Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Cirrhosis Using US Visualization Score C-Triggered Abbreviated MRI

Diagnostics and omics technologies for the detection and prediction of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease-related malignancies

The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) continues to rise, making it the leading etiology of chronic liver diseases and a prime cause of liver-related mortality. MASLD can progress into steatohepatitis (termed MASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and ultimately cancer. MASLD is associated with increased risks of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and also extrahepatic malignancies, which can develop in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients, emphasizing the importance of identifying patients with MASLD at risk of developing MASLD-associated malignancies. However, the optimal screening, diagnostic, and risk stratification strategies for patients with MASLD at risk of cancer are still under debate. Individuals with MASH-associated cirrhosis are recommended to undergo surveillance for HCC (e.g. by ultrasound and biomarkers) every six months. No specific screening approaches for MASLD-related malignancies in non-cirrhotic cases are established to date. The rapidly developing omics technologies, including genetics, metabolomics, and proteomics, show great potential for discovering non-invasive markers to fulfill this unmet need. This review provides an overview on the incidence and mortality of MASLD-associated malignancies, current strategies for HCC screening, surveillance and diagnosis in patients with MASLD, and the evolving role of omics technologies in the discovery of non-invasive markers for the prediction and risk stratification of MASLD-associated HCC.

Abbreviated MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the limited sensitivity of ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, this systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of non-contrast abbreviated MRI (NC-aMRI) compared to contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI (CE-aMRI) for HCC surveillance, offering evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases, identifying studies on aMRI for HCC surveillance. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed by study location, proportion of patients with cirrhosis and HCC, and underlying liver diseases.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 27 studies (2009-2023), distributed between Western (n = 14) and Eastern (n = 13) countries. The pooled sensitivity and specificity (95%CI, I2) were 86% (83-88%, 63%) and 92% (90%-94%, 74%). The NC-aMRI protocols reported in 21 studies exhibited 83% (79-87%, 63%) sensitivity and 91% (88-93%, 67%) specificity, while the 15 studies on CE-aMRI protocols displayed 88% (84-91%, 64%) sensitivity and 94% (90-96%, 78%) specificity, with no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (p = 0.078) or specificity (p = 0.157). Subgroup analysis in NC-aMRI studies showed significant differences in sensitivity for high-prevalent chronic hepatitis B (87% vs. 78%, p = 0.003) and studies done in eastern countries (86% vs. 76%, p = 0.018). Additionally, specificity showed significant differences for high-prevalent chronic hepatitis C (94% vs. 90%, p = 0.009), with meta-regression identifying major sources of study heterogeneity as the inclusion of a majority of patients with chronic hepatitis B (p = 0.008) and the geographic regions where studies were conducted (p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

Surveillance aMRI protocols exhibit satisfactory performance for detecting HCC. NC-aMRI may be used effectively for HCC surveillance, especially in chronic hepatitis B prevalent settings.