Issues related to single-tooth implants

The connective tissue graft as a membrane to improve esthetics according the defect

Dental implants are now one of the most useful therapies worldwide with higher rates of success from simple to complex cases, but also, with different results regarding the esthetics, cost and long-term success maintenance. In the beginning, dental implants therapy function and survival was the main goal. Nevertheless, through the years, the success criteria have increased, evolved, and improved beyond function to include esthetic and patient-related outcomes. Parallel to implant therapy, guide bone regeneration and periodontal plastic surgery have also evolved to achieve predictable, functional, and esthetic results in shallow and complex defects. However, they are mostly performed during different surgical procedures at different stages, raising the treatment time and cost for patients, directly related to the bio materials used and surgical times. The purpose of this case series is to present a simplified clinical scenario using a connective tissue graft as a membrane to improve esthetics and patient satisfaction while reducing treatment time and cost.

Strategic considerations in treatment planning: deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth

Prosthodontists face the difficult task of judging the influence and significance of multiple risk factors of periodontal, endodontic, or prosthetic origin that can affect the prognosis of an abutment tooth. The purpose of this review is to summarize the critical factors involved in deciding whether a questionable tooth should be treated and maintained, or extracted and possibly replaced by dental implants. A MEDLINE (PubMed) search of the English, peer-reviewed literature published from 1966 to August 2009 was conducted using different keyword combinations including treatment planning, in addition to decision making, periodontics, endodontics, dental implants, or prosthodontics. Further, bibliographies of all relevant papers and previous review articles were hand searched. Tooth maintenance and the acceptance of risks are suitable when: the tooth is not extensively diseased; the tooth has a high strategic value, particularly in patients with implant contraindications; the tooth is located in an intact arch; and the preservation of gingival structures is paramount. When complete-mouth restorations are planned, the strategic use of dental implants and smaller units (short-span fixed dental prostheses), either tooth- or implant-supported, as well as natural tooth abutments with good prognoses for long-span FDPs, is recommended to minimize the risk of failure of the entire restoration.

Implant or the natural tooth--a contemporary treatment planning dilemma?

An assessment of whether to rehabilitate a tooth requiring endodontic treatment or to replace it with a dental implant can often involve a challenging and complex decision-making process. This paper reviews the literature pertaining to both treatment modalities and identifies key issues that need careful consideration in planning the most appropriate course of care in a given clinical situation. A need to appreciate advances across both disciplines is highlighted, allowing the development of effective interdisciplinary evidence-based treatment strategies to maximize treatment outcome.