Incidence and Epidemiology of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations

Multi-institutional review of characteristics and management of gunshot wounds to the spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the vertebral column represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, constituting approximately 20% of all spinal injuries. The management of these injuries is an understudied and controversial topic, given its heterogeneity and lack of follow-up data.

PURPOSE

To characterize the management and follow-up of GSWs to the spine.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A multi-institutional retrospective review of the experience of two urban Level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with GSWs to the spine between 2010-2021.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures included work status, follow-up healthcare utilization, and pain management were collected.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, surgery and medical management, and follow-up. Statistical analysis included T-tests and ANOVA for comparisons of continuous variables and chi-square testing for categorical variables. All statistics were performed on SPSS v24 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

A total of 271 patients were included for analysis. The average age was 28 years old, 82.7% of patients were black, 90% were male, and 76.4% had Medicare/Medicaid. The thoracic spine (35%) was most commonly injured followed by lumbar (33.9%) and cervical (25.6%). Cervical GSW was associated with higher mortality (p<.001); 8.7% of patients developed subsequent osteomyelitis/discitis, 71.3% received prophylactic antibiotics, and 56.1% of cervical GSW had a confirmed vertebral or carotid artery injury. ASIA scores at presentation were most commonly A (26.9%), D (20.7%), or E (19.6%), followed by C (7.4%) and B (6.6%). 18.8% of patients were unable to be assessed at presentation. ASIA score declined in only 2 patients, while 15.5% improved over their hospital stay. Those who improved were more likely to have ASIA B injury (p<.001). Overall, 9.2% of patients underwent spinal surgery. Of these, 33% presented as ASIA A, 21% as ASIA B, 29% as ASIA C, and 13% as ASIA D. Surgery was not associated with an improvement in ASIA score.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the ubiquitous and heterogeneous experience with GSWs to the spine, rigorous attempts should be made to define this population and its clinical and surgical outcomes. Here, we present an analysis of 11 years of patients presenting to two large trauma centers to elucidate patterns in presentation, management, and follow-up. We highlight that GSWs to the cervical spine are most often seen in young black male patients. They were associated with high mortality and high rates of injury to vertebral arteries and that surgical intervention did not alter rates of discitis/osteomyelitis or propensity for neurologic recovery; moreover, there was no incidence of delayed spinal instability in the study population.

Influence of Hospital Transfer Status on Surgical Outcomes for Traumatic Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: Insights from a Multicenter Investigation

OBJECTIVE

Surgical intervention for unstable thoracolumbar spine fractures is common, but delayed management and complications can impact outcomes. This study compares perioperative outcomes between patients directly admitted and those transferred from another facility for thoracolumbar spine surgery, aiming to identify predictors of complications and mortality.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2021 identified 61,626 patients undergoing fusion surgeries for thoracolumbar spine fractures, excluding spinal cord injury or pathological fractures. Patients were categorized as Direct (admitted from the emergency department) and Transfer (transferred from another facility). Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, and complications, were compared.

RESULTS

Our patient population (54.3% female, mean age 62.4 ± 12.9 years) comprised 12.2% Transfer and 87.8% Direct patients. Following propensity score matching, Transfer patients had a longer hospital LOS (5.1 ± 5.7 days vs. 4.5 ± 4.6 days, P < 0.001). Transfer exhibited higher rates of superficial incisional surgical site infection (1.7% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.003), sepsis (1.7% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.038), pneumonia (1.7% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.019), postoperative reintubation (0.9% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.036), and failure to wean off ventilator >48 hours postsurgery (0.7% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.005) compared to Direct admissions. Direct group had a higher rate of perioperative transfusion (16.5% vs. 13.4%, P < 0.001). Transfer patients also had a higher 30-day mortality rate compared to Direct admissions (1.1% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Interhospital transfers significantly affect hospital LOS, postoperative morbidity, and mortality in thoracolumbar spine surgery. Enhancing postoperative monitoring for transfer patients is crucial.

A Prediction Nomogram for Fractured Vertebra Recollapse After Posterior Reduction and Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Fractures

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish a predictive nomogram model for recollapse of fractured vertebra after posterior pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs).

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior pedicle screw fixation for TLFs at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of recollapse of the fractured vertebra at the final follow-up. The predictors for fractured vertebra recollapse were identified by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram model was developed. The prediction performance and internal validation were established.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were included in this study. Of these, 46 (20.5%) patients developed recollapse of fractured vertebra. Age, thoracic and lumbar injury severity score, screw distribution in the fractured vertebra, and anterior vertebral height compression ratio were associated with vertebral recollapse. These predictors were used to construct a predictive nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram model was 0.891. The concordance index was 0.891, and it was 0.877 with bootstrapping validation. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis also suggested that the nomogram model had excellent predictive performances for fractured vertebra recollapse.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical nomogram incorporating 4 variables was constructed to predict fractured vertebra recollapse after posterior pedicle screw fixation for TLFs. The nomogram demonstrated good calibration and discriminative abilities, which may help clinicians to make better treatment decisions.

A Novel Bipedicular Dissociation Fracture Pattern of Vertebral Osteoporotic Fractures of the Elderly

INTRODUCTION

CVFs are common, with several classification systems available. We have encountered osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) with PDF, a never-described fracture pattern.This study evaluates this unique fracture's characteristics.

METHODS

Retrospective study of surgically treated OVFs during 2016 to 2020.

RESULTS

Of 105 patients, 85 had classifiable OVFs and 20 had uni-PDF (n = 10, 9.5%) or bi-PDF (n = 10, 9.5%). Both cohorts mainly had single vertebral fractures and upper end plate involvement with cleft sign found in 30% of PDFs versus 15.3% of OVFs (P < 0.001), higher incidence of burst fractures (40% vs. 25.9%; P < 0.001). Posterior vertebral body collapse was higher for PDFs (13.2 ± 9.3% vs. 18.3 ± 8.5%; P = 0.02). Most OVFs underwent balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) (94%). Most bi-PDFs were regarded unstable; six patients underwent PSF (2 short PSF, 1 PSF + BKP, and 3 BKP with intravertebral pedicular lag screws at the fractured vertebra). Half of the bi-PDFs underwent BKP-developed nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Our study is novel in describing an unrecognized OVF pattern disregarded in current classification systems. We found notable differences in fracture characteristics, prefracture functional status, and surgical results between OVF and PDF cohorts. We suggest adding this fracture pattern as a unique OF-4 subtype or a specific entity between OF-4 and 5, with uni-PDF as type A and bi-PDF as type B.

Normal Functional Local Alignment and Segmental Motion at the Thoracolumbar Junction: A Cross-Sectional Study of Healthy Subjects

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have investigated the mechanical behavior of the thoracolumbar spine. However, finding an accurate reference for the normal functional local alignment and segmental motion (SM) at the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) is challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to assess age- and sex-related changes and differences in local alignment and SM at the TLJ.

METHODS

The study recruited healthy subjects aged 20 to 79 without complaints of back pain. Healthy subjects (60 males and 60 females) with appropriate imaging results were enrolled in the study. The subjects were divided into age groups (20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years); each group included 10 subjects of each sex.

RESULTS

The SM at the TLJ was small but noticeable, and the motion gradually increased toward the lower level of the TLJ, closer to the lumbar region. No significant differences were observed between male and female subjects in any SM measurements at the TLJ. The SM at the TLJ gradually decreased with age, while local kyphosis of TLJ progressed. The results also showed that the thoracolumbar slope value did not change with age and remained at a mean of -12.8 ± 7.2° (P = 0.893).

CONCLUSIONS

This study's results provide valuable guidance for appropriate surgical planning and rehabilitation of patients with spinal diseases or trauma. Furthermore, the results can be the basis for categorizing accurate criteria to evaluate the degree of disability after treatment.

Return to Play Criteria After Adult Lumbar Spinal Fractures: A Review of Current Literature and Expert Recommendations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Understanding the management of lumbar spinal fractures and return to play (RTP) criteria is an essential component of care for adult athletes. Appropriate management of lumbar spinal fractures must balance minimizing time away from physical activity while also minimizing risk of reinjury. The purpose of this review is to summarize current recommendations on lumbar spinal fracture management and RTP guidelines and to provide expert opinion on areas of discrepancy in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a paucity of high-level evidence on the management and return to play criteria for adult lumbar spine fractures in athletes. Much of the data and recommendations are based on expert opinion and studies in pediatric or osteoporotic patients, which may not be applicable to adult athletes. These data presented here may be used to aid patient-physician conversations and provide guidance on expectations for patients, coaches, and athletic trainers. In general, we recommend that patients be free of lumbar pain, neurologically intact, and have full strength and motion of the lumbar spine and lower extremities before returning to play. Adequate protective equipment is recommended to be worn at all times during practice and play.

In-hospital mortality trends after surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar injury: A national inpatient sample database study

Introduction

Given the increasing incidence of traumatic thoracolumbar injuries in recent years, studies have sought to investigate potential risk factors for outcomes in these patients.

Research question

The aim of this study was to investigate trends and risk factors for in-hospital mortality after fusion for traumatic thoracolumbar injury.

Materials and methods

Patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion after traumatic injury were queried from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2012 to 2017. Analysis was performed to identify risk factors for inpatient mortality after surgery.

Results

Patients in 2017 were on average older (51.0 vs. 48.5, P = 0.004), had more admitting diagnoses (15.5 vs. 10.7, p < 0.001), were less likely to be White (75.8% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.006), were from a ZIP code with a higher median income quartile (Quartile 1: 31.4% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.011), and were more likely to have Medicare as a primary payer (22.9% vs. 30.1%, p < 0.001). Bivariate analysis of demographics and surgical characteristics demonstrated that patients in the in-hospital mortality group (n = 90) were older (70.2 vs. 49.6, p < 0.001), more likely to be male (74.4% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.031), had a great number of admitted diagnoses (21.3 vs. 12.7, p < 0.001), and were more likely to be insured by Medicare (70.0% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis found age (OR 1.06, p < 0.001) and Black race (OR 3.71, p = 0.007) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Our study of nationwide, traumatic thoracolumbar fusion procedures from 2012 to 2017 in the NIS database found older, black patients were at increased risk for in-hospital mortality after surgery.

Expert Opinion, Real-World Classification, and Decision-Making in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficits?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVES

To compare decision-making between an expert panel and real-world spine surgeons in thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs) without neurological deficits and analyze which factors influence surgical decision-making.

METHODS

This study is a sub-analysis of a prospective observational study in TL fractures. Twenty two experts were asked to review 183 CT scans and recommend treatment for each fracture. The expert recommendation was based on radiographic review.

RESULTS

Overall agreement between the expert panel and real-world surgeons regarding surgery was 63.2%. In 36.8% of cases, the expert panel recommended surgery that was not performed in real-world scenarios. Conversely, in cases where the expert panel recommended non-surgical treatment, only 38.6% received non-surgical treatment, while 61.4% underwent surgery. A separate analysis of A3 and A4 fractures revealed that expert panel recommended surgery for 30% of A3 injuries and 68% of A4 injuries. However, 61% of patients with both A3 and A4 fractures received surgery in the real world. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a 1% increase in certainty of PLC injury led to a 4% increase in surgery recommendation among the expert panel, while a .2% increase in the likelihood of receiving surgery in the real world.

CONCLUSION

Surgical decision-making varied between the expert panel and real-world treating surgeons. Differences appear to be less evident in A3/A4 burst fractures making this specific group of fractures a real challenge independent of the level of expertise.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Spinal Injury: A Narrative Review of Algorithms in Diagnosis and Prognosis

Spinal injuries, including cervical and thoracolumbar fractures, continue to be a major public health concern. Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning technologies offer exciting prospects for improving both diagnostic and prognostic approaches in spinal injury care. This narrative review systematically explores the practical utility of these computational methods, with a focus on their application in imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as in structured clinical data. Of the 39 studies included, 34 were focused on diagnostic applications, chiefly using deep learning to carry out tasks like vertebral fracture identification, differentiation between benign and malignant fractures, and AO fracture classification. The remaining five were prognostic, using machine learning to analyze parameters for predicting outcomes such as vertebral collapse and future fracture risk. This review highlights the potential benefit of machine learning and deep learning in spinal injury care, especially their roles in enhancing diagnostic capabilities, detailed fracture characterization, risk assessments, and individualized treatment planning.

Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of monoplanar screws (MSs) versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws (HSs) in percutaneous short-segment intermediate screw fixation (PSISF) for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTBFs) in patients without neurologic impairment.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 100 patients with single-segment TTBFs and no neurologic impairment who underwent PSISF with 6 monoplanar screws (MS group) or correct were retrospectively enrolled. The demographic data, radiologic evaluation indicators, perioperative indicators and clinical assessment indicators were analysed between the MS group and HS group.

RESULTS

The demographic data and perioperative indicators were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR), kyphosis Cobb angle (KCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA) and spinal canal encroachment rate (SCER) were significantly improved in both groups (*P < 0.05). The MS group obtained better correction than the HS group in terms of improvement in the AVHR, KCA and VWA after surgery (*P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the MS group had less correction loss of AVHR, KCA and VWA (*P < 0.05). The MS group presented greater improvement in the SCER at the last follow-up (*P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of all patients were significantly better postoperatively than those preoperatively (*P < 0.05), and the scores collected at each follow-up visit did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the MS group, no internal fixation failure was observed during the follow-up period, but, in the HS group, two cases of internal fixation failure were observed at the last follow-up (one case of rod loosening and one case of screw breakage).

CONCLUSIONS

Both MSs and HSs fixation are effective treatments for TTBFs and have comparable clinical outcomes. In contrast, MSs fixation can improve the correction effect, better improve the SCER, and further reduce correction loss as well as reduce the incidence of instrumentation failure. Therefore, MSs fixation might be a better option for treating TTBFs in patients without neurological deficits.

Perioperative morbidity and mortality in octogenarians sustaining traumatic osteoporotic type 4 and 5 thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures: a retrospective study with 3 years follow-up

PURPOSE

This study aimed to guide the more efficient management of type 4 and 5 thoracolumbar or lumbar osteoporotic fractures (OF) in patients aged 80 years and older with an acute onset of neurological decline. This aim was achieved by assessing the clinical course and morbidity and mortality rates and identifying potential risk factors for patient mortality METHODS: Electronic medical records were retrieved from a single institution pertaining to the period between September 2005 and December 2020. Data on patient demographics, neurological conditions, surgical characteristics, complications, hospital course, and 90-day mortality were also collected.

RESULTS

Over a 16-year period, 35 patients aged ≥80 years diagnosed with thoracolumbar and lumbar OF were enrolled in the study. The mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was >6, indicating a poor baseline reserve (9.4 ± 1.9), while cardiovascular diseases were the most prevalent among comorbidities. The mean surgical duration was 231.6 ± 89.3 min, with a mean blood loss of 694.4± 200.3 mL. The in-hospital was 8.6% and 90-day mortality rates at 11.4%. Two patients underwent revision surgery for deep wound infection. Intraoperative and postoperative radiography and computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed correct screw placement. Proper alignment of the thoracolumbar spine was achieved in all the patients. Unique risk factors for mortality included the presence of comorbidities and the occurrence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent instrumentation in patients with acute onset of neurological decline and potentially unstable spines due to thoracolumbar and lumbar OF improved functional outcomes at discharge. Age should not be a determinant of whether to perform surgery.

Surgical management of thoracolumbar junction fractures: An evidence-based algorithm

Background

The management of thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) fractures, involving the restoring anatomical stability and biomechanics properties, still remains a challenge for neurosurgeons.Despite the high frequency of these injuries, specific treatment guidelines, set on biomechanical properties, have not yet been assumed. The present study is meant to propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm. The primary aim for the protocol validation was the assessment of postoperative neurological recovery. The secondary objectives concerned the evaluation of residual deformity and rate of hardware failure. Technical nuances of surgical approaches and drawbacks were further discussed.

Methods

Clinical and biomechanical data of patients harboring a single TLJ fracture, surgically managed between 2015 and 2020, were collected. Patients' cohorts were ranked into 4 groups according to Magerl's Type, McCormack Score, Vaccaro PLC point, Canal encroachment, and Farcy Sagittal Index. The outcome measures were the early/late Benzel-Larson Grade and postoperative kyphosis degree to estimate neurological status and residual deformity, respectively.

Results

32 patients were retrieved, 7, 9, 8, and 8 included within group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Overall neurological outcomes significantly improved for all patients at every follow-up stage (p ​< ​0.0001). Surgeries gained a complete restoration of post-traumatic kyphosis in the entire cohort (p ​< ​0.0001), except for group 4 which experienced a later worsening of residual deformity.

Conclusions

The choice of the most appropriate surgical approach for TLJ fractures is dictated by morphological and biomechanical characteristics of fracture and the grade of neurological involvement. The proposed surgical management protocol was reliable and effective, although further validations are needed.

Assessment of Instability in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Using a New Bone Scan Scoring System

Background and Objectives: Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures require surgical management as they can result in neurological deficits if left untreated. This study aimed to evaluate whether a new bone scan scoring system could accurately assess instability in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures who underwent bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging prior to surgery between January 2015 and August 2017 at Ulsan University Hospital were selected for inclusion. Instability was determined by clinical assessment and imaging, and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score was determined. Bone scans were visually evaluated using a new bone scan scoring system. Bone scan findings of vertebral body (B_B) and posterior column (B_P) were scored separately and were summed to produce B_TS {B_TS (total score) = B_B (body score, 5 points) + B_P (posterior score, 2 points)}. The diagnostic performance of the scoring system for identifying unstable then thoracolumbar burst fractures were assessed. Results: Of the 52 thoracolumbar burst fractures, 34 (65.4%) were unstable and 31 (59.6%) had a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5. The diagnostic performance of using B_TS ≥ 4 to identify unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures and those with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5 was as follows: sensitivity, 61.8% and 58.1%; specificity, 94.4% and 81.0%; positive predictive value, 95.5% and 81.8%; and negative predictive value, 56.7% and 56.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed bone scan scoring system has a high specificity and positive predictive value for identifying thoracolumbar burst fractures that are unstable or have a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5. This scoring system may help to inform decisions regarding surgical management.

Analysis of the Classification Systems for Thoracolumbar Fractures in Adults and Their Evolution and Impact on Clinical Management

Although they represent a significant chapter of traumatic pathology with a deep medical and social impact, thoracolumbar fractures have proven to be elusive in terms of a definitive classification. The ever-changing concept of the stability of a thoracolumbar injury (from Holdsworth’s two-column concept to Denis’ three-column theory), the meaningful integration of neurological deficit, and a reliable clinical usability have made reaching a universally accepted and reproductible classification almost impossible. The advent of sophisticated imaging techniques and an improved understanding of spine biomechanics led to the development of several classification systems. Each successive system has contributed significantly to the understanding of physiopathological mechanisms and better treatment management. Magerl et al. developed a comprehensive classification system based on progressive morphological damage determined by the following three fundamental forces: compression, distraction, and axial torque. Vaccaro et al. devised the thoracolumbar injury severity score based on the following three independent variables: the morphology of the injury, posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity, and neurological status at the time of injury. However, there are limitations to the classification system, especially when magnetic resonance imaging yields an uncertain status of PLC. The authors review the various classification systems insisting on their practical relevance and caveats and illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the most widely used systems with relevant cases from their practice.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Minimal-Invasive Dorsal Percutaneous Fixation of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures

Introduction: Minimal-invasive instrumentation techniques have become a workhorse in spine surgery and require constant clinical evaluations. We sought to analyze patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinicopathological characteristics of thoracolumbar fracture stabilizations utilizing a minimal-invasive percutaneous dorsal screw-rod system. Methods: We included all patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures who underwent minimal-invasive percutaneous spine stabilization in our clinics since inception and who have at least 1 year of follow-up data. Clinical characteristics (length of hospital stay (LOS), operation time (OT), and complications), PROMs (preoperative (pre-op), 3-weeks postoperative (post-op), 1-year postoperative: eq5D, COMI, ODI, NRS back pain), and laboratory markers (leucocytes, c-reactive protein (CRP)) were analyzed, finding significant associations between these study variables and PROMs. Results: A total of 68 patients (m: 45.6%; f: 54.4%; mean age: 76.9 ± 13.9) were included. The most common fracture types according to the AO classification were A3 (40.3%) and A4 (40.3%), followed by B2 (7.46%) and B1 (5.97%). The Median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3 (range: 1−4). Stabilized levels ranged from TH4 to L5 (mean number of targeted levels: 4.25 ± 1.4), with TH10-L2 (12/68) and TH11-L3 (11/68) being the most frequent site of surgery. Mean OT and LOS were 92.2 ± 28.2 min and 14.3 ± 6.9 days, respectively. We observed 9/68 complications (13.2%), mostly involving screw misalignments and loosening. CRP increased from 24.9 ± 33.3 pre-op to 34.8 ± 29.9 post-op (p < 0.001), whereas leucocyte counts remained stable. All PROMs showed a marked significant improvement for both 3-week and 1-year evaluations compared to the preoperative situation. Interestingly, we did not find an impact of OT, LOS, lab markers, complications, and other clinical characteristics on PROMs. Notably, a higher number of stabilized levels did not affect PROMs. Conclusions: Minimal-invasive stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures utilizing a dorsal percutaneous approach resulted in significant PROM outcome improvements, although we observed a complication rate of 13.2% for up to 1 year of follow-up. PROMs were not significantly associated with clinicopathological characteristics, technique-related variables, or the number of targeted levels.