1
|
Hsu YC, Liu YF, Chang CJ, Hsiao YM, Huang YH, Liu KC, Chen CM, Kim HS, Lin CL. How to Prevent Nerve Root Injury in Uniportal Full Endoscopic Lumbar Fusion Surgery? Insights From a Cadaveric Anatomic Study With Simulation Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:1301-1310. [PMID: 38872241 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000005066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN The study included 2 fresh-frozen cadavers. OBJECTIVE To elucidate the positional relationship between surgical instruments and nerve roots during full endoscopic facet-sparing (FE fs-TLIF) and full endoscopic facet-resecting (FE fr-TLIF) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and propose safe instrumentation insertion procedures and recommend cage glider designs aimed at protecting nerve roots. BACKGROUND Endoscopic surgical techniques are increasingly used for minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery, with FE fr-TLIF and FE fs-TLIF being common approaches. However, the risk of nerve root injury remains a significant concern during these procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight experienced endoscopic spine surgeons performed uniportal FE fr-TLIF and FE fs-TLIF on cadaveric lumbar spines, totaling 16 surgeries. Postoperation, soft tissues were removed to assess the positional relationship between the cage entry point and nerve roots. Distances between the cage entry point, traversing nerve root, and exiting nerve root were measured. Safe instrumentation design and insertion procedures were determined. RESULTS In FE fr-TLIF, the mean distance between the cage entry point and traversing nerve root was significantly shorter compared with FE fs-TLIF (3.30 ± 1.35 vs . 8.58 ± 2.47 mm, respectively; P < 0.0001). Conversely, the mean distance between the cage entry point and the exiting nerve root was significantly shorter in FE fs-TLIF compared with FE fr-TLIF (3.73 ± 1.97 vs . 6.90 ± 1.36 mm, respectively; P < 0.0001). For FE fr-TLIF, prioritizing the protection of the traversing root using a 2-bevel tip cage glider was crucial. In contrast, for FE fs-TLIF, a single-bevel tip cage glider placed in the caudal location was recommended. CONCLUSION This study elucidates the anatomic relationship between cage entry points and nerve roots in uniportal endoscopic lumbar fusion surgery. Protection strategies should prioritize the traversing root in FE fr-TLIF and the exiting root in FE fs-TLIF, with corresponding variations in surgical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chia Hsu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Fu Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Jui Chang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Meng Hsiao
- Department of Orthopedics, Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan
| | - Yi-Hung Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan
| | - Keng-Chang Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Min Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Hyeun-Sung Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheng-Li Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ge Z, Zhao W, Wu Z, He J, Zhu G, Song Z, Cui J, Jiang X, Yu W. Hidden Blood Loss and Its Possible Risk Factors in Full Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040674. [PMID: 37109060 PMCID: PMC10145574 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) is a representative recent emerging minimally invasive operation. The hidden blood loss (HBL) in an Endo-LIF procedure and its possible risk factors are still unclear. METHODS The blood loss (TBL) was calculated by Gross formula. Sex, age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, ASA classification, fusion levels, surgical approach type, surgery time, preoperative RBC, HGB, Hct, PT, INR, APTT, Fg, postoperative mean arterial pressure, postoperative heart rate, Intraoperative blood loss (IBL), patient blood volume were included to investigate the possible risk factors by correlation analysis and multiple linear regression between variables and HBL. RESULTS Ninety-six patients (23 males, 73 females) who underwent Endo-LIF were retrospective analyzed in this study. The HBL was 240.11 (65.51, 460.31) mL (median [interquartile range]). Fusion levels (p = 0.002), age (p = 0.003), hypertension (p = 0.000), IBL (p = 0.012), PT (p = 0.016), preoperative HBG (p = 0.037) were the possible risk factors. CONCLUSION Fusion levels, younger age, hypertension, prolonged PT, preoperative HBG are possible risk factors of HBL in an Endo-LIF procedure. More attention should be paid especially in multi-level minimally invasive surgery. The increase of fusion levels will lead to a considerable HBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhilin Ge
- First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Wenhua Zhao
- First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Zhihua Wu
- First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Jiahui He
- First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Guangye Zhu
- First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Zefeng Song
- First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Jianchao Cui
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Xiaobing Jiang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
| | - Weibo Yu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with a Tubular Retractor System: A Retrospective Controlled Study. World Neurosurg 2022; 165:e457-e468. [PMID: 35752422 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare the safety and clinical efficacy of full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FE-LIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS A total of 70 patients with single-level lumbar degenerative diseases underwent FE-LIF or MIS-TLIF with a tubular retractor system from August 2018 to August 2020. Postoperatively, the efficacy and safety were compared using several clinical and radiological indices. RESULTS A total of 32 patients underwent FE-LIF and 38 received MIS-TLIF with a tubular retractor system, and all patients had no apparent complications. The FE-LIF group had higher radiation exposure, longer operation time, and less bleeding than the MIS-TLIF group (P < 0.05). Postoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging showed that the nerve decompression was sufficient. The pain in the lower back and legs was significantly relieved, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was greatly improved after surgery (P < 0.01) in both the groups. The sensory and motor functions of nerve roots were remarkably recovered in both the groups at the 1-year follow-up (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in MacNab scores between the 2 groups. As per Mannion's fusion classification, the interbody fusion rate was significantly better in the FE-LIF group than in the MIS-TLIF group. CONCLUSIONS FE-LIF, which is safe, effective, and minimally invasive, exhibits the same clinical efficacy as MIS-TLIF but with longer operation time and increased radiation exposure.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lewandrowski KU, Abraham I, Ramírez León JF, Soriano Sánchez JA, Dowling Á, Hellinger S, Freitas Ramos MR, Teixeira De Carvalho PS, Yeung C, Salari N, Yeung A. Differential Agnostic Effect Size Analysis of Lumbar Stenosis Surgeries. Int J Spine Surg 2022; 16:318-342. [PMID: 35444041 PMCID: PMC9930655 DOI: 10.14444/8222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A meta-analysis of 89 randomized prospective, prospective, and retrospective studies on spinal endoscopic surgery outcomes. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to provide familiar Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back, and VAS leg effect size (ES) data following endoscopic decompression for sciatica-type back and leg pain due to lumbar herniated disc, foraminal, or lateral recess spinal stenosis. BACKGROUND Higher-grade objective clinical outcome ES data are more suitable than lower-grade clinical evidence, including cross-sectional retrospective study outcomes or expert opinion to underpin the ongoing debate on whether or not to replace some of the traditional open and with other forms of minimally invasive spinal decompression surgeries such as the endoscopic technique. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019 identified 89 eligible studies on lumbar endoscopic decompression surgery enrolling 23,290 patient samples using the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain used for the ES calculation. RESULTS There was an overall mean overall reduction of ODI of 46.25 (SD 6.10), VAS back decrease of 3.29 (SD 0.65), and VAS leg reduction of 5.77 (SD 0.66), respectively. Reference tables of familiar ODI, VAS back, and VAS leg show no significant impact of study design, follow-up, or patients' age on ES observed with these outcome instruments. There was no correlation of ES with long-term follow-up (P = 0.091). Spinal endoscopy produced an overall ODI ES of 0.92 extrapolated from 81 studies totaling 12,710 patient samples. Provided study comparisons to tubular retractor microdiscectomy and open laminectomy showed an ODI ES of 0.9 (2895 patients pooled from 16 studies) and 0.93 (1188 patients pooled from 5 studies). The corresponding VAS leg ES were 0.92 (12,631 endoscopy patients pooled from 81 studies), 0.92 (2348 microdiscectomy patients pooled from 15 studies), and 0.89 (1188 open laminectomy patients pooled from 5 studies). CONCLUSION Successful clinical outcomes can be achieved with various lumbar surgeries. ESs with endoscopic spinal surgery are on par with those found with open laminectomy and microsurgical decompression. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This article is a meta-analysis on the benefit overlap between lumbar endoscopy, microsurgical decompression, laminectomy, and lumbar decompression fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA .,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ivo Abraham
- Family and Community Medicine, Clinical Translational Sciences at the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA,Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN - Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Jorge Felipe Ramírez León
- Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN - Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia,Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia,Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, DC, Colombia
| | - José Antonio Soriano Sánchez
- Neurosurgeon and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeon, Head of the Spine Clinic of The American-British Cowdray Medical Center I.A.P. Campus Santa Fe [Centro Médico ABC Campus Santa Fe], Santa Fe, Mexico
| | - Álvaro Dowling
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil,Orthopaedic Spine Surgeon, Director of Endoscopic Spine Clinic, Santiago, Chile
| | - Stefan Hellinger
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Isar Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Rogério Freitas Ramos
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Nima Salari
- Desert Institute for Spine Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Anthony Yeung
- Desert Institute for Spine Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA,Department of Neurosurgery Albuquerque, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Endoscopic Techniques for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Principles and Context. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:4979231. [PMID: 35345525 PMCID: PMC8957448 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4979231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic techniques in spine surgery are rapidly evolving, with operations becoming progressively safer and less invasive. Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) procedures comprise many spine procedures that have benefited from endoscopic assistance and minimally invasive approaches. Though considerable variation exists within endoscopic LIF, similar principles and techniques are common to all types. Nonetheless, innovations continually emerge, requiring trainees and experienced surgeons to maintain familiarity with the domain and its possibilities. We present two illustrative cases of endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a comprehensive literature review of the different approaches to endoscopic LIF procedures.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim HS, Wu PH, Sairyo K, Jang IT. A Narrative Review of Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Uniportal Facet-Preserving Trans-Kambin Endoscopic Fusion and Uniportal Facet-Sacrificing Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:S72-S83. [PMID: 34974422 PMCID: PMC9421270 DOI: 10.14444/8166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion aims to achieve the bony union of 2 lumbar segments through cage insertion using full spinal endoscopy. Endoscopic fusion can adjust foraminal height and disc height, improve alignment, and minimize collateral soft tissue damage during the insertion of an interbody cage. The surgery is performed under constant irrigation with normal saline and an optical endoscopic lens close to the targeted disc segment. Two main subtypes of uniportal endoscopic fusion are currently described in the literature. We broadly classify them into facet-preserving and facet-sacrificing endoscopic lumbar interbody fusions. We have termed them uniportal facet-preserving trans-Kambin endoscopic fusion and uniportal facet-sacrificing posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. In this article, we review the current literature and discuss the history, indications, contraindications, technical differences, clinical outcomes, and complications of uniportal endoscopic interbody fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pang Hung Wu
- Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- National University Health Systems, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Koichi Sairyo
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Il-Tae Jang
- Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ishihama Y, Morimoto M, Tezuka F, Yamashita K, Manabe H, Sugiura K, Takeuchi M, Takata Y, Sakai T, Maeda T, Nagamachi A, Sairyo K. Full-Endoscopic Trans-Kambin Triangle Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Surgical Technique and Nomenclature. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 83:308-313. [PMID: 34808676 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Full-endoscopic lumbar surgery is used for decompression of lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Now, a cage can be inserted through Kambin's triangle for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). We have been performing full-endoscopic trans-Kambin triangle LIF (KLIF) at our institution since 2018. In this article, we describe this technique and present our results. METHODS We performed full-endoscopic one-level KLIF in 10 patients. The procedure is as follows. First, percutaneous pedicle screws are inserted. Listhesis is reduced if necessary. The endoscope is inserted in Kambin's triangle. Next, the superior articular process is partially removed, enlarging Kambin's triangle to allow safe insertion of the cage. A cannula is inserted into the disk to avoid damaging the exiting nerve. The disk material is shaved and curetted. Finally, the harvested bone is packed in a cage and inserted into the disk space. We analyze the complications, visual analog scores (VAS), and MacNab's criteria. RESULTS One patient had an irritation in the exiting nerve at L4-L5. The VAS for back pain and leg pain decreased from 69 to 9 and from 60 to 9, respectively. The clinical outcome was considered excellent in eight and good in two patients. CONCLUSIONS Kambin's triangle lies immediately behind the psoas major. Therefore, we consider KLIF as a lateral LIF procedure comparable with oblique or extreme LIF. However, unlike oblique or extreme LIF, there are no major vessels and organs in the surgical field; therefore, KLIF is the safest type of lateral LIF. Furthermore, using the endoscope, we can perform decompression directly using the facetectomy technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Ishihama
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Morimoto
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Fumitake Tezuka
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kazuta Yamashita
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Manabe
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kosuke Sugiura
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Tokushima Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Makoto Takeuchi
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Takata
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Toshinori Sakai
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Toru Maeda
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Tokushima Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Akihiro Nagamachi
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Koichi Sairyo
- Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang JC, Li ZZ, Cao Z, Zhao HL, Zhang M. Technical Notes of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Anterior Expandable Cylindrical Fusion Cage: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-Up. World Neurosurg 2021; 158:e618-e626. [PMID: 34775095 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to introduce technical notes of full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FE-LIF) with an anterior expandable cylindrical fusion cage. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent FE-LIF with an anterior expandable cylindrical fusion cage through transforaminal or interlaminar approaches from August 2018 to April 2019. Patient demographics and operation-related complications were recorded. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS A total of 32 patients (34 segments) were included in this study. Among them, 14 received full endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and 18 received full endoscopic interlaminar lumbar interbody fusion. There were significant differences in interbody fusion indications between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). All operations were successfully completed without complications. Postoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging showed that nerve decompression was sufficient in all patients, and the visual analog scale scores of low back pain and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index scores, and sensory and muscle strength were significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.01). The MacNab score included 9 excellent ratings, 4 good ratings, and 1 fair rating in the full endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group and included 10 excellent ratings and 8 good ratings in the full endoscopic interlaminar lumbar interbody fusion group; the scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups at 1 year after surgery (P > 0.05). Complete interbody fusion was achieved in both groups according to computed tomography at 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS FE-LIF is a safe and effective minimally invasive lumbar surgery with an anterior expandable cylindrical fusion cage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Chang Wang
- Joint Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University, China Postgraduate Training Base of The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Hospital of Jinzhou, Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen-Zhou Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Zheng Cao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Liang Zhao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mo Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patkar SV, Patkar P. Basilar Invagination: Surgical Treatment by Novel Anterior Implant. J Orthop Case Rep 2021; 11:36-39. [PMID: 35437498 PMCID: PMC9009472 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i06.2248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Anterior retropharyngeal realignment, distraction, and atlantoaxial fixation are an option for the treatment of symptomatic basilar invagination (BI). The anterior implants for distraction and fixation for atlantoaxial joints are still evolving. We share our experience using a novel implant which can easily, safely, and rigidly fix both lateral masses to the body of the axis. Methods After exposing both the atlantoaxial joints anteriorly, the joints were prepared, distracted with wedge shaped autologous tricorticate bone grafts and realigned to correct the cervicomedullary strain. The atlantoaxial joints were fixed using a novel titanium plate by passing screws upwards and laterally into the lateral masses of the atlas and centrally into the body of the axis. Post-operative imaging showed effective correction of BI and atlantoaxial dislocation. Post-operative dynamic X-ray images confirmed maintenance of rigid fixation at 6 months. Conclusion This new plate screw construct is safe, easy, cost-efficient, and biomechanically appealing option for the treatment of symptomatic BI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushil V Patkar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Poona Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pradnya Patkar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Fulwood, Preston, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li ZZ, Wang JC, Cao Z, Zhao HL, Lewandrowski KU, Yeung A. Full-Endoscopic Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note With 1-Year Follow-Up. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:504-513. [PMID: 33963038 DOI: 10.14444/8072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF) is a minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion procedure using a bullet-shaped polyetheretherketone (PEEK) nonexpandable fusion cage modified to diminish risk to the exiting nerve root during posterolateral implantation through the Kambin safe zone under fluoroscopic guidance. The objective of this study was to present feasibility of this procedure and 1-year clinical outcome data. METHODS The authors present a prospective cohort study of 20 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided and full-endoscopic OLLIF in 22 segments allowing protection of the exiting nerve root from January 2018 to March 2019. The foraminoplasty, discectomy, endplate preparation, placement of bone graft and insertion of the fusion cage was done under continuous full-endoscopic visualization. The OLLIF fusion was backed up with bilateral percutaneous posterior supplemental pedicle screw fixation. Primary clinical outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS) of low back and leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation. At final follow-up, the Macnab score was also evaluated. Secondary outcome measures were computed tomography (CT) assessment fusion using the Mannion classification of spinal fusion and adverse events related to the device as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of nerve root decompression. RESULTS All patients had significant relief of low back pain and leg pain, by VAS and ODI scores that improved significantly (P < .01). There were no complications. Postoperative lumbar MRI of all patients showed sufficient direct nerve decompression. At 1-year follow-up, excellent Macnab outcomes were obtained 13 patients, good in six, and fair in one. Impaired sensation and muscle strength of the involved nerve root significantly recovered in all but 2 patients (P < .05). According to the Mannion CT-based classification of spinal fusion, CT showed complete interbody fusion achieved in all 22 segments. CONCLUSIONS Full-endoscopic OLLIF is a safe, effective, minimally invasive, economical, practical, and widely applicable minimally invasive interbody fusion technique in the lumbar spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Zhou Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Chang Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Cao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Liang Zhao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Arizona; Visiting Professor Department of Orthopaedics, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; and Department of Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Anthony Yeung
- Desert Institute for Spine Care, Phoenix, Arizona; Executive Director International Intradiscal Therapy Society, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sharma M, Chhawra S, Jain R, Sharma S. Full Endoscopic Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in DDD Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: A Latest Technique. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 14:S71-S77. [PMID: 33900948 PMCID: PMC7888205 DOI: 10.14444/7168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumbar interbody fusion has long been used in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Lumbar spinal interbody fusion surgery traditionally is an open surgical technique. Although lumbar spinal interbody fusions using endoscopy have been reported, the endoscope was used partially for the interbody fusion. We are reporting a case where lumbar interbody fusion with discectomy was entirely done through direct visualization with the endoscope. METHODS We report a case of a 55-year-old woman who underwent the transforaminal percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion technique (FELTIF) under continuous and direct visualization at the L5-S1 level. To facilitate the interbody fusion, a foraminoplasty with complete resection of the superior articular process (SAP) and a partial pediculectomy of the S1 pedicle was performed. End plate sparing decortication techniques were used under direct video endoscopic visualization. The cage and bone graft insertion occurred through the endoscopic working cannula, thereby protecting the retracted traversing and exiting nerve roots at the surgical level. Posterior supplemental fixation with percutaneous pedicle screws was performed to complete the circumferential fusion. RESULT The VAS leg score was reduced to 2 from preoperative score of 7 and the VAS back score reduced 3 from preoperative score of 9. Her neurogenic symptom score improved from 8 before surgery to 1 at the last follow-up. The fusion is assessed by plain radiographs in follow up. CONCLUSIONS We concluded that the insertion of an interbody fusion cage device directly through an endoscopic working cannula was technically feasible. Future research should focus on examining the clinical outcomes of this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen F, Liu X, Sun J, Xin J, Su C, Wang G, Cui X. Radiographic anatomy and clinical significance of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal oblique fixation from posterior corner in lumbar spine. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1391. [PMID: 33313136 PMCID: PMC7723534 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-2046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Endoscopic transforaminal decompression and interbody fusion (ETDIF) has been widely discussed due to its advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, quick recovery, high safety, and relatively fewer complications, as well as adverse factors such as incomplete decompression, steep learning curve, low fusion rate, and high radiation risk. Furthermore, this technique requires the use of supplemental posterior pedicle-screw. Decompression, interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation are not completed in a single channel. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal oblique fixation from posterior corner in lumbar spine (PETOFPC) overcomes the above limitations. The purpose of this study is to confirm the anatomical feasibility for PETOFPC in the posterolateral transforaminal approach and to provide anatomic data for the design of new integrated fixable and fused interbody cage. Methods Sixty volunteers (22 men and 38 women) who underwent lumbar CT scans were collected and sent to the GEAW4.4 workstation. As a cohort study, the distances and angles of each path in the sagittal and axial planes were measured and analyzed statistically. Results The lengths of each path are not less than 40mm, and the longest can be up to 46mm. The paths in full-length group are about 5mm longer than that in medium group. PE (from point P to target E) path was the optimal path. The angles of each path were significantly different (P≤0.001), namely, a1 > a2 > a3, b1 > b2 > b3, and c1 < c2 < c3. Conclusions This study confirms anatomic feasibility for PETOFPC and provides anatomic data for the design of new integrated fixable and fused interbody cage. PETOFPC may be a very promising technology and have great clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feifei Chen
- Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaoyang Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Jianmin Sun
- Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Jun Xin
- Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Cheng Su
- Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Guodong Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Xingang Cui
- Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lewandrowski KU, Ferrara L, Cheng B. Expandable Interbody Fusion Cages: An Editorial on the Surgeon's Perspective on Recent Technological Advances and Their Biomechanical Implications. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:S56-S62. [PMID: 33122184 DOI: 10.14444/7127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Expandable cages have gone through several iterations since they first appeared on the market in the early 2000s. Their development was prompted by some common problems associated with static interbody cages, including migration, expulsion, dural or neural traction injury, and pseudarthrosis. OBJECTIVE To summarize current technological advances from earlier expandable lumbar interbody fusion devices to implants with vertical and medial-to-lateral expansion mechanisms. METHODS The authors review the currently available expandable cage designs, the incremental technological advances, and how these devices impact minimally invasive surgery interbody procedures and clinical outcomes. The strategic concepts intended to improve the minimally invasive application of expandable interbody fusion implants are reviewed from a surgeon's perspective in a clinical context to discuss how their use may improve patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The geometrical configuration, effective stiffness of composite multi-material cage designs may impact the bone-implant contact area with the endplates. Hybridization strategies of expandable cage technology with modern minimally invasive and endoscopic spinal surgery techniques are presented by outlining their advantages and disadvantages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Arizona, Department of Orthopaedics, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia, Department of Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lisa Ferrara
- OrthoKinetic Technologies LLC, Southport, North Carolina
| | - Boyle Cheng
- Carnegie Mellon University, Neurosurgical and Spine Research, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heo DH, Lee DC, Kim HS, Park CK, Chung H. Clinical Results and Complications of Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2020; 145:396-404. [PMID: 33065349 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) may combine the advantages of minimally invasive fusion and endoscopic spine surgery, little evidence exists on endoscopic TLIF. This meta-analysis investigated the clinical results of endoscopic TLIF. METHODS We performed a systematic search of Web-based electronic databases to identify articles on endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion. Only studies of water-based endoscopic TLIF with pedicle screw fixation were included. We analyzed preoperative and postoperative scores for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scales (VASs) for back and leg pain to evaluate clinical efficacy. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of VAS and ODI was analyzed. We calculated differences in means and 95% confidence intervals and investigated indications for endoscopic TLIF, surgical approaches for endoscopic TLIF, the endoscopic systems that were used, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS Thirteen articles were included in this meta-analysis. Uniportal and biportal endoscopic systems were used. Six articles used the posterolateral approach and 7 used the trans-Kambin approach. Preoperative ODI and VAS scores for leg and back pain significantly improved after endoscopic TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (P = 0.00). The ODI significantly improved by twice as much as the MCID. The mean change in the VAS for back and leg pain showed significant improvements over the MCID. The perioperative complications were usually minor. CONCLUSIONS The early clinical results of endoscopic TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation are favorable. However, long-term outcomes should be investigated and randomized controlled trials should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hwa Heo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopedics, Endoscopic Spine Surgery Center, Seoul Bumin Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Chan Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, South Korea.
| | - Hyeun Sung Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Nanoori Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Choon Keun Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, South Korea
| | - Hungtae Chung
- Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopedics, Endoscopic Spine Surgery Center, Seoul Bumin Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Heo DH, Hong YH, Lee DC, Chung HJ, Park CK. Technique of Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Neurospine 2020; 17:S129-S137. [PMID: 32746526 PMCID: PMC7410385 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2040178.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) may have advantages of minimally invasive fusion surgery as well as those of endoscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to present the biportal endoscopic TLIF technique along with video presentations and a review of the literature on this technique. Basically, the biportal endoscopic TLIF technique is similar to minimally invasive TLIF with a tubular retractor. There were 2 options in the biportal endoscopic TLIF procedures. The first was the insertion of one long TLIF cage and the other was the insertion of 2 short posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages. After the interbody fusion procedures, percutaneous pedicles screw fixation was performed. Biportal endoscopic TLIF achieved complete neural decompression through laminectomy and facetectomy like conventional TLIF. Endplate preparation was performed completely under a clear and magnified endoscopic view. It was also feasible to insert a large TLIF cage or 2 cages for PLIF without exiting nerve root injury. Biportal endoscopic TLIF might have the advantages of endoscopic surgery as well as minimally invasive fusion surgery. Direct neural decompression, endplate preparation under endoscopic guidance, and the insertion of a large TLIF cage or 2 PLIF cages may be the merits of biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hwa Heo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Endoscopic Spine Surgery Center, Seoul Bumin Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Ho Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang Barunsesang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong Chan Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - Hun Jae Chung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Endoscopic Spine Surgery Center, Seoul Bumin Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Choon Keun Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu PH, Kim HS, Jang IT. A Narrative Review of Development of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery. Neurospine 2020; 17:S20-S33. [PMID: 32746515 PMCID: PMC7410380 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2040116.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In the first phase of development of lumbar endoscopic spine surgery, the focus was on removal of soft disc material through the working corridor of Kambin’s triangle using transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. With the introduction of the interlaminar approach and increased interest from both industry and surgeons, there has been an exponential development of endoscopic surgical equipment and a corresponding expansion of endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic treatment strategies are applied to conditions ranging from contained prolapsed intervertebral discs to noncontained migrated herniated discs, hard calcified discs, spinal stenosis in the central or lateral recess and the foraminal and extraforaminal region, and other combinations of degenerative conditions requiring decompression or fusion surgery. The further expansion of endoscopic surgical management involving complicated spinal cases and the final quartet of trauma, infections, tumors, and possibly deformities could be the future stage of endoscopic spine surgery development. This article covers the full range of current treatment strategies and presents possible future developments of endoscopic spine surgery for the management of lumbar spinal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pang Hung Wu
- Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Spine Surgery, Seoul, Korea.,National University Health System, JurongHealth Campus, Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore
| | | | - Il-Tae Jang
- Nanoori Gangnam Hospital, Spine Surgery, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dysethesia due to irritation of the dorsal root ganglion following lumbar transforaminal endoscopy: Analysis of frequency and contributing factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 197:106073. [PMID: 32683194 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New onset of acute dysethetic leg pain due to irritation of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) following uneventful recovery from an expertly executed lumbar transforaminal endoscopic decompression is a common problem. Its incidence and relation to any risk factors that could be mitigated preoperatively are not well understood. METHODS We performed a multicenter frequency analysis of DRG irritation dysesthesia in 451 patients who underwent lumbar transforaminal endoscopic decompression for herniated disc and foraminal stenosis. The 451 patients consisted of 250 men and 201 women with an average age of 55.77 ± 15.6 years. The average follow-up of 47.16 months. The primary clinical outcome measures were the modified Macnab criteria. Chi-square testing was employed to analyze statistically significant associations between increased dysesthesia rates, preoperative diagnosis, the surgical level(s), and surgeon technique. RESULTS At final follow-up, Excellent (183/451; 40.6 %) and Good (195/451; 43.2 %) Macnab outcomes were observed in the majority of patients (378/451; 83.8 %). The majority of study patients (354; 78.5 %) had an entirely uneventful postoperative recovery without any DRG irritation, but 21.5 % of patients were treated for it in the immediate postoperative recovery period with supportive care measures including activity modification, transforaminal epidural steroid injections, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, gabapentin, or pregabalin. There was no statistically significant difference in dysesthesia rates between lumbar levels from L1 to S1, or between single (DRG rate 21.8 %) or two-level (DRG rate 20.2 %) endoscopic decompression (p = 0.742). A statistically significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysesthesia was observed in patients who underwent decompression for foraminal stenosis (38/103; 27 %), and recurrent herniated disc (7/10; 41.2 %; p = 0.039). There were also statistically significant variations in dysesthesia rates between the seven participating clinical study sites ranging from 11.6%-33% (p = 0.002). Unrelenting postoperative dysesthetic leg pain due to DRG irritation was statistically associated with less favorable long-term clinical outcomes with DRG rates as high as 45 % in patients with a Fair and 61.3 % in patients with Poor Macnab outcomes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative dysesthesia following transforaminal endoscopic decompression should be expected in one-fifth of patients. There was no predilection for any lumbar level. Foraminal stenosis and recurrent herniated disc surgery are risk factors for higher dysesthesia rates. There was a statistically significant variation of dysesthesia rates between participating centers suggesting that the surgeon skill level is of significance. Severe postoperative dysesthesia may be a predictor of Fair of Poor long-term Macnab outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim HS, Raorane HD, Wu PH, Yi YJ, Jang IT. Evolution of endoscopic transforaminal lumbar approach for degenerative lumbar disease. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2020; 6:424-437. [PMID: 32656380 PMCID: PMC7340818 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic spine surgery has evolved dramatically in last 30 years; with the development of new improved endoscopic optics and instrumentation limitation of endoscopic spine surgery has significantly reduced. The transforaminal approach has been limited in its indications due to its optimized approach and obstacles of bony or neural structures. As the initial transforaminal approach is based on the inside out technique, there were many limitations on the indications. Outside-in approach has been developed to address these limitations. However, the outside-in approach was not free from anatomical obstacles. The mobile outside-in approach technique has advantage of both inside-out and outside-in technique. It is equally safe as inside-out technique and provides an easy handling of structures, while it is equally versatile as outside-in technique in managing different types of disc prolapse such as central, paracentral, foraminal, far lateral, and up and down migration, and in high-canal compromise cases. The mobile outside in technique, however, demands a longer learning curve and beginners need to be patient while learning the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeun Sung Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Pang Hung Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Jin Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Il Tae Jang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim HS, Raorane HD, Heo DH, Yi YJ, Jang IT. Endoscopic spine surgery in Republic of Korea. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2020; 6:S40-S44. [PMID: 32195413 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeun-Sung Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Dong Hwa Heo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Jin Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Il-Tae Jang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Discectomy Using Biportal Endoscopic Approach: Technical Report and Preliminary Clinical Results. World Neurosurg 2020; 137:31-37. [PMID: 32028006 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bilateral or huge disc herniations cause bilateral radiculopathy and severe lower back pain. In such cases, a bilateral discectomy may be required to resolve the radicular pain in both legs. We attempted a surgical technique involving bilateral lumbar discectomy via a unilateral approach using a percutaneous biportal endoscopic technique. The purpose of the present study was to describe our surgical technique and investigate the clinical outcomes in symptomatic bilateral lumbar disc herniation. METHODS Eleven patients with bilateral disc herniation of the L4-L5 or L5-S1 segments were surgically treated using the percutaneous biportal endoscopic approach. Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral discectomy was performed in all patients. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was performed 1 day after surgery, and the clinical parameters were investigated preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS All enrolled patients were successfully treated by biportal endoscopic bilateral discectomy via a unilateral approach. Surgery was performed at the L4-L5 level in 1 patient and the L5-S1 level in 10 patients. The mean operative time was 67.5 ± 13.1 minutes. A visual analog scale of leg pain and the Oswestry disability index showed significant improvement after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral discectomy using the percutaneous biportal endoscopic approach could be an effective and alternative treatment of symptomatic bilateral herniated disc disease affecting L4-L5 or L5-S1 segments.
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang YW, Xia WH, Gao WC, Xiao X, Xiao Y, Gong FP. Direct foraminoplasty in endoscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. J Int Med Res 2020; 48:300060519875372. [PMID: 31530061 PMCID: PMC7262861 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519875372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective As a new minimally invasive surgery developed in recent years, the procedure of endoscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has not been well described. We herein describe a patient with lumbar disc herniation who underwent direct foraminoplasty and thorough decompression using a self-designed endoscopic trephine in endoscope-assisted TLIF at L4–5. Methods A 57-year-old man presented with a 3-month history of low back and right leg pain. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging indicated protrusion of the L4–5 intervertebral disc in the right posterior direction. The patient underwent endoscopic surgery involving direct foraminoplasty, removal of the L4–5 intervertebral disc, and thorough decompression around the nerve roots. Results During the 1-year follow-up, the patient was generally in good condition and had no significant limitation of lumbar spine activity. Conclusions Endoscopic resection for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation is not a novel concept, but the improvement in the efficacy of endoscope-assisted TLIF and other endoscope-assisted spinal surgeries deserves to be reported. Through the innovation and improvement of surgical equipment for endoscope-assisted TLIF, direct foraminoplasty and thorough decompression can be effectively realized. These advances will help to promote the postoperative efficacy and enhance the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Wei Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Medical Department of Graduate School, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wen-Han Xia
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wen-Cheng Gao
- Department of Orthopedics, Dongguan Houjie Town People’s Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, China
| | - Xin Xiao
- Medical Department of Graduate School, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yan Xiao
- Medical Department of Graduate School, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Fei-Peng Gong
- Department of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ramírez León JF, Ardila ÁS, Rugeles Ortíz JG, Martínez CR, Alonso Cuéllar GO, Infante J, Lewandrowski KU. Standalone lordotic endoscopic wedge lumbar interbody fusion (LEW-LIF™) with a threaded cylindrical peek cage: report of two cases. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2020; 6:S275-S284. [PMID: 32195434 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.06.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
We report two cases of a standalone lordotic endoscopic wedge lumbar interbody fusion (LEW-LIF™) with a stress-neutral non-expandable cylindrical threaded polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody fusion implant. Patients underwent full-endoscopic transforaminal decompression and fusion for symptomatic lateral recess stenosis due to disc herniation, and hypertrophy of the facet joint complex and ligamentum flavum and no more than grade I spondylolisthesis. Lumbar interbody fusion with cages traditionally calls for posterior supplemental fixation with pedicle screws for added stability. A more simplified version of lumbar decompression and fusion without pedicle screws would allow treating patients suffering from stenosis and instability induced sciatica-type low back and leg pain in an outpatient ambulatory surgery center setting (ASC). This would realize a significant reduction in cost as well as the burden to the patient with decreased postoperative pain and earlier return to function. A 62-year-old female patient had surgery at L4/5 for a 6-year history of worsening right sided sciatica-type leg- and low back pain. Another 79-year-old female had the same surgical management at L4/5 for a 5-year history of unrelenting left-sided spondylolisthesis-related symptoms. Both patients had an uneventful postoperative course until the last available follow-up of 24 weeks with greater than 60% VAS and Oswestry disability index (ODI) reductions. There was no evidence of implant expulsion, subsidence, or postoperative instability. We concluded that standalone outpatient lumbar transforaminal endoscopic interbody fusion with a non-expandable threaded cylindrical cage is feasible, and favorable clinical outcomes provide proof of concept to study long-term clinical outcomes in larger groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Felipe Ramírez León
- Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.,Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.,Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN-Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz
- Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.,Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN-Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Carolina Ramírez Martínez
- Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.,Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.,Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN-Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.,Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona, Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lewandrowski KU, Ransom NA, Yeung A. Subsidence induced recurrent radiculopathy after staged two-level standalone endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with a threaded cylindrical cage: a case report. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2020; 6:S286-S293. [PMID: 32195435 PMCID: PMC7063320 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
We report a case of subsidence induced recurrence of unilateral L5 and S1 radiculopathy six months following a successful staged two-level endoscopic standalone lumbar interbody fusion using the VARILIF-L™ device. The patient was a 64-year-old female who first underwent outpatient endoscopic fusion L4/5 for failed non-operative care of Grade I spondylolisthesis. Within 11 months from the L4/5 index procedure, she developed symptomatic adjacent segment disease stemming from the L5/S1 level. A preoperative computed tomography before the planned L5/S1 endoscopic standalone VARILIF™ fusion 15 months following her L4/5 VARILIF™ procedure revealed fusion at the L4/5 level with minimal subsidence of the VARILIF-L™ implant, and advanced degeneration of the L5/S1 motion segment with lateral recess and foraminal stenosis, reduced posterior disc height, and vacuum disc. The patient underwent uneventful L5/S1 endoscopic standalone fusion using the VARILIF-L™ implant with successful clinical outcome and resolution of back and leg symptoms. Six months after the second endoscopic L5/S1 VARILIF™ procedure she developed recurrent L5 and S1 radiculopathy. Computed tomography showed significant implant subsidence and formation of a large soft tissue bulge on the approach side behind the interbody fusion cage. The subsidence induced subsidence and loss of posterior disc height and the associated recurrence of nerve root compression of the traversing S1 and exiting L5 nerve root. The recurrent radiculopathy was eventually treated with another transforaminal endoscopic decompression which included a more generous foraminoplasty with resection of the remaining superior articular process including a partial S1 pediculectomy and additional resection of the posterior annulus as well as scar and bony tissue that had formed within the axillary hidden zone of Macnab. We concluded that recurrent radiculopathy might occur after standalone lumbar transforaminal endoscopic interbody fusion with an expandable threaded cylindrical cage as a result of vertical and angular subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Staff Orthopaedic Spine Surgeon, Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Nicholas A. Ransom
- Staff Orthopaedic Spine Surgeon, Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Anthony Yeung
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Desert Institute for Spine Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lewandrowski KU, Zhang X, Ramírez León JF, de Carvalho PST, Hellinger S, Yeung A. Lumbar vacuum disc, vertical instability, standalone endoscopic interbody fusion, and other treatments: an opinion based survey among minimally invasive spinal surgeons. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2020; 6:S165-S178. [PMID: 32195425 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background A diseased lumbar intervertebral vacuum disc void of any structurally intact tissue may be vertically unstable. A primary standalone endoscopic decompression and interbody fusion surgery in the treatment of vertical instability in patients with a vacuum disc may be a more reliable treatment than decompression alone. Methods The authors solicited responses to an online survey sent to spine surgeons by email, and chat groups on social media networks, including Facebook, WeChat, WhatsApp, and Linkedin. Descriptive and correlative statistics were employed to count the responses and compare the surgeon's responses recorded on a Likert scale from 1 (disagree) to 10 (agree) or in multiple-choice questions. Surgeons were asked about their familiarity with the concept of vacuum disc and vertical instability and how they would treat such patients. Kappa statistics and linear regression analysis of agreement of incoming responses were performed. Results A total of 1,165 surgeons accessed the survey. The completion rate was 22.78. The majority surgeons were very familiar with the concept of a "vacuum disc" as a sign of end-stage lumbar degenerative disc disease and a collapsing lumbar motion segment (182/273; 66.7%; Likert score 6.53). The majority of surgeons also thought that vertical instability precedes anterolateral lumbar instability (187/273; 68.5%; Likert score 6.64) and that a vacuum disc may cause vertical instability with symptomatic dynamic foraminal & lateral recess stenosis (222/273; 81%; Likert score 7.48), mechanical back pain (201/273; 73.1%; Likert score 7.48), and may cause sciatica-type low back and leg pain (179/273; 66.3%; Likert score 6.59). The majority of surgeons indicated that vacuum phenomenon on radiographic studies is associated with vertical instability and collapse resulting in dynamic foraminal and lateral recess stenosis and should be treated surgically (199/266; 73.7%; 7 missing responses; Likert score 6.86). Preferred treatments were decompression alone without fusion (P<0.014). There was consensus in support of fusion by TLIF or PLIF with a Likert score of 6.68 (184/266; 69.2%; 7 missing responses). There was no consensus on standalone fusion. Conclusions Vacuum phenomenon on radiographic studies is associated with a vertical instability and collapse, resulting in dynamic foraminal and lateral recess stenosis that should be treated surgically. Preferred surgical treatments were decompression alone, decompression with interbody fusion using just bone graft, and fusion employing TLIF or PLIF. Further research into the clinical significance of lumbar vacuum disc, vertical instability and its most appropriate surgical treatments if any is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson AZ, USA.,Department Neurosurgery, UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Xifeng Zhang
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Jorge Felipe Ramírez León
- Orthopedic & Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeon, Reina Sofía Clinic & Center of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Bogotá, Colombia.,Spine Surgery Program, Universidad Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Anthony Yeung
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.,Desert Institute for Spine Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dowling Á, Lewandrowski KU, da Silva FHP, Parra JAA, Portillo DM, Giménez YCP. Patient selection protocols for endoscopic transforaminal, interlaminar, and translaminar decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2020; 6:S120-S132. [PMID: 32195421 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background The indications of different endoscopic and endoscopically assisted translaminar approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis are not well-defined, and validated protocols for the use of the transforaminal over the interlaminar approach are lacking. Methods We performed a retrospective study employing an image-based patient stratification protocol of stenosis location (type I-central canal, type II-lateral recess, type III-foraminal, type IV-extraforaminal) and clinical outcomes on 249 patients consisting of 137 (55%) men and 112 (45%) women with an average age of 56.03±16.8 years who underwent endoscopic surgery for symptomatic spinal stenosis from January 2013 to February 2019. The average follow-up of 38.27±27.9 months. The primary clinical outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and modified Macnab criteria. Results The frequency of stenosis configuration in decreasing order was as follows: type I-121/249; 48.6%, type III-104/249; 41.8%, type II-15/249; 6%, and type IV-9/249; 3.6%. The transforaminal approach (137/249; 55.0%) was used in most type II to IV lesions followed by the interlaminar approach (78/249; 31.3%), and the full endoscopic approach (12/249; 4.8%), and the endoscopically assisted translaminar approach (8/249; 3.2%) which was exclusively used for type I lesions. Macnab outcomes analysis showed Excellent in 47 patients (18.9%), Good in 178 (71.5%), Fair in 18 (7.2%) and Poor in 6 (2.4%), respectively. Paired two-tailed t-test showed statistically significant VAS (5.46±2.1; P<0.0001) and ODI (37.1±16.9; P<0.0001) reductions as a result of the endoscopic decompression surgery. Cross-tabulation of the Macnab outcomes versus the endoscopic approach and surgical technique confirmed beneficial association of the approach selection with Excellent (P=0.001) and Good (P<0.0001) outcomes with statistically significance. Conclusions This study suggests that in the hands of skilled endoscopic spines surgeon use of an image-based stenosis location protocol may contribute to obtaining Excellent and Good clinical outcomes in a high percentage (93%) of patients suffering from lumbar stenosis related radiculopathy. Additional comparative studies should examine the prognostic value of choosing the endoscopic approach on the basis of the proposed four-type stenosis protocol by correlating its impact on outcomes with preoperative diagnostic injections and intraoperative direct visualization of symptomatic pain generators under local anesthesia and sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Dowling
- Department of Spine Surgery, Endoscopic Spine Clinic, Santiago, Chile.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson AZ, USA.,Department Neurosurgery, UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fabio Henrique Pinto da Silva
- Department of Orthopaedics, Marcilio Dias Navy Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Department of Orthopaedics, DWS Spine Clinic Center Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jaime Andrés Araneda Parra
- Department of Orthopaedics, DWS Spine Clinic Center Santiago and Roberto Del Rio Hospital, Santiago, Chile
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lewandrowski KU, León JFR, Yeung A. Use of "Inside-Out" Technique for Direct Visualization of a Vacuum Vertically Unstable Intervertebral Disc During Routine Lumbar Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression-A Correlative Study of Clinical Outcomes and the Prognostic Value of Lumbar Radiographs. Int J Spine Surg 2019; 13:399-414. [PMID: 31741829 PMCID: PMC6833958 DOI: 10.14444/6055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to record the frequency of lumbar intervertebral disc vacuum phenomenon on routine lumbar plain films taken prior to transforaminal endoscopic decompression surgery for sciatica-type leg and back pain and to correlate it with visualized intradiscal pathology and clinical outcomes. METHODS A prospective case series study of 200 consecutive patients with an average mean follow-up of 41.85 months who underwent lumbar endoscopic transforaminal decompression at 236 lumbar levels was conducted. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of vacuum phenomenon on preoperative x-ray to predict the presence of an empty vacuum disc found during transforaminal microdiscectomy using the "inside-out" approach were calculated using the YESS™ technique. Clinical outcomes were assessed by both Macnab criteria and visual analog score (VAS) reduction. RESULTS Of the 200 patients evaluated, 124 (62%) were deemed to have a vacuum disc on intraoperative probing using the "inside-out" technique. During needle insertion the more severely degenerative discs are met with negative pressures manifested by an air discogram. According to Macnab criteria, all patients who also had extruded disc herniations had excellent results (8 of 200), with the mean VAS decreasing from 6.1 ± 2.6 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 1.4 at the final follow-up (P < .01). This indicates a more severely degenerative disc causing nonspecific back pain due to lack of anterior column support from the intervertebral disc, accentuating foraminal stenosis. Patients with contained disc herniations (62 of 200) had excellent and good results 82.2% of the time. The mean VAS decreased from 6.9 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 2.2 ± 1.1 at final follow-up (P < .01). This identifies the disc as a contributing factor in low back pain. It can also identify the disc and annulus in combination with foraminal stenosis as a contributing factor. In the spinal stenosis group (130 of 200), 81.5% of patients had excellent to good results, and the mean VAS decreased from 6.3 ± 1.5 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 1.2 at final follow-up (P < .01). An analysis of lumbar x-ray vacuum phenomenon in patients with visualized vacuum disc showed true-positive (35 patients) and false-negative (89 patients), compared with an x-ray negative grading in patients without intraoperatively visualized vacuum disc of false-positive (2 patients); and true-negative (74 patients); this allowed for calculation of sensitivity (28.2%), specificity (97.4%), and positive predictive value (94.6%) of preoperative diagnostic x-ray in relation to intraoperatively visualized presence of the vacuum disc during subsequent endoscopic decompression surgery. Direct endoscopic visualization of the inside of the vacuum disc revealed longitudinal fissuring of the intervertebral disc as the most common finding in 77 of the 124 patients (62.1%) with a vacuum disc. Cavitation with delamination was the second most common observation (21 patients). Fair outcomes were associated with cavitation and delamination of the intervertebral disc from the endplates (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS A vacuum phenomenon seen on lumbar x-rays is highly specific for a source of one component that is actually a multiple source of nonspecific common back pain. A vacuum disc being found during "inside-out" transforaminal discectomy actually encompasses the disc, annulus, and foraminal stenosis as a multifactorial source of nonspecific common back pain. Further studies of better prognosticators of failed endoscopic transforaminal discectomy are required and are underway by the coauthors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
- Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Anthony Yeung
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
- Desert Institute for Spine Care, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|