Molecular techniques reveal high prevalence of Legionella in dental units

Legionnaires' disease in dental offices: Quantifying aerosol risks to dental workers and patients

Legionella pneumophila is an opportunistic bacterial respiratory pathogen that is one of the leading causes of drinking water outbreaks in the United States. Dental offices pose a potential risk for inhalation or aspiration of L. pneumophila due to the high surface area to volume ratio of dental unit water lines-a feature that is conducive to biofilm growth. This is coupled with the use of high-pressure water devices (e.g., ultrasonic scalers) that produce fine aerosols within the breathing zone. Prior research confirms that L. pneumophila occurs in dental unit water lines, but the associated human health risks have not been assessed. We aimed to: (1) synthesize the evidence for transmission and management of Legionnaires' disease in dental offices; (2) create a quantitative modeling framework for predicting associated L. pneumophila infection risk; and (3) highlight influential parameters and research gaps requiring further study. We reviewed outbreaks, management guidance, and exposure studies and used these data to parameterize a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model for L. pneumophila in dental applications. Probabilities of infection for dental hygienists and patients were assessed on a per-exposure and annual basis. We also assessed the impact of varying ventilation rates and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Following an instrument purge (i.e., flush) and with a ventilation rate of 1.2 air changes per hour, the median per-exposure probability of infection for dental hygienists and patients exceeded a 1-in-10,000 infection risk benchmark. Per-exposure risks for workers during a purge and annual risks for workers wearing N95 masks did not exceed the benchmark. Increasing air change rates in the treatment room from 1.2 to 10 would achieve an ∼85% risk reduction, while utilization of N95 respirators would reduce risks by ∼95%. The concentration of L. pneumophila in dental unit water lines was a dominant parameter in the model and driver of risk. Future risk assessment efforts and refinement of microbiological control protocols would benefit from expanded occurrence datasets for L. pneumophila in dental applications.

[Efficacy of Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water against Contamination of Water Line of Dental Units]

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) against the contamination of the water line of dental units and the effects of SAEW on the water line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experimental material was a prototype dental unit equipped with a SAEW generator. SAEW is directly supplied to each device or part of this unit system. Experimental SAEW samples were collected from a high-speed handpiece (HS-1), an ultrasonic scaler, and a cup filler of the prototype dental unit. Control samples were taken before and after the prescribed flushing from another high-speed handpiece (HS-2) that is directly supplied with tap water in the same dental unit. The samples were analyzed for free chlorine and heterotrophic bacteria for 7 years to assess the efficacy and effects of SAEW. The substances eluted in SAEW were examined to investigate the effect of SAEW on the water line. A questionnaire survey was conducted on patients on whom dental uints supplied with SAEW were used.

RESULTS

SAEW always showed a higher free chlorine concentration than tap water during the observation period of 7 years. In HS-2 supplied with tap water, the free chlorine concentration increased significantly owing to the prescribed flushing. SAEW always showed a significantly smaller number of heterotrophic bacteria than tap water. No abnormal levels values of water line components eluted into SAEW were observed. There were few negative comments from patients on whom dental units supplied with SAEW were used.

CONCLUSIONS

SAEW continuously used for 7 years was effective for contamination control in the water line of dental units.

Establishing a laboratory model of dental unit waterlines bacterial biofilms using a CDC biofilm reactor

In this study, a laboratory model to reproduce dental unit waterline (DUWL) biofilms was developed using a CDC biofilm reactor (CBR). Bacteria obtained from DUWLs were filtered and cultured in Reasoner's 2A (R2A) for 10 days, and were subsequently stored at -70°C. This stock was cultivated on R2A in batch mode. After culturing for five days, the bacteria were inoculated into the CBR. Biofilms were grown on polyurethane tubing for four days. Biofilm accumulation and thickness was 1.3 × 10⁵ CFU cm^-2 and 10-14 μm respectively, after four days. Bacteria in the biofilms included cocci and rods of short and medium lengths. In addition, 38 bacterial genera were detected in biofilms. In this study, the suitability and reproducibility of the CBR model for DUWL biofilm formation were demonstrated. The model provides a foundation for the development of bacterial control methods for DUWLs.

Introduction to Clinical Microbiology for the General Dentist

Clinical oral microbiology may help dental professionals identify infecting pathogenic species and evaluate their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility. Saliva, dental plaque biofilms, mucosal smears, abscess aspirates, and soft tissue biopsies are sources of microorganisms for laboratory testing. Microbial-based treatment end points may help clinicians better identify patients in need of additional or altered dental therapies before the onset of clinical treatment failure, and help improve patient oral health outcomes. Microbiological testing appears particularly helpful in periodontal disease treatment planning. Further research and technological advances are likely to increase the availability and clinical utility of microbiological analysis in modern dental practice.

Cultural and Molecular Evidence of Legionella spp. Colonization in Dental Unit Waterlines: Which Is the Best Method for Risk Assessment?

Legionella spp. are ubiquitous in aquatic habitats and water distribution systems, including dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of Legionella in DUWLs and tap water samples using PMA-qPCR and standard culture methods. The total viable counts (TVCs) of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria in the samples were also determined. Legionella spp. were detected and quantified using the modified ISO 11731 culture method. Extracted genomic DNA was analysed using the iQ-Check Quanti Legionella spp. kit, and the TVCs were determined according to the ISO protocol 6222. Legionella spp. were detected in 100% of the samples using the PMA-qPCR method, whereas these bacteria were detected in only 7% of the samples using the culture method. The number of colony forming units (CFUs) of the TVCs in the DUWL and tap water samples differed, with the bacterial load being significantly lower in the tap water samples (p-value = 0). The counts obtained were within the Italian standard range established for potable water in only 5% of the DUWL water samples and in 77% of the tap water samples. Our results show that the level of Legionella spp. contamination determined using the culture method does not reflect the true scale of the problem, and consequently we recommend testing for the presence of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria based on the assumption that Legionella spp. are components of biofilms.

Evaluation of gram negative bacterial contamination in dental unit water supplies in a university clinic in tabriz, iran

Background and aims

Bacterial contamination of dental unit water supplies (DUWS) has attracted a lot of attention in recent years due to the emergence of serious infectionsin susceptible dental patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presence of gram-negative bacterial contamination in DUWS at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Dentistry.

Materials and methods

This descriptive study was carried out on 51 active dental units in different departments. Con-tamination was determined by taking samples from the unit's water supply before dental procedures and the use of specific culture media. The cultures were evaluated after 48 hours.

Results

Gram-negative bacterial contamination was identical in all the departments. In the departments on the ground floor, namely Departments of Periodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pseudomonas contamination was observed in 71% of units; in the departments on the first floor, namely Departments of Prosthodontics, Orthodontics and Pedodon-tics, 46.8% of the units had Pseudomonas contamination; and in the departments on the second floor, namely Departments of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, 37.7% of the units demonstrated Pseudomonas contamination.

Conclusion

Gram-negative bacterial contamination was evident in the evaluated DUWS. The contamination type was identical but the number of contaminated units decreased with the increase in the height of the floors.

An audit improves the quality of water within the dental unit water lines of general dental practices across the East of England

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and improve upon the quality of water emanating from the dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) which supply irrigation for dental handpieces and triple spray syringes in general practice.

DESIGN

A prospective clinical audit.

SETTING

Seventy-two general dental practices in the East of England.

METHODS

In 2006, 124 dentists initially registered to participate in the audit. By 2007, 72 had begun and by 2008, 68 had completed the project. This involved collecting samples of water discharged from the DUWLs in the dental practices both before the start and mid-way through a morning session. These were tested microbiologically at a United Kingdom Accreditation Service testing laboratory.

INTERVENTIONS

Before the audit, 56% of the DUWLs were reportedly flushed through for 2 minutes at the start of the day, 29% were purged for 20 seconds in between each patient, 50% were treated with a wide range of different disinfectant solutions, 44% were drained down dry at the end of the day and 9% had no cross-infection control measures applied to them at all. In the audit, 100% used a disinfectant solution alone, predominantly either Alpron or Sterilox.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The minimum audit standard set was for the water samples to meet the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline on the quality of DUWL water, namely that the United States' Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory standards for drinking water be adopted, in that no more than 5% of water samples should be contaminated with total coliforms and that they should not have more than 500 colony forming units per ml (cfu/ml) of heterotrophic water bacteria. However, the participating dentists were encouraged to try and achieve the more stringent European Union (EU) standards for potable (drinking) water, namely for the water samples to have neither Escherichia coli nor any other faecal coliforms present and for the aerobic colony count to be less than 100 cfu/ml at 22°C after 72 hours of culturing.

RESULTS

In the pre-audit survey, none of the 72 DUWL water samples were contaminated with E. coli but in five of them (7%) coliforms were recovered. Only 25% reached the EU potable water standard, of which 11% had zero planktonic bacterial contamination. Three percent were above the EU standard but below the CDC guideline/EPA regulatory drinking water standard, while alarmingly, 72% of them failed to reach this minimum audit standard altogether. However, after the application of a suitable disinfectant for at least a month, the audit revealed that E. coli still remained absent in the water samples taken from the 68 DUWLs that completed the project and in only one (1.5%) were coliforms recovered. Remarkably, nearly 81% reached the EU potable water standard, of which 54% had zero planktonic bacterial contamination, with nearly an additional 6% reaching the American CDC/EPA standard and with only 13% failing outright.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical audit using appropriate DUWL disinfectants can result in the improvement of the quality of water that is discharged through DUWLs, thereby minimising both the risk of cross-infection to vulnerable patients as well as to dental staff chronically exposed to contaminated aerosols.

Antibiofilm activity of sodium bicarbonate, sodium metaperiodate and SDS combination against dental unit waterline-associated bacteria and yeast

AIM

To determine the effect of sodium bicarbonate (SB), sodium metaperiodate (SMP) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) combination on biofilm formation and dispersal in dental unit waterline (DUWL)-associated bacteria and yeast.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The in vitro effect of SB, SMP and SDS alone and in combination on biofilm formation and dispersal in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Candida albicans was investigated using a 96-well microtitre plate biofilm assay. The combination showed a broad-spectrum inhibitory effect on growth as well as biofilm formation of both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, and yeast. In addition, the SB + SMP + SDS combination was significantly more effective in dispersing biofilm than the individual compounds. The combination dispersed more than 90% of P. aeruginosa biofilm whereas the commercial products, Oxygenal 6, Sterilex Ultra, and PeraSafe showed no biofilm dispersal activity.

CONCLUSION

The composition comprising SB, SMP, and SDS was effective in inhibiting as well as dispersing biofilms in DUWL-associated bacteria and yeast.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This study shows that a composition comprising environmentally friendly and biologically safe compounds such as SB, SMP, and SDS has a potential application in reducing DUWL-associated acquired infections in dental clinics.

Microbial biofilm formation in DUWS and their control using disinfectants

OBJECTIVES

Due to the presence of extended narrow bore tubing and long periods of stagnation, dental unit water systems (DUWs) can be prone to relatively high levels of microbial contamination, including the formation of biofilm and the presence of opportunistic pathogens, irrespective of the source and quality of the inflowing water. Whilst the European Union (EU) has yet to set a definitive microbiological guideline, the American Dental Association (ADA) has set a maximum of <200 colony forming units (cfu)/ml for DUWs water in the USA. The objective of this review is to discuss why microbial contamination and biofilms are so prevalent in DUWs, as well as the role of disinfectants and their potential for achieving microbial water quality levels recommended by the ADA.

STUDY SELECTION

The review outlines the principal factors responsible for biofilm formation in DUWs and a number of mechanisms used for microbial control.

SOURCES

The source material contained in this review is taken from the peer-reviewed literature.

DATA

A variety of disinfectants are available for use, but controlled laboratory and clinical studies have shown that they can vary markedly in their efficacy and suitability for use. Some products have been shown to successfully remove biofilm and consistently reduce the microbial load of out-flowing water to <200 cfu/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

The effective delivery of approved disinfectants can control the level of microorganisms in DUWs at acceptable levels.

Do contaminated dental unit waterlines pose a risk of infection?

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence that the dental unit waterlines are a source of occupational and healthcare acquired infection in the dental surgery.

DATA

Transmission of infection from contaminated dental unit waterlines (DUWL) is by aerosol droplet inhalation or rarely imbibing or wound contamination in susceptible individuals. Most of the organisms isolated from DUWL are of low pathogenicity. However, data from a small number of studies described infection or colonisation in susceptible hosts with Legionella spp., Pseudomonas spp. and environmental mycobacteria isolated from DUWL. The reported prevalence of legionellae in DUWL varies widely from 0 to 68%. The risk from prolonged occupational exposure to legionellae has been evaluated. Earlier studies measuring surrogate evidence of exposure to legionellae in dental personnel found a significant increase in legionella antibody levels but in recent multicentre studies undertaken in primary dental care legionellae were isolated at very low rate and the corresponding serological titres were not above background levels. Whereas, a case of fatal Legionellosis in a dental surgeon concluded that the DUWL was the likely source of the infection. The dominant species isolated from dental unit waterlines (DUWL) are Gram-negative bacteria, which are a potent source of cell wall endotoxin. A consequence of indoor endotoxin exposure is the triggering or exacerbation of asthma. Data from a single large practice-based cross-sectional study reported a temporal association between occupational exposure to contaminated DUWL with aerobic counts of >200cfu/mL at 37 degrees C and development of asthma in the sub-group of dentists in whom asthma arose following the commencement of dental training.

SOURCES

Medline 1966 to February 2007 was used to identify studies for this paper.

STUDY SELECTION

Design criteria included randomised control trials, cohort, and observational studies in English.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of published cases of infection or respiratory symptoms resulting from exposure to water from contaminated DUWL is limited, there is a medico-legal requirement to comply with potable water standards and to conform to public perceptions on water safety.

An audit improves the quality of water within the dental unit water lines of three separate facilities of a United Kingdom NHS Trust

OBJECTIVE

To improve the quality of water emanating from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs).

DESIGN

A prospective clinical audit.

SETTING

Three geographically separate district dental facilities of a United Kingdom NHS Trust, involving two community clinics and one hospital orthodontic department, which were evaluated between 2002 and 2004.

METHODS

Samples of water discharged from the DUWLs were collected prior to the start and midway through a morning session. These were tested microbiologically at a United Kingdom Accreditation Service testing laboratory within six hours of sampling.

INTERVENTIONS

One of the clinics followed the contemporaneous BDA advice of flushing water through its DUWLs while the other two clinics used separate intermittent disinfection purging regimes instead. One of them used a two stage protocol of Ethylene Diamine Tetra-Acetic acid followed by hydrogen peroxide, while the other used Bio 2000 as a single agent, which was subsequently superseded by the continuous use of super-oxidised water (Sterilox).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

To assess whether the samples either met the American Dental Association's guideline on the quality of DUWL water, or the more stringent European Union standards for potable (drinking) water.

RESULTS

The two units which used a disinfection regime both complied with the ADA guideline and the EU potable water standard. However, the unit which only flushed through its DUWLs without using a disinfectant failed to comply with either of them. After all three dental facilities subsequently standardised their DUWL disinfection regimes by using Bio 2000, the colony counts from all of the water samples thereafter remained well below the EU recommended level. The unit which progressed to using Sterilox as a continuous disinfectant achieved and maintained zero readings from its water samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical audit can result in the improvement of the quality of water that is discharged through DUWLs, thereby minimising both the risk of cross infection to vulnerable patients, as well as to dental staff chronically exposed to contaminated aerosols.

Bacterial aerosols in dental practice - a potential hospital infection problem?

Aerosols containing microbes from the oral cavity of the patient are created when using modern high-speed rotating instruments in restorative dentistry. How far these aerosols spread and what level of contamination they cause in the dental surgery has become a growing concern as the number of patients with oro-nasal meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization has increased. The present study aimed to determine how far airborne bacteria spread during dental treatment, and the level of contamination. Fall out samples were collected on blood agar plates placed in six different sectors, 0.5-2m from the patient. Restorative dentistry fallout samples (N=72) were collected from rooms (N=6) where high-speed rotating instruments were used, and control samples (N=24) were collected from rooms (N=4) used for periodontal and orthodontic treatment where rotating and ultrasonic instruments were not used. The collection times were 1.5 and 3 h. In addition, samples were taken from facial masks of personnel and from surfaces in the rooms before and after disinfection. After 48 h of incubation at 37 degrees C, colonies were counted and classified by Gram stain. The results showed significant contamination of the room at all distances sampled when high-speed instruments were used (mean 970 colony-forming units/m2/h). The bacterial density was found to be higher in the more remote sampling points. Gram-positive cocci, namely viridans streptococci and staphylococci, were the most common findings. The area that becomes contaminated during dental procedures is far larger than previously thought and practically encompasses the whole room. These results emphasize the need for developing new means for preventing microbial aerosols in dentistry and protection of all items stored temporarily on work surfaces. This is especially important when treating generally ill or immunocompromised patients at dental surgeries in hospital environments.

The role of flushing dental water lines for the removal of microbial contaminants

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine the role of flushing dental water lines for the removal of heterotrophic plate count bacteria, Legionella spp., and free-living protozoa.

METHODS

Forty dental offices were surveyed in the study. An initial sample and a sample taken after three minutes of flushing were obtained from the air/water syringe at each location. All samples were quantitatively analyzed for heterotrophic bacteria using three bacteriological procedures. The samples were analyzed for the presence of Legionella spp. using cultural, immunological, and molecular procedures and for the occurrence of free-living protozoa using a killed bacteria plate procedure.

RESULTS

The flushing process reduced the level of heterotrophic plate count bacteria by 1.1 to 1.5 log10 CFU/ml. Compliance with recommendations for bacterial levels varied depending on the methodology employed in the analysis. The flushing process did not reduce the occurrence of Legionella spp. or free-living protozoa.

CONCLUSION

The results support recent U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations that the process of flushing dental water lines cannot be relied upon as a sole means of reliably improving the quality of water used in dental treatment.

Risk assessment of dental unit waterline contamination

Biofilms form rapidly on dental unit waterlines. The majority of the organisms in the biofilm are harmless environmental species, but some dental units may harbour opportunistic respiratory pathogens. This paper describes a risk assessment approach to analysing the hazard from biofilm organisms contaminating dental unit waterlines on the respiratory health of both the dental team and patients. The health risk from the respiratory pathogens Legionella spp, Mycobacterium spp and Pseudomonads was found to be low. Nevertheless, in order to satisfy water regulations and comply with health and safety legislation dentists should institute infection-control measures to maintain the dental unit water at the standard of less than 200 colony-forming units per ml of aerobic bacteria.

A cross sectional study of water quality from dental unit water lines in dental practices in the West of Scotland

OBJECTIVE

To determine the microbiological quality of water from dental units in a general practice setting and current practice for disinfection of units.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of the water quality from 40 dental units in 39 general practices and a questionnaire of the disinfection protocols used in those practices.

SETTING

NHS practices in primarydental care.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-nine general practices from the West of Scotland.

METHODS

Water samples were collected on two separate occasions from dental units and analysed for microbiological quality by the total viable count (TVC) method. Water specimens were collected from the triple syringe, high speed outlet, cup filler and surgery tap. Each participating practitioner was asked to complete a questionnaire. Results Microbial contamination was highest from the high speed outlet followed by the triple syringe and cup filler. On average, the TVC counts from the high speed water lines at 37 degrees C and for the high speed lines, triple syringe and cup filler at 22 degrees C were significantly higher than that from the control tap water specimens. The study included units from 11 different manufacturers with ages ranging from under one year to over eight years. The age of the dental unit analysed did not appear to influence the level of microbial contamination. Five of the practices surveyed used disinfectants to clean the dental units but these had no significant effect on the microbiological quality of the water. The majority of dental units (25 out of 40) were never flushed with water between patients. A number of different non-sterile irrigants were used for surgical procedures.

CONCLUSION

The microbiological quality of water from dental units in general dental practice is poor compared with that from drinking water sources. Suitable sterile irrigants should be used for surgical procedures in dental practice. Further work is required for pragmatic decontamination regimens of dental unit water lines in a general dental practice setting

Evaluation of the efficacy of Alpron disinfectant for dental unit water lines

AIMS

To assess the efficacy of a disinfectant, Alpron, for controlling microbial contamination within dental unit water lines.

METHODS

The microbiological quality of water emerging from the triple syringe, high speed handpiece, cup filler and surgery hand wash basin from six dental units was assessed for microbiological total viable counts at 22 degrees C and 37 degrees C before and after treatment with Alpron solutions.

RESULTS

The study found that the use of Alpron disinfectant solutions could reduce microbial counts in dental unit water lines to similar levels for drinking water. This effect was maintained in all units for up to six weeks following one course of treatment. In four out of six units the low microbial counts were maintained for 13 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Disinfectants may have a short term role to play in controlling microbial contamination of dental unit water lines to drinking water quality. However, in the longer term attention must be paid to redesigning dental units to discourage the build up of microbial biofilms.

Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants

Bacterial biofilm in dental unit waterlines (DUWs) is a widespread problem, and poses a potentially significant risk of infection to dental staff and patients, particularly those who are medically compromised or immunocompromised. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the level of bacterial contamination of dental chair unit output water in the Dublin Dental Hospital, and to investigate the efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants in reducing bacterial loads to < or =200 cfu/mL as recommended by the American Dental Association. The chemical quality of dental chair unit input and output water was well within the limits recommended for potable water. Water supplied to the units yielded an average aerobic heterotrophic bacterial cell density of 184 cfu/mL. However, the corresponding density in output water was considerably higher; the average cell density in water from the three-in-one air/water syringes and cup fillers in 12 chairs was 8200 and 4300 cfu/mL, respectively. Dental unit water obtained from 18 separate reservoir-supplied units in general practices in the Dublin area yielded an average of 66000 cfu/mL. The bacterial species found were predominantly environmental organisms, which were also present at low levels in the input water. Some of the species identified (e.g., Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas fluorescens) are known opportunistic pathogens. The capacity of two disinfectants, Sterilex Ultra and Sanosil, to reduce bacterial contamination to safe levels was compared. In a controlled study, once weekly overnight (15 h) disinfection using either agent reduced the bacterial density to below the American Dental Association recommended level of 200 cfu/mL. However, once disinfection ceased the bacterial loads increased to unacceptably high levels within three weeks. Electron microscopic analysis showed that both disinfectants markedly reduced biofilm in the DUWs, but the biofilm rapidly became extensive again when once weekly disinfection ceased. While both disinfectants were equally effective in lowering the bacterial counts to acceptable levels, Sterilex Ultra was associated with clogging of DUWs in some dental chair units after repeated usage, suggesting that Sanosil is a more suitable agent for routine use.

The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines

The purpose of this study was to assess water samples from a hospital dental clinic to determine whether a disinfectant/coolant irrigant containing chlorhexidine (Lines, Micrylium Laboratories) affects the presence of microbial organisms in dental unit waterlines. Water samples from three hospital dental operatories were collected at baseline and after overnight treatment with a disinfectant-containing irrigant followed by sterile water irrigation. Saliva of treated patients and sterile water rinse specimens were collected from the waterlines of these operatories for three consecutive days, then weekly for eight weeks after treatment. Specimens were cultured to identify total heterotrophic plate counts as well as presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species. Baseline organism counts varied from 10(3) to 10(5) colony-forming units per milliliter. After treatment, no organisms were detected in waterline discharge. Decontamination of dental unit waterlines is possible using a disinfectant/irrigant followed by sterile water irrigation. The potential for contamination of the lines from patients' saliva may have been reduced due to use of anti-retraction valves and the disinfectant/sterile water irrigation, as conducted in this study.

Use of chlorine dioxide to disinfect dental unit waterlines

This paper describes a trial of chlorine dioxide in dental unit waterlines to produce potable quality water. Four treatment protocols using 50 ppm activated chlorine dioxide solution were tested. Each caused a short-term (<48 h) decline in total viable counts but did not provide potable quality water. Intermittent use of chloride dioxide is thus not suitable for long-term decontamination of dental unit waterlines. Units should be redesigned to discourage biofilm formation, and more research into practical methods of achieving potable water is required in the interim.

Evaluation of ultrasonic scaling unit waterline contamination after use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinse lavage

BACKGROUND

An infection control problem in dental operatories which is not fully controlled is waterline contamination by heterotrophic mesophilic bacteria. These bacteria are present in water supplies as a planktonic phase and adhere to the lumen of tubings as a biofilm comprised of their external cell surface glycocalyx and by production of extracellular carbohydrate polymers. The adherent film is most difficult to remove. The accumulated planktonic phase can be reduced significantly by flushing water from the lines before use in patient treatment, but will return when the equipment is idle through the accumulation of more planktonic phase and by slough of the biofilm surface-adsorbed phase not yet enmeshed in the carbohydrate matrix. Chlorine dioxide has antimicrobial activity against many bacteria, spores, and viruses. It is used in water supply treatment as a disinfectant and slime preventive and has an advantage over chlorine in that carcinogenic trihalomethanes are not generated.

METHODS

This study compared use of phosphate buffer-stabilized chlorine dioxide (0.1%) mouthrinse as a lavage in ultrasonic dental scaler units with the use of tap water as a control. Sterile water flushed through the units onto heterotrophic plate count (HPC) sampler plates was cultured 7 days at room temperature and colonies were counted at 12x. One test and one control unit were used for biopsy of internal tubing and scanning electron microscopy imaging.

RESULTS

The HPC counts, in colony forming units (CFU)/ml, were reduced 3- to 5-fold by flushing tap water through the units, but they returned after units were idle overnight. When phosphate-buffered chlorine dioxide mouthrinse was used as a lavage, CFU/ml were reduced 12- to 20-fold. Holding chlorine dioxide in waterlines overnight reduced recurrent buildup compared to water (P <0.05). Scanning electron microscopy images indicated a significant reduction of biofilm coverage by chlorine dioxide as compared to water (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Phosphate-buffered chlorine dioxide mouthrinse was effective in these short-term trials for control of waterline contamination in ultrasonic dental scaling units. It should prove as useful in dental professional waterline applications as it has in industrial uses for biofilm control.

Bacterial aerosols in the dental clinic: a review

A number of sources of bacterial aerosols exist within and outside the dental clinic. The concentration of bacterial aerosols and splatters appears to be highest during dental procedures, especially those generated by some procedures such as ultrasonic scaling, or using a high speed drill. Several infectious diseases could be transmitted to staff and patients by airborne bacterial and other contaminants in the dental clinic. Air-conditioning and ventilation systems should be regularly maintained to reduce environmental contaminants and to prevent recirculation of bacterial aerosols. Pre-procedural rinsing by patients with mouthwashes as well as vacuum and electrostatic extraction of aerosols during dental procedures could also be employed. Dental staff should also consider appropriate immunizations and continue to use personal protective measures, which reduce contact with bacterial aerosols and splatters in the dental clinic.

Legionella: from environmental habitats to disease pathology, detection and control

Studies on Legionella show a continuum from environment to human disease. Legionellosis is caused by Legionella species acquired from environmental sources, principally water sources such as cooling towers, where Legionella grows intracellularly in protozoa within biofilms. Aquatic biofilms, which are widespread not only in nature, but also in medical and dental devices, are ecological niches in which Legionella survives and proliferates and the ultimate sources to which outbreaks of legionellosis can be traced. Invasion and intracellular replication of L. pneumophila within protozoa in the environment play a major role in the transmission of Legionnaires' disease. Protozoa provide the habitats for the environmental survival and reproduction of Legionella species. L. pneumophila proliferates intracellularly in various species of protozoa within vacuoles studded with ribosomes, as it also does within macrophages. Growth within protozoa enhances the environmental survival capability and the pathogenicity (virulence) of Legionella. The growth requirements of Legionella, the ability of Legionella to enter a viable non-culturable state, the association of Legionella with protozoa and the occurrence of Legionella within biofilms complicates the detection of Legionella and epidemiological investigations of legionellosis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods have been developed for the molecular detection of Legionella and used in environmental and epidemiological studies. Various physical and chemical disinfection methods have been developed to eliminate Legionella from environmental sources, but gaining control of Legionella in environmental waters, where they are protected from disinfection by growing within protozoa and biofilms, remains a challenge, and one that must be overcome in order to eliminate sporadic outbreaks of legionellosis.