Cao J, Dong Y, Fan P, Mao F, Chen K, Chen R, Huang B, Cheng Y, Wang WP. Early evaluation of treatment response to transarterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The role of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2021;
78:365-377. [PMID:
33682701 DOI:
10.3233/ch-201086]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) with quantitative analysis is available in recent years. It can reduce the quantitative sampling error caused by the inconsistency of different sections in order to evaluate local treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accurately.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the value of dynamic 3D-CEUS in evaluating the early response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment in patients with advanced HCC lesions.
METHODS
In this prospective study, both two-dimensional (2D) CEUS and dynamic 3D-CEUS were performed on 40 HCC patients who scheduled for TACE at baseline (T0) and 1-3 days (T1) after treatment. Tumor microvascular perfusion changes were assessed by CEUS time-intensity curve (TIC) and quantitative parameters. According to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging 1 month after treatment results, patients were divided into responders and non-responders groups. The changes of perfusion parameters of both 2D-CEUS and 3D-CEUS were compared between responders and non-responders groups before and after TACE treatment.
RESULTS
Before and after TACE treatment, no significant difference in maximum diameter of HCC lesions between the two groups could be found. There were more significant differences and ratios of perfusion parameters in 3D-CEUS quantitative analysis than in 2D-CEUS. The mutual significant differences and ratios of 2D-CEUS and 3D-CEUS included peak intensity (PI) difference, PI ratio, ratio of area under the curve (A), ratio of area under the wash-out part (AWO) and slope (S) difference. The former 4 corresponding parameters were better on 3D-CEUS than on 2D-CEUS.
CONCLUSION
Dynamic 3D-CEUS can be used as a potential imaging method to evaluate early treatment response to TACE in advanced HCC patients.
Collapse