Abdominal Skin Rash After TACE Due to Non-Target Embolization of Hepatic Falciform Artery

Transarterial Chemoembolization with Doxorubicin Eluting Beads for Extra-Abdominal Desmoid Tumors: Initial Experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as an alternative local treatment for extra-abdominal desmoid tumors (DTs).

METHODS

Eleven adult female patients (mean age = 40.1 years) with symptomatic, progressively enlarging extra-abdominal DTs were determined ineligible for cryoablation after failing observation or systemic therapy and treated with a single session doxorubicin DEB-TACE. Six rectus sheath, one chest wall, three axilla, and one upper extremity DTs were included. The median follow-up was 155.0 ± 52.3 days. Treatment response was assessed by MRIs and maximum visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful without immediate complications. The average size of treated DT was 161.8 ml (range: 28.3-420.0 ml). The mean doxorubicin dose was 13.3 mg/m². All patients experienced skin changes which improved over time without treatments. No higher-grade adverse events were observed. Initial one-month follow-up MRI demonstrated partial to near-complete tumor necrosis, ranging from 1.4 to 97.6% (mean: 36.4%). Additional follow-up revealed a further reduction of overall tumor volume (mean: - 38.1%, p < 0.0001) and maximum VAS (mean: - 2.6, p = 0.0026) in 10 out of 11 patients (90.9%). After the first month, the residual tumors exhibited continued volume reduction in 10 out of 11 patients (mean:  - 16.5%, p = 0.0230). There was also a significant decrease of T2 signal intensity within residual tumor on the latest follow-up (mean:  - 29.6%, p = 0.0217), suggesting a reduction in tumor cellularity.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE may be a safe and effective local treatment alternative in DT patients.

Recognition and management of dermatologic complications from interventional radiology procedures

A variety of dermatologic complications can occur after interventional radiology procedures, including fluoroscopy-induced radiation dermatitis, thermal skin injury from tumor ablation, non-target embolization to the skin, allergic reactions related to interventional radiology procedures, and dermatitis and infections at catheter sites. Yet, interventional radiologists typically lack training in dermatology. This review focuses on recognition of dermatologic complications and introduces basic principles for management of these complications. By taking a more active role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of dermatologic complications, interventional radiologists can improve the care for patients suffering iatrogenic skin inury.