Assessment of Weight Loss and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Suggestive of Exocrine Pancreatic Dysfunction After Acute Pancreatitis

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasing in incidence across the world, and in all age groups. Major changes in management have occurred in the last decade. Avoiding total parenteral nutrition and prophylactic antibiotics, avoiding overly aggressive fluid resuscitation, initiating early feeding, avoiding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the absence of concomitant cholangitis, same-admission cholecystectomy, and minimally invasive approaches to infected necrosis should now be standard of care. Increasing recognition of the risk of recurrence of AP, and progression to chronic pancreatitis, along with the unexpectedly high risk of diabetes and exocrine insufficiency after AP is the subject of large ongoing studies. In this review, we provide an update on important changes in management for this increasingly common disease.

Diabetes mellitus as a consequence of acute severe pancreatitis: Unraveling the mystery

The occurrence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in pancreatitis is being increasingly recognized lately. Diabetes can develop not only with chronic pancreatitis but even after the first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP). The incidence of diabetes after AP varies from 18% to 23% in 3 years and reaches up to 40% over 5 years. The exact pathogenesis of diabetes after AP is poorly understood and various mechanisms proposed include loss of islet cell mass, AP-induced autoimmunity, and alterations in the insulin incretin axis. Risk factors associated with increased risk of diabetes includes male sex, recurrent attacks of pancreatitis, presence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and level of pancreatitic necrosis. Diagnosis of post-pancreatitis DM (PPDM) is often excluded. Treatment includes a trial of oral antidiabetic drugs in mild diabetes. Often, insulin is required in uncontrolled diabetes. Given the lack of awareness of this metabolic disorder after AP, this review will evaluate current information on epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and management of PPDM and identify the knowledge gaps.

Predictive Risk Factors of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency Developed After Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis (AP) patients between those who developed pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and those who did not, and to investigate the predictive factors of PEI.

Patients and Methods

From October 1st 2019 to July 30th 2021, AP patients admitted at our center were included. The fecal elastase-1 assay was adopted for PEI diagnosis. The clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes between the patients with and without PEI were analyzed.

Results

In total, 63 males and 42 females were included. There were 27 patients with mild AP, 54 with moderately severe AP, and 24 with severe AP. The median modified computed tomography severity index (MCTSI) was 6.000(4.000, 8.000). During the follow-up, 38 patients developed PEI after AP. The univariate analysis showed that higher ASA grade (P = 0.006), more severe AP (P = 0.000), the presence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (P = 0.030), higher MCTSI (P = 0.000), the development of infected pancreatic necrosis (P = 0.002) and local complications (P = 0.000), higher levels of triacylglycerol (P = 0.022), video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement intervention (P = 0.015), and longer intensive care unit stay (P = 0.044) were correlated with PEI development. Furthermore, the logistic regression analyses showed that MCTSI during hospitalization is an independent risk factor for PEI development during the AP recovery period.

Conclusion

ASA grade, severity of AP, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, MCTSI, infected pancreatic necrosis, local complications, higher levels of triacylglycerol, video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement intervention, and longer intensive care unit stay were potentially associated with PEI development during the AP recovery period. High MCTSI was independently associated with the development of PEI during the AP recovery period, which may help alert to the possibility of PEI to help with its early detection and treatment.

Nutrition in acute pancreatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to discuss recent developments in different topics regarding nutrition and acute pancreatitis (AP), including oral refeeding, nutritional therapy, and implications of gut microbiota.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity increases the risk for severe AP and mortality. Considering the worldwide obesity rates, this finding could have major implications in the global outcomes of patients admitted with AP. Recent research confirms that early oral feeding leads to shorter length of stay, fewer complications, and lower costs. In case of intolerance to oral feeding or severe disease, nutritional therapy should be offered within 24-72 h, whereas enteral nutrition (EN) has been shown superior to parenteral nutrition. EN can be administered through gastric or jejunal feeding, depending on digestive tolerance and the presence of ileus. Nevertheless, modalities of EN in patients undergoing endoscopic drainage of pancreatitis-related collections are still undetermined. Weight-loss after discharge occurs frequently and could reflect post-AP pancreatic exocrine failure. Finally, novel research regarding gut microbiota could open new therapeutic opportunities to prevent bacterial translocation and pancreatic necrosis' infection.

SUMMARY

Despite available evidence many questions regarding nutritional management in patients with AP remain open. Modulation of gut microbiota could play an important role in further therapeutic management.