1
|
Mustahsan VM, Anugu A, Komatsu DE, Kao I, Pentyala S. Biocompatible Customized 3D Bone Scaffolds Treated with CRFP, an Osteogenic Peptide. Bioengineering (Basel) 2021; 8:bioengineering8120199. [PMID: 34940352 PMCID: PMC8698998 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8120199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently used synthetic bone graft substitutes (BGS) are either too weak to bear the principal load or if metallic, they can support loading, but can lead to stress shielding and are unable to integrate fully. In this study, we developed biocompatible, 3D printed scaffolds derived from µCT images of the bone that can overcome these issues and support the growth of osteoblasts. METHODS Cylindrical scaffolds were fabricated with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and Stratasys® MED 610 (MED610) materials. The 3D-printed scaffolds were seeded with Mus musculus calvaria cells (MC3T3). After the cells attained confluence, osteogenesis was induced with and without the addition of calcitonin receptor fragment peptide (CRFP) and the bone matrix production was analyzed. Mechanical compression testing was carried out to measure compressive strength, stiffness, and elastic modulus. RESULTS For the ABS scaffolds, there was a 9.8% increase in compressive strength (p < 0.05) in the scaffolds with no pre-coating and the treatment with CRFP, compared to non-treated scaffolds. Similarly, MED610 scaffolds treated with CRFP showed an 11.9% (polylysine pre-coating) and a 20% (no pre-coating) increase (p < 0.01) in compressive strength compared to non-treated scaffolds. CONCLUSIONS MED610 scaffolds are excellent BGS as they support osteoblast growth and show enhanced bone growth with enhanced compressive strength when augmented with CRFP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vamiq M. Mustahsan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; (V.M.M.); (A.A.)
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA;
| | - Amith Anugu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; (V.M.M.); (A.A.)
| | - David E. Komatsu
- Department of Orthopedics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA;
| | - Imin Kao
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA;
| | - Srinivas Pentyala
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; (V.M.M.); (A.A.)
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA;
- Department of Orthopedics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergin SM, Wang TY, Park C, Rajkumar S, Goodwin CR, Karikari IO, Abd-El-Barr MM, Shaffrey CI, Yarbrough CK, Than KD. Pseudarthrosis rate following anterior cervical discectomy with fusion using an allograft cellular bone matrix: a multi-institutional analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 50:E6. [PMID: 34062497 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.focus2166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of osteobiologics, engineered materials designed to promote bone healing by enhancing bone growth, is becoming increasingly common for spinal fusion procedures, but the efficacy of some of these products is unclear. The authors performed a retrospective, multi-institutional study to investigate the clinical and radiographic characteristics of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion performed using the osteobiologic agent Osteocel, an allograft mesenchymal stem cell matrix. METHODS The medical records across 3 medical centers and 12 spine surgeons were retrospectively queried for patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with the use of Osteocel. Pseudarthrosis was determined based on CT or radiographic imaging of the cervical spine. Patients were determined to have radiographic pseudarthrosis if they met any of the following criteria: 1) lack of bridging bone on CT obtained > 300 days postoperatively, 2) evidence of instrumentation failure, or 3) motion across the index level as seen on flexion-extension cervical spine radiographs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed to identify independent preoperative or perioperative predictors of pseudarthrosis in this population. RESULTS A total of 326 patients met the inclusion criteria; 43 (13.2%) patients met criteria for pseudarthrosis, of whom 15 (34.9%) underwent revision surgery. There were no significant differences between patients with and those without pseudarthrosis, respectively, for patient age (54.1 vs 53.8 years), sex (34.9% vs 47.4% male), race, prior cervical spine surgery (37.2% vs 33.6%), tobacco abuse (16.3% vs 14.5%), chronic kidney disease (2.3% vs 2.8%), and diabetes (18.6% vs 14.5%) (p > 0.05). Presence of osteopenia or osteoporosis (16.3% vs 3.5%) was associated with pseudarthrosis (p < 0.001). Implant type was also significantly associated with pseudarthrosis, with a 16.4% rate of pseudarthrosis for patients with polyetherethereketone (PEEK) implants versus 8.4% for patients with allograft implants (p = 0.04). Average lengths of follow-up were 27.6 and 23.8 months for patients with and those without pseudarthrosis, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated osteopenia or osteoporosis (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.51-16.4, p < 0.01) and usage of PEEK implant (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.04-4.83, p = 0.04) as independent predictors of pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS In patients who underwent single-level ACDF, rates of pseudarthrosis associated with the use of the osteobiologic agent Osteocel are higher than the literature-reported rates associated with the use of alternative osteobiologics. This is especially true when Osteocel is combined with a PEEK implant.
Collapse
|
3
|
Shepard NA, Rush AJ, Scarborough NL, Carter AJ, Phillips FM. Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Applications and Future Trends. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:113-119. [PMID: 34376500 DOI: 10.14444/8059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft augmentation for spinal fusion is an area of continued interest, with a wide variety of available products lacking clear recommendations regarding appropriate use. While iliac crest autograft has long been considered the "gold standard", suboptimal fusion rates along with harvest-related concerns continue to drive the need for graft alternatives. There are now multiple options of products with various characteristics that are available. These include demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and demineralized bone fibers (DBF), which have been used increasingly to promote spine fusion. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated narrative on the use of DBM/DBF in spine surgery. METHODS Literature review. RESULTS The clinical application of DBM in spine surgery has evolved since its introduction in the mid-1900s. Early preclinical studies demonstrated its effectiveness in promoting fusion. When used in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, more recent clinical data suggest similar rates of fusion compared with autograft, although clinical studies are primarily limited to level III or IV evidence with few level I studies. However, significant variability in surgical technique and type of product used in the literature limits its interpretation and overall application. CONCLUSIONS DBM and DBF are bone graft options in spine surgery. Most commonly used as graft extenders, they have the ability to increase the volume of traditional grafting techniques while potentially inducing new bone formation. While the literature supports good fusion rates when used in the lumbar spine and when used with adjuvant cages or additional grafting techniques in the cervical spine, care should be taken when using as a stand-alone product. As new literature emerges, DBM and DBF can be a useful method in a surgeon's armamentarium for fusion-based procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas A Shepard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Augustus J Rush
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Frank M Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shin JJ. Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration, Cervical Alignment, and Clinical Outcomes After One- and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Neurospine 2019; 16:589-600. [PMID: 31607093 PMCID: PMC6790739 DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938166.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to assess the influence of a fused segment on cervical range of motion (ROM) and adjacent segmental kinematics and determine whether increasing number of fusion levels causes accelerated adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods A total of 165 patients treated with ACDF were recruited for assessment, and they were divided into 3 groups based on the number of fusion levels. Radiological measurements and clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) assessed preoperatively and at ≥2 years of follow-up.
Results ASD occurred in 41 of 165 patients who underwent ACDF (1-level, 12 of 78 [15.38%]; 2-level, 14 of 49 [28.57%]; 3-level, 15 of 38 [39.47%]; p=0.015) at final follow-up (mean, 31.9 months). Significant differences were found in reduction of global ROM based on the number of fusion levels (p<0.001). The upper adjacent segment ROM increased over time (p=0.004); however, lower segment ROM did not. Three-level ACDF did not obtain greater amounts of lordosis than did 1- or 2-level ACDF (p=0.003). Postoperative neck VAS scores and NDI were significantly higher for 3-level ACDF than for 1- or 2-level ACDF (p=0.033 and p=0.001).
Conclusion ASD occurred predominantly in multilevel cervical fusion, more frequently in the upper segment of the prior fusion and as the number of fusion levels increased. Patients who underwent multilevel fusion had greater reduction of global ROM and increased compensatory motion at the upper adjacent segment. Three-level ACDF did not appear to restore cervical lordosis significantly compared with 1- or 2-level arthrodesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Jae Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ledet EH, Sanders GP, DiRisio DJ, Glennon JC. Load-sharing through elastic micro-motion accelerates bone formation and interbody fusion. Spine J 2018; 18:1222-1230. [PMID: 29452282 PMCID: PMC6008179 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Achieving a successful spinal fusion requires the proper biological and biomechanical environment. Optimizing load-sharing in the interbody space can enhance bone formation. For anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), loading and motion are largely dictated by the stiffness of the plate, which can facilitate a balance between stability and load-sharing. The advantages of load-sharing may be substantial for patients with comorbidities and in multilevel procedures where pseudarthrosis rates are significant. PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel elastically deformable, continuously load-sharing anterior cervical spinal plate for promotion of bone formation and interbody fusion relative to a translationally dynamic plate. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING An in vivo animal model was used to evaluate the effects of an elastically deformable spinal plate on bone formation and spine fusion. METHODS Fourteen goats underwent an ACDF and received either a translationally dynamic or elastically deformable plate. Animals were followed up until 18 weeks and were evaluated by plain x-ray, computed tomography scan, and undecalcified histology to evaluate the rate and quality of bone formation and interbody fusion. RESULTS Animals treated with the elastically deformable plate demonstrated statistically significantly superior early bone formation relative to the translationally dynamic plate. Trends in the data from 8 to 18 weeks postoperatively suggest that the elastically deformable implant enhanced bony bridging and fusion, but these enhancements were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Load-sharing through elastic micro-motion accelerates bone formation in the challenging goat ACDF model. The elastically deformable implant used in this study may promote early bony bridging and increased rates of fusion, but future studies will be necessary to comprehensively characterize the advantages of load-sharing through micro-motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric H. Ledet
- ReVivo Medical, 33 Old Niskayuna Road, Loudonville, NY 12211,Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 110 8 Street, Troy, NY 12180,Stratton VA Medical Center, R&D Service, 113 Holland Avenue, Albany, NY, 12208
| | | | - Darryl J. DiRisio
- ReVivo Medical, 33 Old Niskayuna Road, Loudonville, NY 12211,Albany Medical College, Department of Neurosurgery, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Joseph C. Glennon
- Veterinary Specialties Referral Center, 1641 Main Street, Pattersonville, NY 12137
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, Wagner Q, Musset AM, Benkirane-Jessel N, Bornert F, Offner D. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng 2018; 9:2041731418776819. [PMID: 29899969 PMCID: PMC5990883 DOI: 10.1177/2041731418776819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 371] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone replacement might have been practiced for centuries with various materials of natural origin, but had rarely met success until the late 19th century. Nowadays, many different bone substitutes can be used. They can be either derived from biological products such as demineralized bone matrix, platelet-rich plasma, hydroxyapatite, adjunction of growth factors (like bone morphogenetic protein) or synthetic such as calcium sulfate, tri-calcium phosphate ceramics, bioactive glasses, or polymer-based substitutes. All these substitutes are not suitable for every clinical use, and they have to be chosen selectively depending on their purpose. Thus, this review aims to highlight the principal characteristics of the most commonly used bone substitutes and to give some directions concerning their clinical use, as spine fusion, open-wedge tibial osteotomy, long bone fracture, oral and maxillofacial surgery, or periodontal treatments. However, the main limitations to bone substitutes use remain the management of large defects and the lack of vascularization in their central part, which is likely to appear following their utilization. In the field of bone tissue engineering, developing porous synthetic substitutes able to support a faster and a wider vascularization within their structure seems to be a promising way of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Fernandez de Grado
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Laetitia Keller
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Ysia Idoux-Gillet
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Quentin Wagner
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Anne-Marie Musset
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Nadia Benkirane-Jessel
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Fabien Bornert
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| | - Damien Offner
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), “Regenerative Nanomedicine” laboratory, http://www.regmed.fr, UMR 1260, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, F-67085 Strasbourg Cedex
- Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 8 rue Ste Elisabeth, F-67000 Strasbourg
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, F-67000 Strasbourg
| |
Collapse
|