Does Preservation of Ligamentum Flavum in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interlaminar Discectomy Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Approach Selection: A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature to develop an algorithm formulated by key opinion leaders.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze currently available data and propose a decision-making algorithm for full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH) to help surgeons choose the most appropriate approach [transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) or interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD)] for patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Full-endoscopic discectomy has gained popularity in recent decades. To our knowledge, an algorithm for choosing the proper surgical approach has never been proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and MeSH terms was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Patient samples included patients with LDH treated with full-endoscopic discectomy. The inclusion criteria were interventional research (randomized and nonrandomized trials) and observation research (cohort, case-control, case series). Exclusion criteria were case series and technical reports. The criteria used for selecting patients were grouped and analyzed. Then, an algorithm was generated based on these findings with support and reconfirmation from key expert opinions. Data on overall complications were collected. Outcome measures included zone of herniation, level of herniation, and approach (TELD or IELD).

RESULTS

In total, 474 articles met the initial screening criteria. The detailed analysis identified the 80 best-matching articles; after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 53 articles remained for this review.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed algorithm suggests a TELD for LDH located in the foraminal or extraforaminal zones at upper and lower levels and for central and subarticular discs at the upper levels considering the anatomic foraminal features and the craniocaudal pathology location. An IELD is preferred for LDH in the central or subarticular zones at L4/L5 and L5/S1, especially if a high iliac crest or high-grade migration is found.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the medial foraminal and interlaminar approaches: A comparative study with 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic medial foraminal discectomy (PEMFD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

We retrospectively examined and compared clinical data from 39 single-level LDH patients who underwent PEID and 47 who underwent PEMFD. All the patients were diagnosed with single-level LDH and were treated in Xuzhou Central Hospital for single-segmental lumbar disc herniation between June 2017 and December 2019. Collect and count surgical-related indicators, intraoperative bleeding volume and 24-hour postoperative drainage volume, lower extremity numbness Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the pain VAS and lumbar Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.

RESULTS

Intraoperative bleeding volume and 24-hour postoperative drainage volume were significantly lower in the PEMFD group (p < 0.05). Operation time and length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the groups. Transient spinal cord injury and surgical site infection did not occur. Recurrence occurred in two patients in each group. Repeat surgery in these patients demonstrated remarkable epidural scarring in the PEID group patients; no scarring was evident in the PEMFD group patients. The numbness VAS score 72 h after surgery and the pain VAS and ODI scores 1 month after surgery significantly differed between groups; however, pain VAS and ODI scores 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery did not. At last follow-up, the modified MacNab criteria outcome did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

PEMFD and PEID have similar short- and medium-term outcomes. However, PEMFD has several advantages: simplicity, lower bleeding volume, and preservation of the LF.

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol

Background

Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Methods

This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Discussion

This trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for using interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021).

Dural leakage due to ipsilateral needle placement for spinal level localization in unilateral decompression surgery: A case report

Background:

A spinal dural defect caused by needle placement for spinal level localization is an uncommon complication of cerebrospinal fluid leak with the potential for the development of intracranial hypertension.

Case Description:

Our 48-year-old patient underwent unilateral fenestration and sequestrectomy for intractable L5 radiculopathy due to disc herniation at the level L4–5 on the right side. The spinal level was identified with fluoroscopy after placement of a 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle on the right side. Intraoperatively, a sub-millimeter spinal dural defect was visualized on the ipsilateral side.

Conclusion:

Caution is needed when needle placement is used to localize the spinal level for unilateral surgery.

Nonsurgical treatment outcomes for surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation: a comprehensive cohort study

Physicians often encounter surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who request non-surgical management even though surgery is recommended. However, second opinions may differ among doctors. Therefore, a prospective comprehensive cohort study (CCS) was designed to assess outcomes of nonsurgical treatment for surgical candidates who were recommended to undergo surgery for LDH but requested a second opinion. The CCS includes both randomized and observational cohorts, comprising a nonsurgery cohort and surgery cohort, in a parallel fashion. Crossover between the nonsurgery and surgery cohorts was allowed at any time. The present study was an as-treated interim analysis of 128 cases (nonsurgery cohort, n = 71; surgery cohort, n = 57). Patient-reported outcomes included visual analogue scores for the back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L), the Oswestry Disability Index, the EuroQol 5-Dimension instrument, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), which were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. At baseline, age and SF-36 physical function were significantly lower in the surgery cohort than in the nonsurgery cohort (p < 0.05). All adjusted outcomes significantly improved after both nonsurgical and surgical treatment (p < 0.05). The nonsurgery cohort showed less improvement of VAS-B and VAS-L scores at 1 month (p < 0.01), but no difference between cohorts was observed thereafter for 24 months (p > 0.01). Nonsurgical management may be a negotiable option even for surgical candidates in the shared decision-making process.

Current and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: What are the Common Procedures we Have Now and What Lies Ahead?

The aging population around the world leads to increasing incidence of degenerative spinal conditions. There is a need for a minimally invasive technique in treatment for spinal conditions to meet the medical complexity and comorbidities that comes with aging. Principles of endoscopy are similar to minimally invasive surgery, which is to decrease pressure on soft tissue crushing from prolonged retraction, avoid soft tissue stripping and dissection, and bone and ligamentous preservation for optimal decompression without excessive destruction. Endoscopic spine surgery techniques started slowly in development in the 1970s to 2000s, with a rapid phase of development since the turn of the 21st century with endoscopic solutions developing in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar conditions with increasing complexity in nature of operation. Technological enhancement with progressively supportive literature is pushing boundaries of endoscopy from the early days of soft tissue procedure to current fusion procedures, endoscopic spine surgery techniques is covering more areas of spine than ever previously possible with good clinical results. We present a review on the current techniques available and postulated near future development for endoscopic spine surgery.

Treatment of high-iliac-crest L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation via a transverse process endoscopic transforaminal approach

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of transverse process endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for the treatment of high-iliac-crest L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with high-iliac-crest L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation who were treated with transforaminal endoscopy from April 2016 to January 2019 in the Department of Neurosurgery of Xuanwu Hospital were selected. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the efficacy of the procedure.

RESULTS

All of the patients successfully underwent the surgical treatment. Sixteen patients (94.1 %) completed effective follow-up for more than 12 months. The VAS was 7.8 ± 1.9, 2.9 ± 1.6, 2.3 ± 1.5 and 2.2 ± 1.6 before surgery and at one day, 3 months, and the last follow-up after surgery, respectively. The ODI scores were 52.8 ± 15.2 and 16.9 ± 9.7 before surgery and 3 months after surgery, respectively, both of which were lower than before surgery (both P < 0.01).

EFFICACY EVALUATION

An excellent outcome was achieved in 13 (81.3 %) patients, a good outcome in 1 patient (6.3 %), an acceptable outcome in 1 patient (6.3 %), and a poor outcome in 1 patient (6.3 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The transverse process endoscopic transforaminal discectomy is a safe and effective surgical method for the treatment of high-iliac-crest L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation.

A Narrative Review of Development of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery

In the first phase of development of lumbar endoscopic spine surgery, the focus was on removal of soft disc material through the working corridor of Kambin’s triangle using transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. With the introduction of the interlaminar approach and increased interest from both industry and surgeons, there has been an exponential development of endoscopic surgical equipment and a corresponding expansion of endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic treatment strategies are applied to conditions ranging from contained prolapsed intervertebral discs to noncontained migrated herniated discs, hard calcified discs, spinal stenosis in the central or lateral recess and the foraminal and extraforaminal region, and other combinations of degenerative conditions requiring decompression or fusion surgery. The further expansion of endoscopic surgical management involving complicated spinal cases and the final quartet of trauma, infections, tumors, and possibly deformities could be the future stage of endoscopic spine surgery development. This article covers the full range of current treatment strategies and presents possible future developments of endoscopic spine surgery for the management of lumbar spinal conditions.

Technical Considerations of Interlaminar Approach for Lumbar Disc Herniation

With the evolution of endoscopic instruments and techniques, full-endoscopic spine surgery has attracted more attention worldwide in recent years. At the initial stage, surgeons conducted endoscopic lumbar discectomy using the transforaminal approach. Next, interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy was developed to treat a herniation disc at the L5-S1 level. The progression in interlaminar endoscopic techniques has further broadened the indications for full-endoscopic spine surgery. However, the steep learning curve of endoscopic procedures has remained challenging. The use of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy entails many essential skills to manage the different anatomical structures of the spine. From the perspective of successful and safe interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy, we have discussed the technical considerations for endoscopic procedures.

The risk factors associated with delirium after lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients

Background

To prospectively explore the incidence and risk factors for postoperative delirium in elderly patients following lumbar spine surgery.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 148 consecutive patients over the age of 65 who were scheduled to undergo spine surgery. Patients were screened for delirium using the short Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) postoperatively. Patient demographics and relevant medical information were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative delirium.

Results

Eighty-three patients (56.1%) who underwent lumbar spine surgery (not coexisting with cervical or thoracic spine surgery) were enrolled in our study. Post-operative delirium was noted in 14.5% of patients over 65 years old. The presence of preoperative Parkinsonism was significantly higher in the delirium group (41.7% vs. 8.5%, P=0.002), as was a higher preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) (7.0±15.2 vs. 1.3±2.3 mg/L, P=0.017) when compared with the non-delirium group. Of the risk factors, male sex [odds ratio (OR) =0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01-0.66, P=0.017], Parkinsonism (OR =5.83, 95% CI: 1.03-32.89, P=0.046), and lower baseline MMSE score (OR =0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.97, P=0.032) were independently associated with postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Conclusions

Post-operative delirium occurred in 14.5% of elderly patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. Male sex, Parkinsonism, and lower baseline MMSE score were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in elderly patients following lumbar surgery.