Cement Augmentation of Vertebral Compression Fractures May Be Safely Considered in the Very Elderly

Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture - A Short Review of Orthosis and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Balloon Kyphoplasty

The management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) in the elderly includes nonoperative treatment and vertebroplasty, but has not been established due to the diversity of patient backgrounds. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of 3 treatment modalities for the management of OVF: orthotic treatment, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). The method was based on an analysis of the latest RCTs, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews on these topics. No study showed a benefit of bracing with high level of evidence. Trials were found that showed comparable outcomes without orthotic treatment. Only 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed an improvement in pain relief up to 6 months compared with no orthosis. Rigid and nonrigid orthoses were equally effective. Four of 5 RCTs comparing vertebroplasty and sham surgery were equally effective, and one RCT showed superior pain relief with vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of onset. In open trials comparing vertebroplasty with nonoperative management, vertebroplasty was superior. PVP and BKP were comparable in terms of pain relief, improvement in quality of life, and adjacent vertebral fractures. BKP does not affect global sagittal alignment, although BKP may restore vertebral body height. An RCT was published showing that PVP was effective in chronic cases without pain relief. Vertebroplasty improved life expectancy by 22% at 10 years. The superiority of orthotic therapy for OVF was seen only in short-term pain relief. Soft orthoses proved to be a viable alternative to rigid orthoses. Vertebroplasty within 3 weeks may be useful. There is no significant difference in clinical efficacy between PVP and BKP. Vertebroplasty improves life expectancy.

The Effectiveness of Vertebral Height Restoration Based on the Vertebroplasty Procedure Used to Treat Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Whether the use of a balloon or stent in vertebroplasty for vertebral fractures, such as balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) or vertebral body stenting (VBS), actually contributes to the restoration of postoperative vertebral height is unclear. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), BKP, and VBS in the correction of collapsed vertebrae in patients with painful vertebral fractures.

METHODS

The cases studied involved 34 vertebrae in 28 patients treated with PVP, 43 vertebrae in 38 patients treated with BKP, and 20 vertebrae in 20 patients treated with VBS at Izinkai Takeda General Hospital. Changes in the vertebral height and local kyphosis angle were measured based on standing lumbar radiographs before and after surgery and were compared among the treatment groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences in changes in the height of the anterior wall, middle body, or posterior wall of the treated vertebrae among the 3 treatment groups. The same was true for changes in the local kyphosis angle. The effectiveness of vertebral height restoration depended heavily upon preoperative vertebral instability in all the treatment groups. Correction loss due to balloon deflation effect or balloon sinking was noted with VBS or BKP.

CONCLUSION

BKP and VBS have the advantage of reducing the risk of extravertebral leakage of injected bone cement, but they have a disadvantage in that they are no more effective than PVP in restoring collapsed vertebrae despite the use of a balloon or metal stent.

What are the risk factors for a second osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Osteoporosis is characterized by decreased bone strength and an increased risk of fracture. Osteoporosis-related fractures are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, dysfunction, access to health care, health-care costs, and reduced quality of life. Therefore, preventing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) is important. Secondary OVCFs often occur after the first OVCF.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify risk factors for a second OVCF after a first OVCF.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred seventy-eight patients from a single institution who had their first OVCF between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019 were enrolled in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The following data were observed for all cases: patient demographics, bone mineral density, and pelvic parameters.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients from a single institution who had their first OVCF between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019. Demographic factors, medication (oral bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, denosumab), bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), fat, and muscle amount of the trunk using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and pelvic parameters (lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis) were investigated.

RESULTS

Of 178 patients who had an OVCF, 68 (38.2%) had a second OVCF. Patients were followed up for >2 years and wore braces for an average of 6 months. The mean age was 71.9±8.63 years, mean BMD T-score was -3.1±1.09, and mean BMI was 23.3±2.96. Comparing those with and without a second OVCF, the smaller the BMD T-score and trunk muscle mass to fat ratio, the more likely a second OVCF occurred (p<.05). There were fewer second OVCF cases in the injection medication group than in the peroral group (p<.05). There were no significant differences in radiologic parameters between these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had a second OVCF had an average of 21.3 months after the first OVCF. Risk factors for a second OVCF are low T-scores in the femur, and low M/F ratio of the trunk, android, and gynoid regions. For patients with an OVCF, injection medications may be advisable.

Beyond Pain Relief: An In-Depth Review of Vertebral Height Restoration After Balloon Kyphoplasty in Vertebral Compression Fractures

This comprehensive review delves into the intricate landscape of vertebral height restoration after balloon kyphoplasty in cases of vertebral compression fractures. With a comprehensive examination of procedural intricacies, radiological evaluations, clinical outcomes, and influential factors, a nuanced comprehension unfolds. Beyond its immediate alleviation of pain, vertebral height restoration emerges as a linchpin in enhancing spinal alignment, fostering functional recuperation, and augmenting the overall quality of life. This review underscores the pivotal role of balloon kyphoplasty, transcending its mere medical utility to become a conduit for renewed independence and well-being among individuals grappling with vertebral compression fractures. The ongoing advancements in medical science and the continued pursuit of research stand poised to amplify the significance of vertebral height restoration, manifesting a promising horizon for individuals seeking respite from pain, a revitalised capacity for movement, and a life unburdened by its constraints.

Risk of Revision After Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Narrative Review

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) can hinder physical motor function, daily activities, and the quality of life in elderly patients when treated conservatively. Vertebral augmentation, which includes vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty, is a commonly used procedure for OVFs. However, there have been reports of complications. Although serious complications are rare, there have been instances of adjacent vertebral fractures, cement dislocation, and insufficient pain relief due to cement failure, sometimes necessitating revision surgery. This narrative review discusses the common risks associated with vertebral augmentation for OVFs, such as cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures, and highlights the risk of revision surgery. The pooled incidence of revision surgery was 0.04 (0.02-0.06). The risks for revision are reported as follows: female sex, advanced age, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, blindness or low vision, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, split type fracture, large angular motion, and large endplate deficit. Various treatment strategies exist for OVFs, but they remain a subject of controversy. Current literature underscores the lack of substantial evidence to guide treatment strategies based on the risks of vertebral augmentation. In cases with a high risk of failure, other surgeries and conservative treatments should also be considered as treatment options.

The future of ambulatory surgery for geriatric patients

The elderly segment of the population is growing rapidly worldwide. Older patients comprise a disproportionate percentage of the surgical caseload. Physiological changes are inevitable with aging; some may impact a patient's response to anesthesia and surgery. Careful evaluation of an elderly patient preoperatively is vital to proper patient selection for ambulatory surgeries, particularly for complex and lengthy procedures. Cognitive issues, frailty, and geriatric syndromes make a patient vulnerable and sometimes unsuitable for certain ambulatory procedures. Preoperative planning and interventions may improve outcomes for the elderly patient undergoing ambulatory surgery.

Difference in the Cobbs Angle Between Standing and Supine Position as a Prognostic Factor After Vertebral Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Objective

We retrospectively analyzed patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) undergoing vertebral augmentation to compare the Cobb angle changes in the supine and standing positions and the clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively extracted the data of OVCF patients who underwent vertebral augmentation. Back pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Supine and standing radiographs were assessed before treatment to determine the Cobb angle and compression ratio. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff to predict favorable outcomes after vertebral augmentation.

Results

A total of 249 patients were included. We observed a statistically significant increase in the VAS score change with increasing Cobb angle and compression ratio (p < 0.001), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a difference in the Cobb angle (odds ratio [OR], 1.27) and compression ratio (OR, 1.12) were the independent risk factors for predicting short-term favorable outcomes after vertebral augmentation. In addition, we found that the difference in the Cobb angle (OR, 1.05) was the only factor for predicting midterm favorable outcomes after vertebral augmentation. The optimal cutoff value of the difference in the Cobb angle for predicting midterm favorable outcomes was 35.526°.

Conclusion

We found that the midterm clinical outcome after vertebral augmentation was better when there was a difference of approximately 35% or more in the Cobb angle between the standing and supine positions. Surgeons should pay attention to the difference in the Cobb angle depending on the posture when deciding to perform vertebral augmentation in patients with OVCFs.