Randomized Clinical Trial: Crofelemer Treatment in Women With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Clinical course and therapeutic trial for a case of congenital secretory diarrhea due to novel GUCY2C variant

Chronic diarrhea presents a significant challenge for managing nutritional and electrolyte deficiencies, especially in children, given the higher stakes of impacting growth and developmental consequence. Congenital secretory diarrhea (CSD) compounds this further, particularly in the case of the activating variants of the guanylate-cyclase 2C (GUCY2C) gene. GUCY2C encodes for the guanylate-cyclase 2C (GC-C) receptor that activates the downstream cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor (CFTR) that primarily drives the severity of diarrhea with an unclear extent of influence on other intestinal channels. Thus far, management for CSD primarily consists of mitigating nutritional, electrolyte, and volume deficiencies with no known pathophysiology-driven treatments. For activating variants of GUCY2C, experimental compounds have shown efficacy in vitro for direct inhibition of GC-C but are not currently available for clinical use. However, Crofelemer, a CFTR inhibitory modulator with negligible systemic absorption, can theoretically help to treat this type of CSD. Herein, we describe and characterize the clinical course of a premature male infant with a de novo missense variant of GUCY2C not previously reported and highly consistent with CSD. With multi-disciplinary family-directed decision-making, a treatment for CSD was evaluated for the first time to our knowledge with Crofelemer.

Effects of orally administered crofelemer on the incidence and severity of neratinib-induced diarrhea in female dogs

Targeted therapies have increased cancer therapy-related diarrhea (CTD) burden, with high incidence and/or severity of diarrhea for some agents that inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor and receptor tyrosine kinases. Neratinib is a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for breast cancer treatment and causes severe diarrhea in >95% of patients. Crofelemer, a novel intestinal chloride ion channel modulator, is an approved antidiarrheal drug for symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in patients with HIV/AIDS receiving antiretroviral therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of crofelemer prophylaxis in reducing the incidence /severity of neratinib-induced diarrhea without concomitant administration of loperamide in female beagle dogs. A pilot study using 3 dogs determined a maximum daily tolerated dose of neratinib was between 40 and 80 mg; this dose would induce a consistent incidence/severity of diarrhea without risking severe dehydration. In the definitive study, 24 female beagle dogs (8/group) received neratinib once daily and placebo capsules (CTR) four times/day, or neratinib once daily and crofelemer 125 mg delayed-release tablets given two times (BID), or neratinib once daily and crofelemer 125 mg delayed-release tablets given four times per day (QID). Fecal scores were collected twice daily using an established canine stool scoring scale called the Purina Fecal Scoring (PFS) System. After 28 days, using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), dogs in the CTR group had a significantly higher average number of weekly loose/watery stools (PFS of 6 or 7) when compared to either crofelemer BID (8.71±2.2 vs. 5.96±2.2, p = 0.028) or crofelemer QID (8.70±2.2 vs. 5.74±2.2, p = 0.022) treatment groups. The average number of weekly loose/watery stools were not different between the crofelemer BID and QID treatment groups (p = 0.84). This study showed that crofelemer prophylaxis reduced the incidence/severity of neratinib-associated diarrhea in female beagle dogs without the need for any loperamide administration.

The Importance of Visceral Hypersensitivity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Plant Metabolites in IBS Treatment

The visceral stimuli from the digestive tract are transmitted via afferent nerves through the spinal cord to the brain, where they are felt as pain. The overreaction observed in the brain of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients may be due to increased peripheral sensitivity to stimuli from the gastrointestinal tract. Although the exact pathway is uncertain, attenuation of visceral hypersensitivity is still of interest in treating IBS. It has been shown that stress stimulates the sympathetic nervous system while inhibiting the vagus nerve (VN). In addition, stress factors lead to dysbiosis and chronic low-grade inflammation of the intestinal mucosa, which can lead to lower gastrointestinal visceral hypersensitivity. Therefore, an important goal in the treatment of IBS is the normalization of the intestinal microflora. An interesting option seems to be nutraceuticals, including Terminalia chebula, which has antibacterial and antimicrobial activity against various pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Additionally, short-term transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation can reduce the stress-induced increase in intestinal permeability, thereby reducing inflammation. The conducted studies also indicate a relationship between the stimulation of the vagus nerve (VN) and the activation of neuromodulatory networks in the central nervous system. Therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that a two-way action through stimulating the VN and using nutraceuticals may become an effective therapy in treating IBS.

Crofelemer for the Management of Neratinib-Associated Diarrhea in Patients With HER2+ Early-Stage Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy of crofelemer, a first in class anti-secretory anti-diarrheal agent, to manage neratinib-induced diarrhea in patients with early-stage breast cancer taking adjuvant neratinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single center, open label trial enrolled patients with Stage 2 to 3 HER2+ breast cancer taking adjuvant neratinib. One cohort took prophylactic crofelemer 125 mg bid and loperamide in the first 2 cycles, and as needed in subsequent cycles. The second cohort took dose-escalated neratinib with loperamide as needed (DE cohort). The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea in the first 2 cycles.

RESULTS

Seven patients in the crofelemer cohort and 4 in the DE cohort were enrolled. In the first 2 cycles, 2 patients (29%) in the crofelemer cohort and 2 patients (50%) in the DE cohort experienced grade 3 diarrhea lasting 1 day on average. After cycle 2, no additional patients in either cohort had grade 3 diarrhea. Five of 7 patients controlled diarrhea with crofelemer alone. There were no grade 4 diarrhea events in either cohort. Three patients in the crofelemer cohort dose-reduced neratinib due to diarrhea in the first 2 cycles. Patients in the crofelemer cohort had an average of 0.58 diarrhea episodes/day. 82% experienced constipation, all grade 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate crofelemer for neratinib-induced diarrhea and demonstrates crofelemer activity in this setting. Further investigation of crofelemer for diarrhea secondary to cancer treatment is needed.

Comparing probiotic and drug interventions in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Clinical decisions made by health professionals to recommend either drug or probiotic interventions for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) should be supported by proper knowledge of the efficacy rates of both types of interventions. In this article, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of both probiotic- and drug interventions in IBS. Medline was searched between January 2015 - January 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) recruiting participants > 18 years old with IBS and examining the effect of probiotics or drugs were eligible for inclusion. The data of the primary outcome, i.e. the persistence of IBS symptoms (dichotomous symptom data), were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcomes, abdominal pain- and bloating scores (continuous data), were pooled using a standardised mean difference with a 95% CI. The search identified 269 citations of which 32 RCTs were eligible. Our meta-analysis indicated that both probiotic and drug interventions are able to improve the persistence of IBS symptoms (RR 0.60 [0.51; 0.92] versus 0.87 [0.81; 0.92], respectively) and abdominal pain scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.35 [-0.56; -0.14] versus -0.10 [-0.20; 0.00], respectively). However, determining the overall efficacy of both intervention types is inherently complex and such results should be interpreted with care, due to the large diversity of probiotic- and drug types and doses, which is also complicated by variety in IBS subtypes. Hence, as a first step, more large scale randomised double blind placebo-controlled trials focussing on a specific IBS subtype targeted with specific probiotic strains or specific pharmaceutical modalities should be executed, enabling a more proper comparison between trials.

Inadequate safety reporting in the publications of randomised clinical trials in irritable bowel syndrome: drug versus probiotic interventions

Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) offer a unique opportunity to obtain controlled efficacy and safety data to support clinical decisions. However, most RCT reporting has a stronger focus on efficacy rather than safety. This study aimed to identify the safety profile of both probiotic and drug interventions in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In connection to this paper, an accompanying paper was published in which a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic interventions compared to that of drug interventions in IBS. Together, these two studies provide a first assessment regarding the feasibility to determine a burden to benefit ratio for both probiotic and drug interventions in IBS. RCTs including participants (>18 years old) with IBS and comparing probiotic or drugs interventions with control groups were identified by a systematic search of MEDLINE (January 2015 - Jan 2021). Reported safety profiles in drug studies were completer and more detailed as compared with studies on probiotics. Several inconsistencies in safety reporting were identified between and within drug and probiotic studies, such as: didn't report on safety; only reported adverse reactions (ARs) or adverse events (AEs) with a certain severity; didn't report the total number of AEs; didn't split in the control- or experimental arm; didn't specify AEs; and used different thresholds for 'common' AEs. Hence, it is difficult to compare safety data from drug and probiotic RCTs across and between different studies. On the current approaches to safety reporting, we could not establish an unambiguous safety profile for neither probiotic and drug interventions in IBS. These shortcomings hamper a critical comparison of the burden to benefit ratio for IBS intervention.

Identification of biomarkers, immune infiltration landscape, and treatment targets of ischemia-reperfusion acute kidney injury at an early stage by bioinformatics methods

Background

Mechanisms underlying ischemia/reperfusion injury-acute kidney injury (IRI-AKI) are not fully elucidated. We conducted an integrative analysis of IRI-AKI by bioinformatics methods.

Methods

We screened gene expression profiles of the IRI-AKI at early phase from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and enrichment pathways were conducted based on gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Immune cell infiltration analysis was performed to reveal the change of the microenvironment cell types. We constructed protein–protein interaction (PPI), and Cytoscape with plug-ins to find hub genes and modules. We performed robust rank aggregation (RRA) to combine DEGs and analyzed the target genes for miRNA/transcription factor (TF) and drug-gene interaction networks.

Results

A total of 239 and 384 DEGs were identified in GSE87024 and GSE34351 separately, with the 73 common DEGs. Enrichment analysis revealed that the significant pathways involve mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, interleukin-17, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathway, etc. RRA analysis detected a total of 27 common DEGs. Immune cell infiltration analysis showed the plasma cells reduced and T cells increased in IRI-AKI. We identified JUN, ATF3, FOS, EGR1, HMOX1, DDIT3, JUNB, NFKBIZ, PPP1R15A, CXCL1, ATF4, and HSPA1B as hub genes. The target genes interacted with 23 miRNAs and 116 drugs or molecular compounds such as curcumin, staurosporine, and deferoxamine.

Conclusion

Our study first focused on the early IRI-AKI adopting RRA analysis to combine DEGs in different datasets. We identified significant biomarkers and crucial pathways involved in IRI-AKI and first construct the immune landscape and detected the potential therapeutic targets of the IRI-AKI by drug-gene network.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41065-022-00236-x.

Placebo Response Rates in Trials of Licensed Drugs for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation or Diarrhea: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are several licensed drugs for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that have proven efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but placebo response rates are high. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of licensed drugs to estimate magnitude of placebo response rate according to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended endpoints and to assess how this varies with stringency of the endpoint used to define response.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE CLASSIC and EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials (through January 2021) to identify RCTs comparing licensed drugs with placebo in adult IBS patients. Studies assessed efficacy according to at least one of composite response, abdominal pain response, or stool response. Data were extracted as intention-to-treat analyses, with dropouts assumed to be treatment failures and pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

There were 17 RCTs of licensed drugs versus placebo in IBS with constipation (4603 patients placebo) and 17 trials in IBS with diarrhea (3908 patients placebo). In IBS with constipation, according to FDA criteria, pooled composite, abdominal pain, and stool response rates with placebo over ≥6 of 12 weeks were 18.9%, 34.6%, and 30.1%, respectively. Evaluating response rates over ≥9 of 12 weeks led to placebo response rates of 4.3% for the composite endpoint, 24.5% for abdominal pain, and 7.7% for stool. In IBS with diarrhea, pooled placebo response rates according to FDA criteria were 16.2% for the composite endpoint, 40.2% for abdominal pain, and 16.2% for stool. Increasing the threshold used to define abdominal pain response from ≥30% improvement to ≥40% or ≥50% led to lower placebo response rates of 34.5% and 23.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Future RCTs should adhere to current FDA-recommended endpoints for IBS because these lead to lower placebo response rates. However, consideration should be given to further refining some of these to better differentiate between active drug and placebo.

Effect of Shugan Jianpi Recipe Combined with Cross Moxibustion on Biochemical Examination Indexes and Total Score of TCM Symptoms in Patients with Spleen-Stomach Damp-Heat Diarrhea Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Objective

To explore the effect of Shugan Jianpi recipe combined with cross moxibustion on biochemical examination indexes and total score of TCM symptoms in patients with spleen-stomach damp-heat diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Methods

Sixty patients with spleen-stomach damp-heat diarrhea (IBS) treated in our hospital from January 2019 to September 2021 were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into the control group and study group. The control group was treated with Chang Shugan Jianpi recipe, and the study group was treated with Shugan Jianpi recipe combined with cross moxibustion. The curative effect, single symptom score, total score of TCM clinical symptoms, plasma gastrointestinal hormone level, IBS-QOL score, and recurrence were compared.

Results

First of all, we compared the curative effects. The study group was significantly effective in 24 cases, effective in 5 cases, and ineffective in 1 case, and the effective rate was 96.67%. In the control group, 13 cases were markedly effective, 10 cases were effective, and 7 cases were ineffective, and the effective rate was 76.67%. The effective rate of the study group was higher compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Secondly, the individual symptom scores were compared. Compared between the two groups, the scores of diarrhea times, stool characteristics, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension in the study group were lower compared to the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the total score of TCM clinical symptoms decreased. Compared between the two groups, the total score of TCM clinical symptoms in the study group was lower compared to the control group at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of 5-HT and VIP decreased. The levels of 5-HT and VIP in the study group were lower compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of anxieties, health worry, behavioral disorder, social reaction, somatic intention, interpersonal relationship, dietary concern, and sexual behavior in the study group were lower compared to the control group. The IBS-QOL scores were significantly lower compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Finally, we compared the recurrence. The recurrence rate in the study group was lower compared to the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The prescription combined with cross moxibustion has the effect of soothing the liver and invigorating the spleen, resolving dampness and stomach, and can reduce the main clinical symptoms of patients with diarrhea IBS of spleen-stomach damp-heat type, and the overall effect is significant. It can also enhance the emotional state of anxiety and depression and achieve the overall psychological and physical balance and health state, and the recurrence rate is low, which can be further applied in clinic.

The placebo response rate in pharmacological trials in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in irritable bowel syndrome are associated with high placebo response rates. We aimed to identify the magnitude of the placebo response and the contributing factors to this occurrence.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis with a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between April 1, 1959, and April 30, 2020. We included all randomised controlled trials that compared an active pharmacotherapeutic agent with placebo and had a dichotomous outcome of response to therapy (in terms of global improvement or improvement in abdominal pain) in adults (aged ≥18 years) with irritable bowel syndrome. Exclusion criteria were trials reporting on treatment satisfaction as a dichotomous outcome of response to therapy or clinician-reported outcomes and a treatment duration of less than 4 weeks. Our main outcome was identification of the magnitude of the pooled placebo response rate for the following endpoints: global improvement, abdominal pain, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) endpoints. We extracted information from published reports and pooled proportions through meta-analysis with random effects. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020170908.

FINDINGS

Of the 6863 publications identified, 70 articles describing 73 randomised controlled trials were included in our analysis. The pooled placebo response rate was 27·3% (95% CI 24·3-30·9) using the global improvement endpoint, 34·4% (31·2-37·8) using the abdominal pain endpoint, and 17·9% (15·2-21·0) using the composite FDA endpoint responder definition, all with substantial heterogeneity between the trials. Studies published before 2006, and those done in Europe, with a parallel design, a run-in period of 2 weeks or less, a dose schedule of three times a day or more, or a smaller sample size of the control group were significantly associated with an increased pooled placebo response rate.

INTERPRETATION

More than a quarter of patients with irritable bowel syndrome had a placebo response in terms of global improvement, with multiple associated moderators. We recommend future trials apply a run-in period of at least 2 weeks and dose once or twice a day to minimise the placebo response rate.

FUNDING

None.

(Poly)phenols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Review

(Poly)phenols (PPs) may have a therapeutic benefit in gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence-base in this regard. Observational evidence does not give a clear indication that PP intake has a preventative role for IBD or IBS, while interventional studies suggest these compounds may confer symptomatic and health-related quality of life improvements in known patients. There are inconsistent results for effects on markers of inflammation, but there are promising reports of endoscopic improvement. Work on the effects of PPs on intestinal permeability and oxidative stress is limited and therefore conclusions cannot be formed. Future work on the use of PPs in IBD and IBS will strengthen the understanding of clinical and mechanistic effects.

Sex-Gender Differences in the Effectiveness of Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Background

In recent years, research on sex-gender differences in health care has increasingly recognized that men and women differ in the way symptoms occur, in risk factors for certain conditions and in the way they respond to the same treatment. A disease that is known to often present differently in women and men is irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Given the difference in prevalence, predominant symptoms and possible other pathophysiology, it is conceivable that a difference in treatment effectiveness in men and women is a discovery waiting to be found.

Purpose

To determine whether there are differences in treatment effectiveness between men and women with irritable bowel syndrome.

Materials and Methods

We searched on PubMed and EMBASE, selecting randomized controlled trials comparing IBS treatment in men and women over 18 years old. One researcher performed the inclusion process, and two researchers independently performed a quality assessment. A descriptive analysis was conducted.

Results

Twelve studies, randomizing 1847 men and 3562 women, were included in this review. Treatment with serotonin antagonist alosetron, treatment with ibodutant and crofelemer and adding cognitive behavioral therapy to medical treatment found significant differences between men and women in favor of effectiveness towards women in either satisfactory relief of overall IBS symptoms or percentage of pain-free days.

Conclusion

Sex-gender can be a determining factor in the effectiveness of IBS treatment. Due to the limited number of studies per treatment option, no recommendations can be made on the choice of a specific treatment. It is clear, however, that so as not to miss beneficial treatment options for either sex, the inclusion, analysis and description of data on the basis of sex is of the utmost importance.

Pharmacological Therapies and Their Clinical Targets in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common disorders of the gut-brain axis, which affects approximately 4% of the global population. The Rome IV criteria define IBS as chronic or recurrent abdominal pain associated with altered bowel habits. Patients can be categorized in four subtypes: IBS with predominant constipation (IBS-C), predominant diarrhea (IBS-D), mixed bowel habits (IBS-M), and unclassified (IBS-U). IBS is associated with a lower quality of life, reduced work productivity, and high healthcare costs. When comparing subtypes, patients with IBS-D report lower disease related quality of life. Due to the scope of this review, we have solely focused on patients with IBS-D. Choosing the right pharmacological treatment in these patients remains challenging due to the heterogeneous patient population, patients' expectation of the treatment outcome, unavailability of efficacious drugs, and the multifactorial and incompletely understood underlying pathophysiology. Currently, pharmacological treatment options target individual symptoms, such as abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, and bloating. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current and recent pharmacological treatment options in IBS-D, targeting the predominant gastrointestinal symptoms. Additionally, we proposed a pharmacological treatment algorithm which healthcare professionals could use when treating individual patients with IBS-D.

Recent advances in diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent progress in the diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome, with a focus on dietary and microbiota aspects.

RECENT FINDINGS

From a pathophysiological point of view, IBS is a multifactorial condition with both peripheral (transit) as central (visceral hypersensitivity, anxiety, depression) contribution in a cumulative fashion to the symptom pattern and severity. More recently, the focus has shifted to diet and microbiota. The number of dietary options that can be used for IBS and the understanding of determinants of their efficacy is rapidly increasing. Several studies have confirmed the efficacy of the low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet. Sucrose-isomaltase deficiency has emerged as pathogenetic mechanisms in a subset of patients, who do not respond to low FODMAP diet but may respond to starch and sucrose elimination. Herbal remedies, probiotics and secretagogues have been the topic of additional treatment trials. The efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in IBS is variable across studies, but donor selection is emerging as a critical factor.

SUMMARY

Irritable bowel syndrome has evolved into a disorder of interaction between dietary factors and gut microbiota, with impact on bowel symptoms as well as extra-intestinal, central, symptoms. Dietary adjustments and treatments targeting the gut microbiota are areas of active research and clinical progress.