Histopathological Features of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Secondary to Osimertinib

Anti-angiogenic Potential of Trans-chalcone in an In Vivo Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model: An ATP Antagonist to VEGFR with Predicted Blood-brain Barrier Permeability

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is characterized by massive tumorinduced angiogenesis aiding tumorigenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) via VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) constitutes majorly to drive this process. Putting a halt to tumordriven angiogenesis is a major clinical challenge, and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the prime bottleneck in GBM treatment. Several phytochemicals show promising antiangiogenic activity across different models, but their ability to cross BBB remains unexplored.

METHODS

We screened over 99 phytochemicals having anti-angiogenic properties reported in the literature and evaluated them for their BBB permeability, molecular interaction with VEGFR-2 domains, ECD2-3 (extracellular domains 2-3) and TKD (tyrosine kinase domain) at VEGF-A and ATP binding site, cell membrane permeability, and hepatotoxicity using in silico tools. Furthermore, the anti-angiogenic activity of predicted lead Trans-Chalcone (TC) was evaluated in the chick chorioallantoic membrane.

RESULTS

Out of 99 phytochemicals, 35 showed an efficient ability to cross BBB with a probability score of > 0.8. Docking studies revealed 30 phytochemicals crossing benchmark binding affinity < -6.4 kcal/mol of TKD with the native ligand ATP alone. Out of 30 phytochemicals, 12 showed moderate to low hepatotoxicity, and 5 showed a violation of Lipinski's rule of five. Our in silico analysis predicted TC as a BBB permeable anti-angiogenic compound for use in GBM therapy. TC reduced vascularization in the CAM model, which was associated with the downregulation of VEGFR-2 transcript expression.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed TC to possess anti-angiogenic potential via the inhibition of VEGFR-2. In addition, the study predicted TC to cross BBB as well as a safe alternative for GBM therapy, which needs further investigation.

Liver Pathology Related to Onco-Therapeutic Agents

Oncotherapeutic agents can cause a wide range of liver injuries from elevated liver functions tests to fulminant liver failure. In this review, we emphasize a newer generation of drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors, protein kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and hormonal therapy. A few conventional chemotherapy agents are also discussed.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for osimertinib

Osimertinib was a third-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), which approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study was to explore the adverse events (AEs) caused by osimertinib through data mining of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), and provide reference for clinical safety. Data of osimertinib were collected from the FAERS database covering the period from first quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2021. Disproportionality analyses was employed to quantify the associated AE signals of osimertinib and detect the risk signals from the data in the FAERS database. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to detect the risk signals from the data in the FAERS database. The definition relied on system organ class (SOCs) and preferred terms (PTs) by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Totally, 9,704,33 reports were collected from the FAERS database, 10,804 reports of osimertinib were identified as the 'primary suspected (PS)' AEs. Osimertinib induced AEs occurred in 27 organ systems. 68 significant disproportionality PTs satisfying with the four algorithms were retained at the same time. Unexpected significant AEs such as scrotal volvulus, hepatic function abnormal, venous thromboembolisms might also occur. The median onset time of osimertinib-associated AEs was 58 days (interquartile range [IQR] 14-212 days), and the majority of the AEs occurred within the first 30 days after osimertinib initiation. Our study found significant new AEs signals of osimertinib and might provide support for clinical monitoring and risk identification of osimertinib.

Osimertinib-related liver injury with successful osimertinib rechallenge: A case report

Osimertinib is approved as the first‐line treatment for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation and for patients who develop EGFR T790M mutation during EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and disease progression. Asymptomatic elevation of aminotransferase levels is commonly observed during TKI treatment; however, significant hepatotoxicity is infrequent. Here, we report a patient with osimertinib‐related drug‐induced liver injury who was successfully managed with osimertinib rechallenge.

Case Report: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Hepatotoxicity Induced by Osimertinib Sequential to Pembrolizumab in a Patient With EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background: Lung cancer is a complex disease with many subtypes. However, histochemical characteristics, and genetic mutation determinations are contributing to better define therapeutic targets and new drugs. Although this guarantees patients the possibility of obtaining tailored treatment, it makes it more difficult for clinicians patient management more difficult for clinicians who have to define the most suitable therapeutic strategy and to deal with new treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). It has been seen that the administration of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sequential to an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) can lead to a higher rate of severe and life-threatening TRAEs. We report the case of a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who experienced severe hepatotoxicity and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) induced by osimertinib sequential to pembrolizumab. Case presentation: A 54-year-old woman with advanced NSCLC received one cycle of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab after diagnosis. Ten days later she began osimertinib 80 mg daily because epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) analysis had revealed an exon 19 deletion. On day 23 of osimertinib the patient experienced an episode of grade (G) 3 hepatotoxicity resolved by discontinuing osimertinib and corticosteroid therapy. The patient restarted osimertinib 80 mg daily after the remission of symptoms but was hospitalized 14 days later following a second episode of severe G3 hepatotoxicity and the onset of SJS, successfully treated with high-dose corticosteroids. Despite the short exposure to osimertinib, the patient obtained a good pathological response. Conclusion: It is important to alert clinicians to carefully evaluate the sequential therapeutic strategy in patients with NSCLC who are candidates for TKI- or ICI-based treatment. Our experience suggests that the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as front-line treatment is a more reasonable and safe option for EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, with ICIs considered as a possible further treatment in sequential approaches.

In vitro inhibition of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 by osimertinib, and prediction of in vivo drug-drug interactions

Osimertinib is the only third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This study aimed to know the inhibitory effect of osimertinib on human UDP-glucosyltransferases (UGTs) and human liver microsomes (HLMs), as well as to identify its potential to cause drug-drug interaction (DDI) arising from the modulation of UGT activity. High inhibitory effect of osimertinib was shown towards UGT1A1, 1A3, 1A6, 1A7, 1A8, 1A10, 2B7 and 2B15. Especially, osimertinib exhibited competitive inhibition against UGT1A1 with a K_i,u of 0.87 ± 0.12 μM. It also noncompetitively inhibited SN-38 glucuronidation in pooled HLMs with a K_i,u of 3.32 ± 0.25 μM. Results from quantitative prediction study indicated that osimertinib administered at 80 mg/day may result in a 4.83 % increase in the AUC of drugs mainly metabolized by UGT1A1, implying low risk of DDI via liver metabolism. However, the ratios of [I]_gut/K_i,u are much higher than 11 in HLMs and recombinant UGT1A1, indicating a risk for interaction in intestine. The effects of osimertinib on intestinal UGT should be paid more attention on to avoid unnecessary clinical DDI risks.

Multikinase inhibitor-induced liver injury in patients with cancer: A review for clinicians

BACKGROUND

Multikinase inhibitors (MKI) are targeted molecular agents that have revolutionized cancer management. However, there is a paucity of data concerning MKI-related liver injury risk and clinical guidelines for the management of liver toxicity in patients receiving MKI for cancer are scarce.

DESIGN

We conducted a PubMed search of articles in English published from January 2000 to December 2018 related to hepatotoxicity of the 29 FDA-approved MKIs at doses used in clinical practice. The search terms were the international non-proprietary name of each agent cross-referenced with «hepatotoxicity», «hepatitis», «hepatic adverse event», or «liver failure», and «phase II clinical trial», «phase III clinical trial», or «case report».

RESULTS

Following this search, 140 relevant studies and 99 case reports were considered. Although asymptomatic elevation of aminotransferase levels has been frequently observed in MKI clinical trials, clinically significant hepatotoxicity is a rare event. In most cases, the interval between treatment initiation and the onset of liver injury is between one week and two months. Liver toxicity is often hepatocellular and less frequently mixed. Life-threatening MKI-induced hepatic injury has been described, involving fulminant liver failure or death. Starting from existing data, a description of MKI-related liver events, grading of hepatotoxicity risk, and recommendations for management are also given for various MKI molecules.

CONCLUSION

All MKIs can potentially cause liver injury, which is sometimes irreversible. As there is still no strategy available to prevent MKI-related hepatotoxicity, early detection remains crucial. The surveillance of liver function during treatment may help in the early detection of hepatotoxicity. Furthermore, the exclusion of potential causes of hepatic injury is essential to avoid unnecessary MKI withdrawal.