Fecal Bile Acid Testing in Assessing Patients With Chronic Unexplained Diarrhea: Implications for Healthcare Utilization

Advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of chronic diarrhoea from bile acid malabsorption: a systematic review

Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) is an important disorder of digestive pathophysiology as it generates chronic diarrhoea. This condition originates from intricate pathways involving bile acid synthesis and metabolism in the liver and gut, the composition of gut microbiota, enterohepatic circulation and key receptors as farnesoid X receptor (FXR), fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4), and the G-protein bile acid receptor-1 (GPBAR-1). Although symptoms can resemble those related to disorders of gut brain interaction, accurate diagnosis of BAM may greatly benefit the patient. The empiric diagnosis of BAM is primarily based on the clinical response to bile acid sequestrants. Specific tests including the 48-hour fecal bile acid test, serum levels of 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), and the 75Selenium HomotauroCholic Acid Test (SeHCAT) are not widely available. Nevertheless, lack of diagnostic standardization of BAM may account for poor recognition and delayed management. Beyond bile acid sequestrants, therapeutic approaches include the use of FXR agonists, FGF19 analogues, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and microbiota modulation. These novel agents can best make their foray into the therapeutic armamentarium if BAM does not remain a diagnosis of exclusion. Ignoring BAM as a specific condition may continue to contribute to increased healthcare costs and reduced quality of life. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of BAM.

Rifaximin and alternative agents in the management of irritable bowel syndrome: A comprehensive review

Rifaximin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, boasts a unique chemical composition and pharmacokinetic profile, rendering it highly effective in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Its minimal systemic absorption confines its impact to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, where it yields significant therapeutic benefits. This review examines rifaximin's physico-chemical attributes and its role in managing IBS symptoms. Its molecular structure facilitates intestinal lumen retention postoral administration, minimizing systemic exposure and adverse effects. This targeted action is crucial in addressing the gut microbiota's role in IBS pathophysiology. By modifying microbial populations and their metabolite production, rifaximin mitigates symptoms like bloating, irregular bowel habits, and abdominal pain associated with IBS. It achieves this by reducing pathogenic bacteria and altering bacterial metabolism, enhancing mucosal and immune function. Clinical trials affirm rifaximin's superiority over placebo and conventional therapies in alleviating overall IBS symptoms and addressing small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Despite its promising efficacy and sustained symptom relief, further research is essential to optimize long-term effectiveness and dosing regimens. Rifaximin stands as a vital treatment option for IBS due to its distinctive properties and clinical utility; yet, ongoing investigation is imperative for maximizing its therapeutic benefits.

Metabolic biomarkers in irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by altered bowel habits and abdominal discomfort during defecation. It significantly impacts life quality and work productivity for those affected. Global data suggests a slightly higher prevalence in females than in males. Today, unambiguous diagnosis of IBS remains challenging due to the absence of a specific biochemical, histopathological, or radiological test. Current diagnosis relies heavily on thorough symptom evaluation. Efforts by the Rome committees have established standardized diagnostic criteria (Rome I-IV), improving consistency and clinical applicability. Recent studies in this framework, seem to have successfully employed metabolomics techniques to identify distinct metabolite profiles in breath and stool samples of IBS patients, differentiating them from healthy controls and those with other functional GI disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Building on this success, researchers are investigating the presence of similar metabolites in easily accessible biofluids such as urine, potentially offering a less invasive diagnostic approach. Accordingly, this review focuses on key metabolites specifically detected in IBS patients' biological specimens, with a focus on urinary metabolites, using various methods, particularly mass spectrometry (MS)-based techniques, including gas chromatography-MS (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-tandem MS (LC-MS/MS), and capillary electrophoresis-MS (CE-MS) metabolomics assays. These findings may make provision for a new set of non-invasive biomarkers for IBS diagnosis and management.

Prospective comparison of diagnostic tests for bile acid diarrhoea

BACKGROUND

Bile acid diarrhoea is often missed because gold standard nuclear medicine tauroselcholic [75-Se] acid (SeHCAT) testing has limited availability. Empirical treatment effect has unknown diagnostic performance, whereas plasma 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) is inexpensive but lacks sensitivity.

AIMS

To determine diagnostic characteristics of empirical treatment and explore improvements in diagnostics with potential better availability than SeHCAT.

METHODS

This diagnostic accuracy study was part of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of colesevelam. Consecutive patients with chronic diarrhoea attending SeHCAT had blood and stool sampled. Key thresholds were C4 > 46 ng/mL and SeHCAT retention ≤10%. A questionnaire recorded patient-reported empirical treatment effect. We analysed receiver operating characteristics and explored machine learning applied logistic regression and decision tree modelling with internal validation.

RESULTS

Ninety-six (38%) of 251 patients had SeHCAT retention ≤10%. The effect of empirical treatment assessed with test results for bile acid studies blinded had 63% (95% confidence interval 44%-79%) sensitivity and 65% (47%-80%) specificity; C4 > 46 ng/mL had 47% (37%-57%) and 92% (87%-96%), respectively. A decision tree combining C4 ≥ 31 ng/mL with ≥1.1 daily watery stools (Bristol type 6 and 7) had 70% (51%-85%) sensitivity and 95% (83%-99%) specificity. The logistic regression model, including C4, the sum of measured stool bile acids and daily watery stools, had 77% (58%-90%) sensitivity and 93% (80%-98%) specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of bile acid diarrhoea using empirical treatment was inadequate. Exploration suggested considerable improvements in the sensitivity of C4-based testing, offering potential widely available diagnostics. Further validation is warranted.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT03876717.

Recent developments in diagnosing bile acid diarrhea

INTRODUCTION

Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) commonly causes chronic diarrhea. Symptoms may be mistaken for disorders of gut brain interaction. Due to the lack of widely available diagnostic tests and poor recognition of BAD, there is a delay in diagnosis leading to increased healthcare system burden and decreased patient quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

A thorough review of the literature was conducted using PubMed for articles on the biological functions of bile acids, pathophysiology and management of BAD, but focusing on diagnostic testing including 75SeHCAT retention, 7αC4, FGF-19, fecal bile acids, and single stool tests. This narrative review discusses available modalities focusing on noninvasive stool and serum testing that are more widely available and show good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of BAD. 75SeHCAT retention is not available in many countries. Alternative diagnostic tests include total and primary fecal bile acid (BA) excretion in 48-hour collection or a single stool sample, serum7αC4 >46 or 52.5 ng/mL, and combination of single stool and serum 7αC4 ±watery stools (Bristol Stool Form Scale 6-7).

EXPERT OPINION

Given the ease of serum and single stool sample acquisition and diagnostic advances, clinical practice should embrace positive diagnosis, rather than BAS therapeutic trial. BAD needs to be considered in diverse gastrointestinal diseases.

Diagnosis and treatment of post-cholecystectomy diarrhoea

The incidence of cholecystitis is relatively high in developed countries and may usually be attributed to gallstones, the treatment for which involves complete surgical removal of the gallbladder (cholecystectomy). Bile acids produced following cholecystectomy continue to flow into the duodenum but are poorly absorbed by the colon. Excessive bile acids in the colon stimulate mucosal secretion of water and electrolytes leading, in severe cases, to diarrhoea. Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is difficult to diagnose, requiring a comprehensive medical history and physical examination in combination with laboratory evaluation. The current work reviews the diagnosis and treatment of BAD following cholecystectomy.

New Developments in Bile Acid Diarrhea

Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is characterized by increased frequency of bowel movements, looser stool consistency, urgency, and need for proximity to toilet facilities owing to the severity of the diarrhea, when compared with or relative to irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. Consequently, BAD leads to decreased quality of life. The condition is often misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea or functional diarrhea. Patients with BAD have accelerated colonic transit, increased intestinal or colonic mucosal permeability, and altered stool microbiome composition associated with reduced dehydroxylation of primary to secondary bile acids. The established diagnostic test, selenium-75 homocholic acid taurine retention, is not available in the United States. Therefore, 48-hour fecal bile acid excretion has been the gold standard for diagnosis. With recent validation of combined measurement of primary bile acids in a single, random stool in addition to fasting serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, a practical point-of-care diagnostic test will soon be available. Randomized controlled trials have documented superiority of colesevelam to placebo and, in a separate study, superiority of the glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist liraglutide compared with colesevelam. Novel experimental approaches for BAD include farnesoid X receptor agonists and fibroblast growth factor 19 analogs. This article updates information on the pathophysiology, mechanisms, manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of BAD.

Defecation status, intestinal microbiota, and habitual diet are associated with the fecal bile acid composition: a cross-sectional study in community-dwelling young participants

PURPOSE

Bile acid (BA) metabolism by intestinal bacteria is associated with the risk of gastrointestinal diseases; additionally, its control has become a modern strategy for treating metabolic diseases. This cross-sectional study investigated the influence of defecation status, intestinal microbiota, and habitual diet on fecal BA composition in 67 community-dwelling young participants.

METHODS

Feces were collected for intestinal microbiota and BA analyses; data about defecation status and dietary habits were collected using the Bristol stool form scales and a brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire, respectively. The participants were categorized into four clusters based on their fecal BA composition, according to cluster analysis, and tertiles based on deoxycholic acid (DCA) and lithocholic acid (LCA) levels.

RESULTS

The high primary BA (priBA) cluster with high fecal cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) levels had the highest frequency of normal feces, whereas the second BA (secBA) cluster with high levels of fecal DCA and LCA had the lowest. Alternately, the high-priBA cluster had a distinct intestinal microbiota, with higher Clostridium subcluster XIVa and lower Clostridium cluster IV and Bacteroides. The low-secBA cluster with low fecal DCA and LCA levels had the lowest animal fat intake. Nevertheless, the insoluble fiber intake of the high-priBA cluster was significantly higher than that of the high-secBA cluster.

CONCLUSION

High fecal CA and CDCA levels were associated with distinct intestinal microbiota. Conversely, high levels of cytotoxic DCA and LCA were associated with increased animal fat intake and decreased frequency of normal feces and insoluble fiber intake.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center system (UMIN000045639); date of registration: 15/11/2019.

Current and Future Therapeutic Options for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea and Functional Diarrhea

Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea are disorders of gut-brain interaction presenting with chronic diarrhea; they have significant impact on quality of life. The two conditions may exist as a continuum and their treatment may overlap. Response to first-line therapy with antispasmodics and anti-diarrheal agents is variable, leaving several patients with suboptimal symptom control and need for alternative therapeutic options. Our aim was to discuss current pharmacologic options and explore alternative therapeutic approaches and future perspectives for symptom management in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea. We conducted a search of PubMed, Cochrane, clinicaltrial.gov, major meeting abstracts for publications on current, alternative, and emerging drugs for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea. Currently approved therapeutic options for patients with first-line refractory irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea include serotonin-3 receptor antagonists, eluxadoline and rifaximin. Despite their proven efficacy, cost and availability worldwide impact their utilization. One-third of patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction with diarrhea have bile acid diarrhea and may benefit from drugs targeting bile acid synthesis and excretion. Further understanding of underlying pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea related to bile acid metabolism, gastrointestinal transit, and microbiome has led to evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches, including fecal microbiota transplantation and enterobacterial "crapsules". These opportunities to treat disorders of gut-brain interaction with diarrhea should be followed with formal studies utilizing large samples of well-characterized patients at baseline and validated response outcomes as endpoints for regulatory approval.

Impact of Bile Acid Diarrhea in Patients With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome on Symptoms and Quality of Life

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) affects approximately a quarter of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). We aimed to compare the demographics, bowel and somatic symptoms, and quality of life of patients with IBS-D, with or without BAD.

METHODS

On one occasion, patients with IBS-D (positive for Rome III criteria) completed the following questionnaires: bowel disease questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression inventory, general quality of life (Symptom Checklist-90), and IBS-specific quality of life. A fasting serum C4 level higher than 52.5 ng/mL was used as a biomarker for BAD. Statistical analysis included a multiple variable logistic model to identify strong predictors of BAD in IBS-D.

RESULTS

Among 219 patients (79% female) with IBS-D, 44 had BAD; the BAD group was significantly older and had a higher body mass index than the patients without BAD. Patients with BAD had more severe bowel dysfunction and impact on IBS-specific quality of life (need of toilet proximity) compared with patients with IBS-D without BAD. Patients with BAD were more likely than other IBS-D groups to receive antidiarrheals, bile acid binders, and antacid secretory agents. The severity of diarrhea and need of toilet proximity were predictors of BAD in IBS-D (P < .01). Patients with BAD were more likely to have a depression score higher than 8 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression inventory.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a greater impact on bowel and somatic symptoms and quality of life in IBS-D with BAD compared with IBS-D without BAD. Screening for BAD in IBS-D is especially relevant, with more severe and frequent diarrhea along with urgency.

Safety and Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea With or Without Bile Acid Diarrhea: Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND

Eluxadoline, a peripherally acting, mixed µ- and κ-opioid receptor (OR) agonist and δ-OR antagonist, is approved for treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea (IBS-D). About a third of IBS-D patients has bile acid diarrhea (BAD); opioids may stimulate TGR5 (bile acid) receptors.

AIM

To evaluate eluxadoline's efficacy on altered bowel functions and safety in IBS-D patients with or without BAD.

METHODS

In a single-center, phase 4, parallel-group, open-label study, patients with IBS-D (cohort 1) and patients with BAD were treated with eluxadoline, 100 mg tablets BID, with food for 4 weeks. Patients recorded bowel functions by electronic daily diary. BAD was based on fasting serum 7αC4 (> 52.5 ng/mL) or concurrent criteria of increased total or primary fecal BAs excreted in 48 h. We assessed efficacy on treatment compared to baseline in the two cohorts. Primary outcome measures were changes from baseline in average stool consistency Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score (range 1-7) and safety.

RESULTS

Mean changes from baseline in cohorts 1 and 2 (data presented in this order) were similar for: BSFS score averaged over 4 weeks' treatment (- 1.25 and - 1.09); daily bowel movement frequency (- 1.48 and - 0.79); daily urgent bowel movements (- 0.52 and - 0.80); IBS-QoL (5.9 and 13.6); serum 7αC4 (- 5.59 and - 8.78 ng/mL). There were no deaths, serious treatment-emergent adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events during the study.

CONCLUSION

Eluxadoline is similarly efficacious in the treatment of IBS-D and BAD, and it appears to be safe and efficacious as documented in large clinical trials.

Advances in the Comprehensive Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease

Patients with postoperative Crohn's disease are difficult to manage because of their risk of experiencing a more severe course, multiple symptom confounders, and poor sensitivity of symptomatic remission to rule out intestinal inflammation. In this group, data are lacking on biologic therapeutic efficacy, and recommendations are lacking for those with multiple medication failures. Novel noninvasive testing can simultaneously exclude alternate causes of symptoms (serum C4, fecal fat, small intestinal bowel overgrowth breath testing) and assess intestinal inflammation (fecal calprotectin, endoscopic healing index). In addition, endoscopy-based disease activity assessment and management are required. Endoscopy should be performed within 6 months of surgery, and aggressive disease activity monitoring can be considered with colonoscopy every 1-2 years subsequently to ensure late recurrence is detected. Patients with multiple resections should be screened for short bowel syndrome. Predictive biomarkers are needed to guide medication selection in this high-risk population. Postoperative prophylactic biologic therapy is prudent for patients with preoperative biologic failure. However, there are no high-quality data to guide which agent should be selected. Selecting biologics with an alternative mechanism of action in those who had failed a biologic with adequate drug concentrations and selection of different agents in those with previous intolerance are reasonable. Significantly more study is required to assess the efficacy of therapies in this setting.

Pathophysiology and Clinical Management of Bile Acid Diarrhea

Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) represents a common cause of chronic diarrhea whose prevalence is under-investigated. We reviewed the evidence available regarding the pathophysiology and clinical management of bile acid diarrhea (BAD). BAD results from dysregulation of the enterohepatic recirculation of bile acids. It has been estimated that 25–33% of patients with functional diarrhea and irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea have BAM. Currently, the selenium homotaurocholic acid test is the gold standard for BAD diagnosis and severity assessment. However, it is an expensive method and not widely available. The validation of the utility in the clinical practice of several other serum markers, such as 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and the fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) is ongoing. The first-line treatment of patients with BAD is bile acid sequestrants. Patients that are refractory to first-line therapy should undergo further diagnostics to confirm the diagnosis and to treat the underlying cause of BAD. An early and correct diagnosis of BAD would improve patient’s quality of life, avoiding additional diagnostic tests that burden health care systems. Considering the limited availability and tolerability of specific medications for BAD treatment, future research is awaited to identify other therapeutic approaches, such as gut microbiota modulating therapies.

Bile Acid Diarrhea in Adults and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Bile acids are central to enterohepatic signaling pathways activated through natural receptors, farnesoid X receptor [FXR mediates synthesis of fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19)], and G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also known as TGR5). Although bile acid diarrhea (BAD) is more commonly encountered in ileal resection or disease, there is evidence documenting "idiopathic" BAD in about 20% of adolescents and 30% of adults presenting with chronic, non-bloody diarrhea often attributed to irritable bowel syndrome. Mechanism(s) leading to increased hepatic synthesis and colonic bile acid levels in "idiopathic" BAD include reduced synthesis of FGF-19 by the ileal mucosa, or genetic variation in hepatocyte proteins klotho β and FGF receptor 4 (FGFR4) that mediate negative feedback of bile acid synthesis.

PURPOSE

The objective of this review is to summarize the diagnosis of BAD in adults and adolescents. In addition to ⁷⁵ SeHCAT retention for diagnosis of BAD, studies have validated fasting serum 7αC4 and FGF-19, respectively, by-product and inhibitor of hepatic bile acid synthesis, as well as fecal bile acid measurements. These assays are widely available through reference laboratories, and they are being simplified (eg, measurement of primary fecal bile acids in a random stool sample). BAD has also been identified as a co-factor contributing to persistent diarrhea in other diseases in remission including inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, celiac disease, and neuroendocrine tumors. In summary, advances in diagnosis of BAD provide opportunities for generalists and pediatric and adult gastroenterologists to provide targeted treatment for BAD presenting as chronic non-bloody diarrhea.

Markers of Bile Acid Metabolism in Pediatric Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Healthy Controls

OBJECTIVES

Excessive fecal bile acids in adults have been associated with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), but their role in pediatric IBS-D is unknown. Serum markers including 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19) were validated in adults to detect bile acid diarrhea (BAD) compared to 48-hour fecal bile acid collection (48FBA). Our aims were to assess fasting serum C4 and FGF-19 and 48FBA in a pediatric population, to compare measurements in IBS-D patients and healthy controls (HC), and to determine the prevalence of BAD among children with IBS-D.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional design, 26 patients with IBS-D and 56 HC were recruited in two pediatric tertiary care centers. Fasting serum C4 and FGF-19 and 48FBA were obtained. Participants completed a 7-day bowel diary coinciding with stool collection. Associations were analyzed using Spearman correlations.

RESULTS

Mean age was 14.7 ± 2.5 years (42.3% female) in IBS-D and 12.6 ± 2.4 years (39.3% female) in HC. There was a significant correlation of C4 with 48FBA (r = 0.48, P < 0.05) and an inverse association with FGF-19 (r = -0.43, P < 0.05). No significant differences were noted in C4 (P = 0.32), FGF-19 (P = 0.1), or 48FBA (P = 0.5) between IBS-D and HC groups; however, 20% of IBS-D patients had elevated C4 and 28% had low FGF-19 values.Fecal primary BA was significantly correlated with stool frequency (r = 0.45, P < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Correlations of C4 with 48FBA and FGF-19 are confirmed in a pediatric population. Twenty percent of pediatric patients with IBS-D had abnormal fasting serum C4. This serum test could be applied to identify BAD in pediatric IBS-D.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Review

IMPORTANCE

The prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the United States is between 7% and 16%, most common in women and young people, with annual direct costs estimated at more than $1 billion dollars in the United States. Traditionally, the diagnosis of IBS has been based on the positive identification of symptoms that correlate with several different syndromes associated with disorders such as IBS diarrhea, IBS constipation, functional diarrhea, functional constipation, chronic functional abdominal pain, or bloating. Several peripheral and central mechanisms initiate gastrointestinal motor and sensory dysfunctions leading to IBS symptoms. Those dysfunctions may require evaluation in patients whose symptoms do not respond to first-line treatments.

OBSERVATIONS

Validation studies of consensus symptom-based criteria have identified deficiencies that favor a simpler identification of the predominant symptoms of abdominal pain, bowel dysfunction, and bloating and exclusion of alarm symptoms such as unintentional weight loss, rectal bleeding, or recent change in bowel function. Symptom-based diagnosis of IBS is enhanced with additional history for symptoms of somatoform and psychological disorders and alarm symptoms, physical examination including digital rectal examination, and screening tests to exclude organic disease (by measuring hemoglobin and C-reactive protein concentrations). The initial treatment plan should include patient education, reassurance, and first-line treatments such as fiber and osmotic laxatives for constipation, opioids for diarrhea, antispasmodics for pain and for management of associated psychological disorders. For patients who do not respond to those IBS treatments, testing for specific functional disorders may be required in a minority of patients with IBS. These disorders include rectal evacuation disorder, abnormal colonic transit, and bile acid diarrhea. Their identification is followed by individualized treatment, such as pelvic floor retraining for rectal evacuation disorders, sequestrants for bile acid diarrhea, and secretory agents for constipation, although there is only limited evidence that this individualized management approach is effective.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Advances in the identification of specific dysfunctions as causes of individual symptoms in the "IBS spectrum" leads to the potential to enhance the diagnosis and management of symptoms for the majority of patients for whom first-line therapies of IBS and management of comorbid psychological disorders are insufficient.

The patient with irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms: when to investigate and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a very common disorder whose clinical presentation varies considerably between patients as well as within the same individual over time. Many of its symptoms, such as pain, diarrhea, constipation and bloating, may be manifestations of a host of other gastrointestinal diseases; some accompanied by increased mortality. This presents the clinician with a real dilemma: how to sensibly investigate the patient in which one suspects IBS but there is a nagging doubt that 'it could be something else'? Could one miss 'something serious'? This short review attempts to provide both an evidence-based response to these vexing questions and a practical guide to detecting alternative diagnoses in the subject with IBS-type symptoms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical features, patient demographics and the clinical context can help to significantly narrow the differential diagnosis of the individual with IBS-type symptoms and may permit a positive diagnosis of IBS. The advent of noninvasive serological and stool tests has greatly facilitated differentiation from celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease, respectively. In the older, female diarrhea sufferer microscopic colitis should be considered. The role of bile acid diarrhea in the individual with diarrhea-predominant IBS is emphasized; the status of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in IBS remain uncertain.

SUMMARY

Attention to detail in the clinical evaluation of the individual with IBS-like symptoms will facilitate a selective and targeted approach to investigation. Wherever indicated, widely available serological and fecal tests will serve to bolster the diagnosis by excluding other options. Proceeding to more invasive testing should be dictated by clinical presentation and scenario with the threshold for intervention being generally lower among those with prominent diarrhea.

Making the Diagnosis of Bile Acid Diarrhea

Bile acid diarrhea is a frequent, treatable cause of functional diarrhea but is difficult to diagnose when the nuclear medicine seleno-taurohomocholic acid test is unavailable. An alternative approach is testing blood for the bile acid precursor, 7α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, which is raised with increased bile acid synthesis. A recent article has defined measurements that have high negative and positive predictive values, further exploring how they can be improved by incorporating measures such as age, stool number, fibroblast growth factor 19, or plasma sulfated bile acids. Other articles have looked at the percentage of fecal primary bile acids. Together, they promise better use of diagnostic biomarkers for this condition.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Straightening the road from the Rome criteria

A sequence of consensus-based Rome criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been published since 1989. The fundamental definition based on abdominal pain in association with bowel dysfunction has been consistent. However, two major changes occurred in the Rome II and IV criteria. The former change involved "splitting off" of symptoms that were not consistently associated with pain, such as functional, constipation, diarrhea, and bloating. In Rome IV, the main changes were the exclusion of discomfort (in contrast to pain) and the more stringent frequency criteria for the pain to be eligible for diagnosis of IBS (specifically, on average, at least 1 day per week in the last 3 months). Validation studies of the consensus, symptom-based criteria have identified multiple deficiencies that question the rationale for "splitting" the different syndromes, and favor a simpler identification of the classical symptoms of abdominal pain, bowel dysfunction, and bloating, and exclusion of alarm symptoms. Advances in the identification of actionable biomarkers related to the symptoms suggestive of functional gastrointestinal disorders have the potential to usher a change in practice from positive diagnosis of symptom complexes followed by empirical treatment to identification of the mechanisms causing the symptoms and targeted therapy.

The Role of Bile Acids in Chronic Diarrhea

Bile acids (BAs) are the central signals in enterohepatic communication, and they also integrate microbiota-derived signals into enterohepatic signaling. The tissue distribution and signaling pathways activated by BAs through natural receptors, farsenoid X receptor and G protein-coupled BA receptor 1 (GPBAR1, also known as Takeda G-coupled receptor 5), have led to a greater understanding of the mechanisms and potential therapeutic agents. BA diarrhea is most commonly encountered in ileal resection or disease, in idiopathic disorders (with presentation similar to functional diarrhea or irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea), and in association with malabsorption such as chronic pancreatitis or celiac disease. Diagnosis of BA diarrhea is based on Se-homocholic acid taurine retention, 48-hour fecal BA excretion, or serum 7αC4; the latter being a marker of hepatic BA synthesis. BA diarrhea tends to be associated with higher body mass index, increased stool weight and stool fat, and acceleration of colonic transit. Biochemical markers of increased BA synthesis or excretion are available through reference laboratories. Current treatment of BA diarrhea is based on BA sequestrants, and, in the future, it is anticipated that farsenoid X receptor agonists may also be effective. The optimal conditions for an empiric trial with BA sequestrants as a diagnostic test are still unclear. However, such therapeutic trials are widely used in clinical practice. Some national guidelines recommend definitive diagnosis of BA diarrhea over empirical trial.

Ten Reasons to Think About Bile Acids in Managing Inflammatory Bowel Disease

There are ten good reasons why it is important to think about abnormalities in bile acid control in inflammatory bowel disease. Before reviewing these reasons, it is relevant to review essential elements in the enterohepatic circulation, synthesis and actions of bile acids.

High prevalence of primary bile acid diarrhoea in patients with functional diarrhoea and irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhoea, based on Rome III and Rome IV criteria

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of primary bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) has been reported for Rome III defined irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. We determined whether this still applies under the contemporaneous Rome IV criteria, given that the latter characterises IBS-diarrhoea as having more frequent abdominal pain compared with previous iterations, whilst no longer recognising abdominal discomfort.

METHODS

Patients referred for a 75SeHCAT test completed a baseline questionnaire comprising, i) demographic data, ii) risk factors for BAD (inflammatory bowel disease, bowel resection, cholecystectomy, microscopic colitis, celiac disease, abdominal-pelvic radiotherapy), iii) the Rome III and IV bowel disorder questionnaire, and iv) mood and somatisation scores. A diagnosis of BAD constituted a 75SeHCAT of ≤15%, with moderate to severe disease being defined as ≤10% and ≤5%, respectively.

FINDINGS

Of 300 patients with complete dataset, 184 had no risk factors for BAD and fulfilled criteria for either IBS-diarrhoea or functional diarrhoea. The prevalence of primary BAD was 38% (n = 70/184), with almost half having moderate (n = 16) to severe (n = 17) disease. Using the Rome III criteria, the prevalence of primary BAD was 36% in IBS-diarrhoea (n = 63/173) and 64% (n = 7/11) in functional diarrhoea; p = 0.11. Using the Rome IV criteria, the prevalence of primary BAD was 38% (n = 53/139) in IBS-diarrhoea and 38% (n = 17/45) in functional diarrhoea; p = 0.97. Patients with primary BAD experienced more frequent loose stools (p = 0.01) and had a higher body mass index (p<0.0001) compared to those without BAD, but otherwise no significant differences were seen in age, gender, mood, somatisation, or abdominal pain. The presence of primary BAD in patients classified as overweight or obese was approximately 40% and 60%, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Over a third of patients with Rome IV IBS-diarrhoea or functional diarrhoea have primary BAD, similar to Rome III. We therefore recommend that, in secondary care settings, generic testing for primary BAD should be considered in patients presenting with chronic diarrhoea of presumed functional origin regardless of concomitant abdominal pain. Centres that lack tests for primary BAD, and who empirically treat instead, may consider targeting patients who are overweight or obese.