The all-ceramic restoration dilemma

Wear resistance of crowns made from different CAM/CAD materials

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this laboratory study was to evaluate the wear resistance of crowns made from current computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) materials. In addition, the abrasion of the steatite antagonist against these materials was compared.

METHODS

Identically shaped crowns of lithium disilicate, zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate and a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) were fabricated with an occlusal thickness of 1.5mm and a lateral wall thickness of 1.2mm (n=8). The crowns were cemented with a dual-polymerizing luting resin on composite resin dies. Using spherical steatite antagonists, all specimens were loaded with 49N for 1,200,000 cycles in a mastication simulator with additional thermocycling. After 120,000, 240,000, 480,000, 960,000, and 1,200,000 cycles, precision impressions were made and investigated with a laser scanning microscope. The vertical and volume substance loss was measured. Additionally, the substance loss of the antagonists was evaluated after 1,200,000 loading cycles.

RESULTS

No significant difference (p>0.05) was found in the median volume loss of the test materials after 1,200,000 cycles (lithium disilicate: 0.405mm³, PICN: 0.362mm³, zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate: 0.340mm³). The vertical substance loss of PICN (157μm) was significantly lower (p≤0.05) than that of lithium disilicate (201μm) and zirconia reinforced lithium disilicate (191μm). However, the substance loss of steatite against zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate (0.191mm³) was significantly lower (p≤0.05) than against lithium disilicate (0.296mm³) and PICN (0.531mm³).

SIGNIFICANCE

All three CAD/CAM materials showed wear resistance that seems appropriate for clinical application. Also, the abrasion of the antagonist looks promising.

Longevity of lithium disilicate indirect restorations in posterior teeth prepared by undergraduate students: A retrospective study up to 8.5 years

OBJECTIVES

To analyze retrospectively the clinical performance and survival of lithium disilicate inlays, partial crowns and crowns placed by undergraduate students.

METHODS

250 lithium disilicate posterior restorations (IPS™Emax Press) were evaluated. Mean service time was 6.6 years (79 months) with a maximum observation time of 8.5 years (102 months). Clinical performance was assessed using FDI Criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to display the distribution of the criteria. Success and survival of the restorations were calculated with the Kaplan Meier method. A Cox regression analysis was performed to detect influencing parameters for the survival or the success of the restorations.

RESULTS

Survival and success rates of lithium disilicate indirect restorations were calculated at 6.6 years with 96.3 % and 93.8 %, respectively. After 8.5 years the survival rate was calculated with 94 % and the success rate with 83.8 %. 10 out of 250 restorations (4%) failed, while the main reasons for failure were fracture of material, debonding/loss of restoration, endodontic complications as well as recurrence of caries. A Cox regression analysis failed to show a correlation between restoration failure and the experience level of the students, an existing root canal treatment, type of tooth, bruxism or the use of rubber dam.

CONCLUSIONS

Lithium disilicate indirect posterior restorations demonstrate a high success and survival rate after a mean service of 6.6 years when placed by undergraduate students with different levels of experience. Co-factors influencing the survival or success rate of these restorations could not be identified.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Lithium disilicate restorations show a good clinical performance up to 8.5 years when prepared by undergraduate students.

Clinical performance and patient satisfaction obtained with tooth-supported ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Studies reporting survival rates along with patient-centered outcomes are necessary to select the appropriate restorative material for crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs). However, studies that report the survival and complication rates of lithium disilicate crowns and the performance of zirconia FPDs compared with metal-ceramic FPDs are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the failure and complication incidence of tooth-supported ceramic crowns and FPDs in function for at least 5 years. Groups included were pressed lithium disilicate crowns (CP), veneered pressed lithium disilicate crowns (CV), and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate crowns (CC). Veneered zirconia-based FPDs (FPDC) were compared with metal-ceramic FPDs (FPDM). Outcomes were survival and failure, success and complications, periodontal conditions, and patient satisfaction assessed at 2 examinations (at baseline ≥1 year after delivery and at the follow-up examination ≥5 years of function).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-two participants with 158 restorations (CP=39, CV=16, CC=20, FPDM=30, FPDC=53) were examined (2.38 ±0.96 years after delivery) to form the baseline data. For the prospective follow-up examination, 70 participants with 141 restorations (CP=39, CV=15, CC=16, FPDM=28, FPDC=43) were examined 4.08 ±0.36 years later.

RESULTS

At the follow-up, restorations were in function for a mean of 6.44 ±1.14 years. Survival rates for crowns were 97.1% (CP=97.4%, CV=100%, and CC=93.8%) and 98.6% for FPDs (FPDM=96.4%, FPDC=100%). Among the 68 crowns, 1 technical and 4 biological complications were recorded. FPDs had more biological and technical complications than crowns (15/149 abutment teeth and 11/71 restorations). Technical complications were seen in 9.3% of zirconia FPDs compared with 25% for metal-ceramic FPDs. Complications were commonly observed at the baseline examination (crowns: 12/75 biological and 1/75 technical; FPDs: 40/174 abutment teeth with biological and 8/83 FPDs with technical complications). The periodontal conditions improved significantly after baseline. The patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the esthetics and function of the crowns and FPDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rate for ceramic crowns and FPDs was 97.9% after a mean observation time of 6.44 ±1.14 years. Biological complications were more commonly observed than technical complications, and complications were more common in FPDs than in crowns. The complication rate was similar for zirconia FPDs and metal-ceramic FPDs. Adherence to strict maintenance measures may have reduced the risk of biological complications.

Surface Roughness of Milled Lithium Disilicate With and Without Reinforcement After Finishing and Polishing: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of various finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials, lithium disilicate (IPS e.max), lithium disilicate reinforced with lithium aluminosilicate (Straumann^® n!ce™), and a stackable low-fusing nanofluorapatite glass ceramic (Ceram).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flat specimens (n = 12) per treatment group were fabricated 2 mm thick, 15 mm in length, and 12mm in width. Samples were either glazed or polished. Glazing was accomplished with either Ivoclar IPS e.max CAD crystall glaze spray or IPS e.max Ceram glaze paste, according to manufacturer instructions. Three different polishing systems were tested: Brasseler Dialite HP, Ivoclar OptraFine, and Komet LD/ZR. Polishing was performed using a Kavo adjustable slow speed electric contra-angle handpiece mounted to an oscillating Toothbrush Dentifrice Assessment Instrument. Surface roughness data was collected using a benchtop stylus profilometer and analyzed for statistical significance using two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Representative scanning electron micrograph images were generated for all samples.

RESULTS

Overall there was no significant difference in Ra when comparing types of ceramic (p = 0.9315, F = 0.071). However, there was a statistically significant difference when comparing groups of finishing treatments (p < 0.001, F = 113.5) and also when comparing finishing treatment with ceramic type (p < 0.001, F = 11.13). No significant difference was found with IPS e.max CAD crystall glaze spray on Straumann^® n!ce™ versus IPS e.max Ceram glaze paste on IPS e.max Ceram (p = 0.8745) or IPS e.max CAD crystall glaze spray on IPS e.max versus IPS e.max Ceram glaze paste on IPS e.max Ceram (p = 0.3373). Significant differences in Ra of Straumann^® n!ce™ were found when comparing Brasseler with Ivoclar (p = 0.0014) and Ivoclar with Komet (p = 0.047). No significant difference was observed between Brasseler and Komet (p = 0.8099).

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the degree of surface roughness depends upon the specific finishing system and ceramic combination used. Straumann^® n!ce™ is more efficiently polished using Brasseler Dialite HP or Komet LD/ZR polishing systems. Ivoclar crystal glaze spray was found to be equally as effective on Straumann^® n!ce™ and IPS e.max as IPS e.max Ceram glaze paste on IPS e.max Ceram.

Mechanical Behavior of Ceramic Monolithic Systems With Different Thicknesses

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the fully stabilized zirconia (FSZ) Prettau Anterior, the partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ) Prettau, and the lithium disilicate IPS e.max CAD (LD) through microstructural and mechanical characterization and effect of thickness on fracture load of the ceramics.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Disk-shaped specimens (12 mm diameter and 1.2 mm thickness) were prepared for biaxial flexural strength (BFS) and Weibull statistics (n=30). For the fracture load static test (FLST) and Weibull statistics (n=30), disk-shaped specimens 12 mm in diameter and thicknesses of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 1.5 mm were cemented on an epoxy-resin substrate.

RESULTS

BFS (MPa) results were PSZ: 683.0 ± 70.23; FSZ: 438.6 ± 64.1; and LD: 248.6 ± 37.3. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for BFS was significant (p<0.001), and the Tukey post hoc test showed differences among all ceramics. There was difference in characteristic strength, but there was no difference in Weibull modulus. Two-way ANOVA for FLST was significant for ceramic (p<0001), thickness (p<0001), and interaction (p<0001). There was no difference among all ceramics at the 0.5 mm thickness. PSZ had higher values for the 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm thicknesses. LD of 1.5 mm thickness exhibited a higher FLST than FSZ.

CONCLUSIONS

PSZ had the highest BFS, but when cemented on a substrate, all ceramics with 0.5 mm thickness behaved similarly. Despite the lower BFS, LD had a fracture load similar or superior to FSZ when cemented on a substrate.

Effect of simulated chairside grinding procedures using commercially available abrasive agents on the surface properties of zirconia

Aim:

The aim of the present study was to assess the change in physical properties (surface roughness, surface hardness and phase transformation) after surface grinding of zirconia by using three commercially available abrasives.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty sintered zirconia specimens were prepared and divided into three groups namely Group M (grinded using Mani Dia diamond bur standard grit), Group T (grinded using Tri Hawk diamond bur coarse grit) and Group P (grinded using Predator carbide bur). A customised assembly was used to follow a standardised protocol for surface grinding. The surface roughness, surface hardness and phase transformation was recorded before and after the grinding procedure.

Statistical Analysis Used:

ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test were used to assess the values obtained after the testing the surface roughness and surface hardness.

Results:

The results of the present study revealed the average values of change in surface roughness as Group M (0.44 μm) and Group T (1.235 μm) and Group P (-0.88 μm). The average values of change in surface hardness were Group T (19.578 HV), Group M (46.722 HV) and Group P (36.429 HV). The change in surface hardness was not statistically significant. There was no phase transformation seen after the grinding procedure.

Clinical Significance:

Carbide burs along with copious water irrigation when used to grind zirconia intra-orally produces has a polishing effect, minimal change in hardness & no phase transformation. The present study advocates the use of carbides for chair-side grinding of zirconia.

Effect of core ceramic grinding on fracture behaviour of bilayered zirconia veneering ceramic systems under two loading schemes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of core ceramic grinding on the fracture behaviour of bilayered zirconia under two loading schemes.

METHODS

Interfacial surfaces of sandblasted zirconia disks (A) were ground with 80 (B), 120 (C) and 220 (D) grit diamond discs, respectively. Surface roughness and topographic analysis were performed using a confocal scanning laser microscope (CSLM) and a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Relative monoclinic content was evaluated using X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) then reevaluated after simulated veneer firing. Biaxial fracture strength (σ) and Weibull modulus (m) were calculated either with core in compression (subgroup Ac-Dc) or in tension (subgroup At-Dt). Facture surfaces were examined by SEM and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Maximum tensile stress at fracture was estimated by finite element analysis. Statistical data analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and one-way ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

As grit size of the diamond disc increased, zirconia surface roughness decreased (p<0.001). Thermal veneering treatment reversed the transformation of monoclinic phase observed after initial grinding. No difference in initial (p=0.519 for subgroups Ac-Dc) and final fracture strength (p=0.699 for subgroups Ac-Dc; p=0.328 for subgroups At-Dt) was found among the four groups for both loading schemes. While coarse grinding slightly increased final fracture strength reliability (m) for subgroups Ac-Dc. Two different modes of fracture were observed according to which material was on the bottom surface. Components of the liner porcelain remained on the zirconia surface after fracture for all groups.

SIGNIFICANCE

Technician grinding changed surface topography of zirconia ceramic material, but was not detrimental to the bilayered system strength after veneer application. Coarse grinding slightly improved the fracture strength reliability of the bilayered system tested with core in compression. It is recommended that veneering porcelain be applied directly after routine lab grinding of zirconia ceramic, and its application on rough zirconia cores may be preferred to enhance bond strength.

The effect of endodontic access on all-ceramic crowns: A systematic review of in vitro studies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to identify from in vitro studies the effect of endodontic access on the fracture resistance and damage around the access cavity of all-ceramic crowns.

DATA

The articles identified were screened by two reviewers according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The reference lists of articles advanced to second round screening were hand searched to identify additional potential articles. The risk of bias for the articles was independently performed by two reviewers.

SOURCES

An electronic search was conducted on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase databases with no limitations.

STUDY SELECTION

383 articles were identified, of which, eight met the inclusion criteria and formed the basis of this systematic review. Factors investigated in the selected articles included the, presence of microcracks at the access cavity, repair protocol, ceramic type, crown fabrication method, luting agent and grit size of the diamond bur. The risk of bias was deemed to be high for three, medium for two and low for three of the reviewed studies. The high level of heterogeneity across the studies precluded meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Based on the currently available scientific evidence, a 'best practice' protocol with regard to improving the fracture resistance of endodontically accessed and repaired all-ceramic crowns cannot be conclusively identified. However, some key factors which potentially impact on the fracture resistance of endodontically accessed and repaired all-ceramic crowns have been isolated. Cautious clinical interpretation of these factors is concluded for the maintenance of the crown as a permanent restoration.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Key factors which impact on the fracture resistance of endodontically accessed and repaired all-ceramic crowns have been isolated from in vitro studies. Cautious clinical interpretation of these factors is advised for the maintenance of the crown as a permanent restoration.

Influence of Veneering Fabrication Techniques and Gas-Phase Fluorination on Bond Strength between Zirconia and Veneering Ceramics

PURPOSE

Porcelain chipping has been one of the main problems of porcelain-fused-to-zirconia restorations. This study evaluates the bond strengths of layered, pressed, and adhesively bonded porcelain to yttria-stabilized zirconia substrates that have undergone traditional preparation or gas-phase fluorination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A three-point bending test was used to evaluate the bond strength of the porcelain and zirconia interface. Sixty-six specimens were prepared (n = 11) following ISO 9693 and loaded until failure using an Instron testing machine. One-half of the zirconia substrates received gas phase fluorination treatment before veneering application. Three porcelain veneering methods were evaluated: layered, pressed, and adhesively bonded porcelain. Bond strength results were interpreted using a two-way ANOVA and a Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

ANOVA revealed a statistically significant effect of the veneering fabrication methods. No main effect was observed regarding the surface treatment to the zirconia. There was a significant effect related to the veneering method used to apply porcelain to zirconia. For untreated zirconia, layered porcelain had a significantly higher flexural strength compared to pressed or bonded, while pressed and bonded porcelains were not significantly different from one another. For zirconia specimens receiving fluorination treatment, both layered and pressed porcelains had significantly higher bond strengths than adhesively bonded porcelain. In addition, fluorinated pressed porcelain was not statistically different from the control layered or fluorinated layered porcelain.

CONCLUSION

The choice of veneering fabrication technique was critical when evaluating the zirconia to porcelain interfacial bond strength. Bonded porcelain to zirconia had a lower flexural strength than layered or pressed porcelain, regardless of zirconia surface treatment. In addition, fluorination had an effect on the bond strength of pressed porcelain.

Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate restorations after endodontic access preparation: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Endodontic access preparation through a lithium disilicate restoration is a frequently encountered clinical situation. The common practice of repairing the accessed crown with composite resin may result in a weakened restoration.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of endodontic access preparation on the fracture resistance and microstructural integrity of monolithic pressed and monolithic milled lithium disilicate complete coverage restorations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty monolithic pressed (IPS e.max Press) and 20 monolithic milled (IPS e.max CAD) lithium disilicate restorations were fabricated. Ten of the pressed and 10 of the milled crowns were accessed for a simulated endodontic treatment and subsequently repaired by using a porcelain repair system and composite resin. All specimens were submitted to cyclic loading and then loaded to failure. Force data were recorded and analyzed with 2-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc test (Sidak correction) to indicate significant differences among the groups (α=.05). A Weibull analysis was also performed for each group. Eight (4 pressed and 4 milled) additional restorations were fabricated to complete a scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis and evaluate the surface damage created by the endodontic access preparation.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference (P=.019) was found between the pressed intact and pressed repaired restorations and between the pressed intact and milled repaired restorations (P=.002). Specimens that were examined with an SEM showed edge chipping involving primarily the glaze layer around the access openings.

CONCLUSIONS

Endodontic access preparation of lithium disilicate restorations resulted in a significantly reduced load to failure in the pressed specimens, but not in the milled specimens.

Survival rate of lithium disilicate restorations at 4 years: A retrospective study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Ceramic restorations are frequently being placed due to the esthetic demand and the cost of noble metals that has increased considerably. One major disadvantage of ceramic restoration is failure of the material due to fracture by crack propagation. In vitro studies are of little clinical significance and in vivo studies are too short to support clinical success.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the failure rate of lithium disilicate restorations (monolithic and layered) at 4 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected over 45 months from 2 commercial laboratories. Restorations were categorized into monolithic restorations and layered restorations. Each category was further classified into complete coverage single crowns, fixed dental prostheses, e.max veneers, and inlay/onlay restorations. Failure rates were compared and analyzed using Chi-square (α=.05).

RESULTS

A total of 21,340 restorations were evaluated in this study and included 15,802 monolithic restorations and 5538 layered restorations. The failure rate for single crown monolithic restorations was 0.91% and was 1.83% for single crown layered restorations. For fixed dental prostheses, 4.55% of monolithic restorations failed. For e.max veneers, 1.3% of monolithic veneers fractured and 1.53% of layered veneers fractured. Of the inlay/onlay restorations group, 1.01% of monolithic restorations fractured.

CONCLUSION

In the short term (45 months), restorations fabricated with the lithium disilicate material (IPS e.max) had relatively low fracture rates. Layered single crowns fractured at approximately 2 times the rate of monolithic crowns.

Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Lithium disilicate is a relatively new and popular restorative material for esthetic and functional rehabilitations, but the evidence for clinical outcomes is not clear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the short-term (1- to 5-year) and medium-term (5- to 10-year) survival rates of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An electronic search for articles in the English-language literature published between January 1998 and June 2013 was performed with the PubMed search engine. The specific search terms used were lithium disilicate, lithium silicate, IPS e max, IPS Empress, CAD CAM, pressed ceramic, monolithic, and bilayer. After applying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the definitive list of selected articles was suitable only for calculating the interval survival rate and cumulative survival rate.

RESULTS

The electronic search resulted in 2033 titles. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 12 clinical studies that addressed the clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate restorations. Of these, 2 were randomized controlled trials, 5 were prospective studies, 1 was a retrospective study, and 4 studies were descriptive in nature. All 12 studies reported on tooth-retained lithium disilicate restorations. The 2-year cumulative survival rate for single crowns was 100%, and the 5-year cumulative survival rate was 97.8%. The 2-year cumulative survival rate for fixed dental prostheses was 83.3%, and the 5-year cumulative survival rate was 78.1%. The cumulative survival rate over a 10-year period, primarily owing to data from 1 study, was 96.7% for single crowns and 70.9% for fixed dental prostheses.

CONCLUSIONS

For lithium disilicate single crowns, the existing evidence indicates excellent short-term survival rates, but the evidence for medium-term survival is limited. For lithium disilicate fixed dental prostheses, the evidence for short-term survival is fair, although limited, but the evidence for medium-term survival is not promising. The majority of failures in both types of restorations were reported in the posterior region.