better prognosis.

Impact of baseline hepatitis B virus viral load on the long-term prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although the combination of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors has become the standard regimen for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), real data on the impact of baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA levels on the clinical efficacy of this regimen is still limited.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of camrelizumab combined with lenvatinib in patients with HCC at varying levels of HBV-DNA.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with HCC who received camrelizumab and lenvatinib treatment were categorized into two cohorts: HBV-DNA ≤ 2000 (n = 66) and HBV-DNA > 2000 (n = 54). The main outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while additional outcomes included the rate of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and any negative events. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed independent predictors of OS, leading to the creation of a nomogram incorporating these variables.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 8.32 months for the HBV-DNA ≤ 2000 group, which was similar to the 7.80 months observed for the HBV DNA > 2000 group (P = 0.88). Likewise, there was no notable variation in the median OS between the two groups, with durations of 13.30 and 14.20 months respectively (P = 0.14). The ORR and DCR were compared between the two groups, showing ORR of 19.70% vs 33.33% (P = 0.09) and DCR of 72.73% vs 74.07% (P = 0.87). The nomogram emphasized the importance of antiviral treatment as the main predictor of patient results, with portal vein tumor thrombus and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging following closely behind.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of patients with HBV-associated HCC treated with camrelizumab in combination with lenvatinib are not significantly affected by HBV viral load.

Impact of baseline hepatitis B virus viral load on the long-term prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although the combination of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors has become the standard regimen for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), real data on the impact of baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA levels on the clinical efficacy of this regimen is still limited.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of camrelizumab combined with lenvatinib in patients with HCC at varying levels of HBV-DNA.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with HCC who received camrelizumab and lenvatinib treatment were categorized into two cohorts: HBV-DNA ≤ 2000 (n = 66) and HBV-DNA > 2000 (n = 54). The main outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while additional outcomes included the rate of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and any negative events. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed independent predictors of OS, leading to the creation of a nomogram incorporating these variables.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 8.32 months for the HBV-DNA ≤ 2000 group, which was similar to the 7.80 months observed for the HBV DNA > 2000 group (P = 0.88). Likewise, there was no notable variation in the median OS between the two groups, with durations of 13.30 and 14.20 months respectively (P = 0.14). The ORR and DCR were compared between the two groups, showing ORR of 19.70% vs 33.33% (P = 0.09) and DCR of 72.73% vs 74.07% (P = 0.87). The nomogram emphasized the importance of antiviral treatment as the main predictor of patient results, with portal vein tumor thrombus and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging following closely behind.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of patients with HBV-associated HCC treated with camrelizumab in combination with lenvatinib are not significantly affected by HBV viral load.

Immunogenicity of inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in patients with chronic hepatitis B undergoing antiviral therapy

Objectives

To investigate the effect and its mechanisms of different antiviral agents on the immunogenicity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Methods

A total of 125 patients with CHB receiving nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) monotherapy or combined with Peg-interferon-alpha (Peg-IFNα) therapy and 29 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Adverse reactions (ADRs) and levels of neutralizing antibody (NAb), immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin M (IgM), and peripheral cytokines post-vaccination were analyzed.

Results

All ADRs were tolerable in CHB patients. Overall, no significant difference was observed in the antibody levels between patients and HCs after two doses of vaccination. An inverse correlation between NAb, IgG titers and the days after two doses was found in non-IFN group but not in IFN group. Correspondingly, peripheral interferon-γ levels were significantly higher in IFN group than in non-IFN group. After a booster dose, NAb and IgG antibodies were maintained at high levels in NA-treated patients.

Conclusion

Peg-interferon-alpha-based therapy may be beneficial for maintaining the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in CHB patients, which may be related to the high levels of IFN-γ induced by Peg-IFNα therapy. A booster dose can effectively recall the robust and long-lasting immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Extended duration therapy regimens based on Pegylated interferon for chronic hepatitis B patients focusing on hepatitis B surface antigen loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is associated with disease control and improvement of prognosis. Therefore, it is regarded as the optimal treatment endpoint for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Pegylated interferon (PegIFN)-based extended therapy regimens was assessed in several studies. In order to summarize a conclusion on the HBsAg loss rate and safety in this regimen, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.

METHODS

Studies on Hepatitis B and PegIFN were searched thoroughly in Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to November 18, 2019. The primary endpoint of this study was the HBsAg loss rate at the end of the extended duration therapy. The secondary endpoint was safety. All analyses were performed by using the R3.6.1 version Software. Quality assessment of RCTs was carried out by using Review manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies, including 545 CHB patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled HBsAg loss rate after PegIFN-based extended duration therapy was 11% (95% CI: 0.05-0.19), I² = 82%, P < 0.01(Q test). The extended duration therapy regimen was safe and tolerable. Subgroup analysis showed HBsAg loss rates were 14% (95% CI: 0.04-0.29) and 10% (95% CI: 0.02-0.20) respectively for HBeAg positive and HBeAg negative patients (P = 0.52). HBsAg loss rates were 11%(95%CI:0.03-0.22)and 12%(95%CI:0.04-0.24)respectively for PegIFN monotherapy and PegIFN with Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) therapy (P = 0.84). HBsAg loss rates were 25% (95% CI: 0.19-0.31) and 8% (95% CI: 0.03-0.15) respectively for the advantageous group and non-advantageous group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For CHB patients, extended duration of PegIFNα-based treatment for more than 48 weeks is likely to improve HBsAg clearance rate. Specially, the advantageous group will benefit a lot. In addition, the extended duration therapy regimen is safe and tolerable.