Teeth with large amalgam restorations and crowns

Dental Restoration Longevity among Geriatric and Special Needs Patients

INTRODUCTION

Although the population is aging and retaining more teeth, there is a lack of studies that address the longevity of dental restorations placed among older adults.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the survival trajectory of dental restorations placed in an outpatient population of geriatric and adult special needs patients over a 15-y span, with particular interest in the longevity of subsequent restorations in teeth that received multiple restorations over time.

METHODS

Dental restorations of different types and sizes in patients aged ≥65 y treated between 2000 and 2014 at the University of Iowa College of Dentistry were followed until they incurred an event (i.e., restoration replacement, extraction of the tooth, or endodontic treatment of the tooth). Survival analysis and extended Cox regression models were used to generate hazard ratios for selected predictor variables.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

A total of 9,184 restorations were followed among 1,551 unique patients. During the follow-up period, 28.7% of these restorations incurred an event, and overall the restorations had a median life span of 6.2 y. In multivariable regression models, after controlling for sex and age, a greater number of restoration surfaces were associated with higher risks of failure, and the initial restoration recorded in the database for each participant tended to have a lower risk of failure than that of restorations that included any of those same surfaces that were placed later. This information could be helpful to older adult patients considering various restorative treatment options during the dental treatment-planning and informed consent process.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

Informed decision making with regard to potential treatment options is an important component of health and well-being. The present study could contribute to the improved health of older adult dental patients by providing baseline information that clinicians can use as they discuss different restorative treatment options with these patients and their caregivers during the informed consent process.

Restoration Survival: Revisiting Patients' Risk Factors Through a Systematic Literature Review

A literature review was conducted to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on restoration survival in posterior permanent teeth as well as to report the methods used to collect these factors. The selection of articles on longitudinal clinical studies investigating the survival of posterior restorations (except full crowns and temporary fillings) and including patient-related factors was performed by applying predefined criteria. The review was organized into two parts, the first describing how patient factors were assessed in the studies (n=45) and the second presenting the statistical significance (n=27) and size of the effect (n=11) of these factors on restoration survival. Patient-related factors mentioned in the studies included age; gender; caries risk; caries activity/severity; decayed, missing, filled teeth; number of restorations; oral hygiene; and bruxism, among others. Sixteen studies included the patient age or age range in the analysis, which was found to be significant in 47% of the studies. Regarding gender, four of 17 reports found a significant effect on survival, showing more failures for men in three studies. The caries risk profile or related variables were included in the analysis of 15 studies, and a significant effect on survival was reported for high-caries-risk individuals (or related variables) in 67% of these studies. Bruxism was also found to influence restoration survival in three of six studies where this variable was investigated. Some issues were found regarding the reporting of methods used to classify patients according to risk and were thoroughly discussed. In view of the information gathered in this review, the assessment of patient factors along with other variables should become part of clinical studies investigating restoration survival, since several of these factors were shown to influence the failure of restorations, regardless of the material type.

Decision-making in the provision of extra-coronal restorations

Decision-making when choosing an extra-coronal restoration for a molar tooth is often multifactorial, requiring consideration for material properties, the underlying tooth tissue, aesthetics and functional requirements. This article reviews the various factors associated with the decision-making when considering an extra-coronal restoration for a molar tooth. The current literature is disseminated and compared to results obtained from clinicians at the Dental Pan Society meeting in 2007. Dentists were seemingly less likely to consider restorations with greater complications for themselves than they were for their patients. The various implications of the results are discussed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

With the plethora of dental materials available, the clinician has a wide choice of restorations. As clinicians become increasingly aware of the relative complications associated with different restorations, they are less likely to choose those that may result in problems, such as loss of vitality. In comparison, patients, if not kept fully informed, are unlikely to be aware of these problems and therefore may be happy to accept a more 'aesthetic' restoration. This decision dynamic-is examined in this article.

Treatment history of teeth in relation to the longevity of the teeth and their restorations: Outcomes of teeth treated and maintained for 15 years

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Limited clinical data exist on the survival of teeth relative to their treatment history.

PURPOSE

This study evaluated failure of teeth relative to their treatment history.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Longitudinal data were collected for 3071 teeth from 148 fully compliant patients from 1 private practice in Yamagata, Japan. Follow-up times ranged from 15 to 23 years, with a mean of 19.2 years (SD 2.4). In this study, every tooth and its restoration were evaluated by one of the authors at the time of each maintenance visit. Treatment history of the teeth was categorized at baseline as follows: (1) sound, unrestored tooth (SUT); (2) 1-surface restoration (RT1); (3) 2-surface restoration (RT2); (4) 3-surface restoration (RT3); (5) 4+-surface restoration (RT4); (6) complete crown (CCT); (7) abutment for fixed partial dental prosthesis (AFT); (8) abutment for removable partial dental prosthesis (APDT); and (9) root canal treatment (RCT). Three types of failure modes were evaluated in this study: (1) restorative failure (secondary caries and/or fracture), (2) extraction, and (3) any failure (restorative failure or extraction). Multivariate survival analysis was used to determine the impact of the treatment history on failure (alpha=.05).

RESULTS

Teeth with multi-surface restorations experienced the highest incidence of any failure (P<.001). For secondary caries, similar risks were noted for the different treatment histories. For failures resulting in extraction, the only teeth with an increased risk were abutments for removable partial dental prostheses (relative risk=5.5) (P=.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrated that restored teeth experienced a higher incidence of failure compared with unrestored teeth. Complete crowns and abutments for fixed partial dental prostheses had fewer restorative failures when compared with teeth with complex multisurface restorations. Removable partial denture abutments experienced the highest failure rate.